Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Section 73 of the Contract Act is lays down the provision relating to damages. It provides that the party, who
breaches a contract, is liable to compensate the injured party for any loss or damage caused, due to the breach
of contract. For compensation to be payable, Two things should be taken into consideration (i) The loss or
damage should have arisen as a natural consequence of the breach, or (ii)It should have been something the
parties could have reasonably expected to arise from a breach of the contract. In the former case, an objective
test would be applied where as in the latter case a subjective test would be applied. Under this section, the
burden of proof lies on the injured party. This section, however, provides that compensation shall not be
awarded for any remote or indirect loss sustained by the parties. Section 73 also provides that the same
principles will apply for breach of a quasi-contractual obligation, i.e. in the event that an obligation resembling
that created by contract has not been discharged, the injured party is entitled to receive compensation as if a
contractual obligation has been breached.
Compensatory Damages
Consequential Damages
For example, a retail store buys customized software to run its cash
registers and inventory system. One day the system breaks down
completely. As a result, the store must close for the day to repair the
system. The stores loss of business for that day is a consequential
damage of the broken contract.
Liquidated Damages
For example, you want to have your kitchen remodeling job finished in
time for your big party. You include a provision in the contract that says
the contractor must pay you $100 per day for every day after the
completion date that the job isnt completed.
Courts dont like liquidated damages clauses and wont enforce them if
they have the effect of being a punishment.
Punitive Damages