Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2: e- Portfolio
SID:17512435 1
Assignment 2: e- Portfolio
precautionary strategy is planned encase any ICT instruments fail before or during the class
activities. Organisation of stationary, coloured pencils, resources and YouTube video clips
are made clear, focused pre prepared direction ensures each classroom activity are clear
and concise. Allowing for a smooth delivery output of the lesson, ensures a strong impact on
classroom direction is understood.
Part B: Report
Section 1.
The crucial role of the following teacher professional standards, serves as a platform for
teaching diversely among classrooms. The focus areas that are evident within the current
Geography lesson plan cater for student learning needs. Professional standards of teaching
(1.5.1, 2.6.1, 3.1.1, 4.2.1), are among the 4 focus areas collected within the following
geography lesson plan.
The focus area of 1.5.1, establishes the link for catering students with individualised learning
needs. It is evident through this lesson plan that class discussion creates an environment of
engagement. Piagets theory on open learning is appropriately established, open learning
enables students to work on various individual projects in keeping with their respective
stages of development (Clarke & Pittaway, 2014). The participation of students provides the
teacher students feedback. Informal assessment is also linked through this focus area,
displaying an inevitable useful observation of the natural class setting, running records,
anecdotal records and written notes to assess the development of the whole child (Black,
2004). This focus area chosen is appropriate for the lesson plan. Samantha Emery notes,
every standard was met and how it refers to the lesson plan, organisation of and resources
used. Diagnosing learning is understood through this focus area, supporting students with
learning difficulties and strategies of assembling tasks into smaller manageable parts. This is
evident through the class discussions within the lesson plan identified.
Literacy needs have been accounted for. Traditional formal presentation is pointed out from
Daniel Colley, though focus area 2.6.1 involving the use of ICT communication. This tool of
ICT communication caters for positive student learning needs. Strong evidence suggests,
digital video can inspire and engage students when incorporated into student- centred
learning activities (Stiler, 2007). The lesson activity involves students to also be in pairs,
developing learner autonomy and enhanced team work communication skills. The focus
area 2.6.1 therefore is implemented to cater for student learning literacy needs. Students
with special needs may benefit from ICT, this helps to assist them in allowing to keep pace
with their peers. For example, students with dyslexia who might normally struggle with
reading or text understanding benefit from listening to an audio recording with imagery
(Stiler, 2007). ICT enables assessment of real- world problems allowing students and
teachers more opportunities for feedback and reflection in order to develop previous lesson
plan structures. In the case of this lesson plan, implemented focus area 2.6.1, shows this
idea as reflected from Amber Patterson Yes, the lesson plan has been planned carefully.
SID:17512435 2
Assignment 2: e- Portfolio
Formal assessment data has been recognised in the focus area 3.1.1. The map challenge, a
task that is present in the last section of the lesson plan, Individualised learning needs for
this task being catered in the form of formal assessment. The formative assessment
provided in the lesson plan allows progress of student data to be recognised from the
completed task. Differentiated instruction through formal tasks is a pedagogical approach
which aims to all learners. Responsive instruction, caters to the needs of all student in the
class, maximizing their potential in learning strengths (Tomlinson, 2004). Peers in the group
hurdle task have also mentioned, in spite of the focus area 3.1.1 being present in this
particular section of the lesson plan, an alternative focus area 2.3.1 is also observed in the
lesson plan. Although, I agree with this focus area being adapted in this section of the lesson
plan, learning needs are catered for establishing challenging learning goals for varying
abilities and not just curriculum assessment and reporting. Differentiation by learning
profile also occurs in reference to Sternbergs Trarchic theory (Clarke & Pittaway, 2014)
Relevant student learner needs are lastly benefited from focus area 4.2.1. Classroom
management, aims to provide effective learning opportunities for students on planned
activities (Ryan, Cooper & Tauer, 2008). Amber Patterson mentions in the feedback, the
lesson plan is well planned and planned carefully. This an agreed opinion, allows for
students to benefit from the lesson plan structural approach for example: the time spent
off- task activities becomes non- productive learning opportunities. Physical factors,
Education factors and Social factors play a crucial role in the lesson plan focus area of 4.2.1
as this creates a positive dynamic environment for learning, therefore this caters for student
learning needs for all levels. Resources outlined for the activities, are established in the
resources column, demonstrating a wide range of resources that help engage students in
their learning. Small mention from the feedback sheets suggest focus area 4.2.1 is present in
this section of the lesson plan as is caters classroom organized approaches.
Part B:
Section 2.
Peer feedback contributions, established improved analyses of the standards. Overall, the
peer feedback was positive for each focus areas identified within the lesson plan. One
comment Daniel Colley explained through question 4 of the feedback, Yes, although
connections are unclear. The feedback helped established a refined look into the focus
areas chosen, going into depth of research with relevance for each of the chosen focus
areas and how they cater for learning needs of students. All peers reviews were pretty
happy with selection of standards and justifications with evidence, no small inclusion of
suggested additional information was formally noted for major changes to be made as well
additional modifications for the geography lesson plan focus areas.
SID:17512435 3
Assignment 2: e- Portfolio
References
Marsh, C.J., Clark, M., Pittaway, S. (2014) Marshs becoming a teacher (6th ED.) Frenchs
Ryan, K., Cooper, J.M., & Tauer, S. (2008). Teaching for student learning: Becoming a master
Black, P. (2004). The nature and value of formative assessment for learning. London: Kings
College
Stiler, G. M. (2007). MP3 players: Applications and implications for the use of popular
Tomlinson, C.A. (2008). Learning to love assessment. Educational Leadership, 55(3), 4-19
SID:17512435 4