Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Details:
General Requirements:
Directions:
As you search the library for scholarly research, limit your search to identify
empirical articles. You can use the "Empirical Research Checklist" to help with
this determination. Upon finding an empirical study, assess the validity of the
conclusion by determining if the conclusion answers your proposed research
question and if the methodology is appropriate.
Write an annotation for each of the six articles that include a concise summary
in your own words and the correct APA citation for each article.
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the
"Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
By John Kennedy, MD, Scott Bresler, PhD, Anthony Whitaker, MD, JD, and Brian
Masterson, MD
Background
Psychiatrists who work in inpatient units are faced with daily decisions about predicting
which patients will be violent, both in the hospital and after discharge. These decisions
are often made using unstructured clinical judgment based on the clinician's experience
and knowledge of the literature. How long such judgment stays the standard of care
remains to be seen, because psychiatric researchers have produced a number of
assessment and management tools to improve the accuracy and use of violence risk
assessment. This article briefly outlines 3 tools: the Brset Violence Checklist (BVC), the
Classification of Violence Risk (COVR), and the Historical Clinical Risk-20 (HCR-20).
Alec Buchanan, M.D., Ph.D. [chair] Renee Binder, M.D. Michael Norko,
M.D. Marvin Swartz, M.D. Approved by the Joint Reference Committee, October
2011
Annotated Bibliography
2
1 3 4 5
Less than
Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
Satisfactory
0.00% 79.00% 87.00% 100.00%
74.00%
100.0 %Content
20.0 %Articles Articles are not Articles are Articles are Articles are
Articles are
included. incomplete or included, some included and
extensive and
incorrect and of which support the
provide
do not support support the PICOT substantial
the PICOT PICOT question. support to the
questions. question. PICOT
question.
50.0 %Annotated Annotated Annotated Annotated Annotated Annotated
Bibliographies bibliography bibliography bibliography bibliography bibliography
(Citation and entries are not entries are entries are entries are entries are
summary for included. incomplete or partially mostly complete and
each article) incorrect. complete and complete and correct.
correct. correct.
2.0 %Thesis Paper lacks Thesis is Thesis is Thesis is clear Thesis is
Development and any discernible insufficiently apparent and and forecasts comprehensive
Purpose overall purpose developed or appropriate to the and contains
or organizing vague. Purpose purpose development the essence of
claim. is not clear. of the paper. the paper.
Thesis is Thesis
descriptive statement
and reflective makes the
of the purpose of the
arguments paper clear
and
appropriate to
the purpose.
2.0 %Argument Statement of Sufficient Argument is Argument Clear and
Logic and purpose is not justification of orderly, but shows logical convincing
Construction justified by the claims is may have a few progressions. argument that
conclusion. lacking. inconsistencies. Techniques of presents a
The conclusion Argument The argument argumentation persuasive
does not lacks presents are evident. claim in a
support the consistent minimal There is a distinctive and
claim made. unity. There justification of smooth compelling
Argument is are obvious claims. progression of manner. All
incoherent and flaws in the Argument claims from sources are
uses logic. Some logically, but introduction authoritative
noncredible sources have not thoroughly, to conclusion.
sources. questionable supports the Most sources
credibility. purpose. are
Sources used authoritative
are credible.
Introduction
and conclusion
bracket the
thesis.
6.0 %Mechanics Surface errors Frequent and Some Prose is Writer is
of Writing are pervasive repetitive mechanical largely free of clearly in
(includes enough that mechanical errors or typos mechanical command of
spelling, they impede errors distract are present, but errors, standard,
punctuation, communication the reader. they are not although a written,
grammar, of meaning. Inconsistencies overly few may be academic
language use) Inappropriate in language distracting to present. The English.
word choice or choice the reader. writer uses a
sentence (register) or Correct and variety of
construction is word choice varied sentence effective
used. are present. structure and sentence
Sentence audience- structures and
structure is appropriate figures of
correct but not language are speech.
varied. employed.
10.0 %Paper Template is not Appropriate Appropriate Appropriate All format
Format (use of used template is template is template is elements are
appropriate style appropriately used, but some used. fully used. correct.
for the major or elements are Formatting is There are
and assignment) documentation missing or correct, virtually no
format is rarely mistaken. A although some errors in
followed lack of control minor errors formatting
correctly. with may be style.
formatting is present.
apparent.
10.0 Sources are not Documentation Sources are Sources are Sources are
%Documentation documented. of sources is documented, as documented, completely
of Sources inconsistent or appropriate to as appropriate and correctly
(citations, incorrect, as assignment and to assignment documented,
footnotes, appropriate to style, although and style, and as appropriate
references, assignment some format is to assignment
bibliography, and style, with formatting mostly and style, and
etc., as numerous errors may be correct. format is free
appropriate to formatting present. of error.
assignment and errors.
style)
100 %Total
Weightage