Department of Education

Region X
DIVISION OF MISAMIS OCCIDENTAL

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee/Ratee: MARK ANDREW F. JARANTILLA Name of Rater: EDWIN V. PALMA
Position: MASTER TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL II
Review Period: OCTOBER 2016/APRIL 2017
Division : MISAMIS OCCIDENTAL Date of Review: APRIL 2017
School: TAGUANAO INTEGRATED

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Results

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA
RATING SCORE
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave
Professional Growth

Quality and Efficiency

and Development

Conducted capacity training for teachers through

BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

LAC session
1. Conducted
seminars/workshops/LAC/ June 2016 - 5 - all documents are present all documents are
March 2017
15.0% 5 5 5 5 5 0.750
for teachers in specific 4 - if 1 document is missing present
learning areas 3 - if 2 documents are missing
2 - if 3 documents are missing
1 - no supporting document
 Quality and Efficiency 5-
attended at least 4 trainings and other related activities within a
year

Professional Growth and 4 - attended at least 3 trainings and other related activities within a
year
Development
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

3 - attended at least 2 trainings and other related activities within a

year
2. Attended seminars,
2 - attended at least 1 trainings and other related activities within a attended 5
workshops/trainings within a June 2016 -
March 2017
10.0% year trainings and other 5 5 5 5 5 0.500
year (Division, regional or
1 - no training attended related activities
national) Means of Verification:

1. Certificate of Recognition
2. Certificate of Appearance
3. Travel Order
4. Memorandum

Quality and Efficiency Served as

a trainer in School/District Based LAC Session
Professional

5 - all documents are present

Development
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

Growth and

Served as trainer in
4 - if 1 document is missing school/district
3. Served as demonstration
June 2016 -
teacher for school/division March 2017
10.0%
3 - if 2 documents are missing
based LAC session 4 4 4 4 4 0.400
level trainings with all documents
2 - if 3 documents are missing present

1 - no supporting document
 Quality and Efficiency 5 - 91% -
Instructional
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

Competence
100% required teaching load handled in a year

1. Handled regular teaching 4 - 85% - 90% required teaching load handled in a year
June 2016 - Handle 91% to 100%
load for the assigned learning March 2017
10.0% 5 5 5 5 5 0.500
teaching load
area 3 - 70% - 84% required teaching load handled in a year
2 - 51% - 69% required teaching load handled in a year
1 - 50% and below required teaching load handled in a year
Instructional

Quality and Efficiency 5 - at least

BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

Competence

5% increase in achievement level in a year

2. Increased
achievement/proficiency level
of students on learning area at
least 2% to 5%
At least 5 % increase in
June 2016 - 4 - at least 4% increase in achievement level in a year proficiency level on
March 2017
10.0% 4 4 4 4 4 0.400
learning areas in
3 - at least 3% increase in achievement level in a year succeeding quarters
2 - at least 2% increase in achievement level in a year
1 - at least 1% increase in achievement level in a year

Quality and Efficiency 5 - 100% of

the required competencies for the students completed in a year
Instructional
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

Competence

4 - 95% - 99% of the required competencies for the students

3. Completed the required
competencies for the students
within a year
completed in a year
100% of the required
June 2016 - competencies for the
March 2017
10.0% 3 - 90% - 94% of the required competencies for the students 4 4 4 4 4 0.400
students completed in a
completed in a year
year
2 - 51% - 89% of the required competencies for the students
completed in a year
1 - 50% below of the required competencies for the students
completed in a year

Instructional Supervision
EDUCATION GOVERNANCE
1. Observed 100% of the
teachers in the school with
pre&post conference in every
quarter
Instructional
Supervision
EDUCATION GOVERNANCE
2. Provided
mentoring/coaching program
and technical assistance to
teachers in the school on
quarterly basis
QUALITY AND EFFICIENCY
Assisted the principal in instructional monitoring and evaluation of
teachers through observation.
5 - if 91% to 100% is monitored and evaluated
4 - if 81% to 90% is monitored and evaluated
3 - if 71% to 80% is monitored and evaluated
2 - if 61% to 70% is monitored and evaluated Quality and Efficiency:
1 - if 60% and below is monitored and evaluated 91% to 100% is monitored
and supervised
June 2016 - TIMELINESS Timeliness: Assisted the
March 2017
10.0% 4 4 4 4 4 0.400
5 - Assisted the principal in instructional monitoring and principal in instructional
supervision of teachers within targeted time monitoring and
4 - Assisted the principal in instructional monitoring and supervision of teachers
supervision of teachers within targeted time within the targeted time
3 - Assisted the principal in instructional monitoring and
supervision of teachers 2 days within targeted time
2 - Assisted the principal in instructional monitoring and
supervision of teachers 3 days within targeted time
1 - Assisted the principal in instructional monitoring and
supervision of teachers 4 days within targeted time
Quality and Efficiency Provided
appropriate coaching/mentoring program and technical assistance
Provided approapriate
to 3 teachers using localized monitoring tools with results
coaching and mentoring
June 2016 - program and technical
March 2017
10.0% 5 - if 91% to 100% is provided 5 5 5 5 5 0.500
assistance to 3 teachers
4 - if 81% to 90% is provided
using monitoring tools
3 - if 71% to 80% is provided
with results
2 - if 61% to 70% is provided
1 - if 51% and below is provided
 Quality and efficiency Managed
Instructional performance of teachers following rpms cycle

3. Managed performance of
Supervision
EDUCATION GOVERNANCE

5 - evaluated 100% teacher performance following the rpms

teachers following the rpms framework cycle
Evaluated 100% teacher
cycle (planning, and 4 - evaluated 95% to 99% teacher performance following the rpms
June 2016 - performance following
commitments, coaching and March 2017
10.0% framework cycle 4 4 4 4 4 0.400
the rpms framework
mentoring, review and 3 - evaluated 90% to 94% teacher performance following the rpms
cycle
evaluation and development framework cycle
planning) 2 - evaluated 51% to 89% teacher performance following the rpms
framework cycle
1 - evaluated 50% and below teacher performance following the
rpms framework cycle

Quality and Efficiency

BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

5 - action research conducted and utilized division wide with research

RESEARCH

proposal, research report, proposed learning intervention and proposed

1. Conducted action research monitoring and evaluation (M&E)of results
June 2016 - No action research
related to school March 2017
2.5% 4 - action research conducted and utilized division wide with required
conducted
1 1 1 1 1 0.025
concerns/problems within a year evidences
3 - action research conducted and utilized by the school
2 - with approved action research proposal
1 - no action research
 Quality and Efficiency 5 - Coach
a 1st place winner in district, division, region or national contest
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

PLUS FACTOR
4 - Coach a 2st place winner in district, division, region or national
1. Coach pupils to represent contest
school in competition. June 2016 - 3 - Coach a 3st place winner in district, division, region or national Coach a 1st Place winner in
2.5% 5 5 5 5 5 0.125
(District,Division, Regional, and March 2017 contest the division
National Level) 2 - Coach a contestant in a division level
1 - Coach a contestant in a district level

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned 100%
Over-all Rating of Accomplishments 4.400
Descriptive Rating Very Satisfactory

EDWIN V. PALMA MARK ANDREW F. JARANTILLA EDWIN V. PALMA

Rater Ratee Approving Officer