You are on page 1of 3

That Chandler accurately described Mjs body is one of the myths about the 1993 case.

SIX
anti-Jackson sources gave SEVEN different reports about what the photos showed and
what Chandler described. Jackson suffered from vitilgo which destroyed pigmentation in
some areas while others remained brown. Evan Chandlers knew this, Jackson talked about
his skin disease on Oprah in February 1993 and Evan Chandler even saw Jackson's left
gluteus when he injected a painkiller while Jackson was a guest inhis house. Chandler
described this scene in his book All that Glitters. So Chandler knew that Jackson's skin had
brown splotches except he didn't know the details. Jordan's description was nothing but his
father's speculation based on what he saw, the fact that Jackson had vitilgo. If Jordan's
description had been accurate there would not be so many contradictory reports about
what was so accurate about it coming from those who did their best to prove to the public
that the photos and the description matched.

Which version should we accept as accurate?

Government's photographer Gary Spiegel version: one dark spot on the lower left side -
supposedly exactly where Chandler put it

or

Tom Sneddon 2005 declaration version: one dark blemish on the right side - only at about
the same relative location where Chandler put it, not exactly where he put it

or

Dimond version number 1: pinkish splotches on the underside of the penis

or

Dimond verions number 2: mottled pink spots on scrotum and buttocks and one dark spot
at the base of the penis, underneath

or

Ray Chandler version: numerous distinctive markings and discolorations, different sizes and
shapes and locations which took two hours to describe and which then exactly matched
the photos

or

Smoking Gun version: distinctive splotches on his buttocks and one dark splotch on a white
penis, the splotch changes location during erection supposedly precisely where Chandler
put it

or

Victor Gutierrez version: pink and brown marks on testicles, brown patches on buttocks,
left glut, dark markings (plural!) on the penis

Sources: Tom Sneddon 2005 declaration

https://www.scribd.com/document/353568614/Contradictory-reports-of-Jordan-Chandler-
s-description-and-the-photos

Smoking Gun :

"With Los Angeles Police Department detectives weighing his claims, Chandler gave them a
roadmap to Jackson's below-the-waist geography, which, he said, includes distinctive
"splotches" on his buttocks and ONE ON HIS PENIS, "which is a light color similar to the
color of his face". The boy's information was so precise, he even pinpointed where the
splotch fell while Jackson's penis was erect"

http://web.archive.org/web/20090630025648/http://www.thesmokinggun.com/michaelja
ckson/010605jacksonsplotch.html

Diane Dimond: Be careful who you love page 14 quoting police photographer Gary
Spiegel, read it here: goo.gl/mKJZYo

"While I was on Mr. Jackson's left side, Dr. Strick asked Mr. Jackson to lift his penis. Mr.
Jackson questioned why he had to do that, but he did comply with the request. When Mr.
Jackson complied with Dr. Strick's request to lift his penis, I observed A DARK SPOT on
the LOWER LEFT side of Mr. Jackson's penis.

Law enforcement sources as well as Chandler family sources said that the dark patch on
Jackson's genitals was found exactly where young Jordan Chandler said they could find
such a mark."

Source: Dimond's book page 145 read it here goo.gl/K7Sr4x

Contary to Jackson's claim, the authorities were not looking to see if he had vitiligo per se,
they were looking to see if Jordan Chandler's very specific description of where "MOTTLED
PINK SPOTS" on Jackson's SCROTUM and BUTTOCKS were located matched the reality. They
were also looking to see if there really was A DARK SPLOTCH AT THE BASE of Jackson's
penis, UNDERNEATH.

Diane Dimond's blog, dianedimond.net:

In the opening chapter of my book I describe the day police went to serve a "body search
warrant" on Mr. Jackson. They were looking to see if the boy's description of Jackson's
erect PENIS as having PINKISH SPLOTCHES on it were correct. Jordie was claiming to have
seen the splotches on the side of Jackson's penis that was exposed only when he was in a
sexually aroused state.
http://dianedimond.net/the-enigma-that-was-michael-
jackson/#commentshttp://dianedimond.net/the-enigma-that-was-michael-
jackson/#comments

Tom Sneddon's declaration 2005:

I have examined the drawing made by Jordan Chandler at Detective Ferrufino's request
and the photographs taken of Defendant's genitalia. The photographs reveal A MARK on
the RIGHT SIDE of Defendants penis At ABOUT THE SAME RELATIVE LOCATION as the
DARK blemish located by Jordan Chandler on his drawing of Defendants erect penis.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/052505pltmotchandler.pdf

Ray Chandler: All that Glitters, page 210:

"It took several hours for Jordie to provide a description that Feldman could understand.
There were NUMEROUS distinctive MARKINGS and discolorations on Michael's privates,
and it was difficult for the boy to explain exactly where they were located, what size they
were, and what shape they took."

Victor Gutierrez Michael Jackson was my lover page 159

October 24 1993 at 11:45 p.m. Jordie's attorneys asked him to document his description of
Jackson's genitalia. The graphic details that the minor recited on a napkin would serve as
an official document. Jordie state: Michael is circumcised. He has short pubic hair. His
testicles are marked with PINK and BROWN marks. Like a cow, not white put pink color.
His body oil stink. He had BROWN PATCHES on ass, on his left glut. The description
included a picture of Jackson's penis that showed DARK MARKINGS.

Related Interests