Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
He released political prisoners and even endorsed The three priests were accused of having fomented the Cavite
their criticism of the church and the friars. He was revolt. The charges were supported by the perjured testimony of a
man who was connected with the Cavite mutiny and consequently
considered a liberal for imposing liberal laws.
they were publicly garroted on February 17, 1872. The above
public execution created consternation, shock and scandal among
He was very close to the ilustrados, a group of the people. The refusal of the Manila Archbishop to defrock them
Filipinos who understood the situation of the thereby expressed the Churchs official doubt as to the guilt of the
Philippines under Spanish rule. three priests. It was inevitable that the friars would be blamed for
their execution. The opinion held universally by the Filipinos was
He was ousted when the monarchy in Spain was that the friars were indeed implicated.
reestablished by the Spanish Cortes. He was
succeeded by the reactionary Governor-General It was difficult to ignore the racial implications of the execution.
Rafael de Izquierdo, who immediately restored the The executed priests were called martyrs by the ilustrados and
old order of things in the Philippines. other sympathizers. The line between anti-Spanish friar and anti-
Spaniard became thinner with dire results for Spanish sovereignty.
Reference: Philippines News Agency
The above event represents a recognizable stage in anticlericalism
The Cavite Mutiny of 1872 and the Execution of three Filipino in the Philippines, a stage equated with anti-friary. However, it was
Priests an attitude initially directed at four religious orders only, the
Recollects, the Dominicans, the Augustinians, and the Franciscans.
On January 20, 1872, about two hundred discontented Filipino
soldiers and workers at Cavite arsenal rose up in arms and killed
their Spanish officers. In two days the mutiny was smashed by the
government troops. Since there was evidence that the mutineers 1. THE SECULARIZATION MOVEMENT AND THE
were in collusion with soldiers in Manila, the whole matter was MATYRDOM OF GOMBURZA
judged not merely a local revolt but one aimed at the separation of 2. Without 1872, there would have been no Plaridel,
the colony from Spain. The suspected leaders were those believed Jaena or Sanciongco; nor would the brave and
to have been harboring liberal ideas. Many masons were arrested, generous Filipino colonies in Europe have existed.
punished and exiled. Many Masonic Lodges were forced to close Without 1872, Rizal would now have been a Jesuit
and those that remained merely existed. General Izquierdo caught and instead of writing "Noli Me Tangere,"
by surprise the Lodge Espanola in Cebu, while at work, and turned would have written the opposite. Jose Rizal in a
over to the court of justice all Masons captured. letter to the staff of La Solidaridad in Paris
3.
Among those arrested in that tragic event of 1872 were three 4. This movement demanded the handling over of
priests, Fathers Burgos, Gomez, Zamora. Father Jose Burgos was a the parishes from the regular clergy ( Dominicans,
Philippine-born Spaniard and had been a student of the brilliant Franciscans, Recollects etc.), who were Spanish
Filipino priest, Dr. Pedro Pelaez who so ably championed the friars, to secular priests, most of whom were
rights of the Filipino clergy. After the death of Father Pelaez in Filipinos.
1863, Father Burgos took up the torch for the Filipino clergy, and 5. The seculars were those who were not bound by
in 1864 anonymously published a manifesto, which implored the monastic vows or rules. Filipino priests were then
righting of wrongs done to Filipino priests who had proved loyal to not accepted by the regular clergy, and were mostly
Spaniards whose moral and intellectual qualities were beyond assigned as assistants to Spanish friars.
question. When, in the middle 1860s, a Reform Committee of 6. BUT WHAT IS THE REAL SCORE? 1. ISSUE ON
laymen and priests was organized in Manila and Madrid to press VISITATION .
for secularization of the parishes, Father Burgos became leader of 7. Filipino Secular Clergy
the sub-committee of the clergy which also included Father 8. Cavite Mutiny
Mariano Gomez and Father Jacinto Zamora. At the time of his 9. The three secular priests were implicated in the
Cavite Mutiny.
10. They were executed in Bagumbayan (Luneta) Cathedral in 1863. After his death, other
through Garrote. priests took his place in fighting for the
11. Paciano Rizal witnessed the event and secularization movement. Among them
mentioned it to his brother Jose. were Fathers Mariano Gomez, Jose Burgos
12. Accidental Heroes of 1872? and Jacinto Zamora.
13. PACO PARK : Former Cemetery and former site
of GOMBURZA tomb (taken from
www.filipinasoul.com )
The Secularization Controversy
Two kinds of priests served the Catholic
Church in the Philippines. These were
the regulars and the seculars. Regular priests
belonged to religious orders. Their main task
was to spread Christianity. Examples were the
Franciscans, Recollects, Dominicans, and
Augustinians. Secular priests did not belong
to any religious order. They were trained
specifically to run the parishes and were
under the supervision of the bishops.
Conflict began when the bishops insisted on
visiting the parishes that were being run by
regular priests. It was their duty, they
argued, to check on the administration of
these parishes. But the regular priests
refused these visits, saying that they were
not under the bishops jurisdiction. They
threatened to abandon their parishes if the
bishops persisted.
In 1774, Archbishop Basilio Santa Justa
decided to uphold the dioceses authority over
the parishes and accepted the resignations of
the regular priests. He assigned secular
priests to take their place. Since there were
not enough seculars to fill all
the vacancies the Archbishop hastened the
ordination of Filipino seculars. A royal decree
was also issued on November 9, 1774, which
provided for the secularization of all parishes
or the transfer of parochial administration
from the regular friars to the secular priests.
The regulars resented the move because they
considered the Filipinos unfit for the
priesthood. Among other reasons they cited
the Filipinos brown skin, lack of education,
and inadequate experience.
The controversy became more intense when
the Jesuits returned to the Philippines. They
had been exiled from the country because of
certain policies of the order that theSpanish
authorities did not like.
The issue soon took on a racial slant. The
Spaniards were clearly favouring their own
regular priest over Filipino priests.
Monsignor Pedro Pelaez, ecclesiastical
governor of the Church, sided with
the Filipinos. Unfortunately, he died in an
earthquake that destroyed the Manila