Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Within the realm of experimental research, there are three major types of design:
A. TRUE-EXPERIMENTAL
True experimental research designs are those where researchers have complete control
over the extraneous variables & can predict confidently that the observed effect on the
dependable variable is only due to the manipulation of the independent variable.1
Experimental research designs are considered the most powerful designs to establish
the causal relationship between independent & dependent variables.
Where the purpose of research is explanation, causal relationship may be established
among the variables by experimentation, especially in studies involving physical
objects, where the variables are more easily controlled than in human studies.
1
Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs for
Research.. Chicago: Rand McNally, P.84-86
2
https://www.simplypsychology.org Experimental Method, accessed on November 12th,
2017.
In this studies, the controlled environment in which the study is conducted can yield a
greater degree of purity in observation.
Conditions not found in a natural setting can be created in an experimental setting,
where the independent variable is manipulated by investigator.
In the experimental approach, we can often create conditions in a short period of time
that may take years to occur naturally. For example, in genetic studies we can breed
strains in very small time, which would take a long time in nature to occur.
When the experiment is conducted in a laboratory, experimental unit, or other
specialized research setting, it is removed from the pressure & problems of real-life
situations & the researcher can pursue his or her studies in a more leisurely, careful, &
concentrated way.
Most of the times, the results of experimental research designs cannot be replicated in
studies conducted on human beings due to ethical problems.
For certain research problems, because of the danger to physical & psychological
health of the human subjects, it is not possible to conduct experiments on human
beings.
Many of the human variables neither have valid measurable criteria nor instruments to
measure them. For example, patient welfare or level of wellness cannot be measured
on any scale or by any instrument. In these situations, if a refined experimental design
is used, there may be a mismatch of research design & the variable measuring
instruments.
In experimental studies conducted in natural settings like hospitals or community, it is
not possible to impose control over extraneous variables.
Another disadvantage of the experimental research design is that it is very difficult to
get cooperation from the study participants, because it may involve medical or
surgical treatment or intervention, which may make the prospective subjects reluctant
to participate in research study.
B. QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL
This design is useful when the experimenter wants to measure the effects of a
treatment over a long period of time.
The experimenter would continue to administer the treatment & measure the effects a
number of times during the course of the experiment.
Generally it is a single-subject research, in which the researcher carries out an
experiment on an individual or on a small number of individuals, by alternating
between administering & then withdrawing the treatment to determine the
effectiveness of the intervention.
A researcher might assess pain levels of a group of patients with low-back pain. After
3 weeks of pain assessment, subjects are taught special exercises to reduce that pain.
During the next 3 weeks, pain levels would again be measured.
Measuring a childs school performance on a weekly basis, & then introducing a new
teaching technique. Then again measuring on a weekly basis.
Quasi-experimental designs are more frequently used because they are more practical
& feasible to conduct research studies in nursing, where in the absence of a large
sample size, randomization &/ or availability of control groups are not always
possible.
This design is more suitable for real-world natural setting than true experimental
research designs.
It allows researchers to evaluate the impact of quasi-independent variables under
naturally occurring conditions.
It may be able to establishing casual relationship. Wherein some of the hypotheses are
practically answered through this design only.
Symbols used :
In discussing experimental designs a few symbols are used.
E Experimental group
C Control group
X Independent variable
Y Dependent variable
R Random assignment of subjects to groups
Yb Dependent variable measures taken before experiment /
treatment (pre-test)
Ya Dependent variable measures taken after experiment/ treatment
(Post-test)
Mr Matching subjects and then random assignment to groups.
3
http://results.mu.ac.in/myweb_test/Research%20Methadology-Paper-3/Chapter7.pdf#page=2&zoom=auto,-
99,416, accessed on November 12th,2017
Pre-test Independent variable Post-test
Yb X Ya
This design provides some improvement over the previous by adding a control
group which is not exposed to the experimental treatment. The experimenter may take
two sections of grade-V of one school or grade-V of one school or grade-V students of
two different schools (intact classes) as experimental and control groups respectively
and assume the two groups to be equivalent. No pre-test is taken to ascertain it.
Group Independent Variable Post-test
E X Ya
C - Ya
This design compares the post-test scores of experimental group (Ya E) that has
received experimental treatment (X) with that of control group (Ya C) that has not
received X.
The major limitation of the design is that there is no provision for establishing
the equivalence of the experimental (E) and control (C) groups. However, since no
pretest is used, this design controls for the effects of extraneous variables such history,
maturation, and pre-testing.
ADVANTAGES OF PRE-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:
Very simple & convenient to conduct these studies in natural settings, especially in
nursing.
Most suitable design for the beginners in the field of experimental research.
DISADVANTAGES OF PRE-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:
Considered a very weak experimental design to establish casual relationship between
independent & dependant variables, because it controls no threat to internal validity.
It has very little control over the research.
It has a higher threat to internal validity of research, & may have a selection bias,
which can be very serious threats for in using this particular design.
If you choose to conduct experimental research, one of your most important tasks will
be to choose the design that gives your research the best combination of internal and external
validity. At the same time, it must be practical enough so that you can actually do the
research in your own circumstances.
Remember, no particular type is right for all situations. Real-world constraints will
often dictate what is practical or possible. In any case you need to be careful to recognize the
weaknesses of the design you choose. Do not attempt to prove things or make claims in your
findings that are beyond the capabilities of your design.
Reference :
http://results.mu.ac.in/myweb_test/Research%20Methadology-Paper-
3/Chapter7.pdf#page=2&zoom=auto,-99,416, accessed on November 12th,2017