INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: CHARITO V. BUSTRIA Name of RatRUBEN E. LAO, ED.D

Position: Teacher III Position: PRINCIPAL/SCHOOL HEAD
Review Period: June 2015 - March 2016 Date of Review: March 30, 2016
Bureau/Center/Service/D
Department of Education
TO BE FILLED DURING
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE ACTUAL
Major Final Outputs Key Result Areas OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT INDICATORS RESULTS RATING SCORE
(MFOs) (KRAs) PER KRA (Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness) Q E T Ave.
Teaching-Learning * Prepare daily lesson logs and June to March 10% 5 - All daily log had the 5 4.6 1.38
Process (30%) activities. following objective,
* Initiate discipline of students 5% subject matter, procedures, 5
* Monitor attendance, 5% evaluation and assignment. 4
diversity appreciation, safe, Established challenging and
positive and motivating measurable goals for student
environment, overall physical learning aligned with PELC
atmosphere, cleanliness, and PLSC. Has provided individual
orderliness of classrooms. activities and teaching methods
* Maintain harmonious relationship 5% elicited interaction from class. 5
among teachers & students. Safety, orderliness and clean
* Develop a sense of responsibility 5% liness of floors, toilets and 4
among teachers & students. proper waste disposal were
maintained.
4 - lacked 1 imdicator
3 - lacked 2 indicators
2 - lacked 3 indicators
1 - lacked 4 indicators
Pupil/Student * Monitor, evaluate and maintain June to March 10% 5 - Evidences showed that the 5 4.2 1.68
Outcomes (40%) pupil/students progress teacher purposely plans assess
* Maintan updated students' 10% ment choices to match the 5
school records different students needs, abilities
* Encourage students to join GSP/ 5% and learning styles. Class record 3
Sports and other activities in the reflected the bases of ratings in
school. all cases/subjects' portfolio
* Monitor and evalaute students' 5% contained all of their accomplish 4
behaviour and discipline ments. Remediation/enrichment
* Assess and evaluate students in 10% program was offered to all 4
their studies students who need it.
4 - lacked 1 imdicator
3 - lacked 2 indicators
2 - lacked 3 indicators
1 - lacked 4 indicators
Community Involvement * Conduct regular/periodic June to March 10% 5 - 130% accomplished 5 3.8 1.14
30% PTA meetings/conferences 4 - 115% - 129% accomplished
* Visit parents of students 5% 3 - 110% - 114% accomplished 2
needing academic monitoring/ 2 - 51% - 99% accomplished
follow-up 1 - below 50% accomplished
* Undertake/initiate projects/ 5% 3
events/activities with external
funding/sponsorship
* Encourage students/parents to join 5% 4
different community activities
* Develop a sense of cooperation 5% 5
and humane relationship within the
community
OVERALL
RATING 4.2
FOR
ACCOMPLISH
MENTS

RUBEN E. LAO, Ed. D CHARITO V. BUSTRIA

Principal IV Ratee
RATER/Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position: PRINCIPAL/SCHOOL HEAD
Review Period: June 2014 - March 2015 Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education

TO BE FILLED DURING
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE
Major Final Outputs Key Result Areas WEIGHT INDICATORS ACTUAL
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE RATING SCORE
(MFOs) (KRAs) PER KRA (Quality, Efficiency, RESULTS
Timeliness)
OVERALL
RATING
FOR
ACCOMPLISH
MENTS