Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

POWER designer

Expert tips, tricks, and techniques for powerful designs

No. 128 national.com/powerdesigner

Average Current Limit Balances Center Point of


Half-Bridge Input Caps
By Ajay Hari, Senior Applications Engineer and Robert Oppen, Design Manager

Introduction
Power converters based on the half-bridge topology input voltage. From both performance and cost
are widely employed in the power supply industry and perspectives, these limitations are undesirable.
are increasingly popular in telecom industry-standard To overcome these limitations, average current limit is
quarter- and eighth-brick formats. The half-bridge topology proposed. Average current limit balances the center
offers high efficiency due to its transformers double- point of the half-bridge capacitor divider and avoids its
ended nature and good power handling up to 500W. It drift during an overload condition. Further, it does not
has the least primary device ratings compared to any alter the feed-forward voltage-mode control typically
isolated topology. The half-bridge topology ideally employed for the half bridge. It also retains the features
requires only one-half the voltage ratings for its input of a standard current limit, such as cycle-by-cycle
capacitors and primary FETs when compared to a full protection, fast response time during an overload event,
bridge. However, during an extended overload condition, and hiccup-mode restart.
with traditional cycle-by-cycle current limiting, the center
point of the half-bridge capacitive divider drifts either Operation of a Half-Bridge Topology
towards the input voltage or the ground. This leads to the A simplified schematic of a half-bridge topology is shown
saturation of the power transformer and requires the in Figure 1. The input capacitors C1 and C2, which form
FETs and the input capacitors to be rated to at least the one-half of the bridge, are arranged in series such that
the mid-point is at half the input voltage.
VIN

LM5039
VIN

Q1 C1
HO
UVLO
VOUT

ACL

Q2 C2
LO

RAMP
SR2
RT

SS SR1

COMP

AGND PGND Error AMP and


Isolation

Figure 1. Simplied Schematic of a Half-Bridge Topology


Maximize Efciency.
Minimize Downtime.
Energy-Efcient Wired and Data Center Applications
As data center energy consumption continues to grow worldwide, IT and facilities
professionals search for new ways to reduce power demands in existing and new
installations. Networking and server systems designers are tasked with increasing
performance and reliability, as well as decreasing system power consumption
and reducing operating expenses. National Semiconductors power management,
monitoring and control, and interface products deliver energy-efcient, cost-effective
solutions for critical communications systems.

CML Ethernet Port


Backplane Repeater

LVDS
Deserializer Ethernet
MAC
PHY
Network
MAC
CML LVDS Processor
Ethernet Port
Serializer
Ethernet
MAC PHY
I/O Port
PCIe
Stackable Stackable System
Repeater
Multi-phase Multi-phase Monitor
DDR
Backplane

PoL PoL CLK FPGA


Memory

Peripheral Card
PoL PoL
12V, 5V, 3.3V
Hot PoL
Swap
System and
I2C/SMBus
Controller Monitoring PoL
48VA
Hot
48V Swap Intermediate
ORing
Control Bus
FET
48VB and Converter
Monitoring

Shown: Data Center Equipment Diagram

Energy-Efcient Highly Reliable Truly Cost-Efcient


High-efciency PowerWise PCB protection and National offers integrated
Point-of-Load ICs, such monitoring ICs, such as solutions, such as the
as the new LM27402 and the new LM25066, and LM5035C, LM5039, and
the stackable LM3753 and system monitors like the new LM25066 to help reduce
LM3754 reduce power LM96080, ADC128D818, and design complexity and time
consumption and thermal LMV7231, maintain system to market while enabling
dissipation. health, while repeaters like smaller form factors and
the DS50PCI402 ensure lower system costs.
signal integrity for overall
system reliability.

national.com/comms
POWER designer
Average Current Limit Balances Center Point of Half-Bridge Input Caps
The other half of the bridge is formed by the switches Q1 Why Average Current Limit?
and Q2. Switches Q1 and Q2 are turned on alternatively During an overload event in a conventional cycle-by-
with a pulse width determined by the input and output cycle current limit implementation, the PWM cycle is
voltages and the transformer turns ratio. When turned terminated by the current sense comparator instead of
on, each switch applies one-half of the input voltage to the PWM comparator. This is similar to peak current-
the primary transformer. The resulting secondary mode control. As previously explained, peak current-
voltage is then rectified and filtered with an LC filter to mode control inherently results in unequal pulse
provide a constant output voltage. widths resulting in an imbalance at the center point
of the half-bridge capacitor divider. Figure 2 shows
Typically, half-bridge power converters are controlled
the waveforms of a half-bridge topology employing
using voltage-mode control. As with any other double-
traditional cycle-by-cycle current limit. The zoomed
ended topologies, such as push-pull or full-bridge, the
SW-node waveform in Figure 2 shows unequal pulse
half-bridge topology is also susceptible to transformer
widths causing the center point of the half-bridge
core saturation. In peak current-mode control for a
capacitor divider to drift. To overcome this drawback,
given load, the Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) cycle
a current limit circuit which balances the pulse widths
is termi-nated at the same current peak. If volts applied
and hence balances the input capacitor divider is
to the transformer in one phase are different from the
needed. This can be achieved by emulating voltage-
other, peak current-mode control adjusts the on-time to
mode control during current limit.
terminate at the same peak. Thereby, it balances the
volt-second product in both of the phases and avoids
transformer core saturation in both the push-pull and Center Point of Half-Bridge
Capacitor Divider
full-bridge topologies. However, this technique is not VOUT

applicable to the half-bridge topology because of the


soft center-point voltage of the half-bridge capacitor SW Node
divider. Any on-time imbalancewhich is inherent in
peak current-mode controlwill result in the center
Zoomed SW Node
point drifting towards either the ground or the input
voltage. And peak current-mode control merely
Unequal Pulse Width
reinforces this trend which leads to unregulated output
voltage and, possibly, transformer saturation.
Figure 2. Current Limit Waveforms of Half-Bridge
In voltage-mode control of the half-bridge topology, Topology Employing Peak Cycle-by-Cycle Current Limit
if one phase is on longerwhether due to device or
timing mismatchthen the voltage applied to the
transformer is lower because the capacitors are on
longer and are discharged further. The volt-second
product applied to the transformer from one phase to
another is thus balanced. The drift of the center point
of the capacitor divider acts as a negative feedback,
avoiding transformer saturation.

national.com/powerdesigner
3
POWER designer
Average Current Limit Balances Center Point of Half-Bridge Input Caps
The ACL capacitor should be selected for minimum
RAMP
LM5039 ripple. Ripple on the ACL capacitor will result in ripple
5V
at the center point of the half-bridge capacitor divider.
COMP
+ It should also be noted that a large value of the ACL
- Terminate
PWM
capacitor can slow down the time taken for the ACL
PWM
Comparator circuitry to take control. Therefore, the peak cycle-by-
-
600 mV
+ cycle current limit is in control longer, resulting in a
5V
Peak Cycle-by-Cyle Limit drift at the half-bridge center-point voltage.
CS
Average Current Limit
+
-
The response of the average current limit circuitry is
500 mV the same whether the short is a soft or hard short.
ACL
+5V During an overload event, the ACL circuitry converts
Frequency
Hiccup-
Foldback
Mode
22 A the power supply into a constant current source such
Logic
RES that the average output current is equal to:
C ACL
12 A

NPRI 500 mV
IOUT = ( )x x CTTURNS
NSEC RCS
Figure 3. Average Current Limit Circuit Implementation
in LM5039 Half-Bridge Controller
Where NPRI and NSEC are primary and secondary turns
of the power transformer, RCS is the current sense
Average Current Limit Implementation
resistor, and CTTURNS is the number of turns of the
In the LM5039 half-bridge controller, the Average
current sense transformer. This scheme is often known
Current Limit (ACL) is implemented by monitoring the
as brickwall current limiting.
voltage at the CS pin with two comparators with
different reference voltages. As shown in Figure 3, the The brickwall current limiting feature is highly
ACL comparator has a threshold that is set to 0.5V and desirable because of the predictability of the onset of
is used to implement a slower average current limit. the current limit at different input line voltages.
The cycle-by-cycle current limit comparator has a However, in a fixed-frequency converter, the average
threshold of 0.6V and is used to provide instant output current exhibits a tail in hard-short conditions.
protection to the power converter. When the 0.5V
threshold is crossed at the CS pin, the ACL comparator 3.5
36V
enables a current source to charge the ACL pin as 3
48V
long as the CS pin is above 0.5V. This quickly charges 2.5 75V
the ACL capacitor to a level that will eventually
VOUT (V)

2
terminate the PWM cycle by pulling down the internal
COMP node. This allows the ACL comparator to take 1.5

control of the current limit every cycle instead of 1


the 0.6V cycle-by-cycle current limit comparator. The 0.5
ACL capacitor provides an averaged signal that pulls
0
down the internal COMP to ensure that equal pulse 25 30 35 40
widths are delivered to both phases of the half-bridge IOUT (A)
in current limit. This approach to the current limit Figure 4. VOUT vs IOUT Curve Illustrating
implementation is similar to the voltage-mode control. Brickwall Current Limiting

4
POWER designer

The peak output-inductor current creeps up during the


Balanced Half-Bridge
on-time and does not have enough off-time to come VOUT
Capacitor Divider Voltage

back down. The minimum achievable on-time is limited


ACL Capacitor Voltage
due to propagation and turn-off delays. To avoid the SW Node

output current tail when the power converter is in


average current limit, the LM5039 controllers oscillator Zoomed SW Node

frequency is proportionally decreased. In a hard-short


condition, the oscillator frequency is reduced to one- Equal Pulse Width

third the oscillator frequency set by the RT resistor.


The frequency foldback is implemented only in the ACL Figure 5. Balanced Half-Bridge Capacitor Waveform in a
condition and does not affect the AC response of the Soft-Short Condition Employing Average Current Limit
control loop. A VOUT vs. IOUT curve, shown in Figure 4,
illustrates the brickwall current limiting.

Results
It can be observed from Figures 5 and 6 that the center
Balanced Center Point of the
point of the half-bridge capacitor divider is balanced in Half-Bridge Capacitor Divider

both soft-short and hard-short conditions. In both of VOUT

the waveforms, it can be seen that prior to the ACL


capacitor charging, the center point starts to drift, but ACL Capacitor
SW Node
once the ACL circuit is in control, the center point is
balanced. From the zoomed trace, it is also clear that
Equal Pulse Width
the average current limit circuitry maintains equal Zoomed SW Node

pulse width to both of the phases of the half bridge.


The ACL capacitor charges faster in a soft-short con- Figure 6. Balanced Half-Bridge Capacitor Waveform in a
dition compared to a hard-short condition owing to the Hard-Short Condition Employing Average Current Limit
difference in pulse widths in both of these conditions.
Frequency foldback can also be seen in Figure 6 by
closely observing the zoomed switch node waveform.

Summary
Traditional peak current cycle-by-cycle current limiting the center point of the half-bridge capacitor divider.
will cause the center point of the half-bridge capacitor The average current limit is activated only during an
divider to drift towards the input rail or ground. To overload condition and it does not affect the typical
avoid this, in the LM5039 PWM controller, a combination feed-forward control employed for the half-bridge
of peak current and average current limiting has been topology or interfere with the AC response of the loop.
implemented. While the peak current limiting gives the
instantaneous protection to the power converter, the Visit national.com/comms to learn more about current
average current limiting takes the control of current limiting schemes and National's complete family of
limiting in few cycles and prevents the voltage drift in isolated PWM controllers.

national.com/powerdesigner
5
Power Design Tools

Design, build, and test analog circuits in this online


design and prototyping environment.
national.com/webench

Expand your knowledge and understanding of


analog with our free online educational training
tool.
national.com/training

Nationals monthly analog design technical


journal.
national.com/edge

Tools for Energy-Efficient Designs


Access white papers, reference designs, and application notes on
PowerWise products and systems.
national.com/powerwise

National Semiconductor
2900 Semiconductor Drive
Dont miss a single issue!
Santa Clara, CA 95051
Subscribe now to receive email alerts when
1 800 272 9959
new issues of Power Designer are available:
Mailing address:
national.com/powerdesigner
PO Box 58090
Santa Clara, CA 95052
Read our Signal Path Designer online
today at:
Visit our website at:
national.com national.com/spdesigner

For more information,


send email to:
new.feedback@nsc.com

National Semiconductor Corporation, April 2010. National Semiconductor, , PowerWise, Signal Path Designer, and WEBENCH are registered trademarks of
National Semiconductor. All other brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. All rights reserved.

550263-019
550263-019

Вам также может понравиться