Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Patricia E. Carley
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 2
Abstract
Numerous studies on mentoring programs have been conducted over the past several years,
covering diverse business and academic domains with a variety of mentor/mentee partnerships,
e.g., peer to peer, alumni to student, teacher to student, manager to trainees, etc. Researchers
findings consistently report that mentoring relationships add significant value and provide
positive outcomes for mentees, allowing them to achieve short-term goals. While the outcomes
reported through these studies seem to be consistent, the factors that contribute to the positive
outcomes seem to vary widely. The purpose of this study is to identify the factors and/or
creating positive outcomes. We will conduct a longitudinal study to examine the long-term
benefits of mentoring to mentees careers and identify if there is a correlation between positive,
productive mentoring relationships and mentees later career success. For this study, we
randomly selected a group of 25 mentor/mentee pairs from a group of volunteers that participate
series of surveys, pre- and post- the Universitys 2015-2016 mentoring program, we will
examine to what extent gender, socioeconomic status, identity likeness, mentor experience, and
meeting quantity and quality affect the mentees satisfaction with the program and ultimately,
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 3
professional supporting, guiding and sometimes assisting a more junior person to be successful
in their personal and/or professional development (Blickle, Schneider, Meurs & Perrewe 2010;
Douglass, Smith, D.L., & Smith, L. J. 2013; Gannon, & Maher 2012).
Bean, Lucas, and Hyers (2014) and Arenofsky (1998) looked at what differentiates a
mentor from a role model or an advisor, and provided their observations on the value of each
role. For example, Arenofsky suggested that while the role model is helpful to individuals for
providing inspiration and one that a person will try to model themselves after, the mentor is
considered, according to true definition, a wise and trusted counselor and teacher (p.1).
Arenofsky pointed out that while a role model may have significant achievements to admire,
they might have significant character flaw(s) that may not make them an ideal mentor.
In the study by Bean et al. (2014), where they examined faculty-to-faculty mentoring at
Westchester University, they found that the relationship was of central importance to both the
mentor and mentee participants. While a role model can be inspirational, there is no interaction
or focused relationship. De Janasz, Ensher and Heun (2008) looked at the value of e-mentoring
programs to business college students and noted that while a role model is valuable for some, in
a virtual mentoring program, acting as role model is not realistic as there is no opportunity to
observe the mentors real life interactions. The conclusions made by De Janasz et al. (2008)
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 4
were that one could sustain a satisfying mentoring relationship even if not face-to-face.
According to their findings, the more frequent the contact a mentee had with his/her mentor, the
more support they received. In other words, the type of contact, e.g. face-to-face, email or
phone, was less important than the frequency of contact in a mentoring relationship. The
findings of Bean et al. (2014) and De Janasz et al. (2008) suggest that mentees found their
mentoring relationship more satisfying when they spent more time as a pair.
Socioeconomic Similarities
Blickle et al. (2010) studied former college students who were established in their careers
and who had been mentored in college. They concluded that mentees from families of higher
socioeconomic status were more successful finding mentors and enjoying a fruitful mentoring
relationship. However, Blickle et al. (2010) also acknowledged that mentees of a higher
socioeconomic status perhaps were better educated on the merits of a mentoring relationship and
were encouraged by family to participate. Furthermore, they theorized that mentees of a higher
socioeconomic status may have more access to senior executives at their place of employment or
elsewhere due to their family background and this could have been a contributing factor in their
Gender
Blickle et al. (2010) also evaluated the role of gender in achieving positive mentoring
outcomes and realizing greater career success. While their findings indicated that gender did not
play a role in improving an individuals future career success, the authors did point out the
sample studied had a low percentage of females (24.6%) as compared to the number of males
that participated. It is not clear if the sample design in the Blickle et al (2010) study, i.e., lower
the positive feedback. Blickle et al. (2010) stated that women in Germany do not perceive it
difficult to find mentors as businesswomen in other countries do. Dimitriadis et al. (2012),
looked at medical students mentored by faculty and alumni at LMU School of Medicine and
found that only one out of every five male mentees chose a female mentor even though there
were sufficient numbers of female mentors for mentees to choose. Conversely, Dimitriadis et al.
(2012) findings indicated that female mentees did not have a similar bias in choosing their
Like Identities
Arenofsky (1998) stated, Sometimes people gravitate toward role models or mentors
because they share the same interests (p. 1). Gannon (2011) suggested that mentees looked for
mentors with similar interests at the outset of the relationship and found having common
interests was comforting when starting a new relationship. However, in the long run, they found
having similar interests did not necessarily result in a more satisfying partnership (dyad) or a
successful outcome. Arenofsky (1998) commented, where you find a mentor or role model, for
instance, among relatives, in a school based or other formal program or from a list of personal
contacts, is not as important as whom you choose (p. 3). Although Arenofskys article was
published in 1998, more recent researchers and authors such as Blickle et al. (2010) and Gannon
et al. (2011) support the theory that like-minded identities resulted in more positive outcomes.
Jefferies and Skidmore (2010) studied medical school fellowship students that had participated in
mentorship program, medical students rotated across several sites where different specialties
were housed, e.g., neonatal, etc. With each rotation, students were provided with new teams of
faculty mentors. The findings from the study indicated that mentees did not prefer an individual
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 6
mentor to a pairing with a Faculty Advisory Committee Triad (p. 2). The mentee responses
also showed that a very small percentage of mentee participants felt that the mentors should have
similar ethnic or cultural backgrounds to that of the mentees (p. 3). De Janasz et al. (2008), who
studied the benefits of e-mentoring, said that their findings suggested that perceived similarity is
a strong predictor of e-mentoring effectiveness while actual similarity is not (p. 405). They
theorize that electronic means of establishing mentoring relationships reduces the opportunity to
make observable judgments of mentee by mentor and vice versa, thus eliminating the initial
meeting.
Ramani, Gruppen and Kachur (2006) wrote in Twelve Tips for Developing Effective
Mentors that past research reports identify characteristics that are valuable in a mentor, for
example, characteristics such as being knowledgeable and respected in their field, being
responsive and available, having good listening skills and being able to give positive as well as
constructive feedback. Ramani et al. (2006) suggested that not all mentors have these
characteristics and that more mentoring training should be provided to mentors to add to the
effectiveness of mentoring programs. Dimitriadis et al. (2012) found that a mentors stature,
experience and communication skills were highly valued by mentees and were very effective in
The results outlined by Jefferies et al. (2010) showed that mentors and mentees attributed
barriers to effective mentoring due to the mentees lack of time. Bean et al. (2014) similarly
found that both mentor and mentee respondents had less satisfying relationships when they
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 7
experienced time constraints. Respondents consistently noted that the more frequently that
mentees had contact with mentors, regardless of the method of contact, e.g., in person one-on-
one meetings, email exchange or phone conversations, the more positive the participants
experience was with the program. Douglass et al. (2013) agreed that time and availability were
important. Their results showed that one-on-one time ranked as one of the top two factors of an
effective mentoring relationship. In the study done in the UK by researchers Gannon et al.
(2012), they found mentees often cited time pressures and competing priorities impactful to the
time spent with their mentors and this finding correlated with the same mentees opinions on
their satisfaction with the overall program. There also seemed to be a correlation between less
frequent meetings/contact and time pressures and whether the mentoring program was voluntary
or not, i.e., when a mentee was required to participate in the mentoring program, statistically they
met less frequently with their mentor advisors and had lower satisfaction with the overall
program.
In the research literature reviewed, the pairings in each study varied widely, from peer
mentoring dyads, to alumni/student dyads, executive managers/new graduate pairings and so on.
All consistently found significant value in the mentoring relationship outcomes and felt the
pairing met the defined objective(s) of the program. However, none of the mentoring programs
studied found the silver bullet, i.e., what specific characteristic or combination of
characteristics makes for the ideal and most satisfying mentor/mentee relationship. This leads us
to the research question that will be explored in this study. This research study sets out to
career success for the mentee. Is it important that the mentees gender and socioeconomic status
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 8
match with mentors? Is it important for the mentor and mentee to have like identities or
important to building a strong mentoring relationship and enabling the mentee to achieve greater
career success? Career success includes one or more of the following for the mentee: higher
compensation, career progression and/or promotions, job satisfaction and/or satisfaction with
their career trajectory. Success is measured by evaluating the mentees salaries, advancement
and their happiness and/or satisfaction in their careers following their involvement in the
mentoring program.
Method
Many studies on mentoring showed that mentees found great benefits in having a mentor.
The purpose of this study is to further explore the value of a mentor, particularly for business
college students, and attempt to identify which aspects of a mentoring relationship lead to higher
degrees of satisfaction for the mentees, and whether satisfaction with the program and the
All 250 students in the BSU College of Managements mentoring program were
contacted by email and asked to join to the mentoring program study. A total of 76 students
responded to the email indicating their interest in participating, a response rate of 30%. A
subsequent email was sent to the 76 volunteer students and their mentors to provide disclosures
on confidentiality and informed consent forms. After all informed consent forms were returned,
we then stratified the volunteer population by gender to emulate the make-up of total population
of 250 students. There were 150 female students and 100 male students (60%/40%) enrolled in
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 9
the Bridgewater State University Business School Mentoring program population. From the 76
volunteers, we noted that the sample included 64 women and 12 men. For our study sample, we
needed 10 male mentees and 15 female mentees. Once our volunteer pool was stratified, we then
used the simple random sampling method to select 10 males from the population of 12
Measurements
The measurements for this study consisted of a background profile form and two
questionnaires. The background profile form was first administered to all of the individuals in
the sample population and we planned to use the background profiles when reporting the final
study results. The background profile requested additional information on the demographics of
the participants, e.g., age, socioeconomic status and ethnicity, and it also included two specific
questions. The intent of the background profile was to establish a baseline on the expectations of
the mentees, i.e., their personal goals and objectives, at the outset of the program.
Background Profile
Q1. What do you hope to achieve most from the mentoring program. Please rank in order of
importance:
___Skills development
___Time management
___Academic Support
The duration of the mentor program study will be nine months, aligned with the
anticipated end date of the current program pairings, and the first questionnaire will be issued
upon closure of the program. In late May 2016 when the program closes for these
mentor/mentee pairs, all mentors and mentees will receive questionnaire one. The questionnaire
will be comprised of a total of 13 items, 6 general questions, 5 questions using a 5-point Likert
scale and two open-ended questions. See Appendix A for the list of questions that will be on
questionnaire one.
Because the goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of an effective mentoring
relationship to career success, it is necessary to conduct a longitudinal study and evaluate the
outcomes sometime after the student is mentored, has graduated from college and has entered the
workforce. Thus, a second questionnaire will be sent to the mentee participants two years after
the mentees graduation from college. Similar to Blickle et al (2010), we will use a two-year
period for this longitudinal study, so that mentees can establish themselves in their career and we
can collect career-related data. The second and final measurement will again be taken in
questionnaire form. The questionnaire will contain a total of 11 items, 8 general questions, 3
questions using a 5-point Likert scale and 1 open-ended question. The questions that will be
Q3. Are you in the field/career that you sought two years ago?
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 11
Q5. Have you been promoted or been given higher responsibilities at your current place of
employment?
Q6. Are you satisfied with the rate of advancement you have achieved?
Q7. Have you continued to seek out and partner with mentors in your organization or
professional community?
Q8. I believe my experience in the BSU mentoring program gave me the skills necessary to grow
Q9. I am happy with where I am in my career and believe my BSU mentor helped me reach my
career goals.
Q11. Reflecting on your past experience in the BSU Mentoring program, what aspects of your
relationship with your college mentor were most helpful to you in achieving career satisfaction?
Please explain.
Results
Following completion of the study, we will report the results of the findings using tables
for the quantitative responses and using narrative description for the reporting the responses to
the qualitative open-ended questions. The narrative description will also include a summary of
the information that was collected via the background profile forms.
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 12
For reporting the quantitative results of Questionnaire one, we will include the data
collected, expressed as means, standard deviations and percentages. Means and standard
deviations will be used to show the responses to the Likert-scale questions, and percentages and
standard deviations will be used to report on the responses to the general questions. We will use
narrative descriptions to outline themes and commonalities seen in the responses to the set of
open-ended questions.
For reporting results to questionnaire two, we will again include the data in a table,
expressed in means and standard deviations to show responses to the Likert-scale questions, and
expressed in percentages and standard deviations to show the responses to the general questions.
For reporting the responses to questionnaire twos open-ended questions, here also we will use a
narrative description to share themes and commonalities, and will add our observations on how
A third table will be included in the Results section to show the correlation between the
respondents level of satisfaction with the mentoring program as reported in Questionnaire one to
their level of satisfaction in their current job/career. We will use the Pearson product-moment
correlation coefficient to express the relationship between the two sets of data, specifically Q5
from questionnaire one to Q10 from questionnaire two. We will also show the coefficient of
determination to represent the correlation in percentages and finally examine the relationship of
the means by performing a t-test on means reported for Q5 in questionnaire one and Q8, Q9, Q10
from questionnaire two. We will provide a narrative to summarize if and how the data supports
our research hypothesis, which was to determine if matching a mentee with a mentor based on
significantly increases a mentees future career satisfaction. We will also share insights from the
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 13
data highlighting factors or characteristics from the studied mentoring relationships that seem
Discussion
As mentioned previously, the purpose of this research study is to determine what factors
or characteristics in a mentoring relationship are most important to creating future career success
and/or satisfaction. Through our measures, we are establishing whether the mentee had a
positive mentoring experience and we will be collecting data from the participants on their
specific experiences, for example, what did they expect to get out of the program, did they get
what they expected from the program, were they happy with their mentor, what topic areas did
they cover with their mentor, how often did they meet, etc. If the responses to questionnaire two
show that the participants have achieved success, we expect that we will see that they had a
positive mentoring experience. We will see if there commonalities across the respondents that
would suggest what factors of the program seem to be key to later career success. We have
hypothesized that pairing mentees with mentors of like gender, socioeconomic status or career
specialty will not significantly increase a mentees future career satisfaction. We expect that the
data from our study will show that the key contributors are quality and depth of the mentoring
communications skills, and having someone accessible and knowledgeable that can guide, advise
Limitations
mentoring program at Bridgewater State University. As such, we started our study with a sample
of convenience, i.e., we solicited participants who were already enrolled in the mentoring
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 14
program. Additionally, we then asked for students in the mentoring program to volunteer for our
study, which introduced self-selection bias. Because of our initial approach in identifying the
study population, readers should be cognizant of the potential impact this approach will have to
the results. It is likely that the mentees used in our the study may already have established
positive views on mentoring and mentoring outcomes so questionnaire one may reflect some
bias. We were not able to account for the sample of convenience bias; however, we worked to
reduce the self-selection bias by creating a subset of the study volunteers, using the simple
We also must consider that there is threat of mortality impacting the results of this study.
Since this is a longitudinal study with the posttest being issued two years after completion of the
study, we expect that there may be some participants who will drop out and not respond to the
posttest, i.e., questionnaire two. Thus, the statistical data we collect, following the posttest, may
not reflect an accurate or complete picture of the how the mentoring experience correlates to
career success.
Those mentees that express satisfaction in their careers, we may find have they continued
to work with mentors in the workplace or informally, or perhaps, mentees attitudes after
questionnaire two may be attributed to the maturation process. Maturation and/or later
experiences with mentors post-BSU could be contribute to the mentees later job satisfaction.
The maturation and/or new mentor experiences could be factors that confound the results we will
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 15
Conclusion
It may be worthwhile to perform additional research in the future to more closely study
style, or a particular set or tools or resources, etc. that contribute to mentees achieving
satisfaction in their mentoring relationship and ultimately, in their career. Using the method of
test-retest reliability may be useful to obtain more detailed information and gain deeper insights.
Additionally, it would be helpful if future research studies included focus groups as a form of
measurement. Obtaining in-depth qualitative data via a phenomenological approach will assist
in exposing additional mentees perceptions. Conversely, it may confirm that the themes, that
In conclusion, we expect our study, similar to the studies of Blickle et al. (2010) and
Bean et al. (2014), will show that there is significant value to mentees, who participate in a
mentoring program, as it gives them important skills before entering the workforce. Ideally, the
discovery(ies), from the data we collect, will be valuable information that future students and
universities can integrate into subsequent programs. Whether we find that the most significant
value and benefit to a mentee is the development of foundational skills, or that it merely provides
an important and guiding support mechanism, the more we learn and share the more satisfied and
successful mentoring programs and college graduates will become. We hope that the key
findings from our study will help students and universities in the future by giving them
additional insights into the How-to to make mentoring relationships more satisfying and
productive, and help students become successful, happy and gainfully employed individuals in
the workplace.
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 16
References
Arenofsky, J. (1998) What Mentors & Role Models Can Do For You. Career World Nov/Dec98,
Vol. 27, Issue 3
Bean, N., Lucas, L., & Hyers, L. (2014) Mentoring in Higher Education Should be the Norm to
Assure Success: Lessons Learned from the Faculty Mentoring Program. Mentoring &
Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22:1, 56-73, DOI: 10.1080/13611267.2014.882606
Blickle, G., Schneider, P.B., & Meurs, J.A. (2010) Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived
Barriers to Obtaining Mentoring: A Longitudinal Investigation. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology
De Janasz, S., Ensher, E.A., & Heun, C. (2008) Virtual Relationships and Real Benefits Using
E-mentoring to Connect Business Students With Practicing Managers. Mentoring &
Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16:4,394-411, DOI: 10.180/13611260802433775
Dimitriadis, K., von der Borch, P., Stormann, S., Meinel, F.G., Moder, S., Reincke, M., &
Fischer, M.R. (2012) Characteristics of Mentoring Relationships Formed by Medical
Students and Faculty. Med Educ Online
Douglass, A.G., Smith, D.L., & Smith, L.J. (2013) An Exploration of the Characteristics of
Effective Undergraduate Peer-Mentoring Relationships. Mentoring & Tutoring:
Partnership in Learning, 21:2, 219-234, DOI:10.1080/13611267.2013.813740
Gannon, J. & Maher, A. (2012) Developing Tomorrows Talent: the Case of an Undergraduate
Mentoring Programme. Education + Training, Vol 54 Iss 6 pp. 440-455
Ramani, S., Gruppen, L., & Krajic Kachur, E. (2006) Twelve Tips for Developing Effective
Mentors. Medical Teacher, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 404-408
CREATING CAREER SUCCESS THROUGH EFFECTIVE MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS 17
Appendix A
Questionnaire One
Likert-scale questions
Specific Questions
1. What did you and your mentor focus on most during the program?
a. Skills development, communications, resume-writing
b. Career planning
c. Business networking
d. Building industry knowledge & business acumen
e. Academic support
f. Other, please specify
2. How often did you and your mentor meet during the program? Meeting could be face to
face, by phone or through email or a form of social media
a. Not at all
b. Once a quarter
c. Once a month
d. Once a week
e. Several times per week
3. What percentage of your meetings was face to face?
4. What percentage of your meetings was conducted by phone?
5. What percentage of your contact was via email or social media?
6. Did you attend business or networking events with your mentor?
Open-ended Questions
1. What characteristics or aspects of your relationships contributed most to your
experience?
2. What characteristics or aspects of your relationships contributed least to your experience?