Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Login
Submit Manuscript
AAP Policy & Collections
Alerts
Subscribe
aap.org
Sign up for Insight Alerts highlighting editor-chosen studies with the greatest impact on
clinical care.
Advertising Disclaimer
Pediatrics
April 2010, VOLUME 125 / ISSUE 4
Article
Figures & Data
Info & Metrics
Comments
Download PDF
Abstract
CONTEXT: Brain injury is the most common long-term complication of congenital heart
disease requiring surgery during infancy. It is clear that the youngest patients undergoing
cardiac surgery, primarily neonates and young infants, are at the greatest risk for brain injury.
Developmental anomalies sustained early in life have lifelong repercussions.
RESULTS: All of the identified studies reported results of the Bayley Scales of Infant
Development for children younger than the age of 3. Outcome data as reported by the Bayley
Scales were combined for infants assessed at 1 year of age, revealing a weighted mean
Mental Development Index of 90.3 (95% confidence interval: 88.991.6) and Psychomotor
Development Index of 78.1 (95% confidence interval: 76.479.7). Additional analysis was
limited by a lack of data at preschool and school age.
cardiac surgery
congenital heart defects
brain injury
developmental disabilities
Survival rates have improved for infants undergoing cardiac surgery in infancy.
Unfortunately, neurologic morbidity is a concern for some survivors. Despite growing
awareness of morbidity, there have been no systematic reviews that have examined such
outcomes in the current surgical era.
A systematic review was performed, considering motor and cognitive outcomes after cardiac
surgery at up to 6 months of age. Our detailed analysis of the literature provides an important
update and a template for future studies.
Over the last 2 decades, advances in surgical technique and intensive care for infants
undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) have led to a decline in mortality.1 As
survival has improved, long-term disability is now considered a key outcome measure for
these patients. Brain injury is the most significant complication of surgery for CHD.
Neuropathologic specimens24 or cerebral imaging techniques such as ultrasound57 and
MRI8,,16 have revealed a spectrum of congenital and acquired insults in up to half of the
infants who undergo cardiac surgery. Compared with older children, the youngest infants are
at greatest risk of brain injury because of the vulnerability of developing white matter to
acute changes in perfusion and oxygenation,17 the greater complexity of the surgery
performed, and the associated physiology. Although imaging modalities give us valuable
insights into the nature and timing of cerebral injury, the paucity of data correlating findings
with long-term follow-up studies limits our ability to make predictions of neurologic outcome
from these results.
For the past 2 decades, concerns relating to brain injury in children undergoing open-heart
surgery, and the paucity of neurodevelopmental follow-up data, have been highlighted.18
Griffin et al19 published a comprehensive review of neurodisability after surgery for CHD
between 1980 and 2001. Of the 19 series identified, most concluded that children with CHD
were at increased risk for impaired neurodevelopment regardless of their lesion. However,
there was inconsistency in findings in the preschool- and school-aged populations,
predominantly because of the spectrum of CHD and the age at surgery. The authors
reinforced the lack of available longitudinal data regarding cognitive and neurologic status of
children with complex CHD.
METHODS
Eligibility Criteria
Types of Studies
This review included all randomized, controlled trials or prospective observational cohort
studies or collective reports of multiple prospective cohorts that met the inclusion criteria for
patients and outcome measures.
Patients
Outcome Measures
We included studies for which motor and/or cognitive outcome using a standardized
assessment tool were reported. These tools typically produce a developmental quotient or
mean assessment score, which is available for comparison to normative data.
Nonstandardized methods of evaluating these outcomes were not considered.
Search Strategy
A comprehensive search was undertaken by using Medline, the Cumulative Index to Nursing
and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Embase. Search terms included cardiovascular
surgical procedures or cardiac surgical procedures or heart defects, congenital and
brain injuries or child development or developmental disabilities or motor skills
disorders or psychomotor performance or psychological tests not syndrome or
chromosome disorders or chromosome aberrations. The search was limited to articles
published in English from 1988 to 2008. Two authors, Ms Snookes and Dr Gunn, reviewed
the initial search yield on the basis of title and abstract, and studies that did not meet the
inclusion criteria were excluded. The review authors then examined the full text of the
remaining articles to determine if they met the inclusion criteria. Reference lists from the
included articles were reviewed for additional studies.
Quantitative Analysis
Cognitive and motor outcome data were pooled into 3 age groups: early development (1 to <3
years); preschool age (35 years); and school age (>5 to 17 years). If serial assessments
within the specified age group were reported, data from the most recent assessment was used.
For example, if a study reported cognitive outcomes at 9 and 18 months, then the outcome at
18 months was used. If serial assessments across our specified age groups were reported, data
from the most recent assessment within each age category were used. For each study, mean
outcome values and SDs were reported. For studies for which outcomes using the same
outcome measure at the same time point were reported, a weighted estimate of mean outcome
values was performed. For these studies, heterogeneity was evaluated by using the I2 statistic.
The I2 statistic describes the percentage of total variation across studies that results from
heterogeneity rather than chance.26 A value of 0% indicates no observed heterogeneity, and
larger values show increasing heterogeneity. The possible reasons for heterogeneity were
explored by scrutinizing the studies and performing subgroup analyses when appropriate.
Authors of individual trials were contacted to obtain clarification of items when necessary.
RESULTS
Description of Studies
The search strategy initially identified 327 references, of which 266 were excluded on the
basis of the title and abstract. Six additional articles were identified through hand-searching,
of which 2 were excluded because of cross-sectional study design.27,28 Sixty-five publications
required more detailed examination, of which 40 were excluded for 1 or more of the
following reasons: an absence of developmental assessment tools and/or systematic reporting
of outcome measures at or beyond 1 year of age29,,33; 16 were excluded because of the
inclusion of infants whose age at primary surgery was >6 months, from which it was not
possible to extrapolate data from the younger subgroups32,34,,48; 7 were excluded because of
an indiscernible surgical period or surgical period before 198849,,55; and 12 were excluded
because of cross-sectional or retrospective study design.37,,40,42,45,46,56,,60
The final 25 articles that met all specified inclusion criteria considered only 8 cohorts; as
would be expected from longitudinal studies, many of these cohorts generated multiple
publications. Pertinent details of the publications that arose from these 8 studies, on which
our results are based, are presented in Table 1. Each cohort is discussed in detail below.
View inline
View popup
TABLE 1
Study 1
Study 1 was a single-center randomized, controlled trial of infants who underwent an arterial
switch operation for transposition of the great arteries (TGA) with either an intact ventricular
septum or a ventricular septal defect. Infants were randomly assigned to receive either low-
flow cardiopulmonary bypass or deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, with stratification
according to diagnosis and surgeon. Exclusion criteria were a birth weight of <2.5 kg, a
recognizable congenital syndrome, an associated extracardiac anomaly of greater than minor
severity, previous cardiac surgery, or the need for additional aortic arch reconstruction before
the first follow-up. Participants were assessed at 1, 4, and 8 years of age by using the Bayley
Scales of Infant Development I (BSID-I), the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of
Intelligence-Revised (WPPSI-R) and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale (PDMS), and
the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 3rd Edition, respectively.61,,72
Study 2
Study 3
Study 5
Study 6
Study 7
Study 8
Cognitive Outcome
Download figure
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1
Weighted mean BSID-II outcome scores at 1 year of age. Left, PDI; right, MDI. The PDI and
MDI have a mean developmental quotient of 100 (SD: 15).
For 1 of the 8 studies, cognitive evaluation at school age was reported, generating 7
publications.64,65,67,,70,72 One publication reported the primary data regarding cognitive
outcome at 8 years with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 3rd edition.68
Motor Outcome
Motor evaluation at preschool age using the PDMS was performed in 1 of the 8 studies,
generating 2 publications.65,66
DISCUSSION
In this comprehensive assessment of available literature, we identified 8 studies that provided
objective assessments of motor and/or cognitive outcomes after cardiac surgery during the
first 6 months of life. These cohorts considered infants with TGA (3), infants with a
functionally univentricular circulation (2), and patients with diverse congenital cardiac
malformations (3). All studies assessed motor and cognitive ability at between 1 and 3 years
of age, with all but 1 study reporting cognitive outcomes within 1 SD of the test mean. Motor
outcomes were typically worse, with 5 articles reporting motor quotients within 1 SD of the
expected outcome and 6 reporting scores between 1 and 2 SDs from the expected mean.
Although it was possible to combine data from 5 studies by using the same outcome measure
at 1 year of age, the results themselves are cautioned by the inclusion of heterogeneous
subgroups. The 5 samples showed a mean BSID-II MDI within 1 SD of the test mean and a
mean BSID-II PDI 2 SDs below the test mean; however, calculations represent 2 cohorts of
patients with functionally univentricular circulations and 3 cohorts with a diverse spectrum of
congenital cardiac malformations. Accordingly, moderate heterogeneity was calculated with
the I2 statistic, which, despite our relatively strict inclusion criteria, is reflective of variations
in cardiac diagnoses, as well as outcome variance between samples.
The paucity of longitudinal, long-term follow-up studies limits the interpretation of these
findings into the school years. We would have liked to perform an analysis of published
results at preschool and school age; however, there were inadequate data for children older
than 3 years of age. Cognitive outcomes between 3 and 5 years of age were reported for 3
studies, with only 1 including assessment of gross and fine motor domains. Raw data were
not provided in the motor study; however, patients were reported as on the 9th and 4th
percentiles for gross and fine motor function, respectively.66 Again, cognitive outcomes were
reported within 1 SD of the test mean. Cognitive outcome at school age was reported for only
1 study, with the sample mean being approximately 3 quotient points below the test mean.70
This study included visual-spatial and visual-motor skill testing (including time to complete a
grooved pegboard), and although a large proportion of results were of concern, examining
these outcomes was not a primary aim of this review. It should be noted that despite concerns
of developmental risk spanning decades, there is insufficient longitudinal data of the late
motor outcomes for children who undergo surgery in the first 6 months of life. The literature
may be considered difficult to interpret given the heterogeneity of CHD diagnoses, and the
very variable timing of surgery and follow-up. Indeed, a number of important studies were
excluded from our review for these reasons. As such, future research should be performed
and evaluated only by first defining the subgroup of interest.
Developmental brain disturbances and injury to cortical and deep nuclear gray matter have
been well described after infant cardiac surgery.8991 Typically, the risk of white matter injury
is greatest during the first weeks of postnatal life, during the most active period of
synaptogenesis and myelination.17,89,92 The vulnerability of immature oligodendrocytes is
further compounded by additional cardiovascular risk factors relating to the underlying lesion
and associated physiology and by the fact that the majority of the most complex operations
are performed on the sickest infants. Despite these widely recognized facts, a significant
percentage of the published literature combines neurodevelopmental outcomes of the
youngest patients with older ones. It was for this reason that a number of well-conducted
prospective studies could not be included in our systematic review. We chose to review only
those patients operated on before 6 months, given that surgery beyond this age tended to
largely fall into lower-risk, definitive procedures in infants and children with a more robust
and mature brain.
Attention to surgical variables has shaped the developmental outcome literature for children
with CHD and has influenced intraoperative practice. The Boston Circulatory Arrest Study
led to changes in surgical practice worldwide and stimulated considerable interest in the
association between neurodisability and CHD.62 We noted a wide variation among the studies
with regard to specific surgical factors such as pH strategy and the use and duration of deep
hypothermic circulatory arrest, which have been implicated as potential risk factors for
impaired outcome.35,69,87 We recognize that even within the confines of this review,
perioperative practice has evolved in a plethora of major as well as subtle ways, and this
could influence the findings reported. This is particularly relevant for extrapolation of results
in which changes to clinical practice were made during the time period between surgery and
outcome assessment for a single cohort. Examples of evolving practice over the past decade
include a U-turn in some centers back to circulatory arrest, modified surgical techniques
(eg, surgical strategies for HLHS), and perinatal and perioperative care in patients at high
risk, including the broader use of extracorporeal life support. Patient characteristics
themselves may too have evolved, with a tendency toward more complex surgery for patients
with lesions previously thought to be inoperable. The paramount message is that impairment-
based outcome studies of infants with CHD should be interpreted in light of sample
characteristics before, during, and after surgical intervention. Similarly, data describing
outcomes of children with a specific diagnosis such as TGA should be extrapolated to other
diagnostic groups with educated caution.
The scope of this review was limited by a number of important factors, including the paucity
of prospective studies, the fact that most assessments occurred at only 1 time point, the poor
sensitivity of early assessment tools, and that the assessment tools themselves changed over
time. Thus, the contribution of specific risk factors to outcome could not be examined.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review has shown that well-designed longitudinal studies form a rare but
potentially valuable basis for research into techniques for reducing the incidence of brain
injury or for modifying its long-term impact after cardiac surgery. Within a subgroup of
infants receiving cardiac surgery at <6 months of age, cognitive and motor developmental
domains were below the expected mean at all ages studied. Our review has shown that at 1
year of age, the risk of motor delay was greater than the risk of cognitive disability.
In an evolving field of medical and surgical management, more definitive outcomes are
critical for parent counseling and the provision of timely intervention for the individual.
Despite widespread awareness and concern regarding neurodisability in survivors of surgery
for CHD, this systematic review has identified the absolute need for focused long-term
studies to investigate the neurodevelopmental outcome of these infants at high risk.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Drs Catherine Limperopoulos, Annette Majnemer, and Frank Pigula for prompt
correspondence regarding data presented in published studies.
Footnotes
o Accepted November 24, 2009.
Address correspondence to Lara Shekerdemian, MD, MRCP, FRACP, Royal
Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. E-mail:
lara.shekerdemian@rch.org.au
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr Gunn receives a postgraduate health research
scholarship from the Murdoch Children's Research Institute; the other authors have
indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
CHD =
congenital heart disease
TGA =
transposition of the great arteries
BSID =
Bayley Scales of Infant Development
WPPSI =
Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence
PDMS =
Peabody Developmental Motor Scale
HLHS =
hypoplastic left heart syndrome
MDI =
Mental Developmental Index
CI =
confidence interval
PDI =
Psychomotor Developmental Index
REFERENCES
1.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Heart, Stroke & Vascular Diseases:
Australian Facts 2004. Canberra, Australia: AIHW and National Heart Foundation
of Australia; 2004. AIHW No. CVD 27
2.
1. Glauser TA,
2. Rorke LB,
3. Weinberg PM,
4. Clancy RR
3.
1. Glauser TA,
2. Rorke LB,
3. Weinberg PM,
4. Clancy RR
. Congenital brain anomalies associated with the hypoplastic left heart syndrome.
Pediatrics. 1990; 85(6): 984990
4.
1. Jones M
. Anomalies of the brain and congenital heart disease: a study of 52 necropsy cases.
Pediatr Pathol. 1991; 11(5): 721736
5.
1. Krull F,
2. Latta K,
3. Hoyer PF,
4. Ziemer G,
5. Kallfelz HC
6.
1. Miller G,
2. Eggli KD,
3. Contant C,
4. Baylen BG,
5. Myers JL
7.
1. Te Pas AB,
2. van Wezel-Meijler G,
3. Bokenkamp-Gramann R,
4. Walther FJ
8.
1. McQuillen P,
2. Barkovich A,
3. Hamrick S,
4. et al
. Temporal and anatomic risk profile of brain injury with neonatal repair of
congenital heart defects. Stroke. 2007; 38(2 suppl): 736741
9.
1. Miller G,
2. Mamourian AC,
3. Tesman JR,
4. Baylen BG,
5. Myers JL
. Long-term MRI changes in brain after pediatric open heart surgery. J Child Neurol.
1994; 9(4): 390397
10.
1. Ashwal S,
2. Holshouser BA,
3. del Rio MJ,
4. Tong KA,
5. Applegate RL,
6. Bailey LL
11.
1. Ashwal S,
2. Holshouser BA,
3. Hinshaw DB Jr.,
4. Schell RM,
5. Bailey L
12.
1. McConnell J
. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in infants and children before and after
cardiac surgery: a prospective study. Am J Dis Child. 1990; 144(3): 374378
13.
1. Mahle WT,
2. Tavani F,
3. Zimmerman RA,
4. et al
. An MRI study of neurological injury before and after congenital heart surgery.
Circulation. 2002; 106(12 suppl 1): I109I114
14.
1. Galli KK,
2. Zimmerman RA,
3. Jarvik GP,
4. et al
. Periventricular leukomalacia is common after neonatal cardiac surgery [published
correction appears in J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128(3):498]. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 127(3): 692704
15.
1. Dent CL,
2. Spaeth JP,
3. Jones BV,
4. et al
16.
1. Miller SP,
2. McQuillen PS,
3. Hamrick S,
4. et al
17.
1. Rezaie P,
2. Dean A
18.
1. Ferry P
19.
1. Griffin KJ,
2. Elkin TD,
3. Smith CJ
. Academic outcomes in children with congenital heart disease. Clin Pediatr (Phila).
2003; 42(5): 401409
20.
1. Miatton M,
2. De Wolf D,
3. Francois K,
4. Thiery E,
5. Vingerhoets G
. Neurocognitive consequences of surgically corrected congenital heart defects: a
review. Neuropsychol Rev. 2006; 16(2): 6585
21.
1. Wernovsky G
22.
1. Goldberg C
23.
1. Ballweg JA,
2. Wernovsky G,
3. Gaynor JW
24.
1. Karsdorp PA,
2. Everaerd W,
3. Kindt M,
4. Mulder BJM
25.
1. Massaro AN,
2. El-dib M,
3. Glass P,
4. Aly H
26.
1. Higgins JPT,
2. Thompson SG,
3. Deeks JJ,
4. Altman DG
28.
1. Hvels-Grich HH,
2. Seghaye MC,
3. Sigler M,
4. et al
29.
1. Cheung PY,
2. Chui N,
3. Joffe AR,
4. Rebeyka IM,
5. Robertson CMT
30.
1. Majnemer A,
2. Limperopoulos C,
3. Shevell M,
4. Rosenblatt B,
5. Rohlicek C,
6. Tchervenkov C
31.
1. Veelken N,
2. Gravinghoff L,
3. Keck EW,
4. Freitag HJ
33.
1. Bartlett JM,
2. Wypij D,
3. Bellinger DC,
4. et al
34.
1. Newburger JW,
2. Jonas RA,
3. Soul J,
4. et al
35.
1. Bellinger DC,
2. Wypij D,
3. du Plessis AJ,
4. et al
36.
1. Wypij D,
2. Jonas RA,
3. Bellinger DC,
4. et al
. The effect of hematocrit during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in infant heart
surgery: results from the combined Boston hematocrit trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg. 2008; 135(2): 355360
37.
1. Sarajuuri A,
2. Jokinen E,
3. Puosi R,
4. et al
38.
1. Miatton M,
2. De Wolf D,
3. Francois K,
4. Thiery E,
5. Vingerhoets G
39.
1. Miatton M,
2. De Wolf D,
3. Francois K,
4. Thiery E,
5. Vingerhoets G
40.
1. McCusker CG,
2. Doherty NN,
3. Molloy B,
4. et al
41.
1. Hvels-Grich HH,
2. Konrad K,
3. Skorzenski D,
4. et al
. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome and exercise capacity after corrective
surgery for tetralogy of Fallot or ventricular septal defect in infancy. Ann Thorac
Surg. 2006; 81(3): 958966
42.
1. Karl TR,
2. Hall S,
3. Ford G,
4. et al
43.
1. Dittrich H,
2. Buhrer C,
3. Grimmer I,
4. Dittrich S,
5. Abdul-Khaliq H,
6. Lange PE
44.
1. Jonas RA,
2. Wypij D,
3. Roth SJ,
4. et al
45.
1. Forbess JM,
2. Visconti KJ,
3. Hancock-Friesen C,
4. Howe RC,
5. Bellinger DC,
6. Jonas RA
46.
1. Forbess JM,
2. Visconti KJ,
3. Bellinger DC,
4. Jonas RA
47.
1. Yang LL,
2. Liu ML,
3. Townes BD
48.
1. Iwamoto I,
2. Baba H,
3. Koga Y,
4. et al
. The relation between EEG and mental development following cardiac surgery
performed under simple deep hypothermia in children. Jpn J Surg. 1990; 20(2): 158
162
49.
1. Jonas RA,
2. Bellinger DC,
3. Rappaport LA,
4. et al
50.
1. Rogers BT,
2. Msall ME,
3. Buck GM,
4. et al
51.
1. Oates RK,
2. Simpson JM,
3. Turnbull JA,
4. Cartmill TB
. The relationship between intelligence and duration of circulatory arrest with deep
hypothermia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995; 110(3): 786792
52.
1. Miller G,
2. Tesman JR,
3. Ramer JC,
4. Baylen BG,
5. Myers JL
. Outcome after open-heart surgery in infants and children. J Child Neurol. 1996;
11(1): 4953
53.
1. Haneda K,
2. Itoh T,
3. Togo T,
4. Ohmi M,
5. Mohri H
54.
1. Park IS,
2. Yoon SY,
3. Min JY,
4. et al
55.
1. Mendoza JC,
2. Wilkerson SA,
3. Reese AH
. Follow-up of patients who underwent arterial switch repair for transposition of the
great arteries. Am J Dis Child. 1991; 145(1): 4043
56.
1. Goldberg CS,
2. Schwartz EM,
3. Brunberg JA,
4. et al
57.
1. Mahle WT,
2. Clancy RR,
3. Moss EM,
4. Gerdes M,
5. Jobes DR,
6. Wernovsky G
58.
1. Kern JH,
2. Hinton VJ,
3. Nereo NE,
4. Hayes CJ,
5. Gersony WM
. Early developmental outcome after the Norwood procedure for hypoplastic left heart
syndrome. Pediatrics. 1998; 102(5): 11481152
59.
1. Hvels-Grich HH,
2. Seghaye MC,
3. Dabritz S,
4. Messmer BJ,
5. von Bernuth G
60.
1. Bellinger DC,
2. Wernovsky G,
3. Rappaport LA,
4. et al
61.
1. Bellinger DC,
2. Rappaport LA,
3. Wypij D,
4. Wernovsky G,
5. Newburger JW
63.
1. Rappaport LA,
2. Wypij D,
3. Bellinger DC,
4. et al
64.
1. McGrath E,
2. Wypij D,
3. Rappaport LA,
4. Newburger JW,
5. Bellinger DC
65.
1. de Ferranti S,
2. Gauvreau K,
3. Hickey PR,
4. et al
66.
1. Bellinger DC,
2. Wypij D,
3. Kuban KC,
4. et al
. General health status of children with D-transposition of the great arteries after the
arterial switch operation. Circulation. 2001; 104(12 suppl 1): I138I142
68.
1. Bellinger DC,
2. Bernstein JH,
3. Kirkwood MW,
4. Rappaport LA,
5. Newburger JW
69.
1. Wypij D,
2. Newburger JW,
3. Rappaport LA,
4. et al
. The effect of duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in infant heart surgery
on late neurodevelopment: the Boston Circulatory Arrest Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg. 2003; 126(5): 13971403
70.
1. Bellinger DC,
2. Wypij D,
3. duDuplessis AJ,
4. et al
71.
1. Cottrell SM,
2. Morris KP,
3. Davies P,
4. Bellinger DC,
5. Jonas RA,
6. Newburger JW
. Early postoperative body temperature and developmental outcome after open heart
surgery in infants. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004; 77(1): 6671
72.
1. Newburger JW,
2. Wypij D,
3. Bellinger DC,
4. et al
. Length of stay after infant heart surgery is related to cognitive outcome at age 8
years. J Pediatr. 2003; 143(1): 6773
73.
1. Visconti KJ,
2. Rimmer D,
3. Gauvreau K,
4. et al
74.
1. Ballweg JA,
2. Wernovsky G,
3. Ittenbach RF,
4. et al
75.
1. Gaynor JW,
2. Gerdes M,
3. Zackai EH,
4. et al
76.
1. Gaynor JW,
2. Jarvik GP,
3. Bernbaum J,
4. et al
77.
1. Gaynor JW,
2. Wernovsky G,
3. Jarvik GP,
4. et al
78.
1. Schultz AH,
2. Jarvik GP,
3. Wernovsky G,
4. et al
79.
1. Tabbutt S,
2. Nord AS,
3. Jarvik GP,
4. et al
80.
1. Goldberg CS,
2. Bove EL,
3. Devaney EJ,
4. et al
81.
1. Robertson DR,
2. Justo RN,
3. Burke CJ,
4. Pohlner PG,
5. Graham PL,
6. Colditz PB
82.
1. Alton GY,
2. Robertson CMT,
3. Sauve R,
4. et al
. Early childhood health, growth, and neurodevelopmental outcomes after complete
repair of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection at 6 weeks or younger. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007; 133(4): 905911
83.
1. Freed DH,
2. Robertson CMT,
3. Sauve RS,
4. et al
84.
1. Robertson CMT,
2. Joffe AR,
3. Sauve RS,
4. et al
85.
1. Creighton DE,
2. Robertson CMT,
3. Sauve RS,
4. et al.
86.
1. Toet MC,
2. Flinterman A,
3. Laar Ivd,
4. et al
. Cerebral oxygen saturation and electrical brain activity before, during, and up to 36
hours after arterial switch procedure in neonates without pre-existing brain damage:
its relationship to neurodevelopmental outcome. Exp Brain Res. 2005; 165(3): 343
350
87.
1. Limperopoulos C,
2. Majnemer A,
3. Shevell MI,
4. et al
. Predictors of developmental disabilities after open heart surgery in young children
with congenital heart defects. J Pediatr. 2002; 141(1): 5158
88.
1. Majnemer A,
2. Limperopoulos C,
3. Shevell M,
4. Rohlicek C,
5. Rosenblatt B,
6. Tchervenkov C
89.
1. Miller SP,
2. McQuillen PS
. Neurology of congenital heart disease: insight from brain imaging. Arch Dis Child
Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007; 92(6): F435F437
90.
1. Kinney HC,
2. Panigrahy A,
3. Newburger JW,
4. Jonas RA,
5. Sleeper LA
. Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in infants with congenital heart disease dying after
cardiac surgery. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2005; 110(6): 563578
91.
1. du Plessis AJ
. Mechanisms of brain injury during infant cardiac surgery. Semin Pediatr Neurol.
1999; 6(1): 3247
92.
1. Volpe J
93.
1. Als H,
2. Duffy FH,
3. McAnulty GB,
4. et al
. Early experience alters brain function and structure. Pediatrics. 2004; 113(4): 846
857
94.
1. Spittle AJ,
2. Orton J,
3. Doyle LW,
4. Boyd R
95.
1. Darrah J,
2. Redfern L,
3. Maguire TO,
4. Beaulne AP,
5. Watt J
96.
1. Sand N,
2. Silverstein M,
3. Glascoe FP,
4. Gupta VB,
5. Tonniges TP,
6. O'Connor KG
97.
1. Glascoe FP,
2. Dworkin PH
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Advertising Disclaimer
Table of Contents
Early Release
Current Issue
Past Issues
AAP Policy & Collections
Editorial Board
Editorial Policies
Overview
Open Access
Pediatric Collections
Author Guidelines
Reviewer Guidelines
Submit My Manuscript
Subjects
Cardiology
o Cardiac Surgery
o Cardiology
Children With Special Health Care Needs
o Children With Special Health Care Needs
Related Articles
1. Bypass procedure used during infant heart surgery does not impair later neurological
outcomes
4. Heart bypass for uncomplicated heart surgery does not reduce neurocognitive function
in children, study finds
Powered by TrendMD
Copyright (c) 2017 by American Academy of Pediatrics
International Access
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement