Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Cambridge University Press and British Association for American Studies are collaborating with JSTOR to
digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of American Studies.
http://www.jstor.org
by ERIC MOTTRAM
s London
King College,
I
In May 1932 the Museum of Modern Art opened on 53rd Street in New
York in an old mansion. A number of artists associated with New Masses,
the leftist magazine founded in 1925, showed a collection of political murals
on imbalance and social cruelty of the
the economic
sharply commenting '
times. Hugo Gellert's mural was entitled Us fellas gotta stick together ',
a an between a young
phrase drawn from already notorious conversation
member of the wealthy Vanderbilt who had obtained a
family, reporting job
on a Hearst newspaper, and his equally rich interviewee, Al Capone, then
in gaol. Capone, as usual, knew the score and told the young capitalist
* *
inheritor: Us fellas gotta stick together.' Gellert's mural neatly encapsu
lated the Hearst-gangsterdom axis, since the centre of corruption, then as
now, in America was the interlocking of business and crime. Naturally,
President Hoover, Henry Ford, J. P. Morgan and J. D. Rockefeller found
' '
the exhibition offensive since they were the fellas in the mural with
Capone. Another picture, by the great political artist, Ben Shahn, showed
figures in the Sacco and Vanzetti case, and one by William Gropper, another
fine political artist, showed J. P. Morgan a
and Andrew Mellon, couple of
two
notorious millionaires, eating tickertape with pigs, and protected by
militiamen. The Gropper was entitled, with little subtlety, but quite accu
*
on theWall '.
rately, The Writing
Louis Adamic has a nice example of business hypocrisy at the height of
the Depression :
Daniel Willard, president of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad (on which began
'
the riots of stated that, to his mind, those who our
bloody 1877), manage large
industries, whatever be the character of their output, should the
recognize impor
tance and of planning their work so as to furnish as
necessity * steady employment
as to those in their service ', for that was an connected with
possible obligation
our economic \
system
As Adamic says, these tycoons spoke as though business, the most important
'
factor in American lives, was not largely dehumanized and . . . indifferent
1 '
Geliert, Us Fellas Gotta Stick Together ', American Dialog (Autumn,
Hugo 1967).
to vital human and social questions; that, by its very nature, business could
"
have no spontaneous and direct, no intelligent, Christian ", or benevolent
interest in society \2
The broad poster effects of New
Masses artists may be placed behind the
more Us
detailed analysis of James Agee's study of the southern poor, Let
Now Praise Famous Men a commission from Fortune magazine
(1936),
which turned into one of compassionate the most
indictments of callous
ever written. are wordsthe
degradation Agee's complemented by terrifyingly
beautiful photographs by Walker Evans - immediately effective images of
on its victims.
the conditions capitalism had imposed (The Farm Security
Administration was to use Dorothea
Lange 's photographs for similar effect.)
The minimal entertainment
for alienated workers the
throughout America,
a
movies, played major part in guiding values in the declined state; Holly
wood had emerged as the disseminating centre of consumer manipulations
in the period, controlling not only patterns of family and sexual life, but
and household an action documented in Margaret
clothing properties,
at theMovies The Day
Thorpe's America (1946). But it isNathanael West's
of the Locust which more examines the tension between con
(1939) fully
sumer art and consumer frustrations, and it is striking how West's novels
resist ideological dogmas rife in the 1930s. Neither he nor Agee, with their
shared knowledge of the waste of life in America, was politically committed
to any myth. West's satire, both here and in Miss Lonelyhearts (1933) and
A Cool Million (1934), is radical in disillusion and absence of compromise,
short cuts into either communism or conservatism or liberal
untempted by
reformist fence-sitting.
Thirties and artists made
intellectuals too many decisions with Stalinist
communism as their example of vitality. Certainly, it can be argued that
'
the Depression and the Communist example gave focus to the unformulated
radicalism of the 1930s and influenced, directly or indirectly, almost every
American writer of any importance '.3A large part of the intellectual middle
*
class seized a viable point of view, a direction for anger, a code of excited
' '
humanitarianism '.4The idea of being on the Left enabled a man to live
Upton Sinclair dragged Sergei Eisenstein into a classic case of bogus left
ism. Stan it the :
Brakhage gives right dimensions
- one ' '
Sinclair of the so-called cocktail communists of American thirties
Upton
. . . these men, in hellish -
contradiction of rich
' ' living being wealthy proletarians
folk ... or some such - . . these men,
poor thus hack idealists. then, proving
more destructive to art or, even, human than the worst
any possible understanding
materialist business man commerce ever ? Sinclair
that dishonest had created
finally
' taking all Sergei's Mexican footage away from him and selling it piecemeal
to Castle Films ', etc., for movies.5
travelogue
'
It was the middle class intellectual who decided what was and was not
' ' '
pro
letarian literature or art. Mass culture once a set of alibis
became, again,
5 Stan *
Brakhage, Sergei Eisenstein ', Caterpillar, 15/16, 1971, 124.
6 The San Francisco
Poets, ed. David Meltzer (New York, 1971), p. 18.
7 Robert *
The Legacy of the 30s ', The Immediate
Warshow, Experience (1962; Anchor ed.,
1964), pp. 3-5.
through which to
simplify men's lives so that they could be manipulated by
the entertainment, film, book and radio industries. Some poets celebratedly
resorted to paradox and irony, the equivalent of the hypocrisies of these
'
industries ? a new orthodoxy ', to use T. S. Eliot's favourite theological
term. Warshow's indictment of Left literature is not borne out by the work
in both Joseph Freeman's Proletarian Literature in the United States (1935) -
which contains Caldwell, Dos Passos, Farrell, Fearing, Patchen, Rukeyser,
and ? and
Odets, John Wexley Joseph North's New Masses anthology (1969)
- which some of the same writers,
includes together with Ag?e, Lorca,
Saroyan, Hemingway remarkable on the death of worker-veterans
(a piece
in a Florida hurricane in 1935), William Carlos Williams, Dreiser and
Perelman.
II
Eliot is a primary example of the writer of the period who combined formal
ability with social decadence, worked out also through his magazine Criterion
between 1922 and 1939. The context is the use in American literature of
to tackle obvious
techniques of urban and agrarian realism experiences of
social collapse, the thorough weakening of moderate solutions, and the per
towards of and Left as substitutes for discrimina
petual veering myths Right
ting analysis. Communist, Fascist and capitalist-Christian systems such as the
Action Fran?aise turned bourgeois liberalism into an agent of weakening
democratic controls. Capitalism tried to prove it could survive under the
fa?ade of the New Deal and failed. Towards such issues the intelligentsia
were out in his essay on W. B.
notoriously ' careless. George Orwell pointed
Yeats in 1943 : the best writers of our time have been reactionary in tend
ency, and though Fascism does not offer any real return to the past, those
who yearn for the past will accept Fascism sooner than its probable
alternatives '.
buted to I'll Ta\e My Stand in 1930 included critics who would influence
American literature for the next three decades ?
university departments
Allen T?te, John Crowe Ransom, Stark Young, and Robert Penn Warren.
* '
Their stand advocated authoritarian disciplines, strong order, hierarchical
8 Cf. *
Eric Mottram, Mississippi Faulkner's Glorious Mosaic of Impotence and Madness ',
Journal of American Studies, 2, 121-9.
religion, scholasticism (that is, knowledge and taste organized as laws), and
and Yeats). It is
the cult of the Byzantine (in part lifted from T. E. Hulme
not surprising that T. S. Eliot's 1934 lectures, later printed as After Strange
Gods : A Primer of Heresy, were
at the University of Virginia.
delivered
Eliot's targets included D. H.
Lawrence, Hardy and Thomas
James Joyce,
and although his criticism has long since become of merely academic interest,
it is worth pointing out that he understood neither those artists' account of
nor their ideologies. Eliot, like many writers of the
personal relationships
time, had been panicked by Oswald Spengler's The Decline of the West
translation appeared in 1926, although the work had been
(the English
around in German since 1917). Spengler's neo-Hegelian prophecies of inevit
able cycles of civilization and barbarism gave writers and politicians who
needed it a neat alibi for authoritarianism, and not least for the cult of
a
managers and amoral engineering efficiency, veneered with paternalism
out of Carlyle's vitalist destiny tradition, a pattern still strong in American
9 at the Movies
Margaret F. Thorpe, America (London, 1946), pp. 30, 65 and 133.
Eden. The former work speaks of schemes to manipulate the masses in their
' '
mediocre sluggishness, and of pastoral units attached to the soil as a norm
' '
for societies. In 1932, his Modern Education and the Classics gave us the
'
uneducated man with an empty mind... as well
equipped to fill his leisure
as is the educated man ', but no programme of economic or class
contentedly
reform.
Society, the centrality of Eliot, the Harvard expatriate American, to the ideo
of the Partisan Review was clear : Trilling absolved him from reac
logies
to intellectual life, to an ?lite of
tionary inhumanity.14 Eliot's commitment
Christian aristos, made him a culture hero for the Columbia University
Partisan Review axis.
Some of the major 1930s writers were content to place their inhumanism
10 New : An the Rebel ed.
Masses Anthology of Thirties, Joseph North (New York, 1969),
p. 47.
11 Crisis of the American Dream
John Tipple, 1020-1040 (New York, 1968), p. 165.
12 and Partisans : A History in America
James B. Gilbert, Writers of Literary Radicalism (New
13 14
York, 1968), p. 125. Ibid., p. 204. Ibid., p. 220.
within elegant structures, and the cultural aristocrats of politics and the
universities gladly maintained the evasion. Robert Frost placed his extreme
laissez-faire libertarianism even Roosevelt's efforts to prevent total
against
a
capitalist collapse. In Build Soil, pastoral poem delivered, not unnaturally,
at Columbia on 31 1932, at a time when Roosevelt needed
University May
support for election and when a quarter of the entire labour force was un
and the suicide rate even than in 1931, Frost came out for
employed higher
oligarchy, 'monarchic socialism', and: 'I'd let things take their course.
And then I'd claim the credit for the outcome.' Small wonder, therefore,
that John F. Kennedy a
asked Frost to read poem at his inaugural ceremonies
two decades later. Us New gotta stick together.
Englanders
of the writers
the on
Left, however, wrote
Many flabbily; mediocrity
stifled the vitality of socialists in the 1930s. The stronger writing lies in the
urban realism of James T. Farrell's Chicago novels (their accuracy vouched
for by Kenneth Rexroth in his Autobiographical Novel) and Clifford Odets's
work for the Group Theatre in New York. But the finer power lay with the
Orwell recalls a
reply Miller had sent to a questionnaire by the
organized
American Marxist Quarterly :
15 Your England
George Orwell, England (London, 1953), pp. 131-4.
no
Miller replied in terms of extreme pacifism, and individual refusal to fight, with
to convert to the same - a declara
apparent wish others in fact,
opinion practically,
tion of irresponsibility.
But Tropic of Cancer and Tropic of Capricorn (1931 and 1939) had a libera
on their readers which would extend and :
ting effect develop into the century
the effect of their criticism of the assumptions that life had to be governed
by labour, and their primacy given to erotic life, not as the centre of sexual
or nor theorized into Freudian schematics, but
productivity anti-puritanism,
as a force which could take energetic forms and, in Georges
Dionysian
Bataille's sense, transgress and break taboos continually. Miller's dense cloud
chambers of language exactly articulated that erotic inescapability, and not
so much a release as an without resort to
immersion, oedipal resistances,
Ill
Intellectuals leapt into Freudian schematics as they leapt into the schema
tics of political and there submitted. West, Agee and Fitzgerald
ideology,
'
did not succumb to the disastrous of intellectual life '. But
vulgarization
the possible effect on a young black American is partly given in Ralph
Ellison's Invisible Man - that
(1952) is, betrayal by both the Communists
and the Garveyites. After the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920s, blacks could
do little but consolidate their small cultural gains and steady levels of pro
test, acting on the one hand as part of the degradations of the poor in Agee's
terms, and, on the other, exploding into the impotent violences represented
in Richard Wright's novels.
' Chicago '
I have seen Black Hands
Wright's poem (1934) begins with the condi
tions of black exploitation by industry and commerce, and black Americans
'
caught in the revelries of sadism ', yet concludes with the only action which
sustains him ? black and white fists raised in unison :
Some shall be millions
day there and millions of them,
On some red in a burst of fists on a new horizon.16
day
16
Joseph North, ed., op. cit., p. 51.
predictable.18
Jazz bands was else,
provided popular entertainment; jazz something
since it has never been a popular art. Jazz artists survived by going to Europe
'
or came with the high-pressure tactics of
taking other jobs. Prosperity
'19
modern publicity which sold swing from 1935 onwards; but again, Guy
Lombardo was show-biz to Ellington's creative individualism. One way of
being distributed. The script had the help of DuBose Heyward, author of
Porgy (which Gershwin adapted from the play of the novel into his opera in
1935). The film did best in Harlem, and, curiously, in the southern states,
'
where the censors only the two murders and a shot of a woman
clipped
smoking '. But the film differed from O'Neill considerably. The members
of court, as Marie Seton out, were more like minstrels, and
Jones's pointed
the underworld was that of the standard movie
gangsterlands in Little
a
Caesar (1930) and The Public Enemy (1931). But the film is step away from
the ghetto movies which, since the first all-black movies of 1916, generally
reveal self-contempt, dark and therefore lower caste Negroes marrying upper
17 Marshall
Steams, The Story of Jazz (London, 1957), p. 187.
Coral CP 63, 1970.
19 Marshall
Steams, op. cit., p. 197.
20 The Big Sea (New York,
Langston Hughes, 1945), p. 258.
class lighter blacks, heroines killing themselves because black, and the rest
of the degraded life which only began to change significantly in i960. The
Emperor Jones hero does not die because he is black; he deals with blacks
and whites in a power relationship which reduces colour to relative
irrelevance.21
IV
fantasy of power, Matthew Arnold's best self become super-self, the epitome
of the liberal secret dream of strength privately and violently employed for
social purpose, without changing social structure. When World War II
came at the end of the 1930s, he did not a time
immediately join the army, at
when his instruments of orgasmic explosion between in-fighting authoritarian
groups had become the general global scene. But in 1940 he did destroy the
West Wall and an article in Das Schwarz Korps branded him ? of all fates
? a
for the Super-American Jew.26 Television reduced much of his original
power by making him visibly an actor. Camera tricks made him ridiculous,
' '
and camp recognitions invaded credibility.
A similar retrieval of information can be obtained, of course, from Blondie,
Mandrake, The Spirit, Dogpatch and the rest - information which can be
correlated for guides to popular presentations of the over-all culture with the
best-seller lists of the 1930s.27 The directions are obvious. The annual leading
best-seller between 1931 and 1938 was either an Ellery Queen detective thriller
or an Erie Stanley Gardner. The close runners-up were or
equally sinister
trashy: Pearl Buck's The Good Earth in 1931; Henry Allen's Anthony
Adverse and James Hilton's Lost Horizon, 1933; Dale Carnegie's How To
Win Friends And People and Margaret Mitchell's
Influence Gone With The
? a ' '-
Wind, 1936; Marco
Page's Fast Company mystery in 1938. The
were The Best of Damon Runyon in 1938 and The Grapes of
exceptions
Wrath in 1939. Steinbeck's work won because, as Robert Warshow says, it
'
had all the surface characteristics of serious literature and it made all the
" "
advanced assumptions \28 But it is confused at basis, does not examine its
social approves of and at its centre
assumptions, capitalist paternalism, places
a form of Emersonian transcendental self-reliance which is both pathetic and
in the context of the Depression.
dangerous
supplied the standard alibis for crude evolutionary economics :meaning that
* '
us fellas govern divine of Nature. The most rhetoric
by right muck-raking
of Hollywood movies falsified social issues, ostensibly presented documen
tarily. Pare Lorentz's The Plow That Brolle The Plains (1936) concerns the
long-term and radical misuse of the Great Plains which led to the Dust
Bowl of the m?daos (it is complementary toWalter Prescott Webb's The
Great Plains which appeared five years earlier in 1931). But it was made
a New Deal agency. The
by the United States Resettlement Administration,
free verse commentary, the fine poetic images, the compassion and the grand
scale cohere to the point where it is clear why government intervention was
necessary; that
but free enterprise at various levels was for
responsible
and ruin, and that the system of America was itself exploitive and
neglect
immoral in its anti-ecological wastefulness of life, is barely even broached.
The New Deal was, after all, an measure.
emergency
glamorous opportunism, while the words try to suggest the energy wasted.
Busby Berkeley's dance-routine designs parallel Earl Hines's dehumanized
brilliance, using large abstract patterns of light and shade with human bodies
and costumes as the instruments of mechanized lavishness. The world of
Public Enemy (1931) remained. William Wellman offers the rise and fall of a
and poolrooms, a life of loot without labour, whose enemy is not the law
and its agents but other gangsters. The direction's on anxiety and
emphasis
excitement, whatever the other aims, produced commonly romantic
script's
audience reactions.31 Gangsters enacted the whole indi
' possessive
society's
vidualism, and at least lived it up before final slaughter. The shame of the
'
cities remained untouched. Epic suggestions inWellman were
grotesquely
extended in Cecil B. DeMille's of American as an
reprogramming ' history
of fists and finance, with the box-office attraction of sensational sin
epic
'32
ning fitted into moral conclusions built from shameless alibis of self
righteousness.
One of the central mythical images of Hollywood in the 1930s is the
- a calculated
Spencer Tracy of twenty-five films between 1931 and 1935
creation of a man of force and integrity who dramatizes tensions between
power, limited
intelligence, personal honour and
social-political
physical
position. If the plot called for dubious or criminal behaviour, redemption
shaped the denouement, however broken the Tracy character must be. His
stoicism, in various forms, became the instance of a man in a depressed,
and the basis of his stardom. was
non-revolutionary society, Tracy Holly
wood's counterpart of the stoically-enduring Hemingway hero and the very
'
of Roosevelt's : This great nation will endure
embodiment inaugural address
as it has endured, will revive and will prosper.'
But Hemingway's endurance ended in nada and Roosevelt's endurance
is not much more than Faulkner's advice toNegroes : endure. The common
centre is impotence. The boy heroes of Odets's Awa\e and Sing ! (1935) and
Kingsley's Dead End (1935), like the boys in Tracy's Captains Courageous
are are
(1937) and Boys' Town (1938) products of capitalist paternalism who
to make out in a social structure. In 1936
cruelly supposed pseudo-reformist
the play (and later John Ford's film) of Erskine Caldwell's Tobacco Road
its decade-long successful run, reducing the original statement on
began
to the that the middle class could tolerate : that the rural poor
poverty myth
were grotesque hicks, sexually bestial and comically drunk. Similarly, the
characters of Capra's You Can't Ta\e It With You (1936) are
querky indi
vidualists fighting for life in a system which is careless of their well-being.
Anarchistic self-reliance, the great curse of the American Dream, pro
all gain and self-respect, hoggish selfishness and unemployment
grammed
into a stoicism near to self-abuse. Dashiell Hammett's Sam Spade and the
Thin Man stoically oppose crime where city law and its agencies had broken
to
down, and Humphrey Bogart began shape, with Duke Mantee in The
Petrified Forest (1936), his image of the hipster prior to Mailer's formula
tion of the White Negro in 1957: the wary survival of the cynic without
to resist
ideology, the desire impotence in the face of degrading and recal
citrant conditions, the acceptance of some measure of outlawry if cunning
and chivalry were not to corrupt absolutely or become the smugly self
VI
point of impingement
The for the majority
'
of the middle class is given
an anonymous writer in 1932 : the citizen is in no
by ordinary, peaceful
to - ... he is rarely thrown into contact
danger speak of with the criminals,
and when he is, his life is in no grave peril. They use their weapons chiefly
upon each other.'33 But, of course, he was indebted to criminals for beer,
cocktails and whisky. The ambiguous anxieties of the urban middle class
are the sphere of James Thurber's fiction and cartoons. His fairy tales may
manipulate solutions from good wizards, but his probes into domestic life
a no could dis
reveal despair within law-abiding family life which magic
solve. Happiness recedes before the threat of economic disaster and sexual
ill-health, stoically endured, while the margins of the New Yorker, where
so much of Thurber's work appeared, advertised fantasies of escalating
'
But as the moral conclusion to one of his stories : There
expense. proclaims
is no or in narrator of A Box To
safety in numbers' anything else.' The
Hide In endures : I still have this overpowering urge to hide in a box.
Maybe it will go away, maybe I'll be all right. Maybe it will get worse. It's
'
hard to say.' The hero of The Private Life ofMr Bid well is last seen walk
iacountry road with the a man : he
ing along halting, uncertain gait of blind
was to see how many steps he could take without opening his eyes '.
trying
The protagonist of The Remarkable Case of Mr Bruhl gradually identifies
'
a gangster he resembles physically and is down
totally with gunned by silent
men, overcoats and what to be cases for musical
wearing carrying appeared
instruments \34 Lying in his hospital bed he snarls his replies to the commis
sioner of police like any gangster; he knows his role from inside. Thurber's
I932)
34 The Thurber Carnival
James Thurber, (London, 1945), p. 148.
in a desperation
heroes repeatedly separate themselves from their routine life
which is neither social protest nor social adjustment.
* ' * '
In What Are the Leftists Saying ? and to Say Thurber
Something
ever
exposed the middle class bohemianism of the 1930s leftists, without
their to the class. He
understanding profound irresponsibility working
retained his popularity, while Edward Dahlberg, a far more complex writer
and a major stylist, has never had a considerable
following,
at least partly
because his targets include both bourgeois behaviour
satirical and Leftist
a
ideological games, treated with vehemence beyond Thurber's faintly comic
poses. Those Who Perish (1934) nails the well-heeled and their carelessness
for ever: their use of public events as subjects for fashionable competitive
conversation; Hitler and the Nazi Youth Movement reduced to a game of
Freudian Mrs Cortlandt Dinwiddie ? ' related to the Astors and
analysis;
'-
Bismarck using Jack London and his wife and World War I as part of
her autobiography, called / Have to Blame?5 As
tentatively Only Myself
Rexroth reports, Bohemianism was a way of in New
* evading the political
York circles : in those days the way
People talked about communism people
talk about acid or smack . . . they didn't know anything about it . . .
" People
"
were the masses
running around talking about and there wasn't really
contact with the masses.'36 On the west coast, the IWW and an
any
anarchistic tradition dominated the intellectual and Bohemian world and to
some extent relieved it from that outrageous tedium of the pseudo-ideological
which Dahlberg in The Flea of Sodom (1951), as he dramatizes
delineates
his recollections of the irresponsible Left in the 1930s, the stultifying desire
to live
mythically which reduced so many to the grotesque. The central
character, Golem, only reads about the hunger of West Virginia coal miners.
'
a
Andromache places his sculpture of lynched Negro share-cropper upon
a shelf above their a protest marcher
nuptial couch ', and dresses the part of
in May-day parades
to play out her leftist alibis :
was and wanted to Etna cement. . .
Everybody living mythically escape boiling
A free-thinker, was banished from the island the
advocating contraceptives, by
water-front faction that was an Irish-Catholic This
proselytizing longshoreman.
was denied because he was already in the party; besides he had a
triptych in his
cellar apartment at Red Hook, the middle panel being Karl Marx, with the Virgin
on one side and on the other.
Mary Shirley Temple
'
an
Dahlberg's proletarian poet, ' Ephraim Bedlam, writes appalling
* Aeschy
lean coal miner's tragedy and recites a poem beginning : O
pellagra,
'
company towns, diphtheria creeks, and burial funds! Pilate Agenda is
35 The Anxious
Years, ed. Louis Filler (New York, 1962; Capricorn ed., 1964), pp. 197-8*
36 David
Meltzer, ed., op. cit., pp. 10-12.
hardly extend beyond the lyric present. The New York of Dos Passos's
fictional epic, USA, written between 1930 and 1936, is an environment of
a dehumanization
deteriorating living. His trilogy traces of city life from
1900 to the execution of Sacco and Vanzetti and the Depression. He is the
novelist of alienation in the 1930s, and, at least at that time, took a
major
stance which was non-ideological and secular. Malcolm Cowley recalls him
'
over to a table full of writers New Masses : Intellectual
calling planning
workers of the world unite, you have nothing to lose but your brains \39
With on trial, Dos Passos at least articulated the economic, per
capitalism * '
sonal and political intersections whose catastrophic centre was us fellas ?
J. P. Morgan, in particular. The waste and sacrifice of life which
private
wealth and laissez-faire policies necessarily imply, isDos Passos's theme. His
characters are with little warmth, a collective who
stereotypes people repre
37 Marius
Bewley, The Eccentric Design (London, 1959), p. 10.
38 Peter
Viereck, Dream and Responsibility (Washington, 1953), p. 61.
39 Malcolm
Cowley, Exiles Return (New York, 1934; rev. ed., 1951), p. 223.
appearance of the community destroyed that family authority ',41 and not
the other way round, as so often it is reported to be.
One of the most
endearing facts of the 1930s, however, is the responsibility
'
at least some artists felt for their function in society, conceiving the very
'
act of creation as one of affirmation of the value of human life and relent
lessly pursuing American experience and the truth about themselves.42 The
a
essential search for mutuality a structure
without ideological rigidity, for
of life firmly founded in particularities of person and place, is to be found
inWilliam novel trilogy, the first volume of which, White
Carlos Williams's
Mule, appeared in 1937. The working- and middle-class lives recorded by
Williams correct the mythological' simplifications of the Andy Hardy film
'
series perpetrated by W. S. Woody Van Dyke II {Andy Hardy Gets
Spring Fever dates from 1939). But in Boston, the school committee and the
*
Chamber of Commerce were in a letter on the
judges competition Why
Hardys should live in Boston ',43 and the Hardys themselves were the product
of research into family norms of behaviour and consumption. These whites
were as
quite stereotypical as Ralph Ellison's
'
blacks and quite as manipu
lated. In 1923Williams had written how the pure products of America go
'? '
crazy and later said : That's the trouble with us all. We're not half used
up. And that unused portion drives us crazy.' Living as closed, partial and
a man into a grotesque part of
mythicized stereotype mythicizes dogma. He
is then by definition a mad inmate of the institution of society. Hollywood's
Andy Hardy series deliberately imposed myth. Illusion infected the decade.
reduced ? whether in the
Actuality mythicization considerably fighting
war in or in the veterans' Bonus
ideological Spain44 taking part Army
massing at Washington in 1932 to demand what Congress had promised,
By the 1940s, the liberal attitudes of the previous decade, generated under
the shame of both capitalist and leftist catastrophes, shifted into conservatism
the simple
fact is, this isn't
the thirties either,
anymore
the outlaws are different,
there came a in the
point
when morgan
empire henry
stopped being pirate and
was made the governor
of Jamaica, but you were
born years
thirty early.51