Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
com
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Nordic Sociological Association
Additional services and information for Acta Sociologica can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://asj.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Roberta Sassatelli
University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
ABSTRACT
Re-interpreting Simmels work on money as an attempt to develop a critical sociology of
consumption from a relativist theory of value, this paper illustrates the extent to which
it may be seen as something more, and different than, sociological impressionism. The
modern social space of valuation is chiefly defined by the development of money
economy within metropolitan settings. This allows for the public commensurability of
values and pushes for their private incompatibility. Subjectivism is heightened in so far
as individuals capacity to sustain difference is vital to social, objective exchange.
Contrary to neo-classical economics, the appreciation of individual choice entails for
Simmel a critical appraisal of the social conditions of its existence which results in a
discussion of the risks associated with the pressure to perform as autonomous choosers.
The paper concludes with a view on what may be a Simmelian sociology of
consumption, one which enriches the classical focus on social distinction with a critical
concern for the modern conditions of valuation and self-constitution. Fashion and style
Roberta Sassatelli, School of Economic and Social Studies, UEA Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
E-mail. (R. Snssntelli@uea.ac. uk)
© Scandinavian Sociological Association 2000
tical unity in his writings. Simmels insistence modernity. Thereby, instead of understanding
on the ambivalence of any observation or social Simmels perspectivism as merely the sign of the
arrangement may, for example, become at once nrnour de [art poiii- [art or as the result of a blase
a deficiency of resolution and an excess of detachment, my interpretation takes him at his
malleability. His writings are thereby easily word.
reducible to a prophetic pastiche, celebrated or Rather than being grounded in some kind
dismissed as an anti-litteram postmodernist of absolute foundation - i.e. use value or labour
commentary on multifaceted urban commodi- -
contrary, they reach the depths of the soul, linking of their fates, their culture (Simmel
being bound with the meaning and the style of [1907] 1990:54).
life ([1903] 1971:328). Everyday life has been In the Philosophie, market exchange cir-
filled with weighing, calculating, enumerating cuits are seen as defining, from the institutional
and the reduction of qualitative values to objective point of view, the modern relation
quantitative terms; relationships can now be between subjects and objects. A focus on the
defined with unprecedented degree of pre-
an subject/object relationship is crucial for Sim-
cision, certainty in the definition of the mels argumentation. This is so for at least two
equalities and inequalities and unambiguous- reasons. Firstly, it offers a framework for
ness in agreements and arrangements ( [ 190 3] spinning epistemological and sociological con-
1971:328). An image of the objectivity of these cerns together. By shaping the subject/object
relations emerges alongside the necessity for the relation, money exchange casts the value of
individual to make sense and govern such specific objects, contributes to the constitution
objectivity. Accordingly, the inhabitants of the of personal identity and moulds knowledge. It is
large, commercial metropolis of modernity are in this sense that Simmel described his Philoso-
becoming more and more calculating. Unable to phie as a book in which I seek to exhibit the
realize an utopia of perfect calculability, com- spiritual bases and the spiritual significance of
mercial modernity still implies a process of economic life, trying to show the relationships
intellectualization: city-dwellers develop a capa- between the forms of the economy and the
city to think of remote ends and of ever more forms of subjectivity or the spheres of interest
3
complex chains of means.3 making up internal life (Simmel [1900b]
Placing a greater emphasis on their 1993:62). Secondly, such focus allows Simmel
ambivalent nature, Simmel develops these to study material culture as such, in its taken-
themes in his Philosophie des Geldes. Emile for-grantedness. It is through material culture,
Durkheim (1901:145) defined this work as through the objects that people have defined in
spurious speculation mainly for methodologi- previous interactions via the entire spectrum of
cal reasons and for what may now appear an economic action - exchange, consumption and
asset. The Plzilosophie is, in fact, an example of production - that the social process takes place.
the most perilous interdisciplinary pursuit The peculiarity of material culture in commer-
within modern episteme, namely a conscious cial modernity may thus be addressed in its own
and outspoken attempt to bridge philosophy and terms, rather than being reduced to produc-
sociology. In particular, Simmel wanted to tionist concerns as Karl Marx ( [ 1867] 19928) did
survey both the epistemological and the social and, with very different emphasis, even Max
preconditions of economic organization. He Weber ([1904] 1976) was tempted to do.
maintains that the fact that two people
exchange their products is by no means simply
an economic fact. Such fact - that is, one whose 3. Money economy
content would be exhausted in the image that
economics presents of it - does not exist Value and valuation
(Simmel [1907] 1990:55). Like any other To follow this path through we need to consider
science, including the natural sciences, eco- in some detail Simmels theory of value.
nomics does not reproduce reality. It rather Revealing his Kantian roots, Simmel conceives
offers a perspective on it (Simmel 1892). Simmel value and reality as two mutually independent
thus sets out to develop a broader picture categories. Our mind is not simply a passive
pursuing two complementary viewpoints. On mirror of reality, it lives in a world of values
the one hand, he addresses the epistemological which arranges the contents of reality in an
prerequisites of our perception of reality as autonomous order (Simmel [1907] 1990:60~.
economy, the preconditions that, situated in Kantian and neo-Kantian tradition in particular
mental states, in social relations and in the conceived the subject as the creator of the
logical structure of reality and values, give meaning and value of objects. Simmel regarded
money its meaning and its practical position; value not as a characteristic of things, but as a
on the other hand. he considers the social relational concept, a judgement on objects
circumstances which are both the product and which rests in the subject. He thus clearly
the effect of the historical phenomenon of departed from sensationalism, running from
money influencing subjective experience, the John Locke through Adam Smith and up to
inner world of the subjects, their vitality. the Marx. with its postulate that objects not merely
Downloaded from http://asj.sagepub.com at Birkbeck College Library on February 21, 2007
2000 Scandinavian Sociological Association. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
distribution.
210
offer occasions for valuation but are the late some moral characteristics as unavoidable
sensational cause of it. human endowment. He rather sees human
Marx is an explicit target for Simmels beings as cognitive and affective operators.
Plzilosopllie. Marx operated within an epistemo- This marks the gap with Marx. In Marxs
logical grammar which conceived the deep analysis it is the primacy assigned to mans
value of a commodity as use value, which is labour as universal and objective foundation of
conditioned by the physical properties of the values which opens the theoretical space for a
commodity and has no existence apart from the notion of alienation. Only what is essentially
latter < [ 1 8 6 7 ] 1928:126). As with Smith, proper to mankind can itself and then
objects act prior to subjects, value is generated
estrange
alienate itself from people. This essential
from them and the notion of value actually element is chiefly defined by production and.
employed is constantly drawn back to the as the creative transformation of the world, it is
contribution of labour ( Dumont 1977: Rubin an end in itself amounting to the absolute
1972; Shapiro 1993). We may, therefore, working-out of (human)creative potentiality
contemplate that the value of objects derives (Marx [1857] 1973:488). Postulating a certain
from their material relationship with the notion of what is - and ought to be - a human
human body and that it is through human being, the labour theory of value ultimately
productivity that these values can be enhanced. yields to the warning that modern people are
All in all, utility is an objective property of alienated from their humanity. Modern value
things and is objectively realized by labour. The construction within money exchange circuits
subjectivity involved in Marxs labour theory of thereby results in abominations of personality.
value is not one which produces value through In opposition to Marxs normativism.
perspective. It is the subjectivity involved in Simmels relativist theory of value aims to
making objects materially available for oneself show that an absolute is not required as the
in an economic way (Shapiro 1993:62). conceptual counterpart to the relativity of
Labour is the source of value both as its concrete things ([1907] 1990:104). Just as each
measure and as its normative foundation. On description depends on aprioristic assumptions
the one hand, moulded by the economic working as to make description possible, so
conditions of production normal for a given values have no universal, objective foundation.
society and with the average degree of skill and For Simmel, the specific value of a thing rests on
intensity of labour prevalent in that society subjective judgement. Value as valuation con-
(Marx [1867]] 19? 8:129 ), it directly quantifies cerns a wanted item and remains inherent in
S
the value of each commodity. The greater the the subject ([1907] 1990:63). Subjective
productivity of labour, the less the labour-time valuation is a condition of the possibility of
required to produce an article, the less the mass values as cultural classification. To be sure,
of labour crystallized in that article, and the less valuation is correlated to the individual being
its value ([1867]] 1928:131). On the other the locus of incompatible wants. Still, such
hand, as the universal condition for the anthropological considerations are far from
metabolic interaction between man and nature normative, even if they may occasionally
([1867] 1928:290), labour ought to testify to amount to a sort of vitalism. Unlike neo-Kantian
the determination of man as a man, his talents gnoseological normativisni, Simmel does not
and his striving for self-realization. believe in the possibility of grounding subjective
Hence, it is only partly true that Simmel did valuation on the basis of a systematic founda-
not intend to pursue a substantive critique of tion of objective criteria (Boudon 1989, Helle
historical materialism (Cavalli 1989). His epis- 1988, Oakes 1985). The gnoseological a priori
temology naturally yields to substantive argu- that he conceives at the roots of every form of
ments. For example, he repeatedly stresses the knowledge are not universal or a-temporal, but
cultural embeddedness of commercial capital- variable in time and space. Furthermore they
ism. Economy and culture are in such close are not reducible to a finite bundle of categories,
integration that no one is able to say whether it their complexity complete computa-
impeding
was the former that affected the latter or vice tion and description (Simmel [1907] 1990 :60-
versa (Simmel [1903]1971:327). More to the 65).
point, Simmels relativism implies not only a As a result. Simmels theory of value
critique of teleology, but also a refusal to delineates a feed-back contiguration: value as
indicate an absolute goal inherent in the valuation is subjective and allows for the
determination of mankind. He does not postu- reproduction of the objectivity of values as
Downloaded from http://asj.sagepub.com at Birkbeck College Library on February 21, 2007
2000 Scandinavian Sociological Association. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
distribution.
211
cultural classification. On the one hand, the jective signitication remains fundamental for
phenomenon of valuation is trans-historical. the market mechanism (Accarino 1982; Blu-
being rooted in the cognitive and practical menberg 19 7h 1. For its very viability, the money
separation between object and subject and economy demands of subjects that they be able
revealing itself in the efforts and sacrifices to make sense, furnish judgement and bestow
needed to overcome distance, obstacles and value on an ever increasing variety of objects.
difficulties (Simmel [1907] 1990:F,6). On the All in all, the duality of money - its objective
other hand. values themselves are socially and relativity - entails a duality of experience. It is
culturally constructed through social interac- certainly true that the subject learns that things
tion (Wecllselwirkll11g). Still Simmel arrived at have an objective value (Boudon 1989). Yet this
the conclusion that relativity is socially value is subjectively upheld.
entrenched, i.e. that values are socially con- Such a duality may seem quite abstract.
structed. but they are not arbitrary. Culture is Yet, it shall become of sociological relevance if
precisely the crystallization of interactions, a we recall that, when discussing it, Simmel hints
frame of values which exists independently of at the cultural dynamics of the mutual con-
the feelings and verdicts of each single indivi- struction of private and public spheres. Simmel
dual, and yet emerges from their intersection was convinced that the abstraction from intini-
are fostered: the most adequate realization and both difference and indifference. What Erving
effectiveness of every individual complication Goffman (1961) described as bureaucratization
and the complete freedom for individual of the spirit - the fragmentary condition of the
reorganization become possible ( [ 1907] 1990: subject who has to enter and exit a number of
319 ). The bulk of differentiated objects produces different roles - may be observed from a new
an enormous specificity in so far as it is ever perspective. Contemporary consumer practices
more difficult to find two people who have tend allow for a maximum of individual
to
selected the same set of objects from material specificity which corresponds to the multi-
culture. This places emphasis on the creation of faceted and highly specific combination of
individual styles as well as on the multiplication roles that each individual has to perform in
of lifestyles. everyday life. However, consumer practices with
Simmel repeatedly stressed that with the their necessary plasticity do not secure deter-
advent of commercial modernity, the subject mined and ultimate support for individual self-
moves from a situation where his or her life constitution. Modern material culture testifies
choices and identity are, so to speak, imposed by to the relativity of value embodying what Max
the things he or she possesses, to a situation of Weber ([1922]1978) identified as the code of
absolute potentiality. In a mature monetary modernity, the separation of different value
economy the subject is freed from the structural spheres. Material culture no longer bestows a
links with goods that enslave him or her: difference on the individual. The multiplication
possessions are no longer classified according to and differentiation of objects and their separa-
the category of a specific life-content, that inner tion into different hierarchies make global logics
bond ... in no way develops which, though it of social distinction more blurred and less
restricts the personality, nonetheless gives sup- efficient. Conceived as a whole, material culture
port and content to it ([1907] 1990:403). The corresponds to a public domain of indifference
subject cannot melt and coincide with goods: all which becomes meaningful only in the differ-
objects remain in his or her hands only for a ence made by subjective valuation.
limited period and they are predisposed toward
conversion into money. The immediate conse- Techniques of consumption
quence of this is the neutralization of the Still, in contemporary consumer culture we find
pervasive power of goods. The absolute domin- techniques that help individuals to come to
ion over things and the potentiality of doing terms with difference and indifference. Techni-
are nevertheless ambivalent phenomena. The ques of consumption may be conceived as
freedom that money confers paves the way to institutionalized guidelines for personal con-
indeterminacy. It is a freedom without any sumption embedded both in discourses and
directive, without any definite and determining organizations. In this light, fashion and style
content. Such freedom favours that emptiness can be described as techniques that. embodying
and instability that allows one to give full rein to particular combinations of difference and indif-
every accidental, whimsical and tempting ference, help govern the modern world of goods.
impulse ([1907] 1990:402). A similar process They respond to what Simmel described as an
does not simply imply an intensification of enduring practical necessity, the constitution
power relations, though. On the contrary, it of oneself through goods. Modern fashion
brings with itself the triumph of negative circulation may thus be appreciated from a
liberty. Tensions derive precisely from the fact perspective which places emphasis on strategy
that it does not furnish positive liberty and rather than function, something which Durk-
does not provide indications for the constitution heim might well have felt as alien to the
of individual identities consistent through time sociological enterprise. However, this perspec-
([1907] 1990:2H3-354). Thus the lengthening tive does not do without the social dimension.
of the teleological series allowing for a broad- On the contrary it looks at consumer practices
ening of interests makes for the impossibility of as strategies enacted tlzrollglz the socio-cultural
knowing the finality of ones own actions. framework, rather than inside it. Furthermore, it
Similarly. the specificity allowed to the indivi- opens up the possibility of considering how
dual is paid for by the indeterminacy of the techniques of consumption may be linked to
consumer practices available. forms of subjectivity and self-constitution,
Expressed in wider social-theoretical terms, something which an exclusive emphasis on
we may say that in contemporary consumer social distinction usually misses.
practices the subject has to come to terms with Such perspective directly derives from
Downloaded from http://asj.sagepub.com at Birkbeck College Library on February 21, 2007
2000 Scandinavian Sociological Association. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
distribution.
214
Simmels observations on fashion and style. it yields to a strong sense of self: and, as
Simmel focused on how these phenomena were indifference, it brings the subject to continu-
experienced, shaping individuality while being ously re-establish a distance and a space of
an instrument of it. To be sure, Simmel saw difference for him or herself in the pursuit of
fashion also as social distinction. 1 Yet, unlike such heightened individuality.
Kant he never used a moralizing tone (Gronow In the Philosophie, when discussing modern
1993), and unlike Veblen (1899) he avoided individual experience as shaped by the way
envy and other highly stigmatized passions as money economy produces and defeats distance,
explanatory devices. In the context of the Simmel refers to style in a similar vein: as the
contemporary sociology of consumption, Sim- manifestation of our inner feelings, style
mels most interesting claim is that fashion and indicates that these feelings no longer immedi-
style are social forms which offer a veil ately gush out but take on a disguise the
through which the modern subject can allude moment they are revealed ([1907] 1990:
to his or her deep individuality. They also 473). In his later essay on style Simmel
provide a provisional social counterweight for ([1908b] 1991:68) developed this suggestion:
any ensuing excess of subjectivism. with the universalistic formalization offered by
Firstly, this view delivers a fuller picture of style, we are freed from the absolute responsi-
the modern longing for novelty, a phenomenon bility to ourselves and we can express ourselves
which is obviously lost to our eyes when we indirectly, without having to balance on the
consider it as coterminous with trans-historical narrowness of mere individuality. At the same
issues of social distinction. In particular, Simmel time, the juxtaposition of different styles that
suggested that fashion heeds the taste for characterizes the environment of the modern
novelty as such. As a finality, novelty may take subject proposes again a space for individuality.
on the quality of what, in Kantian terms, is a allowing for objects to receive a new centre
pure aesthetic pleasure (Gronow 1993). Yet if which is not located in any of them alo-
so, this is because it satisfies the modern anxiety ne([1908b] 1991:69), but coincides with the
of continuous renewal and allows for the unitary combination contrived by the subject.
conception of such renewal as unlimited, Appreciating a particular item of style as ours,
diffusing the perception that what is absolutely we shelter ourselves in a common denominator,
unnatural may at least exist in the form of while being allowed to indicate that it does not
fashion (Simmel [1895] 1971:322, translation contain us, that there is an elusive part of
amended). Fashion therefore also promotes ourselves which lies in the capacity to neutralize
novelty as transitory. It is analogous to the the indifference of any style by means of our
modern impatient time which implies not only own different, subjective combination.
the desire for rapid change, but also the Fashion and style not only illustrate how
attraction of limitation, the attraction of a modernity tries to provide social answers to its
simultaneous beginning and end, the charm of peculiar problem, i.e. for the individual to
novelty coupled to that of transitoriness belong in a totality without loosing individual-
([1895] 1971:302). Fashion allows the indivi- ity ; they also correspond to the rhythm
dual to be up to time. Yet, as ephemeral and dictated by modern material culture. In effect,
doomed to disappear, fashion also appears as a fashion as well as style embody our capacity and
semblance which alludes to other, deeper and necessity of bringing us closer to things by
firmer features of the individual. placing them at a distance from us (Simmel
Secondly, in this view fashion illustrates [1907] 1990:473). Such distance seems to offer
how people may experience and construct a space for subjective valuation which does not
themselves as individuals facing the indifference deny values and which, on the contrary, feeds
of modern material culture. Fashion is a social on cultural classifications re-configuring them.
form through which the negative liberty of the
modern subject and the correlative search for
identity are both controlled and nurtured. It is a 5. Concluding remarks
departure from custom made customary and it
gives a feeling of both safety and adventure. In In setting to offer a social-theoretical
out
other words, fashion offers a space of difference, perspective Simmels Philosophie, I have
on
which nevertheless is expressed in terms of a tried to show that it may be seen as something
relative indifference because of both its tran- more than, and different from, sociological
siency and its public availability. For a moment impressionism. I have re-interpreted Simmels
Downloaded from http://asj.sagepub.com at Birkbeck College Library on February 21, 2007
2000 Scandinavian Sociological Association. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
distribution.
215
individuality while being their instrument. I ence may become part of the individual. Indeed,
have interpreted this as an attempt to look at the development of a blase attitude is a wide-
fashion and style as techniques of consumption, spread subjective answer, whereby people keep
and I have shown how they are responsive to themselves forever at a distance from things and
the sustenance of well-governed subjective experience all things as being of an equally dull
difference and vital to objective exchange. and grey hue ([1907] 1990:256). On the other
Such a perspective is pivotal for a sociology of hand, difference may become a goal in itself.
consumption which struggles with the necessity Eccentricity thus develops as an attempt to
of accounting for both agency and structure overcome indifference. As opposed to the
(see Campbell 1987; Featherstone 1991; Miller indifference of the market, the individuals
1995). search for specificity reinforced by the structural
Secondly, a Simmelian sociology of con- necessity of subjective valuation may generate a
sumption helps us ponder the appeals and the formal and empty difference. Its meaning may
risks of commercial modernity with a minimum no longer be found in the content of such
of normative assumptions. The focus on valua- activity itself but rather in its being a form of
tion and on its social conditions allowed Simmel &dquo;being different&dquo; - of making oneself noticeable
to consider that subjectivity constitution in (Simmel [1903] 1971:336). In both ways - as
commercial modernity is an active and yet blas or eccentric - the individual looses him or
inconclusive process, at least so far as a time- herself as the source of valuation. In the one
consistent unitary identity is pursued. It is case, valuation is no longer sought after and the
precisely thanks to this inconclusiveness that individual has lost the feeling for value differ-
consumption tends to be characterized as ence. In the other, as things are valued for their
creative and dynamic, as a process of contin- difference, difference is not established by
uous emancipation from the conditioning valuation.
implicit in the possession of any particular By describing these risks, Simmel also
good. The heteronomy of the modern subject is implies that there is a path which we may
to be traced back to the fact that he or she is follow in order to confront, if not overcome, the
pushed to self-construction. If we are hetero- predicament of commercial modernity. Such a
nomous, this is so, not because we live the path - possibly elitarian, certainly individualis-
of
rhythm objects as Baudrillard (1970) main- tic - may be portrayed as ethical equilibrism: a
tained, but because, having freed ourselves from balancing practice taking place between the
them, we are obliged to live our own rhythm. indifference of the market which allows indivi-
because we are faced with the task of producing dualization, and the risk that the individuality
ourselves. thus constituted remains empty, incapable of
All in all, the critical perspective which is bestowing value on things, a mere reproducer of
offered by a Simmelian sociology of consump- commensurability. It is in the search of this
tion implies that the indifference of the market narrow and changeable line of equilibrium -
opens a space for individuality without guaran- which may on occasion be offered even by
teeing that the subject be the master of such mundane phenomena such as fashion and style
space, that he or she holds on him or herself the that the individual can construct him or
-
source of valuation. Like in the best sociological herself as a reflexive and inward-directed source
Downloaded from http://asj.sagepub.com at Birkbeck College Library on February 21, 2007
2000 Scandinavian Sociological Association. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
distribution.
216 A
of valuation.l2 And it is through such a never- typically leave out preference formation and
forms. Their models
ending search that indifference may become interdependence, forgetting that the economy is inextricably
bound to subjective and cultural circumstances of interpreta-
meaningful, allowing for the appreciation and tion. For an informative account of Simmels Philosophie
expression of differences which may yet again economic premises as related to development of fin de siecle
make a difference. economics see Alessandro Cavalli (1984). David Frisby
(1992b:80-97) and Jeffrey Shad (1990).
6
First version received September 1999 As with Webers critique of causal explanation in social
Final version Simmels relativism correlated to the finiteness of the
accepted November 1999 sciences, is
1
Implicit and explicit critiques of these views have been also Simmel 1892 10-12)
forward both by scholars who place Simmel 7
persuasively put This concept (lit. reciprocal action). is not only central to
within classical sociological theory (Landmann 1967; Levine Simmels sociology but also to his epistemology, conceptualizing
1985:103-112; Nedelmann 1991), and by scholars who the complexity of a world where everything is in interaction
consider him closer to postmodernist concerns (Weinstein and with everything else (Cavalli 1989: Kaern 1990; Lichtblau
Weinstein 1993:5-28) 1991).
2
David Frisby has documented Simmels concerns with a 8
Simmel ([1907] 1990:175ff) was adamant that money
theory of value epitomized by various letters, notably to feeds on the State as a guarantee of its value. Again, different
Heinrich Rickert (Fnsby 1981; 1992b:80-97). and by the from Marxs notion that money masks an underlying reality,
deviations of the second edition of the Philosophie ([1907] 1990) Simmel views money as itself a social relation, one that like
from the 1900 version being concentrated mainly in the first
credit creates a liabdity rather than liquidating it. The obligation
chapter on value (for the original see Simmel 1900a; see also of the creditor is assumed by the public, thus monetary
Cavalli 1984 and Frisby 1990). However, Frisby focuses mainly
transactions between individuals may appear as private affairs,
on the economic aspects of Simmels theory of value and plays
neo-marginalist thought and the Austrian School has not to be Bandwagon and Snob effects they have been the back-door
overplayed though. Once recognized that it is the interpretive through which preference interdependence has got some access
status of the objects that confers them value (i.e. not that useful to neo-classical economics (Hargreaves Heap 1989). Some
things are desired but that desired things are useful), neo- refined version of this - where immediate desires for imitation or
marginalist economists have departed from Simmels emphasis differentiation are mediated by an embodied disposition, habitus
,
on the construction of valuation conditions and subjectivity inclining agents towards goods that reflect their social standing
Downloaded from http://asj.sagepub.com at Birkbeck College Library on February 21, 2007
2000 Scandinavian Sociological Association. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
distribution.
s 217
- also inspires Bourdieus (1979) work on taste (Sassatelli Geras, N. 198 3. Marx and Human Nature: Refutation of a Legend.
1995). London: Verso.
12
Although I cannot develop these themes here, it is worth Goffman. E. 1961. Role Distance. In E. Goffman Encounters. Two
remembering that, when proposing an explicit ethics in his Studies in the Sociology of Interaction, pp. 73-134. Indianapo-
essay Das individuelle Gesetz ([1913] 1968), Simmel develops lis : Bobbs-Merril.
Nietzseches intimation that the human being has to become Gronow, Y. 1993. Taste and Fashion: The Social Function of
what he or she
Simmels ethics is based on difference and asks
is. Fashion and Style. Acta Sociologica, 36, 89-100.
to recognize Difference is not to be understood as distinction,
it. Hargreaves Heap. S. 1989. Rationality in Economics. Oxford
as the attempt to be different from all the others by fighting ones Basil Blackwell.
way through in the social games of inclusion and exclusion. As Helle, H. J. 1988. Soziologie und Erkenntnistheorie bei Georg
the individual is the entire man, not what is left of him when Simmel, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
one has taken away what he shares with others, to recognize
Ingham, G. 1998. On the Underdevelopment of the Sociology of
ones own difference is to recognize ones own being peculiar Money. Acta Sociologica, 41, 3-18.
Shad, J. A. 1990. The Groundwork of Simmels new Storey (ed.), On Individuality and Social Forms, pp. 324-39.
Levine
Beneath Historical Materialism. In M. Kaern, B.S. Phillips & R. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
S Cohen (eds.), Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology, pp. Simmel. G. 1907 [1990]. Philosophy of Money. second edition.
97-317. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. London: Routledge.
Shapiro, M. J. 1993. Reading Adam Smith: Desire, History and Simmel, G. 1908a [1950]. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New
Value. London: Sage. York: The Free Press.
Simmel, G. 1890. Uber sociale Differenzierung. Sociologische und Simmel. G. 1908b [1991]. The Problem of Style. Theory, Culture
and Society. 8, 63-71.
Psychologische Untersuchungen. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
Simmel, G. 1892. Die Probleme der Geschichtsphilosophie. Leipzig: Simmel, G. 1913 [1968]. Die Individuelle Gesetz. Philosophische
Exkurse. Frankfurt: Surhkamp.
Duncher & Humblot.
Tenbruck, F. H. 1958. Georg Simmel. Koner Zeitschrift fur
Simmel, G. 1895 [1971].Fashion. In D. Levine (ed.), On
Soziologie un Sozialpsychologie. 10, 587-64.
Individuality and Social Forms, pp. 294-323. Chicago: Veblen. T. 1899 The Theory of the Leisure Class. London:
University of Chicago Press.
MacMillan.
Simmel, G. 1900a. A Chapter in the Philosophy of Value. The
Weber, M. 1904 [1976]. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of
American Journal of Sociology, 5, 577-602.
Capitalism. London: Allen and Unwin.
Simmel, G. 1900b [1993]. Philosophy of Money by Georg Weber, M. 1922 [1978]. Economy and Society, Vol. I. Berkeley:
Simmel. In G. Poggi, Money and the Modern Mind, pp 62-8. University of California Press.
Berkeley: University of California Press. Weinstein, D. & Weinstein, M. A. 1993. ) ized Simmel.
(
Postmodern
Simmel, G. 1903[1971].The Metropolis and Mental Life. In D. London: Routledge.