Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
UWRT 1103
Dr. Presnell
As the public education system begins to mold and shape around the demands of our
modernizing society, we realize that principles such as free thinking and creative learning are
increasingly stressed and challenged now more than ever. Grades are the undeniable factor that
pushes students into the next academic level. Test scores have become so standardized and vital
that they are the main factors behind college acceptance and academic success. Despite this, the
wave of technology shines a new light on how the public education system educates its students.
It brings a glimmer of hope to the students and teachers as it is further introduced into the
traditional classroom setting. How exactly does the use of this technology in an educational
\ In certain public education systems principles such as free thinking, creative learning,
good grades, and good test scores are valued differently. On a more detailed scale, how exactly is
creativity and free thinking valued in the traditional classroom compared to grades and test
scores? Creativity is a form of intelligence, but it is not the form usually assessed by tests and
grades (Jalongo, Creativity and Education).Unfortunately grades and test scores are so highly
valued in our public education system that it almost overshadows the creativity of the students.
Grades and test scores are typically required to carry a lot of weight in a students academic
progress. They are necessary for determining if students are able to retain information and fully
understand it before moving on to a different or more difficult topic. Standardized tests, such as
the SAT and ACT, along with regular grade-level advancement tests are emphasized as critical
in education; they develop a one-way method of thinking and fail to test on creativity and
mindful responses. Along with this, grades are slightly valued more than actual learning. This is
seen with the increased record of cheating and plagiarism at public schools and universities. This
whether it is actually beneficial for freethinking and creativity. Recently a survey of twelve
public university students from UNCC showed that 72.7% of students do not believe that
technology blocks their ability to think creatively and that 54.5% of students believes that
classroom allows for a wide variety of possibilities for a young learner. It seems as though
students greatly appreciate the generous amounts of technology in the classroom. The internet
creates a place for students to look up information, create projects, find inspiration for their own
ideas, and journal their thoughts. Students believe that they can go beyond the pen and paper
restrictions with the use of technology. Educators also use technology to appeal to visual, hands-
on, or auditory learners. Smartboards, laptops, ipads, and other forms of modern technology
allow for both students and educators to take a more creative spin on education and knowledge.
It seems as though many people agree that technology in the classroom gives students a sense of
academic freedom and sources for endless knowledge. Technology seemingly makes learning
more fun, easy, and accessible. It only seems to benefit one's view on education and learning,
but how exactly does one begin to view their own creativity and ideas when they are so
whether there is too much technology accessible to students and how exactly does that impact
the way they view their education. Technology has not necessarily left a negative legacy on our
education system but the way that it is used, mistreated, unused, or taken advantage of can leave
lasting impacts on our public education system and the values that lie within it. On a small scale,
the overuse of technology has created a sense of laziness for some students. Young learners
become so accustomed to the free internet access,information that it has to offer, and the
quickness of its retrieval (through phones, laptops, tablets, etc.); this hinders them from
developing as free thinkers and innovative learners. Students begin to view the internet as their
own mind. The thoughts, ideas, and words of others seems to work its way into the mind and
vocabulary of students who have never fully learned how to form their own. Students and
educators can become so invested in the idea of quick and easy learning that they fail to realize
the importance, process, and relevance of creative learning and free thinking. The wide array of
websites and tools such as Sparknotes, online paragraph summarizers, Answers.com, Wikipedia,
and Slideshare make it exceptionally easy for students to take shortcuts to creating essays,
answering problems, or even taking tests. While this seems completely harmless, we must think
about the large-scale repercussions that this technological pursuit really has on the public
education system as a whole. The growth of plagiarism and cheating at public universities and
schools has only seemed to multiply throughout the years as students find new ways to use
technology access to their advantage. This is the result of thousands of expulsions, dropouts,
failed classes, and irreversible reputations for students and the institutions involved. The public
education system is forced to take a stance on whether the implementation of technology in the
intelligence and allows a person to think freely and imaginatively. Specifically, creativity is
acting as a possible vehicle for individual empowerment in institutions and organizations and
being used to develop effective learning (Jeffrey, 17). In a traditional classroom, this type of
learning is key for academic development. Creativity is the driving force behind individual
development.On a larger scale, it is also the force behind economic and social development
(Jeffry, 38). The main purpose of public education is to create and develop educated individuals
who will further benefit and provide to social and humane development. Therefore, creativity
holds the greatest power to the purpose of public education. We must take into consideration
how exactly we are impacting our creativity with the use of technology in our classrooms. While
the list of advantages and disadvantages of the use of technology in our education system can go
on forever; we must take a step back and consider exactly how these factors are solidifying,
expanding, or blocking the creative insight and free-thinking ability that deserves to be catered
Works Cited
Jalongo, J.P. Isenberg|M. R. Creativity and Education. Education.com, Pearson, 24 Apr. 2014,
www.education.com/reference/article/creativity-education/.
Reflection:
While researching, I found myself using more detailed phrases and words so I was able to
directly find the information i was looking for. I also began using more reliable websites and
articles that would allow me to find more factual information that i could tie with my survey
findings. I began tying my survey responses to the outside resources and was able to develop a
diverse array of sources. Writing this essay was much more different than writing the reflective
essay because it involved much more research and planning. I began writing more structured
and fuller paragraphs because of all the evidence and detail that I had to include. Writing this
essay allowed me to also show my own voice within the writing because of the certain facts and
sources that I used. By using these new research methods, I believe that my writing skills have
benefited because I am much more able to mix my own ideas and words into the diverse set of
sources that I found in order to effectively illustrate my main points. I feel much more prepared
for further experiments conducting research. I definitely feel as though my writing skills have
benefited from the way I wrote this essay because I feel as though my writing is much more
structured and organized. I also feel as though I am able to really mix my words and thoughts
into an essay filled with research and analysis. I will use these skills I learned by writing this
essay in future English classes when it comes to writing a paper, a research paper specifically. I
will also use these skills if I am needed to analyze sources and evidence in a lab report. The
construction of a survey will allow me to really understand the thought process of others as well.