Electronics
THIRD EDITION
JOSEPH T. VERDEYEN
Department ofElectrical and Computer Engineering
University ofIllinois at UrbanaChampaign, Urbana, Illinois
PRENTICE HALL
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632
Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data
Verdeyen, Joseph Thomas
Laser electronics. / Joseph T. Verdeyen.  3rd ed.
p. cm.  (Prentice Hall series in solid state physical electronics)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 013 706666 X
I. Lasers. 2. Semiconductor lasers. I. Title. II. Series.
TA1675.V47 1995
621.36'61dc20 932184
CIP
The author and publisher of this book have used their best efforts in preparing this book. These efforts include the
development, research, and testing or the theories and programs to determine their effectiveness. The author and publisher
make no warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, with regard to these programs or the documentation contained in this
book. The author and publisher shall not be liable in any event for incidental or consequential damages in connection with,
or arising out of, the furnishing, performance, or use of these programs.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
ISBN 013706666X
The underlying philosophy of this third edition of Laser Electronics is the same as in the
previous two: lasers are very simple devices and are far simpler than the very complicated
high frequency RF or microwave transistor circuits. The main purpose of the book is to
convince the student of this fact. In one sense, lasers are a simple movement of the decimal
point on the frequency scale three to five places to the right, but much of the terminology
and all of the insight developed by the earlier pioneers of radio have been translated to the
optical domain.
The potential of the many applications oflasers and optical phenomena has necessi
tated the formation of a new word to describe the field: photonics. One would be hard pressed
to define all of its ramifications since new ideas, devices, and applications are frequently
being added. In a very loose sort of way, the early history of radio is being repeated in the
optical frequency domain, and this is a theme that will be employed throughout the book.
Although both have a common basis in electromagnetic theory, there are special phenomena
peculiar to the optical wavelengths.
For instance, a wave intensity of 1015 _10 19 watts/m 2 would have been incomprehensi
ble in 1960, but is now attainable with rather common lasers and comparativel y cheap optics.
Similarly, a 50 femtoseconds (50 x 10 15 s) pulse requires more frequency bandwidth for
transmission than that which was installed in all of the telecommunications networks of
1960. Yet such a pulse is rather common with optical techniques.
The ability to generate such short pulses and transmit them over significant dis
tances (many hundreds of kilometers) by using low loss fibers and erbiumdoped fiber
v
vi Preface
amplifiers (EDFA) was a major impetus for the revisions incorporated into this third
edition.
Chapter 4 has been changed to emphasize some of the more sophisticated aspects of
guided wave propagation, such as dispersion in fibers, solitons, and perturbation theory. By
necessity, the chapter is an introduction intended to encourage further investigation. While
those are important topics for a communication system, they may be too involved for a first
course in lasers. Thus, the entire chapter can be skipped if the focus of the course is on the
generation portion of photonics.
Chapter 9 has been rewritten and reorganized to emphasize the dynamics of the laser:
the approach to CW oscillation, Q switching, and various aspects of mode locking. The
latter has been greatly expanded, but, even so, there are important topics not included.
Various additions have been included in Chapter lOon specific laser systems. The
example of a semiconductor laser pumping a YAG system was carried through in some
detail so as to emphasize the application of the theoretical tools developed in the previous
chapters and to indicate a significant application of the semiconductor laser. The erbium
doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) is also discussed here, and a fairly longwinded simplified
"problem" (with answers) is given to emphasize some of the unique considerations of the
topic and to encourage further investigation of the literature. The multiplicity oflevels of the
EDFA serves as an introduction to gain/absorption between bands and to tunable vibronic
lasers such as alexandrite, Ti.sapphire, and dye lasers.
Much of the expansion in photonics is being red by the improvements in the semicon
ductor laser, which has become the dominant laser for communication and control. Its use
as a pump for the fiber amplifiers and solidstate lasers has also become most important.
Chapter 11 has been expanded somewhat but is still intended to be an introduction to a
course devoted entirely to that laser.
Most students have a fair grasp of the beauty and elegance of electromagnetic theory
but have the mistaken view that the word photon somehow weakens its applicability. That
is unfortunate. The lowest power laser generates literally billions of photons per second,
and thus the classical field description of it is quite adequate. Even when the photon flux
becomes smallsay 10 to 100 SI, the classical field description will handle the practical
cases. Many of the advances in semiconductor lasers, in particular, can be traced to classical
electromagnetic theory of guidance of the modes by the heterostructures. Chapter 12 is
included to introduce the student to some of the more advanced topics, possibly to be
studied in a second course.
Chapters 13 and 14 are aimed at the student who wants a gradual transition to a
quantum theory of the laser while the simple theory is fresh. Chapter 14 is an attempt to
provide a bridge between the simple rate equation description of a laser and the more formal
quantum theory using the density matrix. The two approaches agree, precisely, for the case
of a CW twolevel system, but the former is much easier and more akin to the student's
background. The latter will handle the transient cases, scattering, twophoton phenomena,
etc., at the expense of considerably more mathematics. The serious student should become
aware of the transition between the two approaches, have confidence in both, and be aware
of the pitfalls and limitations, again in a second course. One of the main conclusions is that
Preface vii
a simple rate equation of laser phenomena is quite adequate and accurate most of the time.
A few cases that do not follow this rule are included.
Many more problems are included in this third edition with the primary purpose of
convincing the student of the transparent simplicity of the rate equation approach. Rate
equations are no more difficult than coupled circuit equations (or the differential equation
describing the student's finances): There is always a source (a salary) and a loss (expenses)
that mayor may not be in steady state equilibrium.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Joseph T. Verdeyen
Contents
List of Symbols xx
o Preliminary Comments 1
1.1 Introduction 8
1.2 Maxwell's Equations 9
1.3 Wave Equation for Free Space 10
1.4 Algebraic Form of Maxwell's Equations 11
1.5 Waves in Dielectrics 12
1.6 The Uncertainty Relationships 13
1.7 Spreading of an Electromagnetic Beam 15
ix
x Contents
2.1 Introduction 35
2.2 RatMatrix 35
2.3 Some Common Ray Matrices 37
2.4 Applications of Ray Tracing: Optical Cavities 39
2.5 Stability: Stability Diagram 42
2.6 The Unstable Region 44
2.7 Example of Ray Tracing in a Stable Cavity 44
2.8 Repetitive Ray Paths 47
2.9 Initial Conditions: Stable Cavities 48
2.10 Initial Conditions: Unstable Cavities 49
2.11 Astigmatism 50
2.12 Continuous LensLike Media 51
2.12.1 Propagation ofa Ray in an Inhomogeneous Medium, 53
2.12.2 Ray Matrix for a Continuous Lens, 54
2.13 Wave Transformation by a Lens 56
Problems 57
References and Suggested Readings 62
3 Gaussian Beams 63
3.1 Introduction 63
3.2 Preliminary Ideas: TEM Waves 63
3.3 LowestOrder TEMo,o Mode 66
Contents xi
4.1 Introduction 86
4.2 Optical Fibers and Heterostructures: A Slab Waveguide Model 87
4.2,1 ZigZag Analysis, 87
4.2.2 Numerical Aperture, 89
4.3 Modes in a StepIndex Fiber (or a Heterojunction Laser):
Wave Equation Approach 90
4.3.1 TE Mode it: = 0),92
4.3.2 TM Modes (Hz = 0),94
4.3.3 Graphic Solution/or the Propagation Constant: "R" and "V"
Parameters, 95
4.4 Gaussian Beams in Graded Index (GRIN) Fibers and Lenses 96
4.5 Perturbation Theory 102
4.6 Dispersion and Loss in Fibers: Data 105
4.7 Pulse Propagation in Dispersive Media: Theory 109
4.8 Optical Solitons 116
Problems 122
References and Suggested Readings 127
Problems 139
References and Suggested Readings 142
Problems 492
References and Suggested Readings 499
Problems 574
References and Suggested Readings 585
Problems 676
References and Suggested Readings 679
Problems 693
References and Suggested Readings 695
Problems 725
References and Suggested Readings 728
Appendices
Index 779
List of Symbols
with Typical
Dimensions
(Q in Coulombs; M mass in kg; L in length (em or m); T in seconds; W in Watts; E in
Joules; V in Volts; Temperature in K)
Roman Symbols
xx
Ust of Symbols xxi
L 2)
Im() Imaginary part of the quantity ( )
j The imaginary number ( 1) 1/2
j, J Conduction current (Amperes/area)
J Angular momentum quantum number
k conf c = 2nn/Ao with ko = w/c = 2n/Ao (LI)
k Wave vector = ke; (L I)
K.E. Kinetic energy (in Joules)
19 Length of gain medium (L)
In() Naturallog of ( )
L Laser intensity normalized to a saturation value
/
.c() Laplace transform of ( )
m*c(v) Effective mass in the conduction (valence) band (M in kg)
mo Free electron rest mass (9.1094 x 10 31 kg)
M Magnification of a beam (dimensionless)
n Population difference (N2  NJ) . Vol. (dimensionless)
or Index of refraction (Er ) 1/2 (dimensionless)
nc(E) Density of electrons in conduction band per unit of energy (L 3  Energy I )
ne Electron density (L 3)
ng Group index
n(v) or n(A) Frequency or wavelengthdependent refractive index (dimensionless)
nth Threshold value of population difference [N2  (g2/ gl )NJl . Volume
N Fresnel number (dimensionless)
N eq Equivalent Fresnel number (dimensionless)
NLS Nonlinear Schrodinger equation
Np Number of photons in the laser cavity
N tr Density of electron/holes at optical transparency (L 3)
Nv Number of modes in a volume V between 0 and v
N 2, 1 Density of states 2, 1 (L 3)
N 2(v) Nitrogen in a vibrational state v
p Hole density (L 3)
or Mode index
or Number of modes (or states) per unit of volume (L 3)
Ust of Symbols xxiii
Greek Symbols
By definition
Approximately equal to
Identical to
Absolute value of ( )
Gradient (L I)
Divergence (L I)
Curl (L l)
Laplacian
Partial deriviative
Preliminary
Comments
Before the 1960s, optics formed the basis for a relatively small industry involving rather
sedate and mature topics such as optical instruments, cameras, microscopes, and scientific
applications. Then the laser came on the scene, first the solidstate (ruby) laser, then the
gas laser, then the semiconductor injection laser. Now optics form the basis for many more
functions, products, and services.
At first, the standard joke was, "The laser is a solution in search of a problem." More
seriously, almost everybody recognized the potential of the laser in communications; in data
processing, storage, and retrieval; and even in eye surgery. The question to be answered
was, Could the laser do things that had not been done before, and could it do things better
and more economically than had previous devices and technologies? It is interesting to
observe that the initial applications of the laser have not been in the rather obvious fields
just listed but in new applications by ingenious people who understood the principles of the
laser and who understood the problems to be solved. Hence, we have laser transits, laser
pattern cutting, laser cutting of steel, and laser fusion, and we are starting to make inroads in
optical communications. The history of the laser in the field of communications illustrates
the point about "obvious" applications.
The frequency of the first laser, ruby, atA = 694.3 nm is 4.32 x 1014 Hz, a quantity of
interest to any communication engineer. If only 1% of this carrier frequency is used for the
information bandwidth, then we have a communication charmel that has two to three orders
of magnitude (10 2 to 103 ) more capacity than the widest band charmel in existence. Some
2 Preliminary Comments Chap. 0
of the microwave radiorelay links used by the telephone company have channel widths as
large as 10% of the carrier frequency. Consequently, one laser beam should be able to carry
a huge number of telephone conversations (bandwidth required per telephone conversation,
4 kHz) and many television programs (bandwidth 5 MHz) simultaneously.
There are, however, a few problems. We do not know how to modulate this carrier
at a 4 x 10 12 Hz rate; nor does the technology exist to demodulate at this rate nor can our
terminal equipment handle information at this rate. If that is not enough, we are not overly
confident of being able to transmit the information from point A to a distant point B with the
reliability afforded by microwave links. Finally, there was some doubt as to the reliability of
the laser. Consequently, communications by lasers with the same degree of sophistication
as is done at microwave frequencies lies in the future, but some inroads are being made.
The invention of glass fibers exhibiting very low loss has made laser communications
a viable alternative to wired links. After all, the world has practically exhausted highgrade
copper ore supplies, but we have not really touched the primary ingredient of glass, Sial
(i.e., sand). Thus the first "obvious" application of the laser, communications, had to wait
until 1977 for trial runs over shorthaul links.
Now, fiber optic links are the dominant communication channel being installed. A
significant question is "When will fiber arrive at the home?"
The point to be made is that obvious applications are not so straightforward and
simple. Most often, it is the materials that are the major impediment, but this should not
stop us from looking for other uses. For instance, a first major use of the ruby laser was in
the "trimming" of solidstate circuit components. In that case, we use the ability to focus
the energy of the laser onto a very small spot so as to vaporize the excess material.
Recently, there has been the marriage ofxerography, word processing with computers,
and the ability to modulate, deflect, and focus a laser beam to produce manuscript with nearly
the quality of offset printing, but at a fraction of the cost in capital equipment.
In view of this, then, we will not look at a laser from an applications standpoint.
Rather, we will try to introduce the elementary and simple principles of the laser itself, the
propagation of its radiation, and the elements of the detection problem. The word "simple"
was italicized to emphasize the goal of this textbook: to make the reader feel comfortable
with the following issues:*
1. What physical principles are involved in generation of the laser radiation? (2)
2. What peculiarities can be anticipated in the transmission oflaser beams? (1)
3. What are the characteristics and limitations of common detectors? (3)
Once the reader feels comfortable with an initial understanding, he or she can then read the
more advanced texts and current literature to obtain the finer points of the field of quantum
electronics.
One final comment should be made about the material. Lasers are quantum devices.
There is no avoiding that fact. However, it is not necessary to be familiar with every rule,
'The numbers in parentheses represent the order of the topics covered in this book.
Note to the Students 3
The object of the first part of this book is to provide sufficient tools to understand the
generation and propagation of coherent optical radiation without all of the mystic and
wonderful theorems associated with quantum mechanics. Most of the initial work is merely
an extension of lower frequency concepts with the proviso that one moves the decimal point
four to five places to the right on the frequency scale. This requires a few approximations
to justify this extension, but those are usually quite transparent and palatable to the most
casual observer. They lead to a simpler description of a generator of coherent waves than
is possible at RF or microwave frequencies but there are differences.
For instance, most optical amplifiers and components are bilateral (i.e., they transmit
the same relative value when driven from the right or left terminals, a feature considerably
different from a simple transistor amplifier). An optical amplifier is naturally bilateral, and
techniques for the suppression or encouragement of oscillation are easily identified. It is very
difficult to predict the performance of the transistor amplifier outside of its Class A or linear
regime, but it is trivial to consider an optical amplifier at any level until the optical signal
becomes so large that the amplifier selfdestructs (i.e., melts or explodes) or multiphoton
effects occur. Other contrasting simplifications will become apparent later.
Electromagnetic theory is most important, and all of the phenomena discussed in
elementary courses (for RF and microwave frequencies) can be taken over to the optical
domain with the shift in decimal point mentioned earlier. Not until one is quite advanced
in laser phenomena is the quantization of the field needed. The only issue needed that is
not explicit in Maxwell's equations is that energy comes in discrete packages, a multiple
of hv: But most of our cases involve "billions" of photons so l (more or less) is not
significant. Even in the extreme of a few number of photons, classical electromagnetic
4 Preliminary Comments Chap. 0
theory will handle most cases, even for the cases that are given as "examples" of the
necessity for the photonic character of light, such as the photoelectric effect. The atoms
or the material must be quantized, but we presume that someone else has done the hard
work of measuring the pertinent coefficients and our job is to understand the results and
use them. This approach is called the "semiclassical" quantum theory and is discussed in
greater detail in later chapters. The major shift in your thinking is that voltage and current
are no longer measurable quantities. Power (or intensity) is always the ultimate goal for all
predictions.
After teaching this material for a number of years and to about 500 students, I have
compiled an advice list:
1. Dust off your electromagnetic theory. With a minimal amount of change in your
thinking, you can handle much of laser electronics.
2. Do not be a slave to the SI (or MKSA) system of units. This book will use those
units in the theory, but "practical units" will be used for evaluation. Much of the
published literature uses the cgs system of units (for reasons that escape me), but they
usually give the results in transparent practical units that are easily converted to a
"pure" SI format. However, doing such a conversion is usually an unnecessary step
that introduces a finite probability of error. For instance, you will see that the product
of density (L 3), a crosssectional area (L 2), and a length (L) plays a critical role
in laser theory. Since the product is dimensionless, why go through the exercise of
converting length in centimeters to meters three times? Only if EO or 110 appears in
the solutionseparatelyis it necessary to make the conversion to SI units for the
.. rest of the expression.
3. Become familiar with different ways of specifying fundamental quantities. For in
stance, the frequency v is properly specified in (Hz), but equally informative is
wavelength [innm (10 9 m), A(lO1O m), or 11m (10 6 m)] withAo = cf v ; wavenum
berunits jj = I /A (always expressed in cm" units), or in energy units of hv (Joules) or
h v/ e (volts). There is no accepted way of specifying this information in the literature
so you must be familiar with all of them.
4. Dust off your differential equation background. The most common and important
ones are those that are linear and of first order in the derivatives, and they are usually
coupled. Laplace transforms can be used if you wish. The rare cases of secondorder
differential equations encountered here are usually solved either by the trigonometric
or the hyperbolic functions. It will save you considerable work if you recall that all
arguments of mathematical functions must be dimensionless, and hence a distance
variable z will always be multiplied by quantities with a dimension L I and time t
will be divided by a characteristic time constant.
5. Learn the dimensions of all symbols. Develop the habit of including the dimensions of
all calculations even to the point of including the word dimensionless if appropriate.
It does no good to use obscure dimensions such as coulombs per second when the
common ampere should be familiar to all.
Note to the Students 5
6. Do not depend upon the canned symbolic math programs to do the analytic work for
you. The thought process expended in obtaining an analytic solution is most valuable.
Reserve the computer for cases that are nonlinear and/or too complicated.
7. Be willing to considerextremes. For instance, an infinite intensity will be considered
obviously an impossibilitybut we can come close. Quite often an examination of
the extremes yields the upper and lower bounds to the phenomena.
8. Finally, memorize the following equation for the necessary condition for any
oscillator.
The net round trip gain is the product of all amplification and attenuation ratios as the
wave makes a round trip. Thus if Go is the small signal power gain per pass through
the amplifier, 5 = the fraction of the power surviving each pass due to imperfect
passive components (thus 1  5 = L, the fraction of the power lost per pass), then
for the simple helium/neon laser shown in Fig. 0.1,
or G> 1/5
We will see the application.of this equation many, many times. It is too simple
not to commit to memory.
Consider the simple HeINe gas laser operating at 632.8 nm shown in Fig. 0.1. If R
represents the power reflectivity of the mirrors, L the loss per pass through the windows,
and G the power gain through the tuhe per pass, the laser will oscillate provided that
In writing this equation, we have broken the "loop" at the right of window 1 and
followed a wave around the path. The equation is trivial and transparent.
Some of the interesting problems are (l) How do we excite the system to get the
gain G? (2) Are there any special techniques to construct the mirrors? (3) Why use curved
mirrors? (4) Why orient the windows as shown? (5) What is the beam spread? (6) How
much power do we obtain? (Obviously, it must be less than we put into the system.)

Interestingly enough, quantum theory enters only in the choice of the gases involved,
helium and neon, and then only to provide two energy states separated by
c
E = hv v = ,
A
A = 632.8 om (0.2)
Then a few relatively simple equations relate the gain to the number of atoms in each of
these two states. All the other problems listed can be discussed to an unusual degree of
precision without once invoking the quantum nature of the device.
Most readers will be familiar with the theory of the simple pn junction for rectification
of AC signals and as an integral part of transistors and other solidstate devices. These are
the "complicated" applications of semiconductor electronics that depend, to a major degree,
on the differences between "forward" and "reverse" bias. The semiconductor injection laser
uses this same pn junction in the forward direction to promote the stimulated recombination
of the electrons and holes.
e +h hv (0.3)
The basic physics is quite simple. The technology has benefited from some rather ingenious
thinking, so that now the semiconductor laser is the overwhelming choice for lowpower
communication and control applications.
However, the point remains: lasers are quantum devices, a fact that we accept, live
with, enjoy, and frequently ignore.
REFERENCES
I. C. H. Townes, "Ideas and Stumbling Blocks in Quantum Electronics," IEEE J. Quant. Electron.
QE20, 547, No.6, 1984.
2. W. E. Lamb, Jr., "Laser Theory and Doppler Effect," IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE20, 551, 1984.
3. N. Bloembergen, "Nonlinear Optics," IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE20, 556, 1984.
4. A. L. Schawlow, "Lasers in Historical Perspective," IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE20, 558, 1984.
5. See also the historical section of IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE20, 198725th Anniversary of
Semiconductor Lasers.
6. The fivevolume set entitled The Laser Handbook (New York: NorthHolland Publishing
Company:
Volume I, Eds. F. T. Arecchi and E. O. SchulzDubois, 1972.
Volume 2, Eds. F. T. Arecchi and E. O. SchulzDubois, 1972.
Volume 3, Ed. M. L. Stitch, 1974.
Volume 4, Eds. M. L. Stitch and M. Bass, 1979.
Volume 5, Eds. M. Bass and M. L. Stitch, 1985.
7. R. J. Pressley, Editor inChief, Handbook of Lasers (Cleveland, Ohio: Chemical Rubber Co.),
1971.
References 7
8. There are "thousands" of known lasers spanning the wavelengthrange of far infrared to the UV
and xray portion of the spectrum. A reasonably complete listing for gases is given by R. Beck,
W. Englisch, and K. Giirs, Table ofLaser Lines in Gases and Vapors, Springer Series in Optical
Sciences, 3rd 00. (New York: SpringerVerlag, 1980).
References [1] to [4] are very easy to read and can give a sense of the historical perspec
tive about a field that is exploding. Reference [5] is a volume of the IEEE Transaction on
Quantum Electronics, which commemorated the twentyfifth anniversary of the very impor
tant semiconductor laser. The last three are general handbooks that are useful for physical
properties of optical materials, laser wavelengths, and specialized phenomena.
Review of
Electromagnetic
Theory
1. 1 INTRODUCTION
We will be dealing with electromagnetic waves in that part of the spectrum where optical
techniques have played a historical role. Lenses are used to focus the radiation, mirrors
to direct it, and free space to transmit it. Yet it is still electromagnetic radiation, it obeys
Maxwell's equations, and all the laws studied at low frequencies apply at the "optical"
portion of the spectrum.
The major difference lies in the size of the components used. For instance, a Icm
diameter capacitor used at I MHz is less than 10 4 of a freespace wavelength (A = 300 m),
whereas a Iemdiameter "contact lens" for your eyes is greater than 104 wavelengths for
visible radiation. The small size of the capacitor compared to a wavelength is a requirement
for the validity of circuit theory; however, the large size of the lens makes life easy for the
more exact field theory.
Before we go into field theory at optical frequencies, let us mention the question
of units. The rationalized SI (or MKSA) system will be used throughout in analytical
developments. However, numerical answers will almost always be expressed in em, em>',
or ern/sec. This does not mean we are using a CGS system of units but merely that we are
expressing an answer in a more convenient and intuitively comfortable form, as well as
conforming to most modem and traditional literature. Only if EO, the permittivity of free
space, or {Lo, the permeability of free space, appears in the equation must we go through
8
Sec. 1.2 Maxwells Equations 9
the exercise of converting centimeters to meters. Most of the time, the product appears (i.e.,
{tOEO), which is, of course, equal to 1/c', In that case, we can keep c as rv 3 x 1010 em/sec
in all the equations, provided that the other quantities are also measured in centimeters.
e(r, t) = Re [E(r)e
jwt ] h(r, t) = Re [H(r)e
j wt
]
(1.2.2)
j wt j wt
j(r, t) = Re [J(r)e ] p(r,. t) = Re [P(r)e ]
where Re is real part, r = xa, + yay + za., a, is the unit vector in the ith direction, and
the capital letters E and H are complex vector quantities depending on space coordinates
but not on time. We recognize that if we want the complete field, we must take the real part
of the product E exp (jwt).
If we substitute (1.2.2) into (1.2.1) we obtain the timeindependent form of Maxwell's
equations:
V X H = J + j wEoE + j wP = J + j wD
V X E = jw{toH (1.2.3)
with D = EoE +P
where the common factor of exp (j wt) has been canceled from each side of the equation.
The polarization term is related to the electric field by a constitutive relation:
(1.2.4)
where the term X is the complex susceptibility of the medium through which the wave is
propagating.
After we have become familiar with the simple approach to lasers, we will find that
the atoms enter Maxwell's equations via an "equation of motion" for P; but for now we
assume that the coefficient X is a given parameter of the medium. For instance, the form of
10 Review of Electromagnetic Theory Chap. I
the polarization given by (1.2.4) suggests that it and the vacuum displacement term can be
combined into a single term:
D = EoE +P
= EO(1 + X)E
(1.2.5)
Thus the relative dielectric constant Er is related to the susceptibility by 1 + X, and it in tum
is equal to the square of the index of refraction. In the interest of simplicity, P was assumed
to be in the same direction as E, but this is not true for many of the interesting electrooptic
materials.
Actually, we have done something very important in going from (1.2.1) to (1.2.3,
1.2.4, and 1.2.5). We have gone from the time domain to the angularfrequency domain, w,
1:
by the application of the Fourier transform, defined by
00
j wt
F(w) = fU)e dt (1.2.6)
Let us consider free space, so that the conduction current J is zero. If we take the curl of
I
(1.2.1b) and eliminate h by the use of (1.2.1a) we obtain
or
v X V X e = {LO :t (V X h) = {LoEo : : :
(1.3.1a)
1 ae 2
V 2e   2  2 = 0
c at
where c 2 = 1/ {LoEo is the square of the velocity of light. If the procedure is reversed to
eliminate e, we obtain the same equation with h substituted for e in (1.3.la):
I a2 h
V 2h   2  2 = 0 (1.3.lb)
c at
It is most important to realize that any function oftheform f (t  an. r / c) is a solution, where
an is a unit vector. It is easy to show this in one dimension and only slightly more complicated
to do so for the general case. Physically, it merely means that the wave propagates in the
direction of an with a velocity of c.
Sec. 1.4 Algebraic Form of Maxwells Equations 11
For sinusoidal representation, we say that there is a phase change as the wave
propagates along the direction described by an'
w 2n
lkol =  =  (1.3.3)
c Ao
where Ao is the wavelength in free space.
In writing (1.3.2) we took the functional form of (1.2.2) and, in every place that t
appeared, we replaced it by t  an . r / c, just as the solution to the wave equation demanded.
We also combined w, c, and the unit vector an into a new vector ko. Obviously, the equation
for h is modified in the same manner. We will use k o to denote the wave vector in free space
and k (without the subscript) to indicate it in a dielectric medium.
We could have been more formal in our approach and started with ko as a three
dimensional Fourier transform variable with respect to the three spatial coordinates. Again,
we tend to be somewhat lazy and not bother to state that E is now a function of ko in addition
to being a function of w. Thus, most of the time, we say that we are representing a wave of
constant amplitude E propagating along the direction ko.
If we take (1.3.2) and the corresponding one for h and insert them into Maxwell's equation
for free space, we obtain the algebraic form of Maxwell's equations:
k=
H
FIGURE 1.1. Geometric orientation of the
vectors E, H, and k according to (1.4.2).
For free space, the Poynting vector S = i E x H* points in the same direction as ko.
S = E x H* = E x (ko x E)* 1
EE *  ko (1.4.4)
2 2 W/Lo 2 W/Lo
since ko . E = O.
Let us examine (1.2.1) in more detail for Cases that are commonly encountered in solidstate
lasers or electrooptic materials. For instance, the active atoms in a ruby laser are chromium,
which is added (doped) to a level of 5% into the Alz0 3 host crystal, the details of which
are covered in Chapter 10. The point to be made here is that both Al z0 3 lattice and active
atoms contribute to the polarization, and that it is useful to separate their effects on the
propagation of Waves. Accordingly, we rewrite Maxwell's equations (with j = 0):
ae
at +
V X h = EO (1.5.1a)
ah
V X e = /LO (1.5.1b)
at
where we have combined the lattice polarization term PI with the vacuum displacement Eoe
with the aid of (1.2.5) to obtain the term involving the square of the index of refraction n Z
Now we repeat the mathematics used to derive the homogeneous wave equation of Sec. 1.3:
take the curl of (1.5.1b)
a[v X h)
V X V X e = /Lo
at
Z Z aZe a2 Pa
V(V . e)  V e = /LoEon atZ  /Lo atZ
Sec. 1.6 The Uncertainty Relationships 13
\7
2
e
( n)2 aat2e = {Lo aat2Pa (1.5.2)
2 2
This differs from (1.3.1) in two ways: (1) the velocity of the propagation is cf n, a result
which could be anticipated from elementary electromagnetic theory; and (2) the righthand
side is no longer zero and that the equation is now an inhomogeneous one, with the source
(i.e., the righthand side) being the time derivative of the polarization contributed by the
active atoms. In other words, the active atoms are the SOurce for the optical fields. This
is the proper approach, but it is also somewhat tedious and thus will be postponed until
Chapters 13 and 14.
It was mentioned in Sec. 1.2 that the representation of a sinusoidal function by the real
part of a complex phasor is a shorthand way of taking the Fourier transform of the time
function; This is very important from many standpoints. First, it is the formal way of handling
nonsinusoidal functions and paves the way for a general transient analysis. But most of all,
it leads most naturally into the concept of minimum beam spread from a given aperture.
To appreciate this, let us recall the "uncertainty" relation as it pertains to
communication:
t:>.wt:>.t (1.6.1)
In communications, this theorem says that a minimum bandwidth t:>.w is required to pass
a pulse with a rise time t:>.t. If we multiply both sides of the equation by Ii = h/2n, we
obtain formally a relation equivalent to the Heisenberg* uncertainty principle:
h
t:>.EM>  (1.6.2)
 4n
It is not a very interesting exercise in transform theory to prove that any two conjugate
variables (such as wand r), which are related by the Fourier transform, obey (1.6.1). The
genius of Heisenberg was in relating a physical problem to a mathematical abstraction.
Let us now tum to other conjugate variables. For instance, k x is the Fourier transform
variable with its conjugate x, k y with y, and k, with z. Once (1.6.1) is accepted, the same
theory of Fourier transforms yields
1
t:>.kxt:>.x 2:
1
t:>.kyt:>.y 2: ( 1.6.3)
1
t:>.kzt:>.z 2:
If we again multiply Ii = h/2n and identify lik as the momentum, we obtain the conven
tional form of Heisenberg's uncertainty relations. These relationships are summarized in
'Whether the factor in (1.6.1) should be I, some other number close to I depends on how !:>.w and
!:>. t are defined.
14 Review of Electromagnetic Theory Chap. I
TABLE 1.1
Conjugate
Item Physical variable Relation
1
to Angular frequency t (time) !!.wt!.! 2: "2
1
k, Propagation along x x !!.kx!!.x 2: "2
1
k, Propagation along Y Y !!.ky!!.Y 2: "2
k, Propagation along z z !!.kz!!.z > 4
E Iuo = energy t ses, 2: h/4rr
px Momentum along x x !!.Px!!.x 2: h/4rr
Py Momentum along Y Y !!.Py!!.Y 2: h/4rr
pz Momentum along z z !!'pz!!.z 2: h/4rr
Table 1.1 Note that the uncertainty principle says nothing whatsoever about the relation
between nonconjugate variables.
Before we leave this topic, it is worthwhile to have a more precise definition of the
term "uncertainty": it is the rms value of the deviation of the parameter from its average
value. For instance, if the transverse variation of the electric field of an optical beam were
given by
then the average location of the field is at y = 0 and the "uncertainty" is found from
1: 00
2
(y  0)2 E (y )d y
1: 00
E
2(y)dy
(1.6.5)
In other words, the mathematical formula for the field can also be interpreted as a probability
function. The Fourier transform (in k y space) is given by
[ (2 )2]
12 kyWo
E(k y ) = tt / woEo exp (1.6.6)
Thus there is a distribution of k y wave vectors around k y = 0 and thus the "uncertainty" of
k y is
(1.6.7)
Sec. 1.7 Spreading of an Electromagnetic Beam IS
It is left for a problem to show that this particular field distribution has the minimum value
permitted: . = 1/2.
Let us use the uncertainty relationships to predict the spread of a beam of light energy. Now
we know that this beam is traveling more or less at the velocity of light, c; hence, the wave
vector kz is very well defined at k, = cofc (and, sure enough, the beam is almost everywhere
along the z axis). But if this is a "beam," its extent in the transverse dimension is limited to
the beam diameter, as shown in Fig. 1.2.
If we assume that this "beam" has a smooth "Gaussianlike" spatial extent in the y
direction of the form given by (1.6.4)
E(y) = Eo exp [ (  ;0 Y]
then we must also allow for a spread in wave vectors centered around ky = 0:
[ ( 2 )2]
12 kyWo
E(k y ) = n / woEo exp
AY
I
I I
I \
I
! ,
I _____
I .......Ii>
I ,
I .' w
I \
I .,       ...... k, C
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
=?(" /
exp [( .:. ) '
E(y)
3.
tik = Wo
y
(b)
FIGURE 1.3. Interrelationship between (a) the spatial extent of a beam and (b) the wave
number kyo
Thus, we can construct a diagram for the propagation vectors ky and kz as shown in
Fig. 1.4. It is obvious that the angle (}o/2 is given by
(}o !lk y

2 kz
or (1.7.1)
2)..
(}o =
7l' W o
Thus, a large beam does not spread. Indeed, a uniform plane wave (one with Wo = 00) has
a zero spread, in accordance with every elementary text on electromagnetic theory. (It has
no place to go!)
It is instructive to consider some numbers here. Let x = 694.3 nm and 2wo = 0.1 cm;
then (}o is 8.8 X 104 rad. To achieve the same beam spread at lOcm wavelength would
require an antenna aperture 2wo of 144 m. Such a small divergence of an optical beam
justifies the simple raytracing approach of Chapter 2.
Materials that are anisotropic to electromagnetic waves have many uses in optical electron
ics: modulation, sensing, and harmonic generation are just a few examples. Indeed, most
crystalline materials are anisotropic and even some of the amorphous ones, such as glass,
become so when subjected to an electric field, a magnetic field, or mechanical stress. This
section introduces the formalism for handling such cases.
Sec. 1.8 Wave Propagation in Anisotropic Media 17
We limit our attention to uniaxial media whose dielectric "constant" depends on the
direction of the electrical field, and thus the displacement vector D is described by a matrix
multiplication of E with the electric field E.
o, ]
Dy = EO
[E]0 0 0]
0 E]
[EX]
E, (1.8.1)
[ o, 0 0 E2 Ez
Our goal is to predict the value of the wave vector k as the wave propagates at an angle e
with respect to the z axis (the optical axis) as shown in Fig. 1.5.
From the algebraic form of Maxwell's equations, we know that the wave vector k is
perpendicular to D in any and all casesanisotropy or no anisotropy!
k x h = wD
(1.8.2)
k . (k x H) == 0 = wk D
Hence there is one orientation of the electric field where we know the answer for the
orientation of the fields with respect to k. This is shown in Fig. 1.5(b), and since the case
is so "ordinary," it is given that name. Note that if k is constrained to the yz plane, then
D is always in the x direction, and thus E = Exa x. The same argument can be applied to
the case where the displacement vector is perpendicular to the plane containing k and the
z axis, the socalled optic axis. For such cases, the propagation constant is given by
2
k2 = w JLoEOE]
or
1 1
(independent of e) (1.8.3)
E] ni
If, however, D is not perpendicular to the plane containing k and the optic axis (i.e.,
[a, x k] . D = 0) as shown in Fig. 1.5(c), we have a problem. D is still perpendicular to k,
since (D k = 0), but E is not! Hence we can expect a mixture of E] and E2 in the expression
for the propagation constant, and a somewhat "extraordinary" behavior as a function of e,
a task to which we tum.
For this polarization shown in Fig. 1.5(c), k and D can be expressed as
k = k(cos e a, + sin e a y ) (1.8.4a)
D = D ( cos e a y + sin e a.) (1.8.4b)
(Note that k . D == 0.)
We use (1.8Ab) in conjunction with (1.8.1) to find E:
D
E y = [cose] (1.8.5a)
EOE]
D
E, =  [sin e] (1.8.5b)
EOE2
18 Review of Electromagnetic Theory Chap. 1
.. z
.."
I .."
y
(a)
E,D
k (ordinary)
y
(b)
k (extraordinary)
y H
(c)
FIGURE 1.5. Orientation of k, E, and D for a uniaxial crystal. (a) The general problem.
(b) The ordinary wave. (c) The extraordinary wave.
Sec. 1.8 Wave Propagation in Anisotropic Media 19
Now it is a straightforward exercise in vector analysis to show (see Problem 1.3) that
DD
k Z = u} fLo   (1.8.6a)
ED
or
I ED
= EO (1.8.6b)
Z
neff DD
where the effective index is defined by k] k o = neff, Combining (1.8.6b) with (1.8.5) yields
I cos z o sirr' o
z = z + z (1.8.7)
neff nl nz
The forms of normalized propagation vector (k/ ko) expressed by (1.8.3) and (1.8.7)
are conveniently shown on a graph called the index surface (see Fig. 1.6). Equation (1.8.3)
states that the effective index for the ordinary wave is independent of the angle e. Hence
it is shown as a circle. The effective index for extraordinary wave does depend on e in the
form of an ellipse.
It is apparent from Fig. 1.6 and from (1.8.3) and (1.8.7) that the phase constants for the
ordinary and extraordinary waves are not equal for e # O. This fact plays a critical role in
nonlinear optics where it is crucial that the phase constants of, for example, the fundamental
wave and any harmonic or intermodulation terms, must be synchronized. Fortunately, the
dielectric constants are not constant with frequency (i.e., A),and thus it is possible to choose
a phase matching angle em such that the effective index for the fundamental frequency w,
when propagated as an ordinary (extraordinary) wave, equals the effective index for the
second (third, etc.) harmonic when it is propagated as an extraordinary (ordinary) wave.
Ordinary wave
x,y
Extraordinary
wave
FIGURE 1.6. The index ellipsoid for a
uniaxial crystal.
20 ' Review of Electromagnetic Theory Chap. 1
Consider a unifonn plane wave (upw) impinging on the interface shown in Fig. 1.7 making an
angle fh with respect to the normal to the surface. The discontinuity generates a second wave
Transmitted
at an angle fh and a reflected wave. We could grit our teeth and match field components at
the interface and solve the problem completely. This procedure is necessary if the amplitude
and phase of the transmitted and reflected waves are desired. However, if only the direction
is desired, the procedure can be greatly simplified.
The point to be remembered is that the incident wave is the source, and the transmitted
and reflected waves are the responses. Hence the phases of both responses, whatever they
are, must be synchronized with respect to the source along the boundary where the responses
are generated.
The relative phase of the source along the interface is
= (w/c)n, sinfh (1.9.2)
and this must be the phase of both responses as measured along the interface. If medium 1
is isotropic, this fact forces the incident and reflected waves to make the same angle with
respect to the normal.
For the transmitted field, we force the phases along the boundary to be the same:
(1.9.3a)
or
(1.9.3b)
For an anisotropic medium for 2, the incident wave can generate two transmitted waves,
but both must remain tied to the phase of incident wave along the interface.
Windows oriented at Brewster's angle are commonly used on gas lasers because, in principle,
they transmit waves without reflection for one polarization of the electric field. The geometry
of the electromagnetic problem is shown in Fig. 1.8 for two possible polarizations of the
incident field. In both cases, Snell's law is applicable, and thus the wave vector k is bent
toward the normal in the window material.
There are some artifacts added to Fig. 1.8 to help visualize the physical situation:
The orientations of the induced dipoles in the dielectric material are shown, for it is their
reradiation that generates the reflected wave.
Now every elementary test in electromagnetic theory shows that electric dipoles ra
diate perpendicular to the axis and not along it. Thus for the TE orientation there is no
problem in generating a reflected wave. However, for the TM case and a particular angle of
the incident wave, the reflected wave would try to come off the ends of the dipole, which is
impossible. Hence there is no reflected wave when the angles 8, + 82 = n /2. Combining
this fact with Snell's law yields an expression for an angle of zero reflection:
n
8, + 82 = 
2
n, sin 8, = n2 sin 82 (Snell's law) (1.9.4)
Hence
22 Review of Electromagnetic Theory Chap. 1
E k
Let us reiterate the goals of this book: to understand the physical bases for the generation.
transmission, and detection of electromagnetic radiation in the "optical" portion of the
spectrum. But we should be more precise and focus our attention on a specific characteristic
that distinguishes the laser from a simple lamp.
The distinguishing characteristic is the generation of coherent electromagnetic radia
tion. Now, the topic of coherence is most involved and complex to describe with precision,
but it is relatively easy to understand the firstorder consequences.
Most who have had electronic experience at low frequencies, say less than 30 GHz,
with classical generators never address this subject, because most of our generators had a
long coherence time or length. In other words, they are almost perfectly coherent. But what
does this mean, and how would we measure either coherence time or length?
In a loose sort of way, coherence time is the net delay that can be inserted in a wave
train and still obtain interference. Since electromagnetic waves travel with a velocity of c,
the longitudinal coherence length is simply c times the coherence time. Note that the key
word is interference. Let us illustrate these ideas with a "thought" experiment taken from
lowfrequency electronics and compare it with a similar experiment at optical frequencies
(visible wavelengths).
 
Reflector
Detector Vo" ! ex Ef
E = Eoexp(+jkz) (1.10.2)
Although this analysis is quite adequate for normal laboratory experiments at low
frequencies, we have made the serious assumption of a perfectly coherent source. Such a
device does not exist.
We have assumed that the phase of the incoming wave at a point z is predictable from
the phase of the wave that crossed this point at a time 2z/ c seconds earlier. But, of course,
it is not tied perfectly to this earlier waveform; its phase could have "wandered" in the time
it took the initial wave to traverse the distance from the observation point to the reflector
and back. Thus, we should modify (1.10.1) to read
*In fact, Fig. 1.9 bears a close resemblance to the original experiments of Hertz, who demonstrated the
equivalence of light and lowfrequency waves as predicted by Maxwell's theory.
Sec. 1. 10 Coherent Electromagnetic Radiation 25
where !::J. (t) is a random variable, characteristic of the source. * Thus the output of the
detector changes to
In this case, the minimum (or maximum) is not where we think it should be, and worse
yet, it wanders in time according to the whims of (t). It is almost as if the standingwave
pattern is "jittering" back and forth in a random fashion, as indicated in Fig. 1.11. Normally,
the time rate of change of is small when compared with the angular frequency co, and this
fact explains why we never see this effect at low frequencies from any "decent" source.
Example
Suppose that the maximum value of d/dt was 10 4 of the angular frequency Wo of the
source (a rather poor one, but let us use it). Let the nominal frequency of the source be
1 GHz. If the observation point Z of our detector were a "roomlike" distance away from
the reflector, say 3 m, the time interval between the passage of the first wave train and its
return is only
2z 2 x 3
!::J.t =  = 20ns
c 3 X 108
and the phase could, at most change by
!::J. = d
dt
I !::J.t = 104 X 2n x 10+9 X 20 X 109 = O.OO4n 0.72
max
In other words, the position of the minimum is only jittering by 0.72 /360 = 0.2% of a
wavelength (30 em) or !::J.L = 0.6 rom (probably smaller than the wire used for the dipole
antenna).
However, the numbers and the effects change considerably if we perform the same
type of interference experiment at optical frequencies. Since most components and detectors
are huge when compared with optical wavelengths, the techniques are slightly different but
not in their essential function.
, /
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ / FIGURE 1.11. "Jittering" of the minimum
position owing to the random jumps in phase
of the later portion of the wave.
* f>.r/> is the amount by which the phase can change in the round trip delay time 2z[c.
26 Review of Electromagnetic Theory Chap. 1
,,
,,
,,
,,
_L 4 _
,,
t Eo
,   7      L 2
/47
,,
,
    ....
Hoh k
,
,,
,,
,, "
"
" ra
,...
,
,,
t t
Consider the Michelson interferometer shown in Fig. 1.12. Collimated light is divided
and passed around the two arms of the interferometer in the manner indicated in Fig. 1.12.
Obviously, the radiation that went the M2 route is retarded in time by 2(L 2  LI)/c with
respect to that returning from MI. Shown also is the probable situation of the two beams
propagating at a slight angle with respect to each other. Thus the respective electric fields
at the plane of the detector are given by
In (1.10.5), we have allowed for the phase of one wave to wander with respect to the other.
Again, we must remember that !i.</J (t) is the change in phase ofthe reference during the time
that the other signal is delayed. If the two arms of the interferometer are exactly equal, the
phase term disappears. Optical detectors (eyes, photographic emulsions, and photoelectric
devices) respond to the intensity of the radiation; hence, the relative intensity along the x
direction for a fixed z is given by
(EI + E 2) (Ej + ED
I (x, y = constant ) = 27]0
= 2 5 ) cos
( 27]0 2 [kBX
 + k(L 2  L I) + !i.</J] (1.10.6)
2 2
Sec. 1.10 Coherent Electromagnetic Radiation 27
kefix
2  2
A
or fix = 29
 x
where we have assumed that e is small. Thus the detectorsay our eyeswould see a
series of bright and dark bands in the manner indicated in Fig. 1.13.
As indicated in Fig. 1.13, e must be very small for !:!.X to be a reasonable size.
For instance, if "A = 0.5 /Lm (greenblue) and !:!.X is to be greater than 0.5 em, then
2e 104 rad. Note, too, that the position of the minimum in intensity depends on the
difference in optical path length. Hence, if this difference changes a fraction of a wavelength
(owing to room vibrations), the fringe position will jitter accordingly.
Even if these significant mechanical stability problems are overcome and the align
ment is achieved, the fringe position will still change, owing to the random wandering of
(t). Whereas in the microwave "experiment," we could conceive of measuring the jitter
in the fringes, our optical detector would average the intensity over its time constant. [For
instance, the eye retentivity (or time constant) is on the order of 1/10 sec.] This leads to a
degradation of the fringe visibility, defined as
V = (Imax)  (Imin)
(1.10.7)
(Imax) + (Imin)
where the brackets ( ) indicate time averages.
Again, let us take some typical numbers for a spectral line. Let us assume thatd/dt
is at most 105 of w = 211:c/"A and solve for the difference in lengths that keeps the fringe
position within !:!.X /2 of its predicted position (an interchange between the "bright" and
"dark" bands). Thus !:!./2 = 11:/2 radians.
Another way of looking at this phenomenon and, at the same time, gaining some
insight into the origin of the changes in the phase is to change to the spectral representation
of the field. The instantaneous frequency of the source is given by the time rate of change
of the phase:
d
co =  [Wot
dt
+ 4>(t)]
(1.10.8)
d4>
=Wo+
dt
If we consider the source as being a collection of identical oscillators being turned on and
off randornly,* each contributing a part of the field, then the distribution of frequencies
will be centered about Wo but containing a smaller amplitude on either side, as shown in
Fig. 1.14. This will be discussed in more detail when the line shape is considered.
Let us consider a problem that emphasizes the role of the random jumps in phase owing to the
finite spectral width of the source. Assume that we are measuring the interference between
the two waves by means of a camera and a photographic film, as shown in Fig. 1.15. We can
choose the exposure time by the shutter and thus control the "density" of the blackening of
the film. This density is proportional to the timeintegrated optical power density incident
on a point of the film.
We assume that the two waves have the same amplitude, polarization, and nominal
frequency, Wo. However, we allow the phase of 1 to jump discontinuously by !l4> every T
seconds according to the following random prescription.
Use three different denominations of coins, say, a penny, a nickel, and a dime. Flip
the coins every T seconds, and assign the jump in phase according to Table 1.2. Now let
us compute the fringe visibility by determining the density of the exposure of the film
assuming that the shutter is open for t < T sec and t = NT sec. In the shortexposure
case, the integrated exposure yields perfect fringe contrast according to (1.10.6). But for a
* As we shall see, the atoms are the oscillators. In a laser, the field stimulates the atoms to give up their
energy in a predictable manner, and thus the coherence time is much larger.
Sec. J.1 J Example of Coherence Effects 29
TABLE 1.2
H H H 0
H H T +45 0
H T H +90 0
T H H +135 0
T T T +180 0
T T H 45 0
T H T 90 0
H T T 135 0
Obviously the results depend on the toss of the coin. The author obtained the results
given in Table 1.3 on page 30 (you should generate your own sequence). A plot of the relative
film density for various values of N is shown in Fig. 1.16. If we are able to photograph
the fringes in a time interval short compared to the phase change, very sharp fringes result.
However, if the shutter is open for many phase changes, the visibility decreases more or
30 Review of Electromagnetic Theory Chap. 1
Coin Toss 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Penny H H T H T T T H
Nickel T T H H H T T H
Dime H H H T T H T H
/).</> = +90 +90 +135 +45 90 0
4SO 180 0
0
>o = 0, </> = +90 180 45 0 90 0
135 0
+4SO 4SO
less exponentially with exposure time. For very long periods, the film would be exposed
more or less uniformly.
With this loose understanding of longitudinal coherence, let us tum to the problem
of "transverse" coherence length. Here we inquire whether the phase changes along a
transverse coordinate in a smooth and slow fashion, as wave I of Fig. 1.17, or rapidly in
space and time and in an unpredictable fashion, as wave 2. We could have the same power
in the two waves, and as far as visual observation is concerned, the beam size at z = 0 could
be the same, but there would be a remarkable difference in the divergence of the beam in
the two cases. This is easily shown by applying the previous discussion of the uncertainty
principle considering the fundamentals of wave propagation.
If the phase is to be changing in the x direction, then there must be a component of the
wave vector in that direction, even though the wave is traveling primarily in the z direction.
The magnitude of this phase change can be estimated by using the mean change in phase
!::J.> divided by the distance over which this occurs;
!::J.>
Sk; L (l.ll.l)
1.0 , ...
7f
k(jx
(a)
00 2T 4T
(b)
6T
!
8T
FIGURE 1.16. Relative density (D) or blackening of the film is shown in (a) along with
fringe visibility V. The latter is plotted in (b) as a function of exposure time.
Problems 31
I
\
"
"
x
I
, 1F'
" (x)
";j\ I
r I
I
I
L1
 2 "
l/ J
L,
\
"
(a) (b)
FIGURE 1.17. Two beams of the same size but with radically different variations of
phase in the transverse direction.
.... ,
\
\
\
I
I I
\ I
\ I
, I
.... _"
(a) (b)
FI GURE 1.18. Beam spreads for the two beams of Fig. 1.17.
Thus for the two waves shown in Fig. 1.17, !::J.kx 1 = !::J.I/ L 1 and !::J.kx 2 = !::J.2/ L2. Hence,
the diagrams for the transverse and longitudinal wave vectors are as shown in Fig. 1.18.
Thus the farfield divergence angle is given by
!::J.kx !::J.I A !::J.2 A
(J  (JI   (J2 =   (1.11.2)
L 1 2n L2 2n
Obviously, (J2 (JI, for the situation shown in Fig. 1.17 and the divergence of the second
beam is much greater than the first. Incidentally, (1.11.2) is much more restrictive than one
that is usually specified in terms of the amplitude of the wave [i.e., (1.7.1)].
PROBLEMS
1.1. Why is the factor 2 present in the expression for Poynting vector (i.e., S = Ex H*/2)?
1.2. Assume that the electromagnetic fields vary as exp ( jk . r) and use the rules for the
curl, gradient, and divergence to derive the algebraic form of Maxwell's equations
(1.4.2).
1.3. The algebraic forms for Maxwell's equations for a linear homogeneous anisotropic
medium are
k X H = wD
32 Review of Electromagnetic Theory Chap. 1
k X E = wB
where B is related to H and D to E by
B = fLo(H+ M)
D= foE + P
For many materials, the polarization vector P is not collinear with E; hence, D is
not collinear with E either. The same comments apply to B, M, and H. Assume a
dielectric medium with M = 0 but with no restrictions placed on D and E.
(a) Show that k . D == O.
(b) Show that the wave vector k always points in the direction of D X B.
(c) Show that the amplitude of the wave vector k is given by
2 2 D D
k = co fLo
ED
(d) Show that the Poynting vector, S = E X H*/2, can point in a direction other
than that of the wave vector k.
1.4. Suppose that we are using an optical beam of diameter D to monitor the particle
content of a column of gas. For many applications we would prefer to sample as
small a volume as possible, and consequently we would first choose a very small
beam. But if the path length is long, a very small beam would diverge quickly and
thus sample a larger crosssectional area of the gas column. Use the uncertainty
relations to derive an expression for the beam diameter to minimize the volume of
gas sampled. Assume a helium/neon probing laser (A = 632.8 nm) and a simple cone
describing the convergence and divergence of the beam envelope so as to evaluate
for a gas column 10m long.
1.5. There are various ways to specify the frequency and photon energy of a laser; some
use the energy in eV; some specify the wavelength in angstrom units (10 10 m), in
nanometers, (10 9 m), or in micrometers (10 6 m); others use the wave number li,
the number of wavelengths that will fit inside a centimeter of vacuum; and still others
specify cycles (Hz). Convert the specification of photons from common coherent
sources to the other units.
GaAs 1.47
Ar+ 5145
He:Ne 632.8
CO 2 943
ISM band (in meters) 13.56 MHz
KrF 249
References and Suggested Readings 33
1.6. Repeat the coinflipping routine of Sec. 1.11, and find the fringe visibility as a function
of exposure time.
1.7. Show that the Fourier transform of the field given by
!::J.x
2
=J x
2IE(x)1 2dx/
J IE(x)1
2dx
!::J.k; =J k;IE(kx)1
2dk
x/J 2dx
IE(kx )1
Гораздо больше, чем просто документы.
Откройте для себя все, что может предложить Scribd, включая книги и аудиокниги от крупных издательств.
Отменить можно в любой момент.