Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Any other use requires prior permission of the author and the American Insitute of Physics
J. Chem. Phys. 103 (16), 22 October 1995 0021-9606/95/103(16)/6851/10/$6.00 1995 American Institute of Physics 6851
Downloaded22Dec2000to132.230.78.190.RedistributionsubjecttoAIPcopyright,seehttp://ojps.aip.org/jcpo/jcpcpyrts.html.
Copyright American Institute of Physics. This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the author and the American Insitute of Physics
6852 Stock et al.: Raman spectroscopy of pyrazine
In this work we present new experimental and theoreti- is essential for the correct description of multidimensional
cal data on the RR spectroscopy of the S 1 and the S 2 states of surface crossings.32 A detailed description of these calcula-
pyrazine. While Raman spectra resonant to the S 1 (n p * ) tions for pyrazine has been given previously.27 The active
state of pyrazine have been reported for excitations at several space consists of six valence p orbitals ~three of which are
wavelengths,19,20 only a single S 2 RR spectrum ~at 266 nm! occupied in the ground-state SCF configuration! as well as
is available in the literature.20 Here, we report gas-phase RR the two nonbonding orbitals on the nitrogens. The CASSCF
spectra of pyrazine for five excitation wavelengths within the calculation thus distributes ten electrons over eight orbitals.
S 2 absorption band. These experimental data are compared To obtain a balanced description of the S 0 , S 1 , and S 2 sur-
with ab initio calculations of RR spectra. To obtain these faces, all three states have been included in the CASSCF
spectra, we have extended the calculations of Ref. 27 to ob- functional with equal weight. The state-averaged CASSCF
tain the complete set of parameters of the Taylor expansion calculation defines a single set of orbitals for the three lowest
~gradients and Hessian matrices! of the S 1 and S 2 surfaces at singlet states, which simplifies the calculation of transition-
the S 0 equilibrium geometry. Based on the ab initio data we dipole-moment functions. The CASSCF calculations have
have constructed a vibronic-coupling model including seven been performed with the program system MOLPRO33 employ-
nonseparable vibrational modes. For this model, RR cross ing a DZP basis set.34
sections have been obtained in a time-dependent approach, Electron-vibrational coupling constants have been calcu-
treating the intramolecular coupling in a nonperturbative lated as derivatives of electronic excitation energies with re-
manner. Apart from the electronic S 1 2S 2 gap, which had to spect to ground-state normal coordinates. The coupling con-
be adjusted by less than 2%, and a phenomenological line- stants are defined as35
S D
width, which was inferred from the experimental absorption
]Ek
spectrum, we have used exclusively ab initio data for the k ~i k ! 5 , ~1!
calculation of the RR spectra. The comparison of the theo- ]Qi 0
S D
retical predictions with the new experimental gas-phase RR
1 ] 2E k
spectra obtained at five excitation wavelengths provides a g ~i kj ! 5 , ~2!
stringent test of the theoretical model. 2 ] Q i] Q j 0
TABLE I. Harmonic vibrational frequencies ~in cm21! of the 1A g ground the S 1 state and the modes n14 , n17a , n4 , and n5 in the S 2
state of pyrazine. Theoretical frequencies are given both at the MP2 and state. Significant off-diagonal quadratic coupling constants,
CASSCF levels of theory and are compared with experimental fundamental
leading to Dushinsky rotation of the normal modes, are
frequencies ~Ref. 9!.
found in B 1u symmetry ~n12 ,n 18a , n 19a ,n13!, B 3g symmetry
Symmetry Mode Experiment MP2 CASSCF ~n3 ,n8b ! and A u symmetry ( n 16a , n 17a ) in the S 1 state; in the
S 2 state, significant off-diagonal quadratic couplings are
Ag n6a 596 597 672
n1 1015 1027 1072 found in B 2u symmetry ~n14 ,n19b ! and B 1u symmetry
n9a 1230 1264 1347 ~n12 ,n18a !.
n8a 1582 1633 1797 By determining the gi j at the CASSCF level, we have
n2 3055 3280 3329 neglected dynamic electron correlation effects; by determin-
B 1g n10a 919 914 970 ing vi at the MP2 level, on the other hand, dynamic corre-
lation effects have been accounted for. It is thus not fully
B 2g n4 756 761 774
consistent to combine the CASSCF quadratic coupling con-
n5 983 913 1039
stants with the MP2 ground-state frequencies in the construc-
B 3g n6b 704 711 774 tion of the model Hamiltonian. To correct for the uneven
n3 1346 1384 1509 treatment of ground and excited states, we define scaled qua-
n8b 1525 1592 1649
n7b 3040 3254 3307
dratic coupling constants g 8i j according to
relatively large negative value of g10a,10a implies a signifi- denote the electronic ground state and uw1& and uw2& denote
cant reduction of the vibrational frequency of g10a in both the S 1 (n p * ) and the S 2~pp*! state, respectively. Similar to
excited states. previous work, we treat the strong vibronic S 1 2S 2 coupling
The quadratic coupling constants for all other modes of via the mode n10a exactly to all orders, whereas the intramo-
pyrazine obtained at the CASSCF level are collected in Table lecular coupling of the excited electronic states uw1&, uw2&
III. Significant quadratic couplings ~i.e., large diagonal ele- with the well-separated electronic ground state uw0& is ne-
ments gii ! are found for the modes n12 ,n 8b , n 17a , n 18a ,n14 in glected. As has been found in experimental investigations,38
the S 1,2 S 0 internal conversion process takes place on a
picosecond time scale, and can therefore be ignored, as well
TABLE II. Gradients of the excitation energies of the S 1 and S 2 states of as intersystem crossing, on the femtosecond timescale of RR
pyrazine with respect to dimensionless totally symmetric normal coordinates spectroscopy. Neglecting furthermore vibronic couplings and
obtained at the CASSCF and MRCI levels of theory. Units are eV.
possible intersections of S 1 and S 2 with higher singlet states,
Q1 Q2 Q 6a Q 8a Q 9a the model Hamiltonian reads
TABLE III. The quadratic coupling constants g ~1! and g ~2! ~in eV! of the S 1 and S 2 PE functions of pyrazine obtained at the CASSCF level.
A g modes (D 2h D 2h )
Symmetry Mode Q1 Q2 Q 6a Q 8a Q 9a
(B 3u )S 1 Q1 20.000 46 0.000 25 20.001 59 20.000 92 0.000 12
Q2 0.000 14 20.000 29 0.003 70 20.002 75
Q 6a 0.001 92 0.002 63 0.001 17
Q 8a 20.011 94 0.003 60
Q 9a 20.003 73
(B 2u )S 2 Q1 0.002 76 0.000 93 20.004 37 20.001 03 0.001 00
Q2 20.000 49 0.000 86 20.000 24 20.000 51
Q 6a 20.006 73 0.000 30 0.002 07
Q 8a 0.008 85 0.001 73
Q 9a 0.002 67
A u modes (D 2h D 2)
Symmetry Mode Q 16a Q 17a
(B 1 )S 1 Q 16a 0.014 57 20.012 15
Q 17a 20.047 08
(B 2 )S 2 Q 16a 20.018 56 0.000 07
Q 17a 20.064 54
B 1g mode (D 2h C 2h )
Symmetry Mode Q 10a
(B u )S 1 Q 10a 20.018 00
(B u )S 2 Q 10a 20.018 00
B 2g modes (D 2h C 2h )
Symmetry Mode Q4 Q5
(B g )S 1 Q4 20.023 06 20.003 57
Q5 20.012 60
(A u )S 2 Q4 20.035 28 0.007 00
Q5 20.036 10
B 3g modes (D 2h C 2h )
Symmetry Mode Q 6b Q3 Q 8b Q 7b
(A u )S 1 Q 6b 20.005 99 0.000 24 0.005 60 20.001 25
Q3 20.008 01 20.012 50 0.004 00
Q 8b 20.051 57 0.006 65
Q 7b 20.000 13
(B u )S 2 Q 6b 20.010 79 20.000 11 20.000 47 0.000 45
Q3 20.008 16 0.000 68 20.000 26
Q 8b 0.006 61 20.000 70
Q 7b 20.009 52
B 1u modes (D 2h C 2v)
Symmetry Mode Q 12 Q 18a Q 19a Q 13
(B 1 )S 1 Q 12 20.076 72 20.037 15 0.021 60 20.010 20
Q 18a 20.032 68 0.016 75 20.009 30
Q 19a 20.014 10 0.002 15
Q 13 20.001 28
(B 2 )S 2 Q 12 20.009 97 0.010 10 20.005 55 0.002 87
Q 18a 20.013 02 0.006 30 20.000 14
Q 19a 20.013 52 0.000 58
Q 13 20.009 39
B 2u modes (D 2h C 2v)
Symmetry Mode Q 18b Q 14 Q 19b Q 20b
(B 1 )S 1 Q 18b 20.003 07 0.000 15 0.001 89 20.001 45
Q 14 0.031 99 20.000 92 20.000 53
Q 19b 20.006 20 20.004 50
Q 20b 0.000 74
(A 1 )S 2 Q 18b 20.013 05 20.008 40 0.003 16 0.001 44
Q 14 0.107 78 0.037 50 0.000 68
Q 19b 0.008 41 20.000 95
Q 20b 20.009 52
B 3u modes (D 2h C 2v)
Symmetry Mode Q 16b Q 11
(A 1 )S 1 Q 16b 20.014 74 0.006 00
Q 11 20.010 54
(B 2 )S 2 Q 16b 20.015 07 0.006 00
Q 11 20.016 92
h 05 (i
vi
2 S
2
]2
] Q 2i
1Q 2i , D ~6!
modes ~n1 , n6a , n8a , n9a !, and two quadratically coupled
modes ~n4 and n14!. The spectroscopic effects of the remain-
ing 17 weakly coupled modes are described in a phenomeno-
where the sum runs over all seven vibrational modes in- logical manner by the dephasing rate 1/T 2 . With the excep-
cluded in the model ~see below!. The diagonal diabatic ma- tion of the vertical S 1 2S 2 energy gap D, which was slightly
trix elements h 1 and h 2 as well as the coupling element V 12 adjusted to reproduce the experimental positions of the two
are expanded in terms of ground-state normal coordinates Q i absorption bands ~from Dab initio50.83 eV27 to Dexp50.846
up to second order, yielding eV!, all vibrational and vibronic coupling constants as well
as vibrational frequencies are taken without any further
h k 5h 0 1E k 1 (i k ~i k !Q i 1 (
i, j
g ~i,kj! Q i Q j , ~7! modification from the ab initio data collected in Tables IIII.
0
dt e i ~ v 1 1 e 0 ! t F 22 U
v ~t! ,
2
~13!
tronic dephasing due to the remaining modes is included into
the model in terms of a phenomenological dephasing time where uv& represents the final vibrational state, and v1 and vs
T 2 , which is adjusted to reproduce the homogeneous line- denote the frequencies of the laser excitation and the spon-
width of the absorption spectrum of the S 2 state ~T 2535 fs!. taneous emission, respectively. In the case that both excited
For the S 1 state we introduce T 25400 fs as a purely technical electronic states carry oscillator strength, interference effects
parameter.40 of the radiation emitted from the two electronic states may
To summarize, our model of pyrazine incorporates ex- occur, which have to be taken into account when averaging
plicitly seven nonseparable vibrational modes, namely, the over the molecular orientations ~see Ref. 44 for a detailed
coupling mode n10a , four linearly coupled Condon active discussion!.
FIG. 1. ~a! Experimental ~Ref. 20! and ~b! calculated preresonance Raman
IV. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS spectra of the S 1 (n p * ) state of pyrazine obtained for the excitation wave-
length l5337 nm.
The experimental methods used in this work are basi-
cally those described in Ref. 13 except that a CCD multi-
channel detector ~Princeton Instruments! was used. Briefly, present model47 and are in good agreement with
the excitation wavelengths are either harmonics of the experiment.5,6 Since we wish to focus here on RR emission,
Nd:YAG laser fundamental at 1064 nm or are obtained by these spectra will not be considered.
stimulated Raman scattering from one of these harmonics in As a representative example of S 1 Raman emission, Fig.
hydrogen gas. The vibrational shift in hydrogen gas is 4155 1 presents a preresonant Raman spectrum of pyrazine ob-
cm21. Anti-Stokes stimulated Raman shifting results in in- tained with excitation at 337 nm. Panel ~a! shows the experi-
creases in the frequency of the radiation by multiples of this mental data of Suzuka et al.,20 panel ~b! shows the theoreti-
value. Specifically, 274 nm is 1064/3 plus 234155, 266 nm cal spectrum obtained with the present seven-mode ab initio
is 1064/4, 253 nm is 1064/2 plus 534155, 246 nm is 1064/3 model. For better comparison with experimental data, the
plus 334155, and 240 nm is 266 plus 4155. The spectra computed intensities are plotted at the energetical position
shown are for the gas phase. Spectra of pyrazine were also determined by the measured ground state frequency of the
obtained in acetonitrile and methanol solutions. The signifi- corresponding vibrational quantum. To simulate the experi-
cant but small differences between the spectra obtained in mental resolution, the Raman lines of all reported spectra
solution and in the gas phase will be discussed in another have been convoluted with a Lorentzian of 10 cm21 FWHM.
publication. The S 1 RR spectrum is dominated by the strong excita-
tion of the fundamental of n10a , which derives its intensity
through vibronic coupling from the S 2~pp*! state. The cal-
V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION culation reproduces nicely the strong excitation of n10a as
well a the relative intensities of the excitations in the n1 , n6a ,
Although the present experimental RR spectra corre- n8a , n9a vibrational modes, except that the fundamental of n1
spond to excitation of the S 2 state, we briefly discuss the is somewhat exaggerated. The peak at 1500 cm21 represents
spectroscopy of the S 1 state from the theoretical point of ~to about equal parts! the excitation of 10a16a and 234.
view. This is particularly of interest in order to exhibit the Furthermore the calculation predicts significant intensity of
qualitative differences of the effects of the vibronic coupling 2314, which lies outside the frequency range covered by the
on the S 1 and S 2 RR spectra, respectively. Unlike the diffuse experiment. Finally, it is noteworthy that all seven vibra-
absorption band of the S 2 state ~see below!, the S 1 absorption tional modes incorporated in the ab initio model do show up
spectrum of pyrazine exhibits well resolved peaks ~mostly in the spectrum.
due to vibrational activity in the modes n6a , n9a , n10a !, which Figure 2~a! shows the room temperature gas-phase ab-
give rise to strong single-level fluorescence emission. Single- sorption profile of the S 2 band of pyrazine.38 By analogy
level fluorescence spectra have been calculated for the with the S 2 state of benzene,48 it can be assumed that the
FIG. 3. Experimental ~a! and calculated ~b! resonance Raman spectra of the
S 2~pp*! state of pyrazine obtained for the excitation wavelength l5274
nm.
FIG. 5. Same as Fig. 3 except l5253 nm. FIG. 7. Same as Fig. 3 except l5239 nm.
For all excitation wavelengths, the fundamentals, over- to weak but discernible peaks in the spectra. To exemplify
tones and combination levels of n1 and n6a dominate the that also weaker excitations are reproduced with high accu-
observed spectra. The fundamental of n1 at '1000 cm21 racy, consider the neighboring peaks 236a and 9a. In nice
corresponds to the strongest peak in all spectra. Excitation at agreement of experiment and theory the relative intensity
274 nm, near the red edge of thee S 2 absorption band, yields ratio R of the two peaks changes from R,1 ~Fig. 3! to R.1
mainly excitation of the n1 and n6a fundamentals, whereas ~Figs. 4 and 5! to R'1 ~Fig. 6! to R,1 ~Fig. 7!. These
overtones and combination levels are weak @Fig. 3~a!#. Exci- details indicate that the dynamics in the S 2 state of pyrazine,
tation near the center of the S 2 absorption band ~266 and 253 as far as it is reflected in the RR spectrum, is rather accu-
nm! leads to significantly enhanced intensity of n1 and n6a rately described by the present ab initio vibronic-coupling
overtones and combination levels @Figs. 4~a!, 5~a!#. This en- model.
hancement of higher levels gradually disappears when the It is particularly interesting to note that the nontotally
excitation frequency approaches the blue edge of the S 2 ab- symmetric coupling mode n10a , which dominates the S 1 RR
sorption band @Fig. 7~a!#. spectrum ~Fig. 1!, is hardly observed under resonant excita-
The theoretical RR spectra @panel ~b!# are seen to repro- tion of the S 2 state of pyrazine. In agreement with experi-
duce the enhancement of overtone intensity for excitation ment, the calculation predicts that the peaks 10a, 2310a
near the center of the S 2 absorption band. The relative inten- and 6a110a appear with very low intensity for excitation
sities of the peaks corresponding to 1, 6a, 116a, 231, 231 wavelengths shorter than 274 nm. Considering the crucial
16a, etc., are generally accurately reproduced. The modes role of the mode n10a for the S 2 S 1 internal-conversion
9a, 8a, 4 and 14, which are included in the calculation, lead process as the promoting mode as well as an important ac-
cepting mode,21 the inactivity of this mode in the S 2 RR
spectrum is remarkable. This observation underlines that the
RR spectrum carries only limited information on the photo-
physical dynamics in the excited states.
The agreement between experiment and calculation de-
teriorates for shorter excitation wavelengths. This is particu-
larly conspicuous for excitation at 239 nm ~Fig. 7!. In this
case the current level structure is reproduced by the calcula-
tion, but the calculated intensity of overtones and combina-
tion levels is too high relative to the intensity of the funda-
mentals. It is to be expected that for excitation at the blue
side of the S 2 absorption band of pyrazine higher excited
electronic states have to be considered in the calculation,49
i.e., the electronic three-state model ~5! may break down.
Specifically, one expects off-resonance contributions to the
fundamental transitions from higher-lying states. This pre-
sumes that n6a and n1 are achieved in some nearby higher
state~s!, which could be tested with experiments at shorter
wavelengths. The more immediate concern that such activity
FIG. 6. Same as Fig. 3 except l5246 nm. makes a significant contribution to the spectrum obtained at
FIG. 8. Calculated resonance Raman spectrum of the S 2~pp*! state of pyrazine as obtained by the ab initio three-state seven-mode model. The S 2 Raman
emission is plotted as a function of both excitation wavelength and Raman shift. We have added the absorption spectrum ~arbitrary scale! and indicated the
excitation wavelengths used in the experiment.
239 nm requires a relative intensity determination so that sorption band. On the theoretical side, we have extended
spectra obtained at different wavelengths can be put on the recent CASSCF/MRCI calculations27 to obtain the complete
same relative intensity scale. Overall, however, one can con- set of parameters of the Taylor expansion ~gradients as well
clude that the present three-state seven-mode model is well as Hessian matrices! of the S 1 and S 2 surface, at the S 0 equi-
justified and provides a rather comprehensive description of librium geometry. Based on these ab initio data, we have
the Raman spectra in resonance with the S 1 and S 2 states of constructed a vibronic-coupling model which explicitly in-
pyrazine.
cludes seven ~out of 24! vibrational modes. Employing a
Figure 8, finally, presents a survey of the calculated S 2
time-dependent approach, we have calculated RR cross sec-
RR spectra, showing the Raman emission as a function of
both excitation wavelength and Raman shift, that is, excita- tions for this three-state seven-mode model, treating all in-
tion functions of the most prominent Raman lines. It is con- tramolecular couplings ~numerically! exactly. The calculated
spicuous that the shapes of the excitation functions of the 6a spectra have been found to be in excellent agreement with
and 1 fundamentals and of overtones and combination levels the experimental data. This demonstrates that the combina-
are clearly different. The excitation functions of overtones of tion of modern ab initio electronic-structure theory and mul-
nontotally symmetric modes such as 2314 are again differ- timode time-dependent wave packet propagation techniques
ent, showing enhancement at considerably higher excitation opens the possibility of first-principles predictions of RR
energies than the fundamentals of totally symmetric modes. spectra for polyatomic molecules. The degree of agreement
Figure 8 illustrates the wealth of information on excited-state between theory and experiment obtained in the present ap-
dynamics which can in principle be obtained by RR spectros- plication demonstrates the adequacy of the modeling of the
copy. multidimensional diabatic PESs in terms of a Taylor expan-
sion with respect to normal-mode displacements as well as
VI. CONCLUSIONS the accuracy of the ab initio electronic-structure calculations.
We have presented new experimental and theoretical It is encouraging that predictive calculations of RR spectra
data on the RR spectroscopy of the S 1 and S 2 states of pyra- are nowadays possible for molecules of this size, even when
zine. On the experimental side, we have obtained gas-phase complex non-BornOppenheimer dynamics associated with
RR spectra at five excitation wavelengths within the S 2 ab- surface crossings is involved.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 20
I. Suzuka, Y. Udagawa, and M. Ito, Chem. Phys. Lett. 64, 333 ~1979!.
21
R. Schneider, W. Domcke, and H. Koppel, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 1045
This work has been supported by the Deutsche For- ~1990!.
schungsgemeinschaft and the National Science Foundation 22
G. Stock and W. Domcke, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 5496 ~1990!.
~Grant No. CHE-9503629!.
23
L. Seidner, G. Stock, A. L. Sobolewski, and W. Domcke, J. Chem. Phys.
96, 5298 ~1992!.
24
G. Stock, R. Schneider, and W. Domcke, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 7184 ~1989!;
1
J. B. Birks, Photophysics of Aromatic Molecules ~Wiley, New York, 1970!. G. Stock and W. Domcke, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 12466 ~1993!.
2
E. C. Lim, in Excited States, edited by E. C. Lim ~Academic, New York, 25
M. Seel and W. Domcke, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 7806 ~1991!.
1977!, Vol. 33, p. 305. 26
A. L. Sobolewski, C. Woywod, and W. Domcke, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 5627
3
E. Riedle, H. J. Neusser, and E. W. Schlag, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 4231 ~1993!.
~1981!; E. Riedle, H. Stepp, and H. J. Neusser, Chem. Phys. Lett. 110, 452 27
C. Woywod, W. Domcke, A. L. Sobolewski, and H.-J. Werner, J. Chem.
~1984!; U. Schubert, E. Riedle, and H. J. Neusser, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 5994 Phys. 100, 1400 ~1994!.
~1989!. 28
G. Herzberg and H. C. Longuet-Higgins, Discuss. Faraday Soc. 35, 77
4
T. Suzuki and M. Ito, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 4564 ~1989!.
~1963!.
5
Y. Udagawa, M. Ito, and I. Suzuka, Chem. Phys. 46, 237 ~1980!. 29
R. D. Amos and J. E. Rice, Cambridge Analytic Derivatives Package,
6
D. B. McDonald and S. A. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 74, 4893 ~1981!.
7 issue 4.0, Cambridge, 1987.
J. Kommandeur, W. A. Majewski, W. L. Meerts, and D. W. Pratt, Annu. 30
T. H. Dunning, Jr. and P. J. Hay, J. Chem. Phys. 53, 2823 ~1970!.
Rev. Phys. Chem. 38, 433 ~1987!. 31
L. Zhu and P. Johnson, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 2322 ~1993!.
8
A. Amirav, Chem. Phys. 126, 327 ~1988!.
9
32
B. O. Roos, Adv. Chem. Phys. 69, 399 ~1987!.
K. K. Innes. I. G. Ross, and W. R. Moomaw, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 132, 492 33
MOLPRO is a suite of ab initio programs written by H.-J. Werner and P. J.
~1988!.
10
See, for example, papers in Ultrafast Phenomena IX, edited by P. F. Bar- Knowles, with contributions by J. Almlof, R. D. Amos, S. T. Elbert, W.
bara, W. H. Knox, G. A. Mourou, and A. H. Zewail ~Springer, Heidelberg, Meyer, E.-A. Reinsch, R. M. Pitzer, A. J. Stone, and P. R. Taylor.
34
1994!. T. H. Dunning, Jr. and P. J. Hay, in Methods of Electronic Structure
11
A. B. Myers, R. A. Mathies, D. J. Tannor, and E. J. Heller, J. Chem. Phys. Theory, edited by H. F. Schaefer III ~Plenum, New York, 1977!, p. 1.
77, 3857 ~1982!; M. O. Trulson, G. D. Dollinger, and R. A. Mathies, ibid.
35
L. S. Cederbaum and W. Domcke, Adv. Chem. Phys. 36, 205 ~1977!.
90, 4274 ~1989!.
36
F. Dushinsky, Acta Physicochim. URSS 7, 551 ~1937!.
12
A. B. Myers, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7, 1665 ~1990!; D. L. Philips, M. Z.
37
F. T. Smith, Phys. Rev. 179, 111 ~1969!.
38
Zgierski, and A. B. Myers, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 1800 ~1993!. I. Yamazaki, T. Murao, T. Yamanaka, and K. Yoshihara, Faraday Discuss.
13
D. P. Gerrity, L. D. Ziegler, P. B. Kelly, R. A. Desiderio, and B. Hudson, Chem. Soc. 75, 395 ~1983!.
J. Chem. Phys. 83, 3209 ~1985!; R. J. Sension, R. J. Brudzynski, and B.
39
Y. R. Shen, The Principles of Nonlinear Optics ~Wiley, New York, 1984!.
40
Hudson, ibid. 94, 873 ~1991!. See discussion in Ref. 22.
14
C. M. Jones and S. A. Asher, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 2649 ~1988!; S. A. Asher,
41
R. J. Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 12, 570 ~1957!.
Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 39, 537 ~1988!.
42
R. G. Gordon, Adv. Magn. Res. 3, 1 ~1968!.
15
H. A. Kramers and W. Heisenberg, Z. Phys. 31, 681 ~1925!; P. A. M.
43
E. J. Heller, Acc. Chem. Res. 14, 368 ~1981!.
Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. London 114, 710 ~1927!.
44
R. Heather and H. Metiu, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 6903 ~1989!.
16
V. Hizhnyakov and I. Tehver, Phys. Status Solidi 21, 755 ~1967!; S.-Y. Lee
45
C. Lanczos, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards, B 45, 255 ~1950!.
46
and E. J. Heller, J. Chem. Phys. 71, 4777 ~1979!. J. K. Cullum and R. A. Willoughby, Lanczos Algorithms for Large Sym-
17
D. M. Chipman, Q. Sun, and G. N. R. Tripathi, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 8073 metric Eigenvalue Problems ~Birkhauser, Basel, 1985!, Vol. 1.
~1992!. 47
C. Woywod, thesis, Technical University of Munich, 1994 ~unpublished!.
18
L. M. Markham, L. C. Mayne, B. S. Hudson, M. Z. Zgierski, J. Phys. 48
A. Hiraya and K. Shobatake, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 7700 ~1991!.
Chem. 97, 10319 ~1993!. 49
In pyrazine there exist several higher-lying excited electronic states of
19
H.-K. Hong and C. W. Jakobsen, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 1170 ~1978!. considerable oscillator strength. See Ref. 9.