Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Case Analysis 2
Student Identification Section (enter your name and NetID below and in the document footer)
Name: Pontius, Molly
UANetID: mollypontius
Excel Application Section
Task 1(a):
Task 1(b):
Note: The first set of tasks for Question 2 will be performed prior to showing us
your work. Please fill in the answers for tasks in the designated spaces.
Task 2(a):
Above Average
Salesperson Qtr_1 Qtr_2 Qtr_3 Qtr_4 Total Sales Bonus
Total Sales
Task 2(b):
=SUMIF(TableSales[Employee],"Mathew Gonzales",TableSales[Quarter_1])
Task 2(c):
=SUMIF(TableSales[Employee],"Mathew Gonzales",TableSales[Quarter_2])
Task 2(d):
=SUMIF(TableSales[Employee],"Mathew Gonzales",TableSales[Quarter_3])
Task 2(e):
=SUMIF(TableSales[Employee],"Mathew Gonzales",TableSales[Quarter_4])
Task 2(f):
=SUM(B9:E9)
Task 2(h):
=PRODUCT(G9,0.05)
Task 2(i):
Automatically
computed (after $33,208 $32,672 $33,881 $35,803 Third Ranked ($-value of) Weekly Sales
you enter formulas
for Scenario 1)
Num. of
Salesperson Qtr_1 Qtr_2 Qtr_3 Qtr_4 Quarters Total Sales Bonus
Among Top 3
Task 2(k):
Harvey Garner
Aubrey Lloyd
Damian Hampton
Kenzie Padilla
Penelope Mccarthy
Names of Salespersons receiving a Bonus in Scenario 2
Harvey Garner
Damian Hampton
Kenzie Padilla
Explanation of why the scenarios can produce different results. Your
recommendation and reasons.
The first scenario is based on their overall performance because it uses their total
sales for the year, whereas the second scenario is based on performance per quarter
because they look at only per quarter sales. This is why they produce different
results. I would recommend scenario one because it would incentivize higher
performance throughout the whole year as opposed to just quarterly.