Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Videography -Clarity: Video displayed Video used very clear and Video showed acceptable Video lacked clear shots
15% exceptionally clear and well-designed shots. shots, somewhat lacked and showed little effort
well designed shots. clarity and design. in design of shots.
Videography-Interest: Many different "takes", Several different "takes", Few different "takes", Little or no attempt was
15% camera angles, sound camera angles, sound camera angles, sound made to provide variety
effects, and/or careful effects, and/or careful effects, and/or careful in the shooting of the
use of zoom provided use of zoom provided use of zoom, providing video or augment
variety and augmented variety and aided in little variety or impact to analysis of the poem.
analysis of the poem. analysis of the poem. analysis of the poem
Length of Video: 10% Video was 3-6 minutes Video was within one Video was 1:01 to 2:00 Video was more than 2
long. minute off target lengths. off target lengths, minutes off target
provided some analysis lengths.
of the poem.
Titles and Credits: 10% All titles and credits are Most titles and credits Some titles and credits Few (less than 75%) titles
accurate, legible and are accurate, legible and are accurate, legible and and credits are accurate,
draw the viewer's draw the viewer's draw the viewer's legible and draw the
attention. attention. attention. viewer's attention.
Interest and Purpose - Video has a clear and Video was interesting, Video is not very Video is not interesting
30% interesting purpose, shows clear purpose and interesting and purpose and has no discernable
showing full engagement engagement with the is somewhat unclear in purpose in relation to the
with the poem. poem. relation to the poem. poem.