Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Figure 1.1
· Load calculation Qc , N
Qc = β ⋅ Q = 1,28 ⋅ 22000 = 28160 N
β =1.25 o... 1.3o for double action lifting jack
· Inner diameter of the thread d 3 , mm
1
2
4 ⋅ Qc 4 ⋅ 28160
d3 = = = 22.63[ mm] σac
π ⋅ σ ac 3.14 ⋅ 70
=60….80 MPa for lifting wheights Q > 20000 N
Figure 2.1
Table 2.1
Nominal Pitch Medium Exterior Interior Diameter
Diameter Diameter Diameter
d , mm p, mm d 2 = D2 , mm D4 , mm d 3 , mm D1 , mm
30 6 27.00 31.00 23.00 24.00
· Self-locking condition
β 2 = 4° < ϕ ' = 6.5o
2
3
d2 27
M t = M insI = Q tg (ϕ ' + β2 ) = 22000 tg (6.5 + 4) = 55045 .69[ Nmm ]
2 2
σ e = σ c2 + 4 ⋅τ t2 ≤ σ ac [ MPa ]
σ e = 52 .95 2 + 4 ⋅ 23 2 = 70 .14[ MPa ] ≤ σ ac = 80[ MPa ]
· Slendering coefficient
Figure 2.2
3
4
lf 528
λ= = = 91.82
imin 5.75
l f = k ⋅ l = 2 ⋅ 264 = 528[mm]
l = H I + m = 220 + 44 = 264[mm]
π ⋅ d 34
imin
l
= min ≈ 64 = d 3 = 23 = 5.75[mm]
A π ⋅ d 32 4 4
4
· Buckling domain
3.2. Calculus of the number of turns of the main screw nut (located
inside the secondary screw)
· Number of turns
Figure 3.1
4
5
4Q 4 * 22000
z= = = 6.7
π (d − DI ) pa 3.14(30 2 − 24 2 )13
2 2
It is chosen z = 7
Figure 3.2
5
6
Table 3.1
Nominal Pitch Medium Exterior Interior Diameter
Diameter Diameter Diameter
d , mm p, mm d 2 = D2 , mm D4 , mm d 3 , mm D1 , mm
60 9 55.5 61 50 51
· Self-locking condition
β2 = 2.95 ° < ϕ ' = 7.1°
d2
2
( )
⋅ tg ϕ ' + β 2 = 22000 ⋅
M t = M insII = Q ⋅
55.5
2
⋅ tg (7.1 + 2.95) = 108197 [ Nmm ]
· Effective compression tension
4⋅Q 4 ⋅ 22000
σc = = = 24.76[ MPa]
(
π ⋅ d 3 − D0
2 2
)
3,14 ⋅ (503 − 37 3 )
16 ⋅ d 3 16 ⋅ 50
· Equivalent tension
6
7
· Number of turns, z
Figure 4.1
4Q 4 ⋅ 22000
z= = = 8.45
π (d − DI ) pa 3.14(282 − 232 )13
2 2
It is chosen z=9
· Lenght of the nut
H pII = z ⋅ p = 9 ⋅ 5 = 45[mm ]
7
8
3 ⋅ Q ⋅ ( d 2 − d3 )
σi = ≤ σ ai
π ⋅ d3 ⋅ h 2 ⋅ z
h = 0,634 ⋅ p = 0,634 ⋅ 9 = 5.7[mm ]
3 ⋅ 22000 ⋅ ( 55.5 − 50 )
σi = = 7.9 ≤ σ ai
π ⋅ 50 ⋅ 5,7 2 ⋅ 9
σ ai = 60...80[ MPa ][3]
Figure 4.2
8
9
Figure 4.3
De = D4 + ( 8... 10 ) mm = 61 + 8 = 69[ mm ]
hg =8... 12 [ mm ] =8[mm ]
· Equivalent tension
σ e = σ t2 + 4 ⋅τ t2 = 26 .94 2 + 4 ⋅ 2.39 2 = 27 .36[ MPa ] ≤ σ at
σ at = 60 ... 80[ MPa ][3]
9
10
· Crushing check
4 ⋅Q 4 ⋅ 22000
σs = = = 11 .37[ MPa ] ≤ σ as
(
π ⋅ Dg − De
2 2
)3,14 ⋅ (85 2 − 69 2 )
σ as = 60 ...... 80[ MPa ][3]
· Shearring check
Q 22000
τf = = =12 .69[ MPa ] ≤τ af
π ⋅ De ⋅ hg 3,14 ⋅ 69 ⋅ 8
τaf = 40 ... 55[ MPa ][ 3]
4.7. Choosing and checking the stud nut that secures the nut in
the jacks body
Figure 4.4
10
11
Figure 4.5
Figure 5.1
11
12
4 ⋅Q 4 ⋅ 22000
σc = = = 14 .78[ MPa ] ≤ σ ac
π ⋅ ( Dg − Dci ) 3.14 ⋅ (85 2 − 73 2 )
2 2
4⋅Q 4 ⋅ 22000
σs = = = 3.7[ MPa ]
π ⋅ ( Dbe − Dbi ) 3.14 ⋅ (1312 − 982 )
2 2
σ as = 2...2,5[ MPa ]
CUP CALCULUS
4.8. Double action lifting jack cup
· Choosing the pin which consolidates the cup to the main screw
Figure 6.1
12
13
Figure 6.1
• Shearing
4 M insI
τf = ≤ τ af
π ⋅ d c ⋅ d s2
4 ⋅ 55045 .69
τf = = 79 .25 MPa ≤ τ af
π ⋅ 34 ⋅ 5.12
τ af = 65 ....80 MPa[ 3 ]
• Crushing
cup pin
4 M insI
σs = ≤ σ as
d s(D c2 − d c2 )
Dc = ( 1,4...1,6 )d c =1.6 ⋅ 34 = 54 [mm]
4 ⋅ 55045 .69
σs = =17 .9 MPa ≤ σ as
7 ⋅ ( 54 2 − 34 2 )
σ as =100 ...120 MPa[ 3 ]
pin-screw head
6 M inslI
σs = ≤ σ as
d s ⋅ d c2
6 ⋅ 55045 .69
σs = = 56 .02 MPa ≤ σ as
5.1 ⋅ 34 2
σ as =100 ...120 MPa[ 3 ]
EFFICIENCY CALCULUS
d 2 I tgβ 2 I + d 2 II tgβ 2 II
η= = 0.31
d 2 I tg (ϕ I' + β 2 I ) + d 2 II tg (ϕ II' + β 2 II )
14
15
Figure 8.1
15
16
It is chosen Fm=300[N]
M it 163242 .69
Lc = = = 544 .14[ mm ]
k ⋅ n ⋅ Fm 1 ⋅1 ⋅ 300
n = 1 – no. of workers
k = 1 – unsimultaneousness coef. of the workers action
8.3Lengthener calculus
8.3.1 Lengthener length L p , mm
16
17
32 ⋅ K ⋅ n ⋅ Fm ( L p − l 0 − l ) ⋅ d pe
σi = ≤ σ ai
π (d pe
4
− d pi4 )
32 ⋅ 1 ⋅ 1 ⋅ 300 ⋅ ( 480 − 50 − 60) ⋅ 175
σi = = 2.45 MPa σ ai = 110 MPa
π (175 4 − 171 4 )
· Wheel dimensions
Dm = (1,6...1,8) ⋅ d =1,6 ⋅ 30 = 48 [mm]
z =10 − no. of tu rns
π ⋅ Dm π ⋅ 48
b≤ = = 7.53 [mm]
2⋅z 2 ⋅10
Adopted b = 8
h = ( 0 ,6...0 ,8) ⋅ b = 0 ,6 ⋅ 8 = 4.2[mm]
Di = Dm − h = 48 − 4.8 = 43 .2mm
De = Dm + h = 48 + 4.8 = 52 .8[mm]
a ≤ 0 ,5 ⋅ d −( 1...2 ) = 0 ,5 ⋅ 30 −1.5 =13 .5[mm]
Adopted a =14 mm - for hexagonal contour
Figure 8.2
17
18
3 ⋅ F1 ⋅ h 3 ⋅ 6046 ⋅ 4.2
σi = = = 119 MPa ≤ σ ai
b2 ⋅δ 8 2 ⋅10
σ ai = 100...120 MPa[3]
2 ⋅ M it
F1 = = 6046 N
Dm
δ = 10mm
F1 6046
τf = = = 75 MPa ≤ τ af
b ⋅ δ 8 ⋅10
τ af = 80 ... 100 MPa [3]
F1 6046
σs = = = 57.3MPa ≤ σ as
δ ⋅ h 8 ⋅ 4 .2
σ as = 100 ...120 MPa [3]
Figure 8.3
2 ⋅ M it 2 ⋅ 163242
σs = = = 24.88Mpa ≤ σ as = 100MPa
n ⋅ a ⋅ δ t 6 ⋅13.5 2 ⋅ 12
2
δ t = δ + 2 = 10 + 2 = 12[mm]
n = 6 – for assembly on polygonal contour
18
19
Figure 8.4
h=4.2 mm
l 2 = h1 + δ1 + δt = 86 .5 + 5 +12 = 103 .5mm
.Tensiunea de incovoiere
19
20
· Total tension
6 ⋅ Fl ⋅ al
σi = ≤ σ ai
h ⋅ h22
al = δ t + δ l − 0,5δ = 12 + 5 − 0,5 ⋅ 10 = 12mm
6 ⋅ 6046
σi = = 96 MPa
4.2 ⋅ 20
A 12 X 40 STAS 5754/2/OL50
Fig.8.5.
20
21
4R
τf = ≤ τ af
π ⋅ d b2
al 12
R = Fl ⋅ = 6046 ⋅ = 5003 .58
a2 14,5
δl 5
a 2 = hl + = 12 + = 14,5mm
2 2
τ af = 60 ... 80 MPa
4 ⋅ 6046
τf = = 53 .48 MPa ≤ σ af = 70 MPa
π ⋅12 2
R 5003
σs = = = 69 MPa ≤ σ as = 70 MPa
d b ⋅ h 12 ⋅ 4.2
σ as = 60 ... 80 MPa
16 ⋅ R ⋅ h 16 ⋅ 5003 ⋅ 4.2
σi = = = 61.96 MPa ≤ σ ai = 110 MPa
π ⋅ d b3 π ⋅ 12 3
21
22
22
23
Also this type of thread allows the transmission of the task in both
directions, and has the advantage that can be executed by milling with
high productivity.
23
24
24
25
25
26
13. REFRENCES
1. ALEXANDRU, P. s.a. Mecanisme, vol. II. Universitatea din Brasov,
1984.
2. DRAGHICI, I. s.a. Indrumar de proiectare in constructia de masini, vol.
I. Bucuresti, Editura Tehnica, 1981.
3. DRAGHICI, I. s.a. Organe de masini. Culegere de probleme. Bucuresti,
Editura Didactica si Pedagogica, 1980.
4. GAFITANU, M. s.a. Organe de masini, vol. I. Bucuresti, Editura
Tehnica, 1981
5. JULA, A. s.a. Organe de masini, Indrumar pentru proiectul de an nr. 1,
Universitatea din Brasov, 1986.
6. JULA, A. s.a. Organe de masini, vol. I. Universitatea din Brasov, 1986
7. MOLDOVEAN, GH. s.a. Calculul si proiectarea formei arborilor
drepti. Brasov, Editura Lux Libris, 1998
8. Culegere de norme si extrase din standarde pentru proiectarea
elementelor componente ale masinilor, vol. I si II. Universitatea din
Brasov, 1984
26