Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Emission spectrochemical analysis is the oldest technique unwound one wire. When he placed this grating in a beam
for performing a chemical analysis without the traditional of white light it produced a spectrum, with blue light dispersed
chemical procedure. more than the red light (6 ).
Later Fraunhofer produced reflection gratings by ruling
Foundations grooves with a diamond point on a mirror surface. His fin-
Isaac Newton was the first person to discover the true est grating was only 12 mm wide and contained 9600 grooves,
nature of white light. In 1666, Newton inserted a glass prism but this enabled him to measure the wavelengths of light for
in a beam of sunlight that was shining into his darkened room the first time. Fraunhofer explained the phenomenon of
through a hole in the shutter. This produced vivid and intense diffracted orders and derived the grating equation (6 )
colors on a wall in the same order as in a rainbow. Newton
n = b(sin i sin r)
used a mirror to reflect the colors back through the prism,
producing white light again. He deduced that white light where n is the order number and is the wavelength, b is
was made up of the spectral colors (1). the grating spacing in angstroms, and i and r are the angles
Newton found that the refrangibility increased from of incidence and reflection.
red to violet. Newton believed that the light was transmitted
by minute corpuscles (particles) traveling at high speed (2). Spectrochemical Analysis
Blue corpuscles were smaller than red and so were diverted Emission spectrochemical analysis dates from the work of
more by a prism. the German physicist Gustav Kirchhoff and his collaborator, the
In 1678 a Dutch physician, Christian Huygens, postulated German chemist Robert Bunsen. In 1860, they demonstrated
that light was composed of minute waves in the atmosphere. to a group of geologists in Geneva, Switzerland, how they
Huygenss wave theory of light eventually triumphed over could identify useful elements such as iron, copper, and lead,
Newtons particle theory (3). or sodium and potassium, in potential ores, by the colors that
Invention of the diffraction grating is ascribed to the powdered specimens sprinkled into a Bunsen burner flame
American astronomer David Rittenhouse. In 1786 Ritten- produced. They could estimate concentrations by the intensi-
house made a grating of parallel hairs laid across two fine ties of the colors compared to those from chemically analyzed
screws. When he looked through this at a small opening in the standards to within about 4050%, enough to decide
window shutter of a darkened room, he saw three images of whether a chemical analysis was worthwhile.
approximately equal brightness and several others on either Later, Kirchhoff and Bunsen built a visual spectroscope
side fainter and growing more faint, colored and indistinct, (Fig. 1) consisting of (a) an entrance slit of two narrow
the further they were from the main line. He noted that the jaws separated by 1 mm or less, (b) a glass collimating
blue light was bent more than red light and ascribed these lens to render the light parallel as it entered, (c) a glass prism,
effects to diffraction (4 ). 60 60 60, to form a spectrum, (d) a camera lens to
Between 1814 and 1824 a German optician, Joseph focus the separated colors into spectral lines at (e) the focal
Fraunhofer, built the first spectroscope by placing a prism plane, and (f ) a movable eyepiece to examine the lines more
before the eyepiece of a telescope to study the dim light closely.
of heavenly objects (5). Fraunhofer repeated Rittenhouses In 1859, Kirchhoff and Bunsen, after studying the emis-
experiments with fine wire gratings. He placed two very fine sion spectrum of a sample, discovered spectral lines that did
wires on a framework of coarse wires. Next he carefully not correspond to those of any known element. They postu-
a b
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the KirchhoffBunsen, 1860, 20-cm quartz spectrometer. (b) Line drawing of the KirchhoffBunsen spectrometer
(reverse of schematic, reproduced in J. Chem. Educ. 1956, 33, 20, from an illustration provided by the Deutsches Museum, Munich).
By the 1920s and 1930s the wavelengths of spectra of most Team member 2: in the darkroom, developed, fixed,
common elements had been exactly measured and classified washed and dried the photographic plate and delivered it back
into atom and singly ionized lines. Their energy levels had been through the wall to team member 3. Then he loaded the plate
identified and evaluated (10). Determining relative intensities holder for the next sample.
was less satisfactory because most measurements were based Team member 3: measured the transmissions of the
on a visual estimate of the relative blackness of the photo- stepped filter exposures at several wavelengths and reported
graphed spectra (spectral lines in the red range were much these to member 4. Then he measured the transmissions of
blacker than lines in the ultraviolet range). the analytical lines and their internal standards, and reported
In 1930, there was a major development in spectro- these to member 4.
chemical analysis when Kipp and Zonen, in Holland, produced Team member 4: used a calculating board to prepare
a recording microphotometer capable of measuring repeatably characteristics curves at the required wavelengths, then used
the transmissions of narrow spectral lines on a photographic these to determine intensity ratios; then from the appropriate
plate or film. The instrument scanned the plate slowly and calibration curves, reported the corresponding elemental
recorded the output on a strip chart recorder. In 1932, Hilger concentration back to the melt foreman.
introduced a less expensive and faster nonrecording micro- This procedure reduced analytical times to 1018 min
photometer. Microphotometers improved analytical accuracy for a cast iron sample.
but increased the time required for analysis. Analysis required By 1932, Medium and Littrow quartz spectrographs were
the following steps (11): being manufactured in the United States by Bausch and Lomb
Optical Company and by Gaertner Scientific Company. They
1. Measuring on each plate or film for each wavelength
were protected from lower-cost European instruments by a
range the transmissions of the steps of an iron calibra-
60% duty.
tion line in an exposure, through a stepped sector disk
In the late 1930s, U.S. manufacturers began producing
or a stepped neutral filter. The disk was preferred
spectrographs using gratings instead of prisms as a dispers-
because the relative transmissions were known and
ing element. In 1937, Maurice Hasler at Applied Research
were the same at all wavelengths. The transmissions
Laboratories produced the first grating spectrograph (1.5 m,
of the filter had to be measured at each significantly
7 /mm) for the Geological Survey of California. In 1938,
different wavelength.
Baird produced its first Eagle 3-m grating spectrograph having
2. Plotting the measured transmission of each step against 15,000 grooves per inch and Jarrell Ash delivered its first 21-
the known relative intensity to produce a character- foot Wadsworth grating spectrograph to the General Electric
istic curve for each wavelength region. The longer Companys River Works in Lynn, Massachusetts, for quality
wavelengths have steeper gammas. control in the production of aircraft engines.
The Jarrell Ash Wadsworth stigmatic spectrograph
3. Converting the measured transmissions of the line of
combined high resolution and dispersion (5.4 /mm with a wide
the element to be determined and a nearby internal
wavelength range on two 4 10-in. photographic plates).
standard line of the matrix element and its relative
This instrument was the largest grating spectrograph produced.
intensities, using the characteristic curve.
It was designed to perform exacting measurements on a
4. Plotting Ia/Is against concentrations in chemically ana- nickel, chromium, and iron super alloy for aircraft engines
lyzed standards to produce a calibration or analytical (13 ). It was necessary to keep volatile elements such as bismuth,
curve for each element. cadmium, and arsenic at a parts-per-million level to prevent
corrosion and failure of the engines. The high dispersion and
5. Analyzing an unknown sample by measuring the rela-
wide wavelength range of a Wadsworth spectrograph permitted
tive intensities in step 3 and converting these into
this kind of quality control (14 ).
concentrations from the analytical curves obtained in
Spectrographs also played an important role during
step 4.
World War II. For example, Jarrell Ash spectrographs were
The procedure improved accuracy to 23%, but the used by International Nickel to ensure the quality of the
process took a single operator about 3045 minutes for an nickel being shipped to GE for aircraft engines, and by the
analysis of 1020 elements. It was expensive to hold a furnace National Bureau of Standards, Union Carbide, and Velmer
of steel or cast iron for 3045 minutes while a routine spec- Fassels laboratory at Iowa State to analyze uranium for harm-
trographic analysis was being conducted to control the ful trace elements. The NBS spectrograph was later used for
composition of cast irons. most of the experimental work that was published as Tables
Sawyer and Vincent, at the University of Michigan, of Spectral-line Intensities, Arranged by Elements (15 ).
developed the following assembly-line approach for the Ford After World War II, universities that had supplied gratings
Motor Company in 1939, utilizing a Bausch and Lomb were unable to keep up with demand, so manufacturers built
Littrow Quartz Spectrograph with its plate holder mounted their own ruling machines. Jarrell Ash built a machine that
in the darkroom and a four-person team (12). lasted for three decades before it was modernized. In 1950,
Team member 1: received the specimen by pneumatic Jarrell Ash produced its first replica grating (16 ).
tube from the melt foreman, ground it, mounted it on the In the 1940s, professors and students at various univer-
Petrey Stand, sparked it, and notified member 2 that the ex- sities experimented with replacing photographic plates in
posure was complete. Then he cleaned the stand for the next spectrographs with exit slits and photomultipliers. These ex-
specimen. periments led to the development of three different types of
direct readers (17). Applied Research Laboratories produced 13. Gustafson, M. Good Company: A History of Thermo Jarrell Ash
the first commercial direct reader in 1947. The direct reader and Spectroscopist Richard F. Jarrell; Thermo Jarrell Ash, 1998;
still had to be standardized frequently, but a single operator p 7.
could report a complete analysis for an unknown in a few 14. Ibid.; p 9.
minutes with an accuracy to 13%. Baird and Jarrell Ash 15. Ibid.; pp 910.
introduced other types of direct readers. 16. Ibid.; pp 1314.
17. Jarrell, R. F. Op. cit.; p 5.
Literature Cited
Further Reading
1. Richtmyer, F. K. Introduction to Modern Physics; McGraw-Hill:
New York, 1934; pp 3640. Asimov, I. The History of Physics; Walker: New York, 1984.
2. Wood, R. W. Physical Optics, 3rd ed.; MacMillan: New York, ASTM E-2 Committee. Five Decades of Optical Emission Spectrochemical
1934; p 1. Instrumentation; American Society for Testing and Materials:
3. Richtmyer, F. K. Op. cit., p 49. Conshohocken, PA, 1982.
4. Hutley, M. C. Diffraction Gratings; Academic: London, 1982; Gustafson, M. Good Company: A History of Thermo Jarrell Ash and
p 3. Spectroscopist Richard F. Jarrell; Thermo Jarrell Ash, 1998.
5. Asimov, I. The History of Physics; Walker: New York, 1984; p Hutley, M. C. Diffraction Gratings; Academic: London, 1982.
298. Jarrell, R. F. A Brief History of the Development of Optical Emission
6. Hutley, M. C. Op. cit.; p 4. Spectrochemical Analysis; Thermo Jarrell Ash, 1993.
7. Asimov, I. Op. cit.; pp 298299. Jenkins, F; White, H. Fundamentals of Physical Optics; McGraw-
8. Wood, R. W. Op. cit.; p 260. Hill: New York, 1937.
9. ASTM E-2 Committee. Five Decades of Optical Emission Spec- Richtmyer, F. K. Introduction to Modern Physics; McGraw-Hill: New
trochemical Instrumentation; American Society for Testing and York, 1934.
Materials: Conshohocken, PA, 1982; p 2. Robertson, J. K. Introduction to Physical Optics, 2nd ed.; Van
10. Ibid.; p 3. Nostrand: New York, 1935.
11. Ibid.; p 7. Slickers, K. Automatic Emission Spectroscopy, English Transl.; Ap-
12. Jarrell, R. F. A Brief History of the Development of Optical Emis- plied Research Laboratories: Lausanne, 1980.
sion Spectrochemical Analysis; Thermo Jarrell Ash, 1993; pp 4a5. Wood, R. W. Physical Optics, 3rd ed.; MacMillan: New York, 1934.