Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
OECD/IEA 2006
Hydr o
Renew ables
Other
Coal
Nuclear 12% 25%
6%
Natur al Gas
21%
Oil
35%
Oil Demand
U.S. 25%
Japan 7%
China 7%
Germany 3%
Russia 3%
India 3%
Canada 3%
Brazil 3%
S. Korea 3%
France 3%
Mexico 3%
Updated July 2005. Source: International Energy Annual 2003 (EIA). Canadas reserves include tar sands.
16 000 OECD
2
12 000
Million tones of CO
8 000
4 000 Transition
economies
0
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
80
60
40
20
0
CO NOx VOC SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2
National Initiatives:
US ~ $ 1 700 mill. over 5 years
Japan ~ $ 300 mill. a year
EC (EU) ~ 200-300 mill. a year in the 6th FP
plus: Brazil, Canada, China, India and many others
Sequestration
Coal With Carbon
Economic
ZERO/NEAR
Competitiveness Natural ZERO
Gas EMISSIONS
Abundant, reliable, and affordable
energy is an essential component in a
healthy, global economy
I. Technology
Development
Phase RD&D I Phase
I
Commercialization Decision
Phase
IV
Realization of the Hydrogen Economy IV
IV. Fully Developed
Market and
Infrastructure
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040 Phase
Economic/Institutional Barriers:
Safety, Codes and Standards Fuel Cell Cost
(Safety and global
competitiveness)
Hydrogen Delivery (Investment
for new distribution
infrastructure)
Education
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE LENERGIE
9
Hydrogen Storage
3-8x gap between todays storage system cost and target
Volumetric & Gravimetric
Energy Density
2.7
Compressed Gas 2015 target 3.0
Complex 0.6
Compressed Gas hydride 0.8
12 (5000 psi) Systems
1.6
$/kWh
Liq. H2 2.0
Storage Systems 0 1 2 3 4
6
New technologies for advanced
4 materials/systems
High volume fabrication of
compressed and cryogenic tanks
2
Heat Integration
Improved Catalyst Performance
4 Component Scalablility
Manufacturability
3 Operational flexibility
Remote operation
30
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
High volume production defined as 500,000 units per year. Cost estimated by TIAX with enhanced hydrogen storage.
2004 summary
of public R&D
and
policy efforts
in the IEA countries
2005 analysis
of H2/FC potential
using the IEA ETP
model
(scenarios to 2050)
Electricity
150
Hydrogen
CNG
100
FT fuels coal
Refinery products
0
2002 WEO RS BASE WBCSD BAS MAP
2030 2030 2050 2050 2050
10 25
8 20
6 15
4 10 B
B
2 5
A A
0 C 0 C
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Best scenario: 60% FC vehicles in China by 2050, 42% India and US, 36-
48% Europe, 35% Canada, 22% Japan, 10% Australia
Differences across regions due to discount rate, fuel taxes, infrastructure, consumers attitude for capital-
intensive investment, mobility needs, car-mileage.
7 000
6 000
Hydrogen
5 000
Biofuels
M toe
4 000
Synfuels
3 000 Oil
2 000
1 000
0
2003 Baseline Baseline AC T Map AC T Low TEC H Plus
2030 (WEO 2050 2050 Efficiency 2050
2005) 2050
Primary oil demand is below 2030 baseline level
and is returned to about todays level in TECH Plus.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE LENERGIE
23
Transport CO2 Emissions by Scenario
14 000
2050 Baseline Emission Level
12 000 Hydrogen
Savings
(including fuel
Savings
10 000 cell efficiency)
Biofuels
Mt CO2
8 000
6 000
Fuel efficiency
4 000
2 000 CO2
emissions
0
2003 Baseline 2030 Baseline 2050 ACT Map 2050 TECH Plus
(WEO 2005) 2050
20 000
15 000 +65%
10 000 -32%
5 000
0
2003 Baseline ACT Map 2003 Baseline ACT Map
2050 2050 2050 2050
15
0
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
robert.dixon@iea.org
OECD/IEA 2006