Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
EN
Our mission is to serve democracy by working with the institutions
of the European Union to create a more effective, accountable,
transparent and ethical administration.
Ever wondered who could help you? It may not always be clear whether the
problem is caused by the EU administration, the authorities of a Member State,
or a private entity. Even if you do know who is at fault, it may not be obvious
where you can turn for help. In a Union based on the fundamental principle
of the rule of law, it is of vital importance that there should be a quick and
effective remedy for any problems you encounter in obtaining your rights.
SOLVIT 13
The form can be submitted electronically or printed out and sent by post.
It is also available in paper format from the European Ombudsmans office
on request. You may submit your complaint in any of the 24 official languages
of the EU.
Who can help you?7
Case examples
An Irish citizen asked the European the 45-day deadline provided for in
Medicines Agency (EMA) for access the grant agreement, the outstanding
to documents containing details of all balance for a study it had conducted.
suspected serious adverse reactions The complainant had submitted the
relating to an anti-acne drug. His son had final report, financial statements, and
committed suicide after taking the drug. other required documents within the
The EMA refused his request, arguing required deadline. While the Commission
that the EU rules on access to documents acknowledged receipt of the report, it did
did not apply to reports concerning not pay the outstanding balance. In reply
suspected serious adverse reactions to to the first of several reminders from the
drugs. After investigating the complaint, complainant, it cited holidays and staff
the Ombudsman concluded that the EU shortages as the causes of the delay. The
rules on access to documents apply to Ombudsman contacted the Commission,
all documents held by the EMA. Besides which reacted immediately by contacting
recommending that the EMA review its the complainant and resuming discussions.
refusal to grant access to the adverse It also apologised to the complainant
reaction reports, the Ombudsman for the delay, and promised to calculate
also urged the Agency, as part of its the balance and pay it as soon as the
information policy, to provide additional complainant commented on it.
clarifications so that the public can
understand such data and their significance A Bulgarian national criticised the fact
with greater ease. The EMA accepted that the online registration form on the
the Ombudsmans recommendation by EU Bookshop website (http://bookshop.
announcing the release of the reports. europa.eu) could only be filled in by using
It also adopted a new, proactive policy Latin alphabet characters. He argued that
designed to enhance transparency in it should also be possible to use Cyrillic
matters concerning access to documents and Greek characters. The Ombudsman
that are in its possession. opened an inquiry into the case. The
Publications Office, responsible for the
A Brussels-based non-governmental website, responded to the Ombudsman by
organisation complained to the Ombudsman promising to ensure the use of both Cyrillic
that the European Commission had failed and Greek characters for online registration
to deal with its file and to pay, within on EU Bookshop.
The precise grounds on which an ombudsman can act vary within the network,
but normally include: violation of rights, including human and fundamental
rights; other unlawful behaviour, including failure to respect general principles
of law; and failure to act in accordance with principles of good administration.
A statement of the European Network of Ombudsmen, which clarifies the
service that the members of the network provide to people who complain about
matters within the scope of EU law, is available on the European Ombudsmans
website, where you can also find information on how to lodge a complaint with
an ombudsman in the network.
Who can help you?9
Case examples
A Czech man, living in Ireland and receiving The Greek Ombudsman received
jobseeker benefits, got permission to travel complaints concerning discrimination
to the Czech Republic to attend a course. against women in the examinations for
While there, he sat examinations on the admission to military academies. Among
day set for his return to Ireland. As a result their allegations, the complainants
of his delayed return, the Irish Department mentioned the establishment of a
of Social Protection decided that he was common performance threshold for men
not eligible for jobseeker benefits or even and women regarding physical tests.
for a jobseeker allowance. After the Irish Complaints also cited the disproportionate
Ombudsman intervened and drew attention increase in the minimum height for
to the relevant EU rules, the department candidates of 5cm for men and 10cm
reviewed its decision and paid the man for women. The Ombudsman found that
jobseeker benefits arrears for the period both preconditions constituted indirect
in question and until his entitlement ran discrimination against women and were in
out. The department also promised to breach of EU and national law. He asked
re-examine his entitlement to a jobseeker the Greek authorities to eliminate the
allowance. discrimination. The authorities agreed
to reconsider the issue, in the light of
the Ombudsmans findings, after the
preliminary examinations had ended.
Case examples
Petitioners complained to Parliaments Parliaments Committee on Petitions
Committee on Petitions that the United received several petitions claiming that a
Kingdom authorities were taking too road the Polish authorities were planning
long to deliver residence cards, and that to build across the Rospuda Valley would
they were withholding travel documents cross eco-sensitive areas and seriously
throughout the procedure. The Committee encroach upon other areas protected
requested that the European Commission under EU law. An investigation confirmed
investigate these issues. The Commission this claim, and also found that the Polish
concluded that the United Kingdom authorities had failed to demonstrate that
authorities were indeed not complying they had properly examined alternatives
with the EU rule to issue residence to the planned route. On this basis, the
cards within six months of application. Committee prepared a report, calling for
The United Kingdom recognised the a change to the plans. With this and its
seriousness of the situation and, to remedy own findings, the European Commission
it, significantly increased the number of requested that the Court of Justice of the
staff dealing with applications, and also European Union halt the project while
improved training and procedures. In it considered its legality. The actions of
addition, the authorities introduced an both the Committee and the Commission,
e-mail address for applicants requesting combined with domestic legal pressure,
the return of passports for travel within resulted in a decision by the Polish
ten working days. authorities not to build the road through
the Rospuda Valley.
Case examples
A German traveller had to organise his An Italian citizen, active in the area
own trip to Germany from Madagascar, via of environmental protection, alleged
Paris, because his connecting flight was that the Commissions decision to close
cancelled due to a strike. He complained infringement proceedings against Italy
to the Commission after not receiving regarding a landfill site at Malagrotta,
assistance or compensation from the airline near Rome, was unfair. He argued that
or the responsible French supervisory body, there were certain irregularities in relation
with which he could not communicate to the conditioning plan for the landfill site.
because of language problems. The In the light of significant information that
Commission pursued the case by ensuring the complainant brought to its attention,
that the French supervisory body took the Commission determined that the
the necessary measures. The airline landfill had indeed not been brought into
eventually compensated the complainant. compliance with EU rules. The Commission
The Commission announced that it would reopened the infringement procedure,
help national supervisory bodies reduce with a view to ensuring a full and correct
language barriers for European travellers. application of EU law.
Case example
The EDPS was informed anonymously
about the fact that personal data of
candidates who pass the pre-selection
tests in competitions for EU civil servants
are processed by an external contractor
located in a non-EU country. The EDPS
opened an inquiry into this case on his
own initiative, which led to the conclusion
that in fact, even though the European
Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) had
concluded a contract with an external
firm registered in the United Kingdom,
the data processing operations themselves
were performed in the United States.
The EDPS requested EPSO to verify if the
relevant conditions laid down in the EUs
data protection rules are respected and
to amend the contract so as to ensure
additional guarantees for the data subjects
concerned.
SOLVIT
SOLVIT deals with cross-border problems between citizens or businesses, on the
one hand, and national public authorities, on the other. It is an online network
that the European Commission coordinates. Through SOLVIT national centres,
the EU Member States, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway, work together
to solve, within ten weeks, problems that arise when national public authorities
misapply internal market law.
Case examples
A French citizen studying to become A Swedish company installs pumps in
a pilot at a Belgian flight school could Denmark for home heating systems.
not register as a student with the local In Denmark, it is possible to receive a
Belgian authorities. The problem occurred government subsidy of DKK 20000 if you
because the Belgian flight school was a replace your old oil heating system with a
private establishment that the French- heat pump system. However, the Swedish
speaking Community of Belgium did not companys Danish customers could not
recognise. However, the Belgian Ministry receive the subsidy because the Danish
of Transport approved the certificates that authorities required a Danish company
the school delivered. In line with EU law, registration number in order to pay the
anyone enrolled at the flight school should subsidy. Only companies established in
therefore have student status. Thanks to Denmark can get the said registration
SOLVITs intervention, the local authorities number. After the intervention of SOLVIT,
agreed to reconsider the file of the French the Danish authorities announced that the
citizen and registered him as a student. number was no longer required to receive
the subsidy.
Case examples
A Czech consumer bought a new motorbike A consumer from Lithuania booked a hotel
in Germany. Although he made it clear in Belgium. Upon arrival, the hotel asked
that he was going to export the bike to for a deposit of EUR150 as a guarantee
the Czech Republic, the price incorrectly for any additional costs, such as use of the
included value added tax, which should Internet. The consumer provided her credit
be paid in the country where the vehicle is card as guarantee. The hotel withdrew the
registered. The consumer paid value added deposit from the consumers credit card,
tax twice in Germany and in the Czech even though she did not use any extra
Republic. The consumer was not successful services. She sent a letter to the hotel
in solving the matter with the seller and asking for an explanation and when she
with the tax office in Germany responsible did not receive a reply, called the hotel,
for handling cases where a taxpayer is a which promised to settle the matter. As
non-resident. On the initiative of the Czech the hotel did not call her back, she turned
ECC, the German ECC intervened and the to ECC Lithuania for assistance. Following
dealer refunded to the consumer the value the intervention of ECC Lithuania and
added tax unduly charged. ECC Belgium, the consumer recovered her
deposit.
QK-04-14-978-EN-N
please contact the European Ombudsmans office.
We shall also endeavour to provide an audio version
upon request.
European Ombudsman
1 avenue du Prsident Robert Schuman
CS 30403
F - 67001 Strasbourg Cedex
T. +33 (0)3 88 17 23 13
F. +33 (0)3 88 17 90 62
eo@ombudsman.europa.eu
http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu