Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Fracture Analysis
Consultants, Inc.
Workshop Agenda
2
Part I
1
3/28/2017
3
Part V
original front
4
Part V
2
3/28/2017
y
1 3
s cos K I cos2 K II sin
2r 2 2 2
s max
2
or c 2 tan 1 1 1 8( K II K I )
s max 4( K II K I )
c
5
Part V
predicted
new crack
front
point i ai computed
max KI
point with the extension
median K
median KI value am specified
current extension
min KI crack
front
6
Part V
3
3/28/2017
Specifying extension
Use simplest
is more stable than
specifying cycles.
fit that works.
7
Part V
initial crack
crack extension
4
3/28/2017
Part V 9
2.75
b 4.0
a
9.0 9.0
10.0 10.0
10
Part V
5
3/28/2017
analysis
experiment
Analysis crack-
increment lengths:
a = 0.3 inch
a = 0.2 inch
a = 0.05 inch
11
Part V
The max stress criterion says that the crack will kink in the
direction of a maximum value of a stress component.
Some materials show a transition from Mode I
to Mode II crack growth for stable tearing.
y
s r
LEFM Max stress
Amstutz (1995) 2024-T3, L-T
Amstutz (1995) 2024-T3, T-L
Hallback & Nilsson (1994) 7075-T6
Maccagno & Knott (1989), PMMA
Maccagno & Knott (1991), HY130 @ -196C
s
80
70
60 Mode I x
50
40
6
3/28/2017
predicted direction of
n y
crack propagation
s
x
Keff a, n
14
Part V
7
3/28/2017
k p (90 )
n=
n=2
n=1
n = .5
n = .3
k p ( )
k p (0 )
1 2l
2 l 2 l 2 l
n n n
k p k p n, a 12 22 32
k1 k2 k3
1 2 n
2 n n
a 2
ki a 1 ai2 2 k2
j a
K K
ij ik 15
Part V
16
Part VI
8
3/28/2017
predicted new
crack front
point i ai computed
point with the extension
median K value
am specified
current extension
crack front
18
Part VI
9
3/28/2017
P s K
P
sy Kc
u a
s sc yield function K Kc
0 0
u 0
Kuhn-Tucker a 0
relations
u 0 a 0
19
Part VI
K
Taylor expansion
P
K K Kc
K (a a, P P) K (a, p) a P
a P
from the Kuhn-Tucker relations
a
K (a a, P P) K (a, p) Kc
stable crack growth
K K
so a P 0 K
a P configuration: 0
a
K K
and a P
P a
20
Part VI
10
3/28/2017
Ki K K
Ki (a a, P P) Ki (a, P) a i an i P
i a1 1 an P
j K K
i a P
a
j P
K 1K
a P
a P
Unfortunately, we do not yet know of an
accurate and efficient technique for
computing this matrix.
21
Part VI
Part V 22
11
3/28/2017
Part V 23
s i ai f (ai ) i
(ai ai )
(s i s i ) f (ai ai )
j
2
1 s i ai f (ai )
ai ai
(s i s i ) f (ai ai )
1 Ki 2
ai ai
(s i s i ) f (ai ai ) K 2
ai a j i
Kj
ai ~ Ki2
24
Part VI
12
3/28/2017
25
Part VI
Constant Amplitude:
- Given R
- Computed R
Part V 26
13
3/28/2017
Select the
New Model
button to set
fatigue model
parameters.
Several different
models available:
- temperature
dependent as well
as R dependent.
27
Part VI
Variable amplitude:
Spectrum Variable load spectrum
Sequence
Transient
Load Sequence
Load changes
Load
takeoff land
Time
28
Part VI
14
3/28/2017
29
Part VI
Choose Quasi-Static
growth for simplicity
30
Part VI
15
3/28/2017
31
Part VI
32
Part VI
16
3/28/2017
33
Part VI
Choose method
to compute SIFs
34
Part VI
17
3/28/2017
35
Part VI
36
Part VI
18
3/28/2017
37
Part VI
19