11/19/2017 Thermal-FluidsPedia | Two-Phase Flow Patterns in Horizontal Tubes | Thermal-Fluids Central

Search Thermal-Fluids Central

Entire Website Search

Home Encyclopedia FHMT Journal e-Books e-Resources Jobs Events News Who's Who Links

Home Encyclopedia Index Two-Phase_Flow_Patterns_in_Horizontal_Tubes

Two-Phase Flow Patterns in Horizontal Tubes

From Thermal-FluidsPedia
Horizontal two-phase flow exhibits flow patterns different from those in vertical two-phase flow,
because gravity acts perpendicularly to the flow direction. Two-phase flow in horizontal tubes is
more complex than vertical two-phase flow, because the flow is usually not axisymmetric, due to
the effect of gravity. The flow patterns encountered in horizontal two-phase flow are defined as
follows (Hewitt, 1998; Thome, 2004) and shown in Fig. 1:

Dispersed bubble flow. The vapor (gas) phase appears as distinct bubbles in a continuous
liquid phase. The bubbles tend to rise to the top of the flow due to buoyancy effects. When the
liquid velocity is high, the bubbles may be more uniformly distributed in the liquid, as in vertical
flow.

Plug flow. An increase of quality results in larger vapor (gas) bubble size and the formation of
bullet-shaped plugs, which tend to remain at the top of the flow channel due to buoyancy force.

Stratified flow. The liquid and vapor (gas) velocities in this regime are relatively slow, and
the quality is relatively high. The liquid flows along the bottom of the tube due to gravity while Figure 1: Flow regimes in horizontal two-phase flow
the vapor (gas) phase flows at the top of the tube. It is also possible that a very thin layer of the (Grey=liquid, White=vapor).
liquid forms at the top of the flow channel.

Stratified wavy flow. As the vapor (gas) velocity increases in the stratified flows, the shear forces of the vapor (gas) flow over the liquid cause ripples on the
top of the liquid phase and result in the formation of waves on the liquid-vapor (gas) interface. The waves climb up the sides of the tube and the liquid layer at
the bottom of the channel starts to stretch thin.

Slug flow. The amplitude of the waves increases as the liquid flow rate increases. The crests can span the entire tube, and a bridge starts to develop,
separating the slugs from one another. However, a substantial liquid phase remains and gravity pulls it to the bottom of the flow channel. The top of the flow
channel is still wetted by a relatively thin film of liquid.

Annular-dispersed flow. Similar to the flow pattern in vertical two-phase flow, the liquid layer flows near the inner wall of the tube and the vapor (gas) flows
in the central core. However, the liquid layer at the bottom is thicker than that on the top of the channel due to the effect of gravitational force.

The most widely used flow pattern map for horizontal two-phase flow, proposed by Taitel and
Dukler (1976), is shown in Fig. 2. This map is based on a semi-theoretical method, and it is
computationally more difficult to use than other flow maps. The horizontal coordinate of the
Taitel and Dukler (1976) map is the Martinelli parameter:

where and are the pressure gradients for the liquid and vapor phases,
flowing along the channel. The vertical coordinates of the Taitel and Dukler (1976) map are
defined as

Figure 2: Flow regime map for horizontal two-phase flow.

where D is the tube diameter and is the angle of inclination of the channel to the horizontal. It can be seen that determination of the flow regime using Taitel
and Duklers (1976) map requires the pressure gradient for the liquid and vapor phases flowing along the channel, which should be determined using appropriate
flow models.

It should be pointed out that the flow maps presented in Two-Phase Flow Patterns in Vertical Tubes, and Fig. 2 were obtained for adiabatic two-phase flow;
however, the transition boundaries between different flow regimes depend on the heat flux. Nevertheless, these flow maps are often used to determine the flow
patterns for evaporation and condensation inside tubes, for which external heating or cooling is required. Application of these flow maps to forced convective
boiling or condensation inside a tube may not yield reliable results.

References
Faghri, A., and Zhang, Y., 2006, Transport Phenomena in Multiphase Systems, Elsevier, Burlington, MA

Hewitt, G.F., 1998, Multiphase Fluid Flow and Pressure Drop, Heat Exchanger Design Handbook, Vol. 2, Begell House, New York, NY.

Taitel, Y., and Dukler, A.E., 1976, A Model for Predicting Flow Regime Transitions in Horizontal and Near Horizontal Gas-Liquid Flow, AIChE Journal, Vol. 22, pp.
47- 55.

Thome, J.R., 2004, Engineering Data Book III, Wolverine Tube, Inc., Huntsville, AL.

Further Reading
External Links
Retrieved from "https://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Two-Phase_Flow_Patterns_in_Horizontal_Tubes"

https://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Two-Phase_Flow_Patterns_in_Horizontal_Tubes 1/2
11/19/2017 Thermal-FluidsPedia | Two-Phase Flow Patterns in Horizontal Tubes | Thermal-Fluids Central
This page was last modified on 9 July 2010, at 08:34.

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Copyright 2010-2016 by Global Digital Central. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Two-Phase_Flow_Patterns_in_Horizontal_Tubes 2/2