Republic of the Philippines

7th Judicial Region

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Branch 3
City of Tagbilaran

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,

Plaintiff,
Crim. Case No. 15585
For: Reckless Imprudence
- versus - Resulting to Homicide

HENRY CONCON y PAN,

Accused.
x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -/

PRE-TRIAL ORDER

As part of the pre-trial proceedings of the instant case, the Court hereby
adopts the minutes of the preliminary conference that was conducted before the
Branch Clerk of Court of this Court on May 23, 2012, which include the markings
of documentary exhibits, admission of genuineness and due execution of
documents, and list of witnesses.

The following proposals for admission by the State were admitted by the
defense:

1. That, incident happened on 2/16/12;

2. That, the subject incident happened at CPG Ave., Ubujan District,
Tagbilaran City;
3. That, the subject incident involved is a Multi-cab for hire with Plate
No. GWW -844;
4. That, the owner of the subject vehicle as listed in the LTO document is
one Divina Bagaipo;
5. That, the driver of the subject multi-cab is herein accused Henry
Concon.

Additional Documentary Evidence for the Prosecution:

Exhibit J - Letter Request filed by PNP Traffic Enforcer P/Insp.

Antonio Samante of PNP, Tagbilaran City addressed to the
Registrar of LTO, Tagbilaran City.

Exhibit K - Certified true copy of the computer print-out issued by LTO

filed by Ma. Crisrose Doydoy which contains the details of
subject multi-cab vehicle which shows that the owner is
one Divina Bagaipo.

Page 1 of 2
 Exhibit K-1 - Plate No. GWW-844.
Exhibit K-2 - Type of vehicle & classification: for hire.
Exhibit K-3 - Name of owner Divina Bagaipo of Loreto, Cortes, Bohol.
Exhibit K-4 - Name & signature of Ma. Crisrose R. Doydoy of LTO.
Exhibit L - The subject vehicle itself (multi-cab).

AGREED TRIAL DATES:

January 9, 2014, February 7, 2014, March 7, 2014 and April 14, 2014 all at
9:00 oclock in the morning.

Let it be stressed that no evidence shall be allowed to be presented and

offered during the trial in support of a partys evidence-in-chief other than those
that had been identified and pre-marked during the preliminary conference and
pre-trial. Any other evidence not indicated or listed shall be considered waived
by the parties. However, the Court, in its discretion, may allow the introduction
of additional evidence in the following cases: (a) those to be used on cross-
examination or re-cross-examination for impeachment purposes; (b) those
presented on re-direct examination to explain or supplement the answers of a
witness during the cross-examination; (c) those to be utilized for rebuttal or
sur-rebuttal purposes; (d) those not available during the pre-trial proceedings
despite due diligence on the part of the party offering the same.

It is to be understood that the testimony of a particular witness of either

party should be completed on the scheduled date of hearing allotted to a
particular witness under the One-day Examination of Witness Rule. The Court
however, has the discretion on whether or not to extend the direct and/or cross-
examination of witnesses for good cause shown.

This pre-trial Order shall bind the parties, limit the trial to matters not
disposed of and control the course of the action during the trial

SO ORDERED.

Issued in chambers this 2nd of January 2014, in the City of Tagbilaran,

Bohol, Philippines.

LEO MOISES LISON

Presiding Judge

LML/dbv

Page 2 of 2