Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

#564
COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Monday, November 27, 2017 9:39:02 AM
Last Modified: Monday, November 27, 2017 9:58:38 AM
Time Spent: 00:19:35
IP Address: 216.54.92.22

Page 1: Placement Information

Q1 Student Teacher's Name

Kirstie Robison

Q2 Student Teacher's Endorsement Area Elementary Education, PreK-

6

Q3 Grade Taught First Grade

Q4 Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

10/23/2017

Q5 Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

12/08/2017

Q6 School of Student Teaching Placement

Atlantic Shores Christian Schools Elementary Campus

Q7 School Division Atlantic Shores Christian Schools

Q8 Evaluator's Name (First Last)

Cheryl Gould

Q9 Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.

Email Address: chergou@regent.edu

1/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q10 Evaluator's Position/Role University Supervisor

Q11 What time period is this evaluation for? Mid-Term

Page 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject area(s) Superior

taught.
Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the age Superior
group.
Integrates key content elements and facilitates students use of Superior
higher level thinking skills.
Links content with other subject areas and real world applications. Superior

Q13 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.

Kirstie consistently provided accurate information to the first grade students on an age-appropriate level. She understood the need to
break down the content in a step-by-step manner so that the young learners could easily grasp the concepts. Students solved math
problems during my observation using real-world items.

Page 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

Q14 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Aligns lesson objectives to the schools curriculum and student Exemplary

learning needs.
Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner needs; Exemplary
adapts plans as needed.
Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and Superior
transitions.
Plans for differentiated instruction. Exemplary

Q15 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.

Kirstie's plans clearly provided consideration for differentiation of instruction as well as using a variety of assessment strategies to
determine the strengths and weaknesses of the learners.

Page 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

2/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q16 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Engages and maintains students in active learning. Superior

Differentiates instruction to meet the students needs. Exemplary
Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Superior
Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and resources. Superior
Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. Superior

Q17 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.

Kirstie consistently demonstrated this performance standard. I observed highly-engaged children during their center time. Students
rotated through a variety of center activities, one using technology, and two centers with a teacher and a small group (3 to 6) of children.
This center approach provided students with individualized instruction at each child's level of instructional need. It was amazing to see a
large group of 6 year-olds so peacefully working at learning.

Page 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

Q18 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Exemplary

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and Exemplary
instruments
Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative Exemplary
purposes.
Gives constructive and frequent student feedback. Superior

Q19 Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student learning.

Kirstie provided evidence that she has given and documented student progress for eight assessments. She articulated that she used
the data from these assessment to determine student strengths and weaknesses and then used the "pull out" method to remediate and
reteach where needed.

Page 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

Q20 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and Superior

procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.
Uses available resources and knowledge of students to prevent, Superior
redirect, or reinforce behaviors.
Respects students diversity, including language, culture, race, Superior
gender, and special needs.
Actively listens and pays attention to students needs and Superior
responses.

3/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q21 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive to
learning.

Kirstie had a good grasp on classroom management. The greatest strength of the classroom management aspect was that students
were engaged in meaningful instruction that kept them focused and on-task. No behavioral concerns were noted. The children were
highly-engaged in math centers in individualized or small-group instruction. Ms. Robison interacted enthusiastically and positively with
the children. The students responded well to her instruction.

Page 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

Q22 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Modifies performance based on personal and professional Superior

critiques.
Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and Superior
professional interactions.
Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration with Superior
teachers and other school personnel.
Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and ethical Superior
interactions.

Q23 Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation.

Kirstie has consistently demonstrated her professionalism in all areas above.

Page 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

Q24 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Documents the progress of each student throughout the Exemplary

placement.
Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Exemplary
Uses available data to document/communicate student progress Exemplary
and develop learning targets.

Q25 Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation.

Kirstie provided evidence that she documented student progress in an ongoing manner and used the data to make instructional
decisions. She clearly understands the value and use of such documentation.

4/4