Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Position: Principal 1
Review Period: June 2016-March 2017
School: _______________________
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
child friendly Learning Environment Establish systems for safe and child
school systems friendly learning and school environment
established for students
School Leadership,
Data-based Management and Performs data-based strategic planning to improve
strategic Operations schools performance
planning
performed
Sound school Performs School Leadership,
leadership & Management and Operations
management functions
performed
Rater: ________________________________________
PSDS
ENT & REVIEW FORM
ions(semestral)
1-64% and below accomplishments, strategic planning
process and evidences are largely absent
TUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
Ave
Key Result Areas
(KRAs)
Instructional Leadership
Learning Environment
Accounted for learning outcomes of schools and centers viz-a-viz goals and Manages instructional system
targets
Provided safe and child friendly learning and school environment for Evaluates the school plant, physica
students/learners
teachers where they best fit to teach (grades, learning areas, special assignments, etc.)
es the school plant, physical facilities fitness, safety and sufficiency with the assistance of specialists
omotes and coordinates services for the holistic development of school personnel and pupils
child friendly Learning Environment Establish systems for safe and child
school systems friendly learning and school environment
established for students
Physical Improved physical environment
environment for student learning
improved
Ratee:
______________________________
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM
Name of Rater:
Position: District Supervisor
Date of Review: December 2015
ISP - 1
2% 1 ISP 1 5
PMCF-120
13% 100 95 4
PMCF
10%
5% committees -CPP,DRRM,SPG, GAD, SPT
Policies 3 5 5
5% 5- 17 & above of classrooms & facilities are structured & well-maintained 17 15 4
4- 14-16 of classrooms & facilities are structured & well-maintained
3- 11-13 of classrooms & facilities are structured & well-maintained
2- 8-10 of classrooms & facilities are structured & well-maintained
1- 7 & below of classrooms & facilities are structured & well-maintained
20% 5- 17 and above of teachers provided with technical assistance
10% with corresponding evidences: (observation reports, TNA results
performance analysis & recommendations for devt interventions(semestral) 34 34 5
4- 14-16 of teachers provided with technical assistance
with corresponding evidences(semestral)
3- 10-13 of teachers provided with technical assistance
with corresponding evidences
2- 7-9 of teachers provided with technical assistance
with corresponding evidences
1- 6 & below of teachers provided with technical assistance
with corresponding evidences
2.5% 5- 17 & above of teachers attended(2) INSET with TCR
4- 14-16 of teachers attended(2) INSET with TCR 2 2 5
3- 10-13 of teachers attended(2) INSET
2- 7 -9 of teachers attended(2) INSET
1- 6 & below of teachers attended(2) INSET
2.50% 5- 17 & above of teachers attended LAC sessions with TCR 20 15 3
4- 14-16 of teachers attended LAC sessions with TCR
3- 10-13 of teachers attended LAC sessions with TCR
2- 7-9 of teachers attended LAC sessions with TCR
1- 6 & below of teachers attended LAC sessions with TCR
w/ TCR
5% 5 -Has stakeholders partnership/mobilization plan agreements
(complete with reports and documentations of meetings,
Organized programs with stakeholders,esp. parents for academic 4 4
and other purposes (esp. Strategic planning)
Obtained resources for the school through stakeholders partnership
4 -Has mobilization plan and occasionally meets stakeholders in
meetings and activities but some elements (e.g. not enough
resources raised)
Rater: ________________________________________
PSDS
ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
Efficiency Timeliness Ave
4 4 4 0.3
3 3 3 0.23
0.35
3 3.5 3.5
5 5 0.1
4 4 0.52
5 5 0.25
4 4 0.2
5 5 0.5
5 5 0.125
3 3 0.075
4 4 0.2
4 4 4 4 0.4
4 4 4 0.4
4 4 0.1
3 3 0.075
4 0.1
4 4 0.1
4.025
Name of Employee: ________________________ Name of Rater:
Position: Pri Teacher 1 Position: Principal I
Review Period: JuNE 2015-March 2016 Date of Review: November 2015
District:
School: _______________________
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT
per KRA
Lessons plans Teaching-Learning Process June-March 50%
& daily logs Prepares 1440 lesson plans and daily logs 10%
with IMs of activities including appropriate,
prepared adequate and updated instructional materials
from June 2016 to March 2017
& evaluated
Remedial & Conducts remediation/enrichment programs 7%
Community Involvement 7%
regular/ Conducts regular/periodic PTA meetings 3%
periodic /conferences
PTA meetings
conducted 4
Co-curricular
school
association Initiated/Participated in co-curricular/school 5%
participated association, etc.
____________________________ ____________________________
Ratee Rater
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM
Name of Rater:
Position: Principal I
Date of Review: November 2015
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QUALITY
5-All daily lesson plans had the following objectives
subject matter, procedures, evaluation and assignment
Each part had a full description of what to do with an example
Objective was specific, measurable, attainable, result-oriented
and time-bound
100% and above developed high order thinking skills
Attains 100% and above of the desired learning competencies
4-Had four of the five parts of lesson plan
Each part had a partial description of what to do with an example
Objective was stated with 1 behavioral indicator is missing
86-99% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 86-99% of the desired learning
3- Had 3 of the five parts
Each part had a partial description without example
Objective was stated with 3-4 behavioral indicator missing
75-85% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 75-85% of the desired learning competencies
2- Had 2 of the five parts
Each part had no description of what to do with example
Objective was stated with 1-2 behavioral indicators missing
65-74% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 65-74% of the desired learning competencies
1- Had 1 of the five parts
Each part had no description of what to do and example
Objective was stated without behavioral indicators
64% and below develop high order thinking skills
64% and below attain the desired learning competencies at all
5-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 100% and above of students who need it and
4-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 86%-99% of students who need it and
3-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 75%-85% of students who need it and
2-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 65%-74% of students who need it and
1-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 64% below of students who need it and
completion of interventions
2-Identified classroom/learning problems with research proposals
1- Only classroom/ learning problems/ issues identified
Approving Authority
CE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
5- 100% & above of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs 5-100% and above LPs & DLLs are based on the budget of work
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials 100% and above of LPs & DLLs is prepared daily
4- 86%-99% of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs 4-86%-99% of LPs & DLLs based on the budget of work
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials 86%-99% of LPs & DLLs is prepared daily
3- 75%-85% of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs 3-75%-85% of LPs & DLLs based on the budget of work
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials 75%-85% of LPs & DLLs are updated
2- 65%-74% of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs 2- 65%-74% of LsP & DLLs are based on the budget of work
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials 65%-74% of LPs & DLLs are updated
1- 64% & below of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs 1-64% & below of LPs & DLLs are based on the budget of work
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials 64% & below of LPs & DLLs are updated
5- 100% & above of instructional materials were used appropriately 5-100% of the lessons delivered on time
Managed time and resources efficiently in 100% & above of lessons taught 100% of the activities were done on time
4- 86%-99% of instructional materials were used appropriately 4-86%-99% of the lessons delivered on time
Managed time and resources efficiently in of 86%-99% lessons taught 86%-99% of the activities were done on time
3- 75%-85% of instructional materials were used appropriately 3-75%-85% of the lessons delivered on time
Managed time and resources efficiently in 75%-85% of lessons taught 75%-85% of the activities were done on time
2-65%-74% of instructional materials were used appropriately 2- 65%-74% of the lessons delivered on time
Managed time and resources efficiently in 75%-85% of lessons taught 65%-74%of the activities were done on time
1- 64% & below of instructional materials were used appropriately 1-64% & below of the lessons delivered on time
Managed time and resources efficiently in 64% & below of lessons taught 64%of the activities were done on time
5- 3 action research conducted based target date
4-2 action research conducted based target date
3-1 action research conducted based target date
2-Identified classroom/learning problems with research
proposals on target date
1- Only classroom/ learning problems/ issues identified on
target date
5-100% of activities implemented on time
4-86%-99% of activities implemented 5-10 days late
3-75%-85% of activities implemented 11-15 days late
2-65%-74% of activities implemented 16-20 days late
1-64% of activities implemented 21-30 days late
Target ACTUAL RESULT RATING SCORE
Q E T Average
5
5
1
35 4 4 0.4
10-chart 5 5 5
10-SF2 5 5 5
4-systems 4 4 4 4.67 0.467 seat plan
leader
checklist
group
CR-10 5 5 5
32 5 5
32 4 4 4
100% 5 5 5
5 5 5 4.8 0.38
1 RP 5 5 5 5 5 0.35
R-5 5 5 5
M-5 5 5 5
MPS-85
GSA-85 3 3 3 0.45
4 5 5 5 0.15
5 5 5 5 0.1
2 5 5 0.1
1 1 0.03
5 5 5 5 5 0.25
1
1 1 0.025
1 1 0.025
2.727
Overall Rating
Descriptive Rating
Name of Employee: ________________________ Name of Rater:
Position: Pri Teacher 1 Position: Principal I
Review Period: JuNE 2015-March 2016 Date of Review: November 201
District:
School: _______________________
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT
per KRA
Lessons plans Teaching-Learning Process June-March 50%
& daily logs Prepares 1440 lesson plans and daily logs 10%
with IMs of activities including appropriate,
prepared adequate and updated instructional materials
from June 2016 to March 2017
& evaluated
Remedial & Conducts remediation/enrichment programs 7%
programs
conducted
Community Involvement 7%
regular/ Conducts regular/periodic PTA meetings 3%
periodic /conferences
PTA meetings
conducted 4
Co-curricular
school
association Initiated/Participated in co-curricular/school 5%
participated association, etc.
____________________________ ____________________________
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM
Name of Rater:
Position: Principal I
Date of Review: November 2015
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QUALITY
5-All daily lesson plans had the following objectives
subject matter, procedures, evaluation and assignment
Each part had a full description of what to do with an example
Objective was specific, measurable, attainable, result-oriented
and time-bound
100% and above developed high order thinking skills
Attains 100% and above of the desired learning competencies
4-Had four of the five parts of lesson plan
Each part had a partial description of what to do with an example
Objective was stated with 1 behavioral indicator is missing
86-99% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 86-99% of the desired learning
3- Had 3 of the five parts
Each part had a partial description without example
Objective was stated with 3-4 behavioral indicator missing
75-85% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 75-85% of the desired learning competencies
2- Had 2 of the five parts
Each part had no description of what to do with example
Objective was stated with 1-2 behavioral indicators missing
65-74% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 65-74% of the desired learning competencies
1- Had 1 of the five parts
Each part had no description of what to do and example
Objective was stated without behavioral indicators
64% and below develop high order thinking skills
64% and below attain the desired learning competencies at all
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
EFFICIENCY
5- 100% & above of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials
4- 86%-99% of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials
3- 75%-85% of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials
2- 65%-74% of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials
1- 64% & below of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials
Approving Authority
Target ACTUAL RESULT
TIMELINESS Q E T Average
5-100% and above LPs & DLLs are based on the budget of work
100% and above of LPs & DLLs is prepared daily
4-86%-99% of LPs & DLLs based on the budget of work 4 4 5 4.25
86%-99% of LPs & DLLs is prepared daily
3-75%-85% of LPs & DLLs based on the budget of work
75%-85% of LPs & DLLs are updated
2- 65%-74% of LsP & DLLs are based on the budget of work
65%-74% of LPs & DLLs are updated
1-64% & below of LPs & DLLs are based on the budget of work
64% & below of LPs & DLLs are updated
35 4
10-chart 5 5 5
10-SF2 5 5 5
4-systems 4 4 4
CR-10 5 5 5
32 5 5
32 4 4 4
100% 5 5 5
5 5 5
1 RP
5 5 5 5
R-5
5 5 5
M-5
5 5 5
MPS-85
GSA-85 3 3
4 5 5
5 5 5
2 5
1 1
5 5 5 5
1
1 1
1 1
5-SIP/AIP prepared and submitted on time
4-SIP/AIP prepared and submitted 10-30 days after the schedule
3-SIP/AIP prepared and submitted 2-3 mnths after the schedule
2-SIP/AIP prepared and submitted 4-5 mnths after the schedule
1-SIP/AIP prepared and submitted 6 mnths after the schedule
4 0.4
4 0.4
4.67 0.467
4.8 0.38
5 0.35
3 0.45
5 0.15
5 0.1
5 0.1
0.03
5 0.25
0.025
0.025
3.127
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE C
Name of Employee: ________________________ Name of Rater:
Position: Pri Teacher 1 Position: Principal I
Review Period: JuNE 2015-March 2016 Date of Review: November 2015
District:
School: _______________________
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT
per KRA
Teaching-Learning Process June-March 50%
Prepares 1440 lesson plans and daily logs 10%
of activities including appropriate,
adequate and updated instructional materials
Initiated/Participated in co-curricular/school 5%
association, etc.
____________________________ ____________________________
Ratee Rater
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM
Name of Rater:
Position: Principal I
Date of Review: November 2015
MPS - 85
Teaching methods & strategies elicited 100% interaction 85
Inductive & deductive methods 100% used
Cooperative learning used
ICT integration 100% evident
Pupils observed classroom rules and guidelines - 100%
Overall Rating
Approving Authority Descriptive Rating
ACTUAL RESULT RATING SCORE
T Average
Overall Rating
Descriptive Rating
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FO
Name of Employee :
District:
School: _______________________
5%
4- Conducted Action Research within the district supported by the
Action Research
conducted following evidences: Research proposal approved by the Division
( complete format ), Research Report with findings
45%
Prepares LPs/ DLL using appropriate
Instructional strategies, methodologies and instructional
LPs & DLLs 5- 100 % LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies, approches and
Prepared Competence materials within the year
June to Instructional materials prepared
March 15%
4 - 80-99%% LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies, approches
and Instructional materials parts
3- 60-79% LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies, approches and
Instructional materials prepared
2- 40-59% LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies, approches and
Instructional materials prepared
2- 40-59% LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies, approches and
Instructional materials prepared
NAT/ ELLNA Increases NAT and ELLNA performance 5% 5- 3 points and above increased or more NAT/ ELLNA result
Performance 4 - 2 points increased in NAT/ ELLNA result
Name of Rater :
Position :
5 - Action Research conducted with expenses less 5 - Action research conducted 5 days before the
than the approved budget schedule
4-80-99% of demonstration teachings done with appropriate 4 - demonstration teaching conducted 1- 5 minutes after
Instructional materials / ICT equipment the alloted time
3-60-79% of demonstration teachings done with appropriate 3 - demonstration teaching conducted 6- 10 minutes
Instructional materials/ ICT equipment after the alloted time
2-40-59% of demonstration teachings done with apropriate 2 - demonstration teaching conducted 11-15 minutes
Intructional materials/ ICT equipment after the alloted time
1-39% and below of demonstration teachings done with 1 - demonstration teaching conducted 15 minutes
inappropriate Intructional materials / ICT equipment beyond alloted time
4- 80%-99% of teaching-process facilitated using 4 - 100% of LP/DLL with IMs prepared during the day
appropriate localized instructional materials/ ICT equipment
3- 60% - 79% of teaching-process facilitated using 3- 100% LP/ DLL prepared a day late
appropriate localized instructional materials/ ICT equipment
1- 39% & below teaching-process facilitated using 1- 100% LP/DLL prepared 3 days late
appropriate localized instructional materials / ICT equipment
4-3 mentoring/coaching sessions done using appropriate Ims/ICT 4 -mentoring reports submitted on time
equipment following scheduled time
1- No mentoring/coaching sessions done using appropriate 1 - Mentoring reports submitted 5 days or more after
Ims/ICT equipment following scheduled time
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
Instructional Competence
Instructional Supervision
School/community/Partnership
Technical Assistance
Objectives
Conducted at least an action research related to school
or classroomconcerns/ problems during the year
Participated in seminars, workshops, trainings
within a year (division, regional or national)
Received (division, regional or national)
awards/recognitions within a year
Served as demonstration teacher
1.Attends professional meetings, in-service trainings and related activities for self-growth and advancement.
8. Observes proper decorum
9. Conducts echo seminars for co-teachers.
Conducts in-depth studies or action researches on instructional problems
22. Assists in designing capacity development programs for teachers
23. Serves as trainer in school-based INSET
serves as demonstration teachers
Seminars/workshops/trainings
& evaluated
Remedial & Conducts remediation/enrichment programs 7%
Community Involvement 7%
regular/ Conducts regular/periodic PTA meetings 3%
periodic /conferences
PTA meetings
conducted 4
Co-curricular
school
association Initiated/Participated in co-curricular/school 5%
participated association, etc.
____________________________ ____________________________
Ratee Rater
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM
Name of Rater:
Position: Principal I
Date of Review: November 2016
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QUALITY
5-All daily lesson plans had the following objectives
subject matter, procedures, evaluation and assignment
Each part had a full description of what to do with an example
Objective was specific, measurable, attainable, result-oriented
and time-bound
100% and above developed high order thinking skills
Attains 100% and above of the desired learning competencies
4-Had four of the five parts of lesson plan
Each part had a partial description of what to do with an example
Objective was stated with 1 behavioral indicator is missing
86-99% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 86-99% of the desired learning
3- Had 3 of the five parts
Each part had a partial description without example
Objective was stated with 3-4 behavioral indicator missing
75-85% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 75-85% of the desired learning competencies
2- Had 2 of the five parts
Each part had no description of what to do with example
Objective was stated with 1-2 behavioral indicators missing
65-74% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 65-74% of the desired learning competencies
1- Had 1 of the five parts
Each part had no description of what to do and example
Objective was stated without behavioral indicators
64% and below develop high order thinking skills
64% and below attain the desired learning competencies at all
5-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 100% and above of students who need it and
completion of interventions
2-Identified classroom/learning problems with research proposals
1- Only classroom/ learning problems/ issues identified
Approving Authority
ANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
EFFICIENCY
5- 100% & above of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials
4- 86%-99% of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials
3- 75%-85% of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials
2- 65%-74% of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials
1- 64% & below of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials
35 4 4
10-chart 5 5 5
5-100% & above of student's attendance & classroom cleanliness checked daily 10-SF2 5 5 5
4-86%-99% of student's attendance & classroom cleanliness checked daily 4-systems 4 4 4 4.67
3-75%-85% of student's attendance & classroom cleanliness checked daily
2-65%-74% of student's attendance & classroom cleanliness checked daily
1-64% & below of student's attendance & classroom cleanliness checked daily
CR-10 5 5 5
32 5 5
32 4 4 4
100% 5 5 5
5 5 5 4.8
1 RP
5 5 5 5 5
R-5 5 5 5
M-5 5 5 5
5-100% & above of GSA in subjects taught submitted 2 days after QA.
4-86%-99% of GSA in subjects taught submitted 3-5 days after QA.
3-75%-85% of GSA in subjects taught submitted 6-10 days after QA. MPS-85
2-65-74% of GSA in subjects taught submitted 11-15 days after QA. GSA-85 3 3 3
1-64% & below of GSA in subjects taught submitted 16-20 days after QA.
4 5 5 5
5 5 5 5
2 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
1
1 1
1 1
5-100% of activities implemented on time
4-86%-99% of activities implemented 5-10 days late
3-75%-85% of activities implemented 11-15 days late
2-65%-74% of activities implemented 16-20 days late
1-64% of activities implemented 21-30 days late
Overall Rating
Descriptive Rating
SCORE
0.4
0.467
0.38
0.35
0.45
0.15
0.1
0.1
0.03
0.25
0.025
0.025
2.727