You are on page 1of 11

# Stability of Retaining

Cantilever Walls.
Cantilever Walls

12/3/2010
Institution: Vocational Training Development Institute
Course: Draughting and Building Technology
Course Title: Theory and Design of Structures (2)
Students Name: Shavaun Thomas
ID#: 2008026303
Lecturer: D. Reid
2

## Definition to a Retaining Wall.

A retaining wall is a structure that retains (holds back) any material (usually earth) and prevents

it from sliding or eroding away. It is so designed to resist the material pressure of the material

that it is restraining.

## What is a Cantilever Retaining Wall?

A cantilever retaining wall is one that consists of a wall which is connected to a foundation. A

cantilever wall restrains a significant amount of soil, as a result it must be properly engineered.

They are the most common type used as retaining walls. Cantilever wall rest on a slab

foundation. This slab foundation is also loaded by back-fill and thus the weight of the backfill

and surcharge also stabilizes the wall against overturning and sliding.

## An Introduction to the Stability of Retaining Walls.

One of the principal differences between the Code of Practice BS 8002:19941 and the earlier

## CP2:19512 lies in the philosophy of factor of safety.

BS 8002:1994 introduced the concept of a partial factor of safety. The advantage of this is its

ability to operate directly upon those parts of the calculation subject to the greatest unknowns,

usually the soil strength. In BS 8002 : 1994 the partial factor is applied to tan ', where ' is the

angle of friction of the soil. Properties such as soil unit weight, which can normally be more

reliably estimated, are not affected by application of the partial factor as they would be by the

lumped factor approach of CP2 : 1951. However, by factoring tan ' , not only the magnitude but

also the line of action of the force is altered, and the inclination factors in the bearing capacity

## calculation may be significantly affected.

3

Bearing capacity and sliding stability theory differ. Whatever the philosophy adopted for the

factor of safety, the angle of friction FB mobilized at the required factor of safety against

bearing capacity failure will not be equal to the angle of friction FS mobilized at the required

factor of safety against sliding instability. Therefore retaining walls dimensioned on the basis of

4

5

## Stability as it relates to Retaining Walls (Cantilever Walls).

Bearing capacity and sliding stability theory differs. Whatever the philosophy adopted for the

factor of safety, the angle of friction f FB mobilized at the required factor of safety against

bearing capacity failure will not be equal to the angle of friction f FS mobilized at the required

factor of safety against sliding instability. Therefore retaining walls dimensioned on the basis of

## bearing capacity and of sliding stability would be of different sizes.

The usual method of designing cantilever retaining walls is first to dimension the wall foundation

with respect to the bearing capacity provided by the foundation. Such method usually

involves calculating the factor of safety against bearing capacity failure, which must normally be

as required by the code of practice to which the engineer is working. With the foundation base

width chosen, the walls stability against sliding is next determined. Again, this must also be to

the factor of safety required by the code of practice. When designing cantilever retaining walls or

more modern gravity type, the following cases are normally considered.

## Bearing capacity failure.

In such a case, the sum of the cantilever wall weight plus the vertical component of the active

trust acting on the back of the wall, without the vertical component or any inactive forces on the

front of the wall, proofs greater than the foundation soils capacity, failure occurs.

Sliding stability.

In such condition an outward movement of the retaining wall occurs. It moves away from the

backfill, and due to the horizontal imbalances between the horizontal component of the active

trust acting on the back of the wall, the sum of the sliding resistance at the base and the
6

horizontal component of any inactive force acting on the front of the wall. Water forces acting on

the back of the wall and on the underside of the foundation, will result to instability.

Overturning or (toppling).

Retaining walls rotate at a pivot along its toe. This disturbing moment is due to the horizontal

component of the active trust and the horizontal water or soil force, while the restoring moments

are due to the buoyant wall weight, the vertical component of the active trust along with the

horizontal component of the inactive force. The toe remains horizontal throughout. The case

relates to a retaining wall foundation placed on rock, thus it is not expected to collapse, however,

if this is otherwise it said that the position of the line of action disturbing force will change.

Overall stability.

Generally of most importance on sloping ground, the retaining wall is considered to be just part

of the stability of the site as a whole, and so, is designed as such. The inclination of the retaining

wall, and any structure contained within the soil forming the gradient, contribute greatly to

instability.

## pressure is calculated at the edge of heel.

The rotating point for overturning is normally assumed at bottom of toe. The height

of soil used to calculate lateral earth pressure should be from top of earth to the

bottom of footing.
7

Elements that resisting overturning are weight of stem, weight of footing, weight of

soil above footing. If there is a surcharge, the weight of surcharge can also be

considered.

## moment. Acceptable factor of safety is between 1.5 to 2.

The driving force that causes retaining wall to slide is the lateral earth pressure from

soil and surcharge. The forces that resist sliding are passive pressure at toe, the

friction at the base of the footing; and the passive pressure against the key if used.

The factor of safety against sliding is the total resisting force divided by total driving

## 1. The center of the total weight from the edge of toe is

X= MR Mo

Where W is total weight of retaining wall including stem, footing, earth and surcharge

## 2. If e B/6, the maximum and minimum footing pressure is calculated as

8

Qmax = W 1 + 6 x e Qmin = W 1 - 6 x e

B B B B

Where, Qmax, Qmin are maximum and minimum footing pressure, B is the width of footing.

## 4. If e > B/6, Qmin is zero, Qmax= 2 x W

3 B/2- e

5. Qmax should be less than allowable soil bearing capacity of footing soil.

## 1. The driving force for sliding is calculated as

Ph= KaH2 + q Ka H

## 2. The friction resisting force at the base of footing is calculated as

FR = W

where m is friction coefficient between concrete and soil. m is often taken as tan (2/3 f). f is

## 3. The passive resistance at the toe of retaining wall is calculated as

9

Py= Ky h

Where Kp is passive earth pressure coefficient, h is the height from top of soil to bottom of

footing at toe. If a key is used to help resist sliding, h is the height from top of soil to the bottom

of the key.

FS= FR + Py + Pk

Pk + Pk

## Mo= 1/6 KaH3 + 1/2 q Ka H2

Where g is unit weight of soil, Ka is active pressure coefficient, and H is the height from top of

## 2. The resisting moment is calculated as MR= WsXs+WfXf+WeXe+WkXk+WqXq

where Ws,Wf,We,Wk,Wq are weight of stem, footing, earth, key and surcharge, Xs,Xf,Xe,Xk,Xq are

distance from the center of stem, footing, earth, key, and surcharge to the rotation point at toe.
10

## The factor of safety against overturning is calculated as FS= MR

Mo
11

References.

Jamal, H. (2010, July 03). www.engpedia.com. Retrieved December 03, 2010, from

http://www.engpedia.com/engg/index.php/dictionary-of-civil-engineering/structural-

engineering/1248-retaining-wall.

stability.htm.