Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PII: S1359-4311(17)32023-9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.10.074
Reference: ATE 11272
Please cite this article as: A. Asadi, M. Asadi, A. Rezaniakolaei, L. Aistrup Rosendahl, S. Wongwises, An
Experimental Investigation on Heat Transfer Capability of Mg (OH)2/MWCNT-Engine Oil Hybrid Nano-Lubricant
Adopted as an Automotive Coolant and Lubricant, Applied Thermal Engineering (2017), doi: https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.10.074
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1
Young researchers and Elite Club, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
P. O. Box: 35196-97951
Tel: ++98-23-33654040
Alireza Rezaniakolaei; E-mail: Alr@et.aau.dk
Department of energy technology, Aalborg University, Pontoppidanstraede 111, DK-9220
Aalborg, Denmark
Lasse Aistrup Rosendahl: E-mail: Lar@et.aau.dk
Department of energy technology, Aalborg University, Pontoppidanstraede 111, DK-9220
Aalborg, Denmark
Somchai Wongwises, Email: somchai.won@kmutt.ac.th
Fluid Mechanics, Thermal Engineering and Multiphase Flow Research Lab. (FUTURE),
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkuts University of
Technology Thonburi, Bangmod, Bangkok, Thailand
Abstract
The major objective of the present study is to investigate the heat transfer capability of Mg
(OH)2/MWCNT- engine oil hybrid nano-lubricant. First, the effects of temperature and Solid
volume fraction on the dynamic viscosity and thermal conductivity of Mg (OH)2/MWCNT-
engine oil hybrid nano-lubricant have been experimentally investigated. The experiments have
been conducted in various temperatures (25 C, 30 C, 35 C, 40 C, 45 C, 50 C, 55 C, and 60
C ) and solid concentrations (0.25 %, 0.5 %, 0.75 %, 1 %, 1.5 %, and 2 %). Based on the
2
measurements, it is found that the studied nano-lubricant showed Newtonian behavior in all the
studied temperatures and solid concentrations. Furthermore, the experimental results indicated
that the dynamic viscosity of the nano-lubricant increases with an increase in solid concentration
while it decreases with an increase in temperature. The thermal conductivity of the nanofluid
showed increasing trend as the solid concentration and temperature increased. The minimum and
maximum enhancement were about 13 % and 50 %, respectively. Based on experimental data,
two new trustworthy correlation to predict the dynamic viscosity and thermal conductivity of the
nano-lubricant has been proposed. Finally, the heat transfer capability of the nanofluid has been
investigated in both the internal laminar and turbulent flow regimes and it is found that the
studied nanofluid can be advantageous in heat transfer applications.
1. Introduction
Nanofluids, for the first time, have been introduced by Choi [1] as a suspension of nano-sized
particles into conventional fluids such as water, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, oil, and so
forth. Since their thermal performance is much higher than those conventional fluids, their
applications have been widely developed in recent decade [2-15]. A comprehensive review on
heat transfer, viscosity, and applications of nanofluid has been published by Azami et al. [16],
Bashirnezhad et al. [17], and Devendiran et al. [18], respectively.
It is proofed that the viscosity of working fluids has direct effect on Reynolds and Prandtl
numbers, which are two key parameters in heat transfer. Despite the importance of viscosity, it
was rarely the focus of the most published research papers and most of researchers just focused
on thermal conductivity and convective heat transfer coefficient. However, there are some
published research which investigated the viscosity of nanofluids and the affecting parameters
[19-31]. In recent years, a new innovative class of nanofluids, hybrid nanofluids, have been
introduced which are containing metallic/metal-oxide [32-36], and metal-oxide/carbon nanotubes
[37-40] particles.
One of the widely used working fluid in lubrication and coolant applications is engine oil. The
main responsibilities of engine oils would be decreasing the friction between moving parts,
3
cooling the moving parts, preventing corrosion, and sealing and cleaning the engines [41].
Furthermore, thermal conductivity and viscosity of engine oils are two key parameters in
applications of them. In this regards, there are limited number of papers investigating the
rheological behavior of oil base nanofluids. Hemmat et al. [42] studied the dynamic viscosity of
MWCNT/SiO2 (20-80)-SAE40 hybrid nanofluid in different solid concentrations and
temperatures. Their results showed that the studied nanofluid exhibits Newtonian behavior over
the solid volume fractions up to 1 % while for higher solid volume fraction (1.5 % and 2 %) the
nanofluid showed non-Newtonian behavior. Aberomand et al. [43] conducted an experimental
study on dynamic viscosity and thermal conductivity of Silver-engine oil in different temperature
and solid concentration. Based on experimental data, they proposed a new correlation to predict
the dynamic viscosity of the nanofluid. In another experimental study, Asadi and Asadi [19]
investigated the effect of temperature and solid volume fraction on dynamic viscosity of
MWCNT/ZnO-engine oil nano-lubricant. They indicated that the nano-lubricant exhibits
Newtonian behavior over the studied range of temperatures (5 C to 50 C) and solid
concentrations (0.125 % to 1 %). They also proposed a new correlation to predict the dynamic
viscosity of the nano-lubricant. The dynamic viscosity of MWCNT/SiO2-engine oil in various
temperatures and solid concentrations has been experimentally studied by Afrand et al. [41].
They found that the nanofluid exhibits Newtonian behavior over the studied range of
concentrations and temperatures. Furthermore, based on experimental measurement, they
proposed a new correlation to predict the dynamic viscosity of the nanofluid. Ettefaghi et al. [44]
studied the thermal conductivity of the MWCNT-oil in a limited range of solid concentration and
at the temperature of 20 C. Their results indicated that the thermal conductivity of the nanofluid
increases as the solid concentration increased. They reported 20 % enhancement in thermal
conductivity of the nanofluid. In another experimental investigation, which is recently published,
Asadi et al. [45] studied the rheological behavior of MWCNT/MgO-SAE50 hybrid nano-
lubricant. They studied the effect of temperature and solid volume fraction on dynamic viscosity
of the nano-lubricant and found that the dynamic viscosity increased by increasing the solid
volume fraction in all the temperatures. They have also proposed a new correlation to predict the
dynamic viscosity of the nano-lubricant in the studied range of solid concentrations and
temperatures. The thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of the Cu-engine oil nanofluid has
been experimentally investigated by Aberomand and Jafarimoghaddam [46]. They conducted the
4
experiments in different range of temperatures and solid concentrations and reported that the
thermal conductivity of the nanofluid enhanced by 31 % as the solid concentration and
temperature increased.
From what has been discussed, it is revealed that there is a limited number of investigations on
the rheological properties of oil-based nanofluids. Furthermore, to the best of the authors
knowledge, no comprehensive study has been performed on the heat transfer capability and
thermophysical properties of Mg (OH)2/MWCNT-engine oil hybrid nano-lubricant thus far.
Thus, in the present study, the effect of temperature and solid volume fraction on the dynamic
viscosity and thermal conductivity of Mg (OH)2/MWCNT-engine oil hybrid nano-lubricant has
been empirically investigated. The experiments have been performed in different range of
temperatures (form 25 C to 60 C) and solid volume fractions (form 0.25 % to 2 %).
Furthermore, two new correlations, based on empirical measurements, to predict the dynamic
viscosity and thermal conductivity of the studied nano-lubricant in terms of temperature and
solid volume fraction has been proposed. Finally, the heat transfer capability of the nanofluid in
both the internal turbulent and laminar flow regimes has been investigated for heat transfer
applications in automotive industry.
The stability of nanofluids directly affected by the quality of nanoparticles dispersion in the base
fluid. One of the commonly used method by researchers is visual observation method which is
not precise. On the other hand, this method cannot be practical for the nanofluids which has dark
color (i.e. oil-based nanofluid). Zeta potential is one of the most reliable methods to investigate
the stability of nanofluids. This method has been widely used by researchers in the literature [46,
53-56]. Many researchers have discussed that the samples with the absolute Zeta potential value
less than 30 mV can be considered as unacceptable stability, the values between 30 mV and 45
mV own moderately acceptable stability, and the values higher than 45 mV exhibits excellent
stability [46, 48]. The absolute Zeta potential values of the prepared samples in different solid
concentrations has been clearly presented in Fig. 2. Based on this figure, it is crystal clear that
the prepared samples exhibit excellent stability even after two weeks.
Measuring the dynamic viscosity of the nanofluid in different temperatures (ranging from 25 C
to 60 C) and solid concentrations (ranging from 0.25 % to 2 %), a Brookfield cone and plate
viscometer (CAP2000+), which is supplied by Brookfield engineering laboratories of the US,
has been employed. In this study, the CPE-40 spindle and 2.4 cm 0.8 cone has been used. At the
beginning of each set of measurements, the viscometer has been calibrated using the base fluid
(engine oil 5W50) at the ambient temperature. More detailed information of the viscometer has
been presented in Tab. 1. It must be noted that, in the present investigation, based on
experimental data, the term relative viscosity has been defined as the ratio of dynamic
viscosity of the studied nano-lubricant (nf) to dynamic viscosity of the base fluid (bf).
A KD2 Pro thermal property analyzer (Decagon Devices Inc., USA) has been employed to
measure the thermal conductivity of the studied nanofluid. This device has been widely used by
researchers in thermal conductivity measurement [57-60]. The device works based on transient
hot wire method. It must be noted that at the onset of each set of experiments, the device has
been calibrated by the glycerin supplied by the manufacturer. Moreover, the accuracy of the
device has been tested through measuring the thermal conductivity of water and comparing the
results with the data available in ASHRAE handbook [61] (Fig. 3). As can be seen in Fig. 3, the
6
maximum difference between the measured data and those of ASHRAE handbook is less than
0.9 %. This is the way most of the researchers has been employed in the literature to prove the
accuracy of the experimental measurements [25, 62-64]. Furthermore, in order to set the
temperature of the samples uniformly, a hot water bath temperature has been employed. Fig. 4
shows a schematic view of the thermal conductivity set up. Based on the device user manual, in
order to minimize the errors resulted from the free convection, the probe (needle) of the device
must be kept vertically into the fluid during the measurements. In order to investigate the
repeatability of the measurements, each set of measurements have been repeated three times and
the mean values have been recorded. It must be noted that the interval between each
measurement was 15 minutes. Tab. 2 presents the detailed information of the KD2 Pro device.
There are many debates on rheological behavior of nanofluids by researchers whether they are
Newtonian or Non-Newtonian fluids. For instance, while Kabelac and Kuhnke [65] reported that
the viscosity of Al2O3 nanofluid shows a trend directly depend on shear rate, Prasher et al. [66]
indicated that the viscosity of such a nanofluid is independent from shear rate. On the other
hand, the Prandtl and Reynolds number are affected by the dynamic viscosity of the nanofluid,
which have certain effect on heat and mass transfer and pumping power. In the present study, the
dynamic viscosity of the nanofluids has been measured at different rotational speeds (shear
rates). The dynamic viscosity of the nanofluid with respect to rotational speed in different
temperatures and at the solid concentration of 0.25 % has been shown in Fig. 5. It can be seen
that the variation of dynamic viscosity of the nanofluid over the studied range of rotational
speeds is negligible. Thus, it can be concluded that the studied nanofluid exhibits Newtonian
behavior. This behavior is similar in all the studied solid concentrations and temperatures.
studied nano-lubricant. The Wang et al. and Batchelor model are presented in equation 1 and 2,
respectively.
Where nf represents the dynamic viscosity of nanofluid, bf is dynamic viscosity of base fluid,
and is the solid volume fraction of nanoparticle. Fig. 6 shows the comparison between
experimental data and predicted values by the theoretical models. As can be seen, neither of the
models are able to predict the dynamic viscosity of the studied nanofluid within the acceptable
range of accuracy.
Fig. 8 shows the variation of the dynamic viscosity with respect to temperature in different solid
concentrations. As it can be clearly seen, the dynamic viscosity decreased as the temperature
8
increased. The main cause of this decrease in dynamic viscosity would be the weak interaction
between the molecules which is resulted from the increase of temperature [41].
As it is proofed that the theoretical models are not able to predict the dynamic viscosity of the
studied nano-lubricant in thorough precise manner (section 3.1.2.), the lack of having a
correlation, which can be easily used in various applications, to predict the dynamic viscosity of
this nano-lubricant is felt. In this study, based on the experimental data, a new correlation in
terms of Solid volume fraction () and temperature (T) has been proposed as follows:
nf
1604 256.8 24.73 3 1.615 T 2 0.07343 T 2 83.2 T 7.389 T
bf (3
0.01123 T 3 74.19 2 )
This correlation is able to predict the dynamic viscosity of the studied nano-lubricant in the
studied rang of temperatures and solid concentrations. In order to proof the accuracy of the
proposed correlation, the deviation analysis has been performed using the equation 4.
nf nf
Dev Exp . Pr ed .
100(%)
nf Exp.
(4)
Figure 9 shows the margin of deviation with respect to solid volume fraction in different
temperatures. As it can be seen, the maximum deviation of the correlation is approximately 6.5
%.
3.2.Thermal conductivity:
3.2.1. Effect of temperature and solid concentration:
The trend of thermal conductivity of the studied nanofluid versus temperatures in all the studied
solid concentrations has been presented in Fig. 10. As can be seen, the thermal conductivity of
the nanofluid increase as the solid concentration increased. This increasing trend has been similar
in all the studied temperatures. However, the based fluid (oil) showed different trend; the thermal
conductivity decreased as the temperature increased, which is in accordance with the previously
published papers [46, 54].
9
Fig. 11 shows the relative thermal conductivity of the studied nanofluid with respect to
temperature and solid concentration. It can be clearly seen that the relative thermal conductivity
increases as the temperature and solid concentration increased, which is in accordance with the
previously published literature [46, 54, 72, 73]. This increase could be due to the fact that
increasing the temperature leads to increase the random collisions among the particles and also it
increases the Brownian motion. It is also interesting to note that the minimum and maximum
enhancement in thermal conductivity of the nanofluid is well under 13 % and 50 % which took
place at the temperature of 25 C and 60 C and solid concentrations of 0.25 % and 2 %,
respectively.
Since the motor oils main responsibility is to cooling down the different moving parts of engine,
it can be recommended to use this nanofluid at the temperature of 60 C and solid concentration
of 2 % in cooling applications since it showed the highest thermal conductivity enhancement.
Many theoretical models to predict the thermal conductivity behavior of various nanofluids have
been thus far proposed by researchers in the literature [74-81], but it has been proofed that none
of these theoretical models are able to predict the thermal conductivity of all nanofluids [2, 26,
82, 83]. Thus, in the present study, an attempt has been made to propose a new accurate
correlation to predict the thermal conductivity of the studied nanofluid in terms of temperature
and solid concentration. The proposed correlation is as follows:
Fig. 12 proofs the accuracy of the proposed correlation. The maximum deviation of the
proposed correlation is well under 2 %, which shows the precision of the correlation in the
studied range of temperatures and solid concentrations.
investigated in both the internal laminar and turbulent flow regimes. For the internal laminar
flow regime, it can be calculated using the enhancement ratio of viscosity to that of thermal
conductivity which is suggested by Prasher et al. [66]:
C ( nf bf ) / bf
(6)
Ck (knf kbf ) / kbf
They indicated that for the ratio less than 4 (C/Ck4), the nanofluid could be considered as a
beneficial fluid in heat transfer applications. The evaluation of heat transfer performance of the
studied nanofluid has been presented in Fig. 13. It can be seen that in all the temperatures and
solid concentrations, the ratio is less than 4. Thus it can be concluded that using this nanofluid
could bring certain advantages in heat transfer applications compare to that of the base fluid.
The advantage of using this nanofluid instead of the base fluid in internal turbulent flow regime
can be investigated based on the Mouromtseff number [84] as follows:
Where , , cp, and k represent density, dynamic viscosity, specific heat capacity and thermal
conductivity, respectively. For the ratio of Mo number higher than 1, the nanofluid considered as
advantageous fluid in heat transfer applications. Therefore, higher Mo number indicates better
heat transfer capability of the fluid. In order to estimate the density of a hybrid nanofluid, based
on the law of mixture, Takabi and Salehi [85] proposed a correlation as follows:
They also proposed a correlation to estimate the specific heat capacity of hybrid nanofluids as
follows [85]:
(1 ) nf cbf p ,11c p ,1 p ,2 2c p ,2
cnf (9)
nf
Fig. 14 shows the evaluation of heat transfer capability of the nanofluid in internal turbulent flow
regime. As can be seen, the ratio of the Mo number in all the studied solid concentrations and
temperatures is higher than 1 which shows the capability of the studied nanofluid in heat transfer
applications as a coolant fluid.
11
4. Conclusion:
In the present study, the heat transfer capability of Mg (OH)2/MWCNT- engine oil hybrid nano-
lubricant has been experimentally investigated in different range of temperatures and solid
concentrations. Furthermore, the effect of temperature and solid concentration on dynamic
viscosity and thermal conductivity of the nano-lubricant has been studied. The experiments
carried out in the temperatures ranging from 25 C to 60 C and solid concentrations ranging
from 0.25 % to 2 %. Based on the experimental measurements, the followings can be concluded:
The studied nano-lubricant showed Newtonian behavior in all the studied solid
concentrations and temperatures.
The dynamic viscosity of the nano-lubricant increased with an increase in the solid
volume fraction of nanoparticles while it showed decreasing trend as the temperature
increased. The maximum enhancement took place at the Solid volume fraction of 2
% and temperature of 60 C by less than 50 %.
The thermal conductivity of the nanofluid showed increasing trend as the solid
concentration and temperature increased. The minimum and maximum enhancement
was about 13 % and 50 % at the first and last solid concentrations and temperatures,
respectively.
Based on the experimental measurements, two new trustworthy correlation to predict
the dynamic viscosity and thermal conductivity of the nano-lubricant, with the
maximum deviation of 6.5 % and 2 %, respectively, have been proposed.
Based on the dynamic viscosity and thermal conductivity behavior of the nanofluid,
the heat transfer capability of the nanofluid in cooling applications in automotive
industry has been evaluated in both the internal laminar and turbulent flow regimes.
The results showed that using this nanofluid would be advantageous in cooling
applications in automotive industry compared to the base fluid, pure oil.
Acknowledgement
The fifth author acknowledges the support provided by the "Research Chair Grant" National
Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), the Thailand Research Fund (TRF),
and King Mongkuts University of Technology Thonburi through the KMUTT 55 th Anniversary
Commemorative Fund.
12
Nomenclature Subscripts
K: Thermal conductivity bf: Base fluid
Cp: Specific heat capacity nf: Nanofluid
Mo: Mouromtseff number p: Particle
: nanoparticles volume fraction
Greeks
: Density
: Shear stress
: Shear strain
: Dynamic viscosity
References:
[1] S. U. S. Choi, "Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles," ASME-Publications-
Fed, vol. 231, pp. 99-106, 1995.
[2] M. Afrand, "Experimental study on thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol containing hybrid
nano-additives and development of a new correlation," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 110,
pp. 1111-1119, 1/5/ 2017.
[3] M. Baratpour, A. Karimipour, M. Afrand, and S. Wongwises, "Effects of temperature and
concentration on the viscosity of nanofluids made of single-wall carbon nanotubes in ethylene
glycol," International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 74, pp. 108-113, 5// 2016.
[4] M. Goodarzi, A. Amiri, M. S. Goodarzi, M. R. Safaei, A. Karimipour, E. M. Languri, et al.,
"Investigation of heat transfer and pressure drop of a counter flow corrugated plate heat
exchanger using MWCNT based nanofluids," International communications in heat and mass
transfer, vol. 66, pp. 172-179, 2015.
13
[5] M. Afrand, E. Abedini, and H. Teimouri, "How the dispersion of magnesium oxide nanoparticles
effects on the viscosity of water-ethylene glycol mixture: Experimental evaluation and
correlation development," Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures.
[6] H. Goshayeshi, M. Goodarzi, and M. Dahari, "Effect of magnetic field on the heat transfer rate of
kerosene/Fe 2 O 3 nanofluid in a copper oscillating heat pipe," Experimental Thermal and Fluid
Science, vol. 68, pp. 663-668, 2015.
[7] H. R. Goshayeshi, M. Goodarzi, M. R. Safaei, and M. Dahari, "Experimental study on the effect of
inclination angle on heat transfer enhancement of a ferrofluid in a closed loop oscillating heat
pipe under magnetic field," Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, vol. 74, pp. 265-270, 2016.
[8] M. Afrand, D. Toghraie, and B. Ruhani, "Effects of temperature and nanoparticles concentration
on rheological behavior of Fe3O4Ag/EG hybrid nanofluid: An experimental study,"
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, vol. 77, pp. 38-44, 10// 2016.
[9] M. Safaei, H. Togun, K. Vafai, S. Kazi, and A. Badarudin, "Investigation of heat transfer
enhancement in a forward-facing contracting channel using FMWCNT nanofluids," Numerical
Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, vol. 66, pp. 1321-1340, 2014.
[10] A. S. Kherbeet, M. R. Safaei, H. Mohammed, B. Salman, H. E. Ahmed, O. A. Alawi, et al., "Heat
transfer and fluid flow over microscale backward and forward facing step: A review,"
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 76, pp. 237-244, 2016.
[11] M. R. Safaei, G. Ahmadi, M. S. Goodarzi, M. Safdari Shadloo, H. R. Goshayeshi, and M. Dahari,
"Heat transfer and pressure drop in fully developed turbulent flows of graphene nanoplatelets
silver/water nanofluids," Fluids, vol. 1, p. 20, 2016.
[12] A. Mariano, M. J. Pastoriza-Gallego, L. Lugo, L. Mussari, and M. M. Pieiro, "Co3O4 ethylene
glycol-based nanofluids: Thermal conductivity, viscosity and high pressure density,"
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 85, pp. 54-60, 6// 2015.
[13] M. I. Pryazhnikov, A. V. Minakov, V. Y. Rudyak, and D. V. Guzei, "Thermal conductivity
measurements of nanofluids," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 104, pp.
1275-1282, 1// 2017.
[14] K. N. Shukla, T. M. Koller, M. H. Rausch, and A. P. Frba, "Effective thermal conductivity of
nanofluids A new model taking into consideration Brownian motion," International Journal of
Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 99, pp. 532-540, 8// 2016.
[15] S. Aberoumand and A. Jafarimoghaddam, "Tungsten (III) oxide (WO 3)Silver/transformer oil
hybrid nanofluid: Preparation, stability, thermal conductivity and dielectric strength," Alexandria
Engineering Journal, 2016.
[16] W. H. Azmi, K. A. Hamid, N. A. Usri, R. Mamat, and K. V. Sharma, "Heat transfer augmentation of
ethylene glycol: water nanofluids and applications A review," International Communications
in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 75, pp. 13-23, 7// 2016.
[17] K. Bashirnezhad, S. Bazri, M. R. Safaei, M. Goodarzi, M. Dahari, O. Mahian, et al., "Viscosity of
nanofluids: A review of recent experimental studies," International Communications in Heat and
Mass Transfer, vol. 73, pp. 114-123, 4// 2016.
[18] D. K. Devendiran and V. A. Amirtham, "A review on preparation, characterization, properties and
applications of nanofluids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 60, pp. 21-40, 7//
2016.
[19] M. Asadi and A. Asadi, "Dynamic viscosity of MWCNT/ZnOengine oil hybrid nanofluid: An
experimental investigation and new correlation in different temperatures and solid
concentrations," International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer.
[20] M. H. Esfe, M. Afrand, S. Wongwises, A. Naderi, A. Asadi, S. Rostami, et al., "Applications of
feedforward multilayer perceptron artificial neural networks and empirical correlation for
14
[50] S. Hassani, R. Saidur, S. Mekhilef, and A. Hepbasli, "A new correlation for predicting the thermal
conductivity of nanofluids; using dimensional analysis," International Journal of Heat and Mass
Transfer, vol. 90, pp. 121-130, 11// 2015.
[51] M. Hemmat Esfe, A. Karimipour, W.-M. Yan, M. Akbari, M. R. Safaei, and M. Dahari,
"Experimental study on thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol based nanofluids containing
Al2O3 nanoparticles," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 88, pp. 728-734, 9//
2015.
[52] X. Li, C. Zou, T. Wang, and X. Lei, "Rheological behavior of ethylene glycol-based SiC nanofluids,"
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 84, pp. 925-930, 5// 2015.
[53] D. Cabaleiro, L. Colla, S. Barison, L. Lugo, L. Fedele, and S. Bobbo, "Heat Transfer Capability of
(Ethylene Glycol+ Water)-Based Nanofluids Containing Graphene Nanoplatelets: Design and
Thermophysical Profile," Nanoscale research letters, vol. 12, p. 53, 2017.
[54] S. Aberoumand, A. Jafarimoghaddam, M. Moravej, H. Aberoumand, and K. Javaherdeh,
"Experimental study on the rheological behavior of silver-heat transfer oil nanofluid and
suggesting two empirical based correlations for thermal conductivity and viscosity of oil based
nanofluids," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 101, pp. 362-372, 5/25/ 2016.
[55] S. Askari, R. Lotfi, A. Rashidi, H. Koolivand, and M. Koolivand-Salooki, "Rheological and
thermophysical properties of ultra-stable kerosene-based Fe 3 O 4/Graphene nanofluids for
energy conservation," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 128, pp. 134-144, 2016.
[56] R.-T. Wang and J.-C. Wang, "Intelligent dimensional and thermal performance analysis of Al2O3
nanofluid," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 138, pp. 686-697, 4/15/ 2017.
[57] M. Hemmat Esfe, S. Saedodin, M. Akbari, A. Karimipour, M. Afrand, S. Wongwises, et al.,
"Experimental investigation and development of new correlations for thermal conductivity of
CuO/EGwater nanofluid," International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 65, pp.
47-51, 7// 2015.
[58] R. Agarwal, K. Verma, N. K. Agrawal, R. K. Duchaniya, and R. Singh, "Synthesis, characterization,
thermal conductivity and sensitivity of CuO nanofluids," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 102,
pp. 1024-1036, 6/5/ 2016.
[59] M. Kole and T. K. Dey, "Enhanced thermophysical properties of copper nanoparticles dispersed
in gear oil," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 56, pp. 45-53, 2013.
[60] H. Li, L. Wang, Y. He, Y. Hu, J. Zhu, and B. Jiang, "Experimental investigation of thermal
conductivity and viscosity of ethylene glycol based ZnO nanofluids," Applied Thermal
Engineering, vol. 88, pp. 363-368, 9/5/ 2015.
[61] R. A. S. o. Heating, A. C. Engineers, and G. Atlanta, ASHRAE handbook: fundamentals: ASHRAE,
2009.
[62] L. Kundan, S. S. Mallick, and B. Pal, "Effect of time dependent nanoclusters morphology on the
thermal conductivity and heat transport mechanism of TiO2 based nanofluid," Heat and Mass
Transfer, vol. 53, pp. 1873-1892, 2017.
[63] M. H. Esfe, M. Afrand, A. Karimipour, W.-M. Yan, and N. Sina, "An experimental study on
thermal conductivity of MgO nanoparticles suspended in a binary mixture of water and ethylene
glycol," International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 67, pp. 173-175, 2015.
[64] D. Toghraie, V. A. Chaharsoghi, and M. Afrand, "Measurement of thermal conductivity of ZnO
TiO2/EG hybrid nanofluid," Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 125, pp. 527-535,
2016.
[65] J. F. K. S. Kabelac, presented at the Ann, presented at the Ann. Assembly Int. Heat Transfer
Confer, 2006.
[66] R. Prasher, D. Song, J. Wang, and P. Phelan, "Measurements of nanofluid viscosity and its
implications for thermal applications," Applied physics letters, vol. 89, p. 133108, 2006.
17
[67] X. Wang, X. Xu, and S. U. S. Choi, "Thermal conductivity of nanoparticle-fluid mixture," Journal of
thermophysics and heat transfer, vol. 13, pp. 474-480, 1999.
[68] G. K. Batchelor, "The effect of Brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical
particles," Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 83, pp. 97-117, 1977.
[69] W. Duangthongsuk and S. Wongwises, "Measurement of temperature-dependent thermal
conductivity and viscosity of TiO 2-water nanofluids," Experimental thermal and fluid science,
vol. 33, pp. 706-714, 2009.
[70] L. Godson, B. Raja, D. M. Lal, and S. Wongwises, "Experimental investigation on the thermal
conductivity and viscosity of silver-deionized water nanofluid," Experimental Heat Transfer, vol.
23, pp. 317-332, 2010.
[71] T. Yiamsawas, O. Mahian, A. S. Dalkilic, S. Kaewnai, and S. Wongwises, "Experimental studies on
the viscosity of TiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 nanoparticles suspended in a mixture of ethylene glycol and
water for high temperature applications," Applied Energy, vol. 111, pp. 40-45, 2013.
[72] S. Aberoumand and A. Jafarimoghaddam, "Tungsten (III) oxide (WO3) Silver/transformer oil
hybrid nanofluid: Preparation, stability, thermal conductivity and dielectric strength," Alexandria
Engineering Journal.
[73] M. Afrand, "Experimental study on thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol containing hybrid
nano-additives and development of a new correlation," Applied Thermal Engineering.
[74] R. Hamilton and O. Crosser, "Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two-component systems,"
Industrial & Engineering chemistry fundamentals, vol. 1, pp. 187-191, 1962.
[75] W. Yu and S. Choi, "The role of interfacial layers in the enhanced thermal conductivity of
nanofluids: a renovated HamiltonCrosser model," Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 6, pp.
355-361, 2004.
[76] Q. Li, Y. Xuan, and J. Wang, "Investigation on convective heat transfer and flow features of
nanofluids," Journal of Heat transfer, vol. 125, pp. 151-155, 2003.
[77] B. C. Pak and Y. I. Cho, "Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with
submicron metallic oxide particles," Experimental Heat Transfer an International Journal, vol. 11,
pp. 151-170, 1998.
[78] R. Prasher, P. Bhattacharya, and P. E. Phelan, "Thermal conductivity of nanoscale colloidal
solutions (nanofluids)," Physical review letters, vol. 94, p. 025901, 2005.
[79] J. C. Maxwell, A treatise on electricity and magnetism vol. 1: Clarendon press, 1881.
[80] D. J. Jeffrey, "Conduction through a random suspension of spheres," in Proceedings of the Royal
Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1973, pp. 355-367.
[81] E. Yamada and T. Ota, "Effective thermal conductivity of dispersed materials," Heat and Mass
Transfer, vol. 13, pp. 27-37, 1980.
[82] M. Afrand, M. H. Esfe, E. Abedini, and H. Teimouri, "Predicting the effects of magnesium oxide
nanoparticles and temperature on the thermal conductivity of water using artificial neural
network and experimental data," Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures,
2016.
[83] M. Vafaei, M. Afrand, N. Sina, R. Kalbasi, F. Sourani, and H. Teimouri, "Evaluation of thermal
conductivity of MgO-MWCNTs/EG hybrid nanofluids based on experimental data by selecting
optimal artificial neural networks," Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, vol.
85, pp. 90-96, 2017.
[84] I. Mouromtseff, "Water and forced-air cooling of vacuum tubes nonelectronic problems in
electronic tubes," Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 30, pp. 190-205, 1942.
[85] B. Takabi and S. Salehi, "Augmentation of the heat transfer performance of a sinusoidal
corrugated enclosure by employing hybrid nanofluid," Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol.
6, p. 147059, 2014.
18
Figures:
A B
Fig. 1 TEM image of (A) Mg (OH)2, and (B) MWCNT nanoparticles.
60
Absolute Zeta potential (mV)
58
56
54
52
50
48
0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.5 2
Solid concentration (%)
Fig. 3 Comparison between the thermal conductivity of water measured by KD2 Pro instrument
and those of ASHRAE handbook [61]
Fig. 5 Dynamic viscosity versus shear rate at Solid volume fraction of 0.25 %.
Fig. 7 Relative dynamic viscosity versus (A) Solid volume fraction in different temperatures (B)
temperature in different solid concentrations.
22
Fig. 8 Variations of dynamic viscosity of the MWCNT/Mg (OH)2-engine oil hybrid nano-
lubricant versus temperature in different solid concentrations.
Tables:
The nanofluid showed Newtonian behavior in all the temperatures and concentrations
Dynamic viscosity of the nanofluid increased as solid concentration increased
Dynamic viscosity of the nanofluid decreased as temperature increased
Thermal conductivity increased as the solid concentration and temperature increased
Nanofluids Heat transfer capability was investigated in different flow regimes