hat are LETTERS OF CREDIT?

Those issued by one merchant to another for the purpose of attending to a commercial
transaction.

Kinds:

Common Letter of Creditan instrument by which a bank, for the account of a buyer of
merchandise, gives formal evidence to a seller, of its willingness to permit the seller to draw bills
against it, and stipulates in legal form that all such bills will be honored.

Travelers Letter of Credita letter from a bank addressed to its correspondents stating that
drafts up to a certain sum drawn by the beneficiary will be honored by the bank.

Essential Conditions:
1.) Issued in favor of a definite person and not to order; and
2.) Amount is fixed and specified.

Duration:
1.) Upon a period fixed by the parties;
2.) If none is fixed, 6 months from its date if used in the Philippines or 1 year if used
abroad.

LETTER OF CREDIT
(Art. 567-572 Code of Commerce)

LETTER OF CREDIT
Letter of credit an arrangement by a bank or other person made at the request of a customer
that the issuer will honor drafts or other demands for payment upon compliance w/ the
conditions specified in the credit.

Internationally accepted definition of a LC as provided in the Uniform Customs and Practices for
Documentary Credit (UCPDC):
Letter of Credit any arrangement, however named or described, whereby a bank also known
as the issuing bank, acting upon the request or instruction of another(applicant or customer) or
on its own behalf, binds itself to:

1. Pay to the order of a 3rd person known as beneficiary OR

2. Accepts and pay any draft that may be drawn by the beneficiary, OR
3. Authorize another bank to:
Pay to the order of a 3rd person known as the beneficiary.
Accept and pay any draft by the beneficiary, OR

4. Authorize another bank to negotiate against the stipulated documents.

Note: We are bound by the UCPDC issued by the International Chamber of Commerce. Sec. 2
of the Code of Commerce states that in the absence of any particular provision in the code of
Commerce, commercial transactions shall be governed by the usages and customs generally
observed (BPI vs. Nery).

A Letter of Credit is a special contract designed to answer two concerns:

Sellers refusal to part with his goods before being paid coupled with the Buyers want of
ownership over the goods before paying.

Note: The opening of a LC does not involve specific appropriation of money in favor of the
beneficiary. The correspondent bank does not receive in advance the money form the buyer or
issuing bank but pays the amount out of its own funds and then later on seek reimbursement
from the issuing bank. It does not convey the notion that a particular sum of money has been
specifically reserved or has been held in trust.

Note: An LC is not a negotiable instrument. It does Not conform w/ Section 1 of the Negotiable
Instruments Law. This is because it does not contain an unconditional promise to pay a sum
certain in money. The LC is conditioned to the submission of certain documents. Moreover, the
LC is issued in favor of a definite person and not to order. Therefore, it also lacks the words of
negotiability required.

LC is conditioned on

1. Submission of stipulated documents

2. Compliance with the terms of the LC

Is LC a commercial transaction?
YES. Because it is governed by the Code of Commerce.

PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTION:

Basic parties to a letter of credit:
 1. Applicant/buyer/importer the one who procures the letter of credit and obliges
himself to reimburse the Issuing Bank (IB) upon the receipt of the documents of title. He
is the party who initiates the operation of the Letter of Credit transaction as the buyer of
the merchandise and also of the credit instrument.

2. Issuing Bank is usually the buyers bank; it issues the letter of credit and undertakes
to pay the seller upon receipt of the draft and proper documents to the buyer upon
reimbursement.

3. Seller/beneficiary is the one who in compliance w/ the contract of sale ships the
goods to the buyer and delivers the documents of title and drafts to the issuing bank to
recover payment. He is the beneficiary of the instrument because the instrument is
addressed to him and in his favor.

Additional party/parties to the LC:

4. Correspondent Bank

TYPES OF CORRESPONDENT BANK:

1. Advising/Notifying Bank does not have any contractual relations w/ the buyer but
merely serves as an agent of the issuing bank. Its only responsibility is to transmit the
LC. Thus, it could validly refuse to negotiate or accept, even if the seller tenders all the
documents required under the LC and it does not become liable as the beneficiary has
no cause of action against the bank.

2. Confirming Bank lends credence to the LC issued by a lesser known bank. It

assumes direct obligation to the seller/beneficiary and becomes principally liable.

A notifying bank, who also assumes the role of a negotiating bank does not include assuming
the role of a confirming bank and is therefore not liable to the beneficiary. To be liable, there
must be an absolute assurance that it will undertake the issuing banks obligation as its own. If
it does confirm, the beneficiary become entitled to proceed against either or both banks in case
of breach.

3. Paying Bank the bank w/c pays the beneficiary. It may either be the opening/issuing
bank or any other bank in the place of the beneficiary.
 4. Negotiating Bank any bank in the place of the beneficiary w/c buys or discounts the
sellers draft. Its liability depends on the stage of negotiation. If BEFORE negotiation,
such that it suggests its willingness to negotiate, it has no liability w/ respect to the
seller. But if AFTER negotiation, a contractual relationship will then prevail between
them.

Note: A bank does not become a negotiating bank unless he pays the draft and becomes the
holder of said document.
As such, the IB may notify the seller of the opening of the LC either directly or through a
correspondent bank, w/c may either be a mere advising bank or a Confirming Bank.

Note: The IB has the option to tap a correspondent bank or not.

The liability of a Correspondent Bank depends on what kind of function it plays in the LC
transaction.

RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES is governed by-

1. Issuing bank and applicant the relationship is governed by the terms of the application
and agreement for the issuance of the LC by the bank.
2. Issuing bank and the Beneficiary the relationship is governed by the terms of the LC
issued by the bank
3. Applicant and beneficiary the relationship is governed by the contract they entered
into. ex. Sales

INDEPENDENCE PRINCIPLE-
The bank in determining compliance with the terms of the LC is required only to examine the
shipping document presented by the seller and is precluded from determining whether the main
contract is accomplished or not

DOCTRINE OF STRICT COMPLIANCE-

The document tendered by the seller must strictly conform to the terms of the LC . The
correspondent bank which departs from what has been stipulated under the LC, as when it
accepts a faulty tender , acts on his own risk and may not thereafter recover from the buyer or
issuing bank , the money paid to the benefic
In short, the documents presented must comply w/ those stipulated on. In a LC, the banks only
deals w/ documents and not w/ goods.

Can a breach of contract be invoked against the Issuing Bank?

NO. Because if all the documents stipulated have been submitted and the IB finds that they
conform w/t the LC requires, then the IB must pay the seller. In a LC transaction the banks deal
only w/ documents not goods, so banks pays if the documents are OK and gets reimbursed by
the buyer. This relationship is independent so if ever the goods are in bad condition, the
applicant still pays the bank.

Note: A loan transaction may give rise to LC. An LC does not arise only because of sale or
importation. Example: Standby LC.

Standby Letter of Credit (SLC) it is a bank issued option on loan involving 3 parties: the
bank issuing the credit, the party requesting for such issuance (otherwise known as the account
party) and the beneficiary.
Under the terms of a SLC, the beneficiary has the right to trigger the loan option
(referred to as TAKING DOWN THE LOAN) if the account party fails to meet its commitment, in
w/c case the issuing bank disburses a specified sum to the beneficiary and books an equivalent
loan to its customer.
SLCs may support non-financial obligations such as those of bidders, or financial
obligations such as those of borrowers. In the latter case, the borrower purchases an SLC and
names the lender as beneficiary. Should the borrower default, the beneficiary has the right to
take down the SLC and receive the principal balance from the issuing bank. The borrowers
loan obligation is then passed to the bank.

When the Notifying Bank (NB) may be held liable:

The NB is liable if:

1. It did not notify the seller of the opening of the LC, or

2. It did not determine the apparent authenticity of the required documents.

Note: Only the APPARENT AUTHENTICITY is to be determined. The NB does not warrant the
authenticity of the LC but only its apparent authenticity. So if the LC turns out to be spurious,
NB is not liable for damages unless obvious that it is not authentic.

Therefore, Notifying Bank/Advising Bank is liable if it acts beyond the scope of its authority.

When may the Advising Bank (AB) be equally liable with the Issuing Bank (IB)?

Ordinarily, an AB, whose obligation is merely to advise the seller/beneficiary of the

opening of a LC has no liability. The opening of a LC does not make the IB liable at once
because there is no liability. The liability is conditioned and dependent on the tender or
submission of the documents stipulated upon by the parties. If the beneficiary requires that the
obligation of the IB shall also be made the obligation of the AB to him, there is what is known as
a CONFIRMED COMMERCIAL CREDIT and the AB shall become a Confirming Bank. In this
situation, the liability of the CB is primary and it is as if the credit were issued by the IB and the
CB jointly, thus giving the beneficiary or holder for value of the drafts drawn under the credit, the
right to proceed against either or both banks, the moment the credit instrument has been
breached.
 The CB is liable only when the documents are submitted and gets reimbursed by the IB
because there is no privity of contract with the applicant.
Thus, an AB becomes a CB when the above mentioned conditions occur. In such a
case, the CB acquires the same liabilities as the Issuing Bank and is bound by the same
conditions as an IB.

Function of a Negotiating Bank (NB):

It accepts or gives value to the draft and w/c later on sells the draft to the IB. The IB
then reimburses the NB. What happens is that the NB buys the draft at a discounted price and
then sells it to the IB for its face value.

If LC is disowned by the IB, can the Negotiating Bank ask reimbursement from the
seller? Under what principle?
YES. Seller is a drawer of the draft accepted and paid by the Negotiating Bank. Therefore, the
seller has contingent liability on such draft.

Can a Confirming Bank become a Notifying Bank?

NEVER, because they have different liabilities. The CBs liability is primary while the NBs
liability comes only after negotiation (Before negotiation, there is no liability).

It is the application for the opening of a LC w/c governs the relationship between the
buyer and the IB. This implies that the buyer/applicant is not concerned w/ the terms of
the LC between the IB and the seller/beneficiary.
As to the IB, it is not a guarantor because its liability is not subsidiary since the condition
of the submission of the document is determinative of the liability not the nonpayment of
the buyer.
The IB opens a LC for a consideration w/c comes in the form of a commission.

If the IB does not advance the payment in favor of the seller/beneficiary, may the
buyer/applicant recover the commission paid?
No More because this is the consideration. But he may recover the margin fee.

What among other things, should be stipulated upon the application for a LC?

The documents w/c the seller should submit to the IB.

In LC transactions, the IB deals only w/ the documents, not w/ goods. The IB is not bound or
required to examine the goods. For as long as the required documents are submitted by the
seller, the IB pays the seller.

If the goods turned out to be defective, is this a valid defense to avoid payment by the IB
to the seller?
NO. As long as the documents submitted by the seller are complete and in conformity w/ what
the LC requires, the IB is bound to pay the seller. This is true even if the goods turned out to be
defective.
How about the buyer, is he still bound to reimburse the IB despite the defective goods
received by him?
YES. The buyer has no course of action against the IB. The buyer has a COA against the
seller.

If the documents submitted by the seller are incomplete and the IB still pays the seller, is
the buyer still bound to pay the IB?
NO. Because the IB should not have paid the seller knowing the documents to be incomplete.
The IB deals only w/ documents.

Can the beneficiary demand payment form the CB?

YES. Since the CB is equally liable w/ the IB.

If the beneficiary proceeds against the CB, the CB may ask reimbursement from the IB. But if
the beneficiary proceeds directly against the CB; it has no right to collect from the IB. The
beneficiary may compel the CB to accept drafts it has drawn.

How is payment made by the Issuing Bank?

Payment by the IB is done through:

1. Direct payment or wire transfer or credit in the account of the beneficiary

2. Drawing of a draft by the beneficiary against the IB pay to my order
3. IB may authorize the Confirming Bank to pay
4. Authorize Correspondent Bank to accept and pay any draft drawn
5. Authorize the negotiation of any draft drawn by the beneficiary.

Note: If the drawee doesnt pay, go to the drawer who is secondarily liable.

Apart form the bill of lading, what additional documents may be needed as a condition of
the LC for honoring a draft?

1. Commercial invoice it is a document signed and issued by the seller and contains a
precise description of the merchandise and the terms of the sale such as unit prices,
amount due form the buyer and shipping conditions related to charges such as FOB
(Free on Board), FAS (Free Alongside), C and F (Cost and Freight) or CIF (Cost,
Insurance, Freight).
 2. Consular invoice document issued by the consulate of the importing country to
provide customs information and statistics for that country and to help prevent false
declaration of value.

3. Certificate of analysis may be required to ascertain that certain specifications of

weight, purity, sanitation, etc., have been met. These specifications may be required by
health or other officials of the importing country, or they may be insisted by the importer
as assurance that it is receiving what it ordered.

4. Export declaration it is a document prepared by the exporter to assist the

government to prepare export statistics.

Note: Documents to be passed are not unilaterally determined by the bank but agreed upon by
the buyer and seller.

Document of Title (Bill of Lading) given to the seller upon shipment of goods. This is to be
given to the IB to be able for the seller to get payment.

Is there a scheme where the IB may release the documents of title to the buyer w/o being
reimbursed first by the buyer?
YES. By the IB letting the buyer execute a trust receipt.

Failure of the buyer to open the Letter of Contract does not prevent the birth of the Sales
Contract.

The opening of the letter of credit is only a mode of payment. The letter of the credit is not an
essential requisite to the contract of sale.
Posted by ValreD at 10:00 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest