Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A. David Mendelow,1 Barbara A. Gregson,1 Elise N. Rowan,1 Richard Francis,1 Elaine McColl,2
Paul McNamee,3 Iain R. Chambers,4 Andreas Unterberg,5 Dwayne Boyers,3
and Patrick M. Mitchell 6 on behalf of the STITCH(Trauma) Investigators
Abstract
Journal of Neurotrauma 2015.32:1312-1323.
Intraparenchymal hemorrhages occur in a proportion of severe traumatic brain injury TBI patients, but the role of surgery
in their treatment is unclear. This international multi-center, patient-randomized, parallel-group trial compared early
surgery (hematoma evacuation within 12 h of randomization) with initial conservative treatment (subsequent evacuation
allowed if deemed necessary). Patients were randomized using an independent randomization service within 48 h of TBI.
Patients were eligible if they had no more than two intraparenchymal hemorrhages of 10 mL or more and did not have an
extradural or subdural hematoma that required surgery. The primary outcome measure was the traditional dichotomous
split of the Glasgow Outcome Scale obtained by postal questionnaires sent directly to patients at 6 months. The trial was
halted early by the UK funding agency (NIHR HTA) for failure to recruit sufficient patients from the UK (trial regis-
tration: ISRCTN19321911). A total of 170 patients were randomized from 31 of 59 registered centers worldwide. Of 82
patients randomized to early surgery with complete follow-up, 30 (37%) had an unfavorable outcome. Of 85 patients
randomized to initial conservative treatment with complete follow-up, 40 (47%) had an unfavorable outcome (odds ratio,
0.65; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.35, 1.21; p = 0.17), with an absolute benefit of 10.5% (CI, - 4.425.3%). There were
significantly more deaths in the first 6 months in the initial conservative treatment group (33% vs. 15%; p = 0.006). The
10.5% absolute benefit with early surgery was consistent with the initial power calculation. However, with the low sample
size resulting from the premature termination, we cannot exclude the possibility that this could be a chance finding. A
further trial is required urgently to assess whether this encouraging signal can be confirmed.
Key words: craniotomy; intracerebral hemorrhage; randomized; controlled trial; traumatic brain injury
Introduction The mortality rate for severe isolated TBI in the UK varied between
16% and 40%,4 which is similar to the world-wide rates that vary
between 15% and 38%.3 Intracranial hemorrhage occurs in more
I n the UK, there are 1.4 million presentations of traumatic brain
injury (TBI) at emergency departments each year.1 The inci-
dence worldwide varies between 56 and 430 per 100,000 popula-
than 60% of serious TBIs in one or more of three types: extradural,
subdural, and intraparenchymal. Prompt surgical removal of signif-
tion each year,2 with the highest incidence being in Asia (344 per icant subdural (SDH) and extradural hemorrhage (EDH) is well es-
100,000) and the lowest in the United States (103 per 100,000).3 tablished and widely accepted. Intraparenchymal hemorrhage is more
1
Neurosurgical Trials Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
2
Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
3
Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
4
Department of Medical Physics, South Tees Hospitals Foundation Trust, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
5
Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
6
Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
A. David Mendelow, Barbara A. Gregson, Elise N. Rowan, Richard Francis, Elaine McColl, Paul McNamee, Iain R. Chambers, Andreas Unterberg,
Dwayne Boyers, and Patrick M. Mitchell 2015; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly credited.
1312
SURGERY FOR TRAUMATIC ICH RCT: STITCH(TRAUMA) 1313
common than both these other types and is clearly associated with a Methods
worse outcome, but the role for surgery and its timing remains
Trial design and participants
undefined. Several terms are used to describe the condition, in-
cluding traumatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage, traumatic intra- The STITCH(Trauma) protocol has been published.15 This was an
cerebral hemorrhage (TICH), and contusion. international, multicenter, prospective, patient-randomized, parallel-
Traditional neurosurgical management of patients with severe group pragmatic trial comparing early surgical evacuation of TICH
TBI (sTBI) is frequently based on intracranial pressure (ICP) mea- with initial conservative treatment (ISRCTN 19321911, UK NIHR-
HTA grant no.: 07/37/16). Ethical committee favorable opinion was
surement. Patients with high ICP ( > 30 mm Hg) would typically
obtained from the Southampton Multicenter Research Ethics Com-
undergo craniotomy and those with low ICP ( < 20 mm Hg) would be mittee (REF: 09/H0502/68, June 15, 2009). Local ethical approval was
managed conservatively. Patients with ICP between 20 and 30 mm obtained for each participating center. The trial was conducted ac-
Hg would be observed closely and undergo craniotomy if the ICP cording to Medical Research Council good clinical practice guidelines.
rises.5 This ICP-based approach has been recommended by the Brain Formal agreements were in place between the sponsor (Newcastle
Trauma Foundation,6 although publication of the BEST TRIP trial upon Tyne NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust), the holder of the study
from Latin America7 has engendered further debate. However, not all funding (Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), and each
Downloaded from online.liebertpub.com by 36.80.211.182 on 09/24/17. For personal use only.
hospitals have or use ICP monitoring for patients with TICH, even participating hospital before commencing the study at each site.
though they may be classified as having an sTBI. Early management Only TICH patients for whom the treating neurosurgeon was in
of patients with TICH requires evaluation to determine whether early equipoise about the benefits of early surgical evacuation, compared
with initial conservative treatment, were eligible for the trial. Pa-
surgery should become part of the standard of care in the same way it
tients considered for the trial had had a computed tomography (CT)
is for significant EDHs8 and SDHs.9 scan to confirm the diagnosis and size as well as location of the
The aim of early surgical TICH removal is to prevent secondary hematoma. Clotting or coagulation problems were corrected before
brain injury, which is thought to be caused by a number of mecha- randomization as per local standard clinical practice. Patients were
nisms. Extravasated blood is believed to be neurotoxic, leading to included if they were adults within 48 h of TBI and had evidence of
secondary injury that may be avoided by early surgical removal. a TICH on CT with a confluent volume of attenuation significantly
Journal of Neurotrauma 2015.32:1312-1323.
Larger TICHs may be associated with an ischemic penumbra of brain raised above that of the background white and gray matter greater
tissue that could be salvaged and some TICHs expand to the point than 10 mL calculated by: (length width height)/2 in cm.16
where they cause mass effect, resulting in secondary brain injury. (Initially, the time criterion was within 24 h of TBI, but subsequent
Contused brain does not seem to recover and appears later as en- to an investigators meeting this was increased to allow time for
patients to reach neurosurgery and for the TICH to develop.)
cephalomalacic brain tissue loss on convalescent phase imaging.
Exclusion criteria were: a significant surface hematoma (EDH or
Removal of irreversibly damaged brain contusion with TICH does not SDH) requiring surgery; three or more separate hematomas ful-
increase tissue loss. As with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage filling the inclusion criteria; a cerebellar hemorrhage/contusion;
(SICH), there are patients who will deteriorate clinically and the surgery could not be performed within 12 h of randomization; se-
question of early surgery arises to anticipate such secondary damage. vere pre-existing physical or mental disability or comorbidity that
Use of surgery for TICH varies around the world. It is more would lead to a poor outcome even if the patient made a full re-
frequent in Asia than in Europe or North America. There have been covery from the TBI; permanent residence outside a study country
randomized trials of surgery for SICH,10,11 but none thus far of preventing follow-up; and if the patient and/or relative expressed a
surgery for TICH. Patients suffering a TICH tend to be younger strong preference for one treatment modality.
than those suffering a SICH, and therefore level of disability may Written witnessed informed consent of the patients or their rel-
atives was obtained by neurosurgical staff before randomization.
have a larger effect on ability to return to employment and eco-
In total, 59 neurosurgical units in 20 countries completed all
nomic output. TICHs are more likely to be lobar, superficial, and regulatory requirements and registered with the trial.
have a medium-sized volume (2565 cc).12 These differences be-
tween the conditions mean that the role of surgery for TICH cannot
Interventions
be directly derived from results of the published trials of surgery for
SICH. If early surgery is of benefit to TICH patients, then im- The two trial interventions were early surgery or initial conser-
plementation of early referral and diagnosis with immediate vative treatment. Early surgery was early evacuation of the he-
treatment may reduce incidence of death and disability in this matoma by a method of the surgeons choice (within 12 h of
specific group of TBI patients. randomization), combined with appropriate best medical treatment.
Initial conservative treatment was best medical treatment combined
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in
with delayed (more than 12 h after randomisation) evacuation if it
the UK published their second edition of guidelines for the triage became appropriate later. Both groups were monitored according to
and management of TBI patients in 2007,13 and the Brain Trauma local standard neurosurgical practice.
Foundation published their guidelines for the surgical management Best medical treatment could include (depending on the prac-
of TBI in 2006.14 Both of these organizations have emphasized that tices within the center) monitoring of ICP or other modalities and
studies have been observational and that there is a lack of class 1 management of metabolism, sodium osmotic pressure, tempera-
evidence from well-designed randomized, controlled trials. Those ture, and blood gasses.
unrandomized studies that attempt to compare outcome between All patients had a CT scan at 5 days ( 2 days) after ran-
surgical and nonsurgical groups cannot adequately control for domization to assess changes in hematoma size with and without
known prognostic variables. The NICE recommended in the 2007 surgery.
Information was collected about the status (Glasgow Coma
guideline that research is needed to develop a consensus on criteria
Score [GCS] and focal signs) of patients through the first 5 days of
for lesions not currently considered to be surgically significant, their trial progress as well as ICP/CPP (cerebral perfusion pressure)
namely, TICH. This recommendation facilitated the funding of measures (in invasively monitored patients), to describe any change
[STITCH(TRAUMA)] to find out whether early surgery would in status that led to a change in equipoise for the treating neuro-
improve outcomes, compared with initial conservative treatment, surgeon, and subsequent surgery in patients initially randomized
in patients with supratentorial TICH. to conservative treatment. At 2 weeks after randomization or at
1314 MENDELOW ET AL.
discharge or death (whichever occurred first), a discharge/2-week recommended, at each review, that the trial should continue. How-
form was completed by the responsible neurosurgeon or research ever, in February 2012, the funding agency decided to halt this in-
nurse. This form recorded the patients status at that time, the ternational study with effect from the end of September 2012 for
mechanism of injury, whether and when they had surgery (in- failure to recruit in the UK. At this time, 6 patients had been
cluding why, if randomized to initial conservative treatment, or recruited from the UK, despite our actively encouraging UK center
why not, if randomized to early surgery), the GCS and localizing participation throughout the trial. In total, 10 of the possible 36 UK
features for the 5 days after randomisation, the occurrence of any centers expressed written interest in the study, but only seven com-
adverse events (AEs) after randomization (including death, pul- pleted all regulatory requirements to join the trial. Considerable ef-
monary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and surgical site infec- fort was expended in trying continuously to recruit UK centers and
tion), and past medical history. raise the profile of the studythe study team had a high profile at the
Before assessing outcome each patients GP (in the UK) or national neurosurgical meetings and national neurosurgical research
consultant (outside the UK) was contacted to check that the patient meetings giving presentations about progress on the study and
was alive, confirm the patients place of residence, and complete a manning a stand where investigators could discuss the study with the
major AEs form. team. Monthly e-mail newsletters were sent to neurosurgical de-
partments and paper copies were posted quarterly. Talks were given
Downloaded from online.liebertpub.com by 36.80.211.182 on 09/24/17. For personal use only.
Randomization and masking in individual centers to encourage recruitment. Help with all regu-
latory submissions was also provided. Despite these considerable
To minimise biases resulting from lack of concealment of allo- efforts, only 6 patients could be recruited in the UK.
cation, randomization was undertaken centrally by an independent Analysis was on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. The analysis
24-h telephone and Web randomization service based in Aberdeen plan was adapted, following the decision from the funding agency to
University (Aberdeen, UK). Allocation was stratified by geograph- halt the trial early, agreed by the trial steering committee and pub-
ical region, with a minimization algorithm based on age group, and lished on the study website before unblinding the data. The primary
severity (as measured by whether or not the pupils were equal and analysis was a simple categorical frequency comparison using the
reacting), with a random component (i.e., with probability of 80%). uncorrected chi-squared test for favorable and unfavorable outcomes
Throughout the study, data broken down by treatment assign- at 6 months.17,18 A sensitivity analysis using logistic regression was
ment were never provided to individual investigators or to the study
Journal of Neurotrauma 2015.32:1312-1323.
Neither the sponsor nor the funder of the study had any role One hundred and seventy patients were recruited from 31 centers
in study design, data gathering, analysis and interpretation, in 13 countries between December 2009 and September 2012 and
or writing the report. The corresponding author, E.N.R., and randomly assigned to treatment groups: 83 to early surgery and 87
R.F. had full access to all the data in the study, and all members to initial conservative treatment. Two patients were excluded be-
of the writing committee had responsibility for the decision to cause the treatment decision was made before randomization: In
submit. one case, the patient had surgery before randomization and in the
Downloaded from online.liebertpub.com by 36.80.211.182 on 09/24/17. For personal use only.
Journal of Neurotrauma 2015.32:1312-1323.
FIG. 1. Flow chart for STITCH(Trauma) patients. *One site recruited 1 patient, but had undertaken surgery before randomization
the patient was allocated to initial conservative treatment; another site recruited 1 patient, for whom a treatment decision not to operate
was made before the patient was randomizedthis patient was allocated to early surgery. Because of the severe breach of protocol,
these patients were excluded.
1316 MENDELOW ET AL.
other an early decision was made not to operate (Fig. 1). These were GCS of 8 or less. The volume of the largest hematoma varied between
serious protocol violations. All other patients were included in the 10 and 97 mL, with a median of 23 mL, and 61 (36%) patients had a
analysis, which therefore reports results for 82 patients assigned to second hematoma between 0 and 26 mL, with median of 3 mL. There
early surgery and 86 assigned to initial conservative treatment. were no differences in the three individual components of the GCS,
Table 1 shows the distribution of baseline variables between the handedness, or characteristics of the second hematoma.
two treatment groups. Patients ranged in age from 16 to 83, with a Of the 82 patients in the early surgery group, only 61 (74%) had
median age of 50, and 122 (73%) were male. Before the TBI, 164 surgery, 57 (93%) of these within 12 h of randomisation (see Table
(98%) were Rankin 0 or 1, and 22 (13%) had a history of cardio- 2). The reasons for not having surgery were patient or relative
vascular disease. The main causes of the TBI were road traffic acci- refusal (15), improvement (1), deterioration (2), seizures (1), an-
dents (RTAs; 113; 67%) and falls (47; 28%). Most of the RTAs were esthetic risk (1), and change of history suggesting SICH rather than
motorbike riders (45; 40%) or pedestrians (29; 26%). Sixty-eight TICH (1). Although informed consent was obtained before ran-
patients (40%) were admitted to another hospital before their transfer domization, patients often had more than one relative and further
to the neurosurgical unit. At the time of randomization, 70 (42%) discussion could lead to a change of opinion. Of the 15 patients/
patients had a GCS of 1315, 71 (42%) a GCS of 912, and 27 (16%) a relatives who refused surgery, 9 were in China and 5 in India. Of the
Downloaded from online.liebertpub.com by 36.80.211.182 on 09/24/17. For personal use only.
For continuous variables, median (quartiles) and range are presented For continuous variables, median (quartiles) and range are presented
plus mean and SD; for categorical variables, the number of cases plus mean and standard deviation; for categorical variables, number of
(percentage) is presented. cases (percentage) are presented.
IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; GCS, Glasgow Coma Score. GCS, Glasgow Coma Score.
SURGERY FOR TRAUMATIC ICH RCT: STITCH(TRAUMA) 1317
had surgery within 14 days of randomization, 10 (32%) of these 0.75; p = 0.007), for an absolute difference of 18.3% (95% CI, 5.7,
within 12 h. The reasons for having surgery were neurological 30.9). Figure 3 shows the Kaplan-Meiers plot of survival for the
deterioration (29), no shrinkage in hematoma size (1), and rise in two groups of patients, illustrating the significant survival advan-
ICP (1). Neurological deterioration was identified by a drop in tage of early surgery compared with initial conservative treatment
GCS, enlargement of the hematoma or increase in mid-line shift, ( p = 0.008). Table 3 and Figure 2 show the distribution of GOS,
increase in weakness, or change in pupil size or reactivity. GOSE, and Rankin at 6 months by treatment group. For each of
Surgical patients in the early surgery group were more likely to these secondary outcomes, there is a significant trend in better
have craniotomy than those in the initial conservative group (97% outcome in the early surgery group (chi-squared trend: p = 0.047,
vs. 81%; p = 0.016, Fishers test). One patient in the initial con- p = 0.052, and p = 0.043 respectively), although the proportional
servative group had burrhole surgery, but all others who did not odds models did not reach statistical significance (OR, 0.67; 95%
have craniotomy had craniectomy. The bone flap was more likely CI, 0.39, 1.16; p = 0.153; OR, 0.66, 95% CI, 0.38, 1.13; p = 0.127;
to be replaced in the surgical patients in the early surgery group OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.39, 1.15; p = 0.147).
(77%) than in the initial conservative group (42%; Fisher tests, The main causes of death were the initial head injury (5 early
p = 0.001). As Table 2 demonstrates, surgical patients in the early surgery, 14 initial conservative) and pneumonia (4 early surgery, 2
Downloaded from online.liebertpub.com by 36.80.211.182 on 09/24/17. For personal use only.
surgery group had significantly higher preoperative GCS scores initial conservative). Other causes in the initial conservative
for all subscales than those requiring surgery in the initial con- treatment group included cachexia (2), ischemic stroke (2), men-
servative group. Comparison of the baseline characteristics of ingitis (1), pulmonary embolism (2), renal (1), TBI and surgery (1),
patients in the initial conservative group who had surgery, with seizure (1), and unknown sudden death in the community (1). In
those that did not, showed that patients who deteriorated and went the early surgery group, the other causes were hypovolemic shock
on to have surgery had larger hematomas initially (Mann-Whit- (1), pulmonary embolism (1), TBI and surgery (1), and unknown in
neys test, p = 0.010) and were more likely to have at least one the community (1). Only 8 non-death-related major AEs were re-
pupil unreactive (Fishers test, p = 0.0005), but did not differ on corded: seizure (3); new/enlarged hematoma (2); infection (2); and
age, GCS at the time of randomization, or presence of a second other (1).
Journal of Neurotrauma 2015.32:1312-1323.
GOS (%)
Dead 12 (15) 28 (33) v2 trend p = 0.047
Vegetative 0 (0) 0 (0)
Severely dependent 18 (22) 12 (14) POM p = 0.153
Moderately dependent 26 (32) 18 (21)
Good recovery 26 (32) 27(32)
GOSE (%)
Dead 12 (15) 28 (33) v2 trend p = 0.052
Vegetative 0 (0) 0 (0)
Lower SD 4 (5) 8 (9) POM p = 0.127
Journal of Neurotrauma 2015.32:1312-1323.
Number of cases (percentage) are presented; EuroQol utility index calculated using UK weightings provided by the EuroQol Group Foundation; tests
conducted were v2 (chi-squared), v2 trend (chi-squared for trend), POM (proportional odds model), and M-W (Mann-Whitney). For each test, the p value
is given. Absolute differences with 95% confidence intervals are presented for binary outcomes.
a
One patient did not provide information about their limb movements.
GOS, Glasgow Outcome Scale; GOSE, Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended; SD, severe disability; MD, moderate disability; GR, good recovery.
secondary brain damage would be avoided. The objective of the same group of patients with SICH had the best outcomes with early
STITCH(TRAUMA) trial was to discover whether early surgery surgery in a previous study.23
would prevent the secondary deterioration so often observed with Some units in some countries routinely measure ICP whereas
conservative treatment. Though the primary outcome is not sta- others do not. In this study, 86% of patients were not monitored for
tistically significant, there is a strong signal that early surgery will ICP either because the hospital did not have the technology avail-
indeed prevent such deterioration and save lives. This is noted in able or because they do not routinely use it for this patient group.24
the highly significant reduction in mortality and the better outcomes The question of early surgery for TICH may be particularly im-
in the ordinal analysis of the GOS and Rankin scales. A larger trial portant in those countries that do not measure ICP. An analysis of
is urgently needed to confirm or refute this signal, which is par- global ICP utilization trends and aspirations has confirmed that
ticularly strong in patients with a randomization GCS of 912. This many countries in the world do not have the facilities and resources
SURGERY FOR TRAUMATIC ICH RCT: STITCH(TRAUMA) 1319
Downloaded from online.liebertpub.com by 36.80.211.182 on 09/24/17. For personal use only.
Journal of Neurotrauma 2015.32:1312-1323.
FIG. 4. Subgroup analysis. M-H, Mann-Whitney; CI, confidence interval; GCS, Glasgow Coma Score.
GCS between 9 and 12 had the best outcome with early surgery. The Conclusion
economic analysis indicates that a strategy of early surgery is asso-
ciated with a nonsignificant increase in health care costs. Further A larger trial is needed to confirm this potentially very beneficial
work will estimate the cost-effectiveness of early surgery versus effect of earlier surgery. In the interim, there is a strong case
conservative management using 6-month and 1-year follow-up data. for operating on patients with TICH who have a GCS of 912.
This will demonstrate the magnitude of additional costs over the Those who are alert or just confused (GCS 1315) can probably
longer term, as well as whether any additional costs are associated be watched carefully for any deterioration because there is a
with sufficient benefits in terms of improvements in quality of life, safety margin, which diminishes the lower down the GCS the pa-
measured by the EQ-5D, and length of life. tient descends. Once the GCS has descended below 9, surgical
SURGERY FOR TRAUMATIC ICH RCT: STITCH(TRAUMA) 1321
Low-income countries Early surgery (N = 6) Initial conservative treatment (N = 10) Difference of means
Downloaded from online.liebertpub.com by 36.80.211.182 on 09/24/17. For personal use only.
Low-middle-income Early surgery (N = 40) Initial conservative treatment (N = 39) Difference of means
countries
Journal of Neurotrauma 2015.32:1312-1323.
Upper-middle-income Early surgery (N = 28) Initial conservative treatment (N = 30) Difference of means
countries
intervention appears to be less effective. A strategy of early sur- of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HTA
gery is associated with a small, nonsignificant increase in health program, NIHR, NHS, or the Department of Health.
care costs, but further analysis using longer-term follow-up
data are required to establish better estimates of costs and cost- Author Disclosure Statement
effectiveness.
A.D.M. is director of the Newcastle Neurosurgery Foundation,
which is a nonprofit organization for academic research and edu-
cation, and he is an adviser to Stryker (craniofacial surgery com-
Acknowledgments
mittee). B.A.G., E.N.R., and R.F. received salary support from the
This project was funded by the National Institute of Health STITCH(Trauma) grant, but not from any commercial organiza-
Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment program (project tions. All surgeons in fee-for-service health care systems receive
no.: 07/37/16). The views and opinions expressed therein are those additional fees for undertaking surgery.
1322 MENDELOW ET AL.
eration in the patient with an occult traumatic intracranial hematoma. (2005). Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients
J. Neurosurg. 55, 7581. with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the In-
6. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological ternational Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a
Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on randomised trial. Lancet 365, 387397.
Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS, Bratton, S.L., Chestnut, 19. Drummond, M., Barbieri, M., Cook, J., Glick, H.A., Lis, J., Malik, F.,
R.M., Ghajar, J., McConnell Hammond, F.F., Harris, O.A., Hartl, R., Reed, S.D., Rutten, F., Sculpher, M., and Severens, J. (2009). Trans-
Manley, G.T., Nemecek, A., Newell, D.W., Rosenthal, G., Schouten, ferability of economic evaluations across jurisdictions: ISPOR Good
J., Shutter, L., Timmons, S.D., Ullman, J.S., Videtta, W., Wilberger, Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health 12, 409418.
J.E. and Wright, D.W. (2007). Guidelines for the management of 20. Manca, A., Sculpher, M.J., and Goeree, R. (2010). The analysis of
severe traumatic brain injury. VIII. Intracranial pressure thresholds. J. multinational cost-effectiveness data for reimbursement decisions: a
Neurotrauma 24, Suppl. 1, S55S58. Erratum in: J. Neurotrauma critical appraisal of recent methodological developments. Pharma-
Journal of Neurotrauma 2015.32:1312-1323.
(Appendix follows/)
SURGERY FOR TRAUMATIC ICH RCT: STITCH(TRAUMA) 1323
Appendix
STITCH (TRAUMA) Investigators India: Bangalore, BGS Global Hospital (1): S.A.V. Rao; N.K.
Venkataramanaa; Bangalore, NIMHANS (5): S. Somanna;
Principal investigators: A. David Mendelow, MB, BCh, PhD,
K.V.L.N. Rao; J. lal Gangadharan; Calcutta, AMRI Hospitals
FRCS; Barbara A. Gregson, BSc, PhD, FSS; Patrick M. Mitchell,
(0): R.N. Bhattacharya; Chennai, Fortis Malar Hospital (1): K.
BA, MB, BChir, BSc, FRCS, PhD; Andy Unterberg, MD, PhD;
Sridhar; G. Venkatprasanna; Dehradun, Himalayan Institute
Elaine M. McColl, BA, MSc, PhD; Iain R. Chambers, BSc, PhD,
of Medical Sciences (13): K.K. Bansal; C. Gupta, R. Kumar;
CEng, FIPEM; Paul McNamee, MA, MSc, PhD.
Lucknow, King Georges Medical University (erstwhile CSM
Steering committee: Mr. J. Steers (independent chairman); Mr.
Medical University) (29): S.K. Singh; C. Srivastava; B.K. Ojha;
Andy Vail (statistician); Dr. D. Birchall (neuroradiologist, inde-
A. Chandra; Ludhiana, Christian Medical College & Hospital
pendent member); Mr. Jake Timothy (neurosurgeon, independent
(3): S.S. Grewal; B. Gupta; Maharashtra, Acharya Vinoba
member); Professor Luke Vale (health economist, independent
Bhave Rural Hospital (3): A. Agrawal; Mullana (Ambala), MM
member); Mr. A. White (lay member, Headway); Mr. D. OMeara
Downloaded from online.liebertpub.com by 36.80.211.182 on 09/24/17. For personal use only.