IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

)
MOHAN A. HARIHAR, )
)
Appellant )
) Case No. 17-1381
v. )
)
US BANK NA, et al )
)
Defendants/Appellees )
)

REPLY TO APPELLEES OPPOSITION FOR JUDGEMENT RE: UNOPPOSED

MISPRISION OF TREASON CLAIMS, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. Code 2382 AND

FRAP Rule 27 (a)(3)(A)

Disclosure Statement of the Plaintiff - The Plaintiff respectfully prefaces this REPLY with the

following Disclosure statement:

The gravity of serious legal issues addressed in this Appeal and in the RELATED complaint

against The United States,1 include (but are not limited to) evidenced allegations of TREASON

under ARTICLE III Section 3 of the Constitution, Economic Espionage pursuant to 18

U.S.C. 1832 and is believed to impact matters of National Security. Therefore, copies of this

filed REPLY are sent via email, social media and/or certified mail to: The Executive Office of

1
The related complaint references HARIHAR v. THE UNITED STATES, Docket No. 17-cv-
11109.
the President (EOP), the US Inspector General - Michael Horowitz, US Attorney General -

Jeff Sessions, members of the US Senate and House of Representatives, the House

Judiciary Committee, and to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). A copy will also be

made available to the Public. THEREFORE, ALL AMERICANS serve as WITNESS to

these evidenced acts of misconduct (alleged). Parties are additionally informed for

documentation purposes, and out of the Appellants continued concerns for personal

safety/security.

After reviewing documents filed by Appellees/Defendants suggesting that this Court(s) should

IGNORE and DISREGARD CRIMINAL ACTS COMMITTED WITHIN ITS OWN

WALLS, the Appellant Mohan A. Harihar respectfully disagrees. The content of the

opposition exemplifies yet another ACT of DESPERATION to avoid NOT ONLY civil

accountability, but evidenced CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT that includes TREASON against

The United States. The Appellant therefore, necessarily files this REPLY based on the

following:

1. TREASON Claims Against Three (3) Federal Judges have been Clearly Evidenced

as Part of the Record ALL CLAIMS STAND AS UNOPPOSED and INCLUDE

the SUA SPONTE RECUSAL of District Court Judge Allison Dale Burroughs. This

PRO SE LITIGANT IS CERTAIN, that IF SOMEHOW even a portion of these

claims were incorrect, there would be SOME VALID ARGUMENT to suggest

otherwise. There is NONE, nor can there be, as these evidenced claims are not only

IRREFUTABLE, but are cemented as part of the record(s).

 These evidenced criminal claims of Treason are shown to have occurred WITHIN THE

COURTS OWN WALLS, and are considered some of the gravest criminal acts

known to this Nation.

In their opposition, Appellees/Defendants state that the Treason claims against referenced

officers of the Court are unfounded, however, they provide NO VALID ARGUMENT

to show how they could possibly have arrived at their conclusion(s). Conversely, the

Appellant has clearly articulated for the record EXACTLY how he arrived at his

evidenced conclusions.

2. The Appellant Properly Informed the Appropriate Authorities/Agencies/Offices/

Court(s) of Evidenced Treason Claims As is REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW,

the Appellant/Plaintiff IMMEDIATELY informed the following parties of actions

identified as TREASON under ARTICLE III, Section 3 of The United States

Constitution:

a. The US District Court (Boston, MA);

b. The US Appeals Court of the First Circuit;

c. The Executive Office of The President (EOP);

d. The Department of Justice (DOJ);

e. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI);

f. Members of Congress including (but not limited to) US Senator Elizabeth

Warren (D-MA) AND US Congresswoman Niki Tsongas (D-MA);

g. Governor Charles Baker (R-MA).

3. Suggesting that the Crime of Treason is Non-Existent Again comes with NO

VALID ARGUMENT as to how Appellees/Defendants arrived at their conclusion.

 Instead, it reveals yet another act of desperation to avoid criminal accountability.

Suggesting that there is no liability is simply FALSE. Their collective decision NOT TO

REPORT evidenced Acts of Treason is not only criminal, it is unacceptable, and

SHOULD be considered DISCRACEFUL to this NATION and to the industries

which they represent.

4. UNOPPOSED CLAIMS - The Appellant respectfully reminds the Court that aside from

UNOPPOSED Treason Claims against referenced officers of the Court, the evidenced 1.)

MISPRISION, 2.) FRAUD ON THE COURT AND 3.) ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE

claims against ALL Appellees/Defendants ALSO stand as UNOPPOSED.

5. Enforcing CRIMINAL Statutes The evidenced criminal claims of Treason, and

Misprision of Treason are added to the list of other criminal claims associated with this

litigation. The Appellant is fully aware that as a private citizen, he cannot enforce a

criminal statute. The Appellant has however, appropriately brought these EVIDENCED

CRIMINAL CLAIMS to the rightful attention of the Court, as well as to the attention

of both STATE AND FEDERAL PROSECUTORS. The gravity of these evidenced

claims is believed to impact the betterment of The United States, is considered to

impact matters of National Security, and has certainly warranted the attention of

Congress as well as The President.

IF SOMEHOW, these evidenced criminal claims are ignored by the appropriate

prosecuting authority, it will show cause to bring INCREMENTAL claims against The

United States including (but not limited to):

a. Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law;

b. Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights;

 c. Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1001 Fraud and False Statements;

d. Title 42 Sec. 1983, Civil action for Deprivation of Rights;

6. Incremental Reasons for the Court to Assist with the Appointment of Counsel As

if the Court needed another VALID reason(s) to assist this Appellant with the

appointment of counsel, the increasing complexity of legal issues that must be addressed

certainly warrants exercising legal discretion here under 28 U.S.C. 1915.

The Court is respectfully reminded that JURISDICTION still remains an issue. Circuit

Judges - Torruella, Kayatta, Barron, Thompson, and Chief Justice Howard are considered

to have lost jurisdiction and are no longer allowed to rule in this litigation. Any attempt to

do so will be interpreted by the Appellant as an incremental act(s) of Treason under ARTICLE

III.

Therefore, based on the clearly evidenced record supporting these criminal claims, a

DEMAND is respectfully made for the appropriate Federal prosecuting authority to timely come

forward with charges to match these evidenced claims. The Appellant also respectfully re-states

the DEMAND to correct past erred judgments and finally assist with the appointment of

counsel.

Finally, for documentation purposes, after sending a copy of this court document to the

President, the email from The White House confirming receipt is attached (See Attachment A).

If there is a question regarding ANY portion of this REPLY, the Appellant is happy to provide
additional supporting information upon request, in a separate hearing and with the presence of an

independent court reporter.

Respectfully submitted this 18th Day of October, 2017.

Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
Mo.harihar@gmail.com
 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 18, 2017 I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of
Court using the CM/ECF System, which will send notice of such filing to the following
registered CM/ECF users:

Jeffrey B. Loeb
David Glod
David E. Fialkow
Kevin Patrick Polansky
Matthew T. Murphy
Kurt R. McHugh
Jesse M. Boodoo

Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
Mo.harihar@gmail.com
Attachment A