SPO2 Ruperto Cabanlig vs.
No/ 148431, July 28, W/N the action of killing by
Sandiganbayan and Office of
the Special Prosecutor
PO2 Rufino Mamangun vs.
People of the Philippines
Eliseo Aguilar vs. Department
of Justice
People of the Philippines vs.
Carmelo Catbagan
Baxinela vs. People of the
Philippines
Angcaco vs. People of the
Philippines
People vs. Delima
National Police Commission v.
Bernabe
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
GENERAL LASTIMOSO v. P
& SENIOR INSPECTOR
JOSE J. ASAYO
FELINO QUIAMBAO v. CA
(G.R.
2005)
GR No. 149152, February 2,
2007
G.R. No. 197522, September
11, 2013
(G.R. Nos. 149430-32.
February 23, 2004)
G.R. No. 149652, March 24,
2006
G.R. No. 146664, February 28,
2002
G.R. No. L-18660, December
22, 1922
G.R. No. 129914 (May 12, 2000)
GR NO. 154243, Dec 04, 2007
GR NO. 128305, Mar 28, 2005
SPO2 Ruperto Cabanlig is
considered as a performance
and fulfilment of duty.
W/N the death of the victim
was the necessary consequence
of the petitioners fulfillment of
his duty
W/N the said police officers
exceeded their fulfilment duty
as police officers upon
inflicting harm and eventually
killing Tetet.
W/N police officer Carmelo
Catbagan was justified in
shooting the victims as a direct
result of his fulfillment of a
duty.
W/N fulfilment of duty may
validly be invoked by the SPO2
Baxinela
W/N the justifying
circumstance of fulfilment of
duty is applicable in this case.
W/N police officer Felipe
Delima was justified in
shooting the victim as a direct
result of his fulfillment of a
duty.
W/N POLICE CHIEF
INSPECTOR LEONARDO
BERNABE has been given
proper due process of law
W/N the respondent should be
guilty of grave misconduct
and be dismissed from police
service.
1. W/N PO3 Felino Quiambao
along with 5 others committed
crime, which is a grave
misconduct, while performing
their duties?
2. W/N the appellate court has
the jurisdiction to decide
PNP SUPT. FLORENCIO D.
FIANZA, vs. THE PLEB
(PEOPLE' S LAW
ENFORCEMENT BOARD) of
the CITY OF BAGUIO
ZACARIAS, petitioner, G.R. No. 119847. October 24,
vs. NATIONAL POLICE
COMMISSION
THE OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN vs. SUPT.
BRILLANTES, PO3
PABLICO, AND PO1 FABIA
THE OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN vs. POLICE
SENIOR INSPECTOR YANG
THE NATIONAL
APPELLATE BOARD OF
NAPOLCOM VS. P/INSP.
MAMAUAG, SPO2
ALMARIO, SPO4 GARCIA
and SPO1 FELIPE
SALVADOR YAPYUCO y G.R. Nos. 120744-46 June 25,
ENRIQUEZ, Petitioner,
vs. HONORABLE
SANDIGANBAYAN and THE
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES
NORBERTO MASIPEQUINA
& JOVENCIO ALAMPAYAN
vs. HONORABLE COURT OF
APPEALS and THE PEOPLE
OF THE PHILIPPINES
SALUDAGA VS. GENIO
PABLO N.
QUION, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE
OF THE PHILIPPINES
PO2 RUEL C. MONTOYA GR No. 180146, Dec 18, 2008
v. POLICE DIRECTOR
REYNALDO P. VARILLA
G.R. No. 109638 March 31, Grave Misconduct and
1995 Irregularity in the
Performance of Duty ---(PERO
JURISDICTION UNG ISSUE)
W/N Jenny Zacarias has
2003 committed negligence while
performing her duty.
G.R. No. 213699, September W/N the respondents should be
28, 2016 convicted with grave
misconduct
&
G.R. No. 215008
G.R. No. 149999. August 12, W/N the respondents should be
2005 guilty of serious neglect of duty
and be dismissed from police
service.
2012 W/N Yapyuco and his men and
the offense committed is the
necessary consequence of the
due performance of such duty
or the lawful exercise of such
right.
G.R. No. L-51206 August 25, W/N petitioners had acted in
1989 lawful self-defense.
G.R. NO. 184537 APRIL 23, CRIM PRO UNG ISSUE
2010 PERO CORRUPTION UNG
FACTS- PWEDE NA TO.
G.R. No. 136462. September
Malversation of public
19, 2002
property
Serious Neglect of Duty due
to absence without official
leave
 CIVIL SERVICE G.R. No. 194368 April 2, Gross negligence in the
COMMISSION 2013 performance of his duties
vs. as Senior Jail Officer II MAY
ARLIC ALMOJUELA TUMAKAS NA INTSIK NA
ADIK