Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

Running Head: M3A2: CRITICAL REVIEW 1

M3A2 Critical Review: Best Practices for a Reduction in Workforce

Students Name

Date
M3A2: CRITICAL REVIEW 2

Abstract

During this assignment, you will explore and explain the best practices to follow in the

unfortunate circumstance where a reduction in workforce is necessary within an organization.

Begin by accessing the Excelsior College Library to find reliable and scholarly articles

related to this assignment to expand upon the key topics. Write and submit a critical review of

approximately 250300 words. Be sure to follow the APA style (6th edition) for writing and

include at least one relevant citation for your submission.

Include the following:

Positive and negative consequences of a reduction in workforce

Address credible alternatives to a reduction in workforce


M3A2: CRITICAL REVIEW 3

M3A2 Critical Review: Best Practices for a Reduction in Workforce

The process of workforce reduction is an essential aspect in an organization geared

towards improving the organizations performance, efficiency, productivity, and cost-

effectiveness. The decrease in the workforce happens from time to time in an organization

(OHagan et al., 2008). The best practices of the reduction of the workforce require the

management to be thorough and plan efficiently in order to achieve the expected outcomes of the

strategic implementation. The management needs to define the process in various forms

including work redesigning and work reduction strategies (Cameron, 1994). These inform the

reasons for the workforce reduction and putting employees aware of the process. Also, the

process needs to prepare a strategy for deciding which employees are to leave the organization,

as well as, the exit procedure. Also, preparing the send-off package for the employees is essential

and preparing them for a transition to the career.

The positive impacts of the reduction of the workforce in an organization entail

eliminating redundancy, duplication, and improving the efficiency of the labor force within the

organizational requirements. Also, improves productivity and cost effectiveness in the employee

management and compensation.

The adverse impacts of the reduction of the workforce in an organization entail low

morale of the employees after their colleagues leave and fear of being laid off as well, in turn,

inducing low productivity of employees (Ware & Grantham, 2010). Also, organizations are

bound to incur substantial sum of money and resources as they send a section of its employees

out of the workforce through compensations.


M3A2: CRITICAL REVIEW 4

The most credible alternatives to the reduction of the workforce include expansion of the

company to find new roles for the redundant employees. As well, merging and acquisitions to

expand the operating grounds and accommodate a large pool of employees.


M3A2: CRITICAL REVIEW 5

References

Cameron, K. S. (1994). Strategies for successful organizational downsizing. Human Resource

Management, 33(2), 189-211.

OHagan, M., Divis, M., & Long, J. (2008). Best practice in the reduction and elimination of

seclusion and restraint: seclusion time for change. Te Pou (http://www. tepou. co.

nz/file/PDF/FINAL-SECLUSION-REDUCTION-BESTPRACTICE-Research-Report.

pdf). Retrieved, 7.

Ware, J., & Grantham, C. (2010). Managing a remote workforce: Proven practices from

successful leaders. The Work Design Collaborative, 151, 7-20.

Вам также может понравиться