Making a state on the basis of religion will be the most anti-Hindu thing if someone who claims to be

flag holder of Sanatana or Hindu Dhara, as it has never been a basis of rule or motive of gaining
power by Political entities, regardless of state carried by whom the followers of different sects were
continued their way of intellect, practices and culture, if this would have been a basis for forming a
state or gaining power we would never had an imagination of Akhanda Bharat, Geographically or
not, if this would have been basis for any point time we would never had even an Imagination of
Akhand Bharat or Jambu Dvid or description of Vishnu Puran, on the contrary our Kings have
unanimously followed a pattern of changing subscription from one ideology or philosophy to others,
in contrast to this the formation of first Islamic state or expansion of Mandina based Muslim empire
was parllay moulded as the State or power shifted from one sect to another, whether justifying
expansion in the name of One God and one Umar, or considering non-worshiper of one God as
sinner,or considering Umar as place or Peace and rest as Place of War, the fundamental reason
behind the separation between Shia and Sunni faction was not appointing Shias third Imam Hussain
as the new Caliphat, which lead to formation of Shia rebel group and overthrowing Uhmadiyat rulers
from the thrown, even if we go to the establishment of first Islamic state the foundation was socio-
political system which was created on the basis of Islam

So if someone tries to make a state on basis of religion, its just can not be named a Hindu state,
because the idea is totally foreign to Indian thought, the only time India United under the banner of
religion was the time of Islamic Invasion,even Islamic invasion could not have brought religion for
the basis of fight until and unless religious identities and symbols were not hurted, its the distortion
of temples which leads to formation of Vijaynagar samrajya and the Maratha empire

The need of secular state arises from the same source, why do you need a secular state, because till
now you had religious body as state, for Roman empire, the same applies, from the Gods point of
view, they took the legitimacy of their state, that since the god permits it so only they have
legitimate right to rule, n that is why in French revolution u had all the separate democracy
demandes

This is the reason why Brahmins never took over the state as a society, because there is no
intersection or foundational basis of state on Religion, thats the reason why Priest were operated
on their through temples and Educational institues, and Since the educational institutes were
nurtured by this society flow of knowledge was never interrupted by the difference of State.