Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
S h a l e sSECTION: Sh
haal el se s
5RFNSK\VLFVRIRUJDQLFVKDOHV
LEV VERNIK and JADRANKA MILOVAC, Marathon Oil Corporation
Figure 2. Measurements (blue data points, from Vernik, 1993) and model predictions (red lines) of elastic stiffening with isostatic confining
pressure on partially oil-saturated Bakken Shale from the wet-gas window (a). Relationship between and b for the same core sample (b).
Figure 3. (a) Relationship between compressional and shear velocity for bedding-normal (hot colors) and bedding-parallel (cold colors) ultrasonic
core measurements from Bossier Shale at 15 MPa (squares) and Bakken and Woodford shales at 70 MPa (circles). (b) The same template for
dipole sonic data obtained in wells in Bakken, Woodford, and Bossier shales.
bedding-subparallel maturation cracks may be open in situ Our ability to understand the relationships among the
and detectable by sonic logs. Even more intriguing is the rela- three Thomsen anisotropy parameters is critical in constrain-
tionship between the anisotropic parameters and b, showing ing the TI tensor from sonic logs, VSP, and seismic data. As
a crossover from < b to > b at about the same stress level we will see later, this change in b/ ratio with crack closure has
in this partially gas-saturated oil shale (Figure 2b). Of course, important implications in geomechanics as well.
this Bakken Shale core shows the greatest stress sensitivity in
our data set; nonetheless we can argue that a typical range VP versus VS
of b/ ratio variation for the organic shales in situ lies in the In order to review the VP versus VS relationship in organic
range from 0.4 to 0.8i.e., the anisotropy of these rocks is shales, we have compiled several published data sets (Vernik
positively anelliptical (Vernik and Liu, 1997). and Nur, 1992; Vernik and Liu, 1997) and in-house core and
Effects of kerogen and porosity where kerogen density can vary from 1.21.4 g/cm3 depend-
There are several challenges in modeling composition and ing on maturity; the nonkerogen component usually consists
porosity effects on velocities in organic shales, which are of clay, quartz, carbonates, and pyrite; and the density of this
critical in mapping their organic richness and reservoir prop- component lnk normally varies between 2.722.81 g/cm3. Fi-
erties from seismic amplitudes and/or impedances. First, nally, porosity was computed from bulk density as = (lm
their porosity is not easily and unambiguously determined lb)/(lm lf) with lk =1.3 g/cm3, lf =0.8 g/cm3 (oil shale),
from either core or log data. Second, it is unclear how we and lf = 0.5 g/cm3 (gas shale).
can employ micromechanics modeling for shales in general, It is evident from Figure 4 that the vast majority of our or-
because these lithologies clearly defy the main assumptions ganic shales fall into the 510% porosity range with Bakken,
of Gassmanns theory and their dry-frame compliances are Woodford, and Bazhenov shales on the lower and Bossier
hard to define due to rock-fluid interaction effects. For prac- shales on the high end of this range. Hence, the bulk-density-
tical applications, we choose to employ (1) the mass-balance- log data can be successfully employed in porosity modeling
based porosity computation using a combination of TOC if the kerogen volume and mineral composition are properly
and XRD mineralogy data to derive the solid matrix density constrained.
and (2) the simple empirical model relating porosity to elas- Backus averaging can be used as a first approximation
tic stiffnesses and velocities measured in the bedding-normal to derive the bedding-normal compressional stiffness of the
direction. solid matrix if we partition it into the following three compo-
From the mass-balance equation the relationship between nents: (1) total clay, (2) kerogen, and (3) silt:
volume of kerogen (K) and TOC is given by:
(4)
(2)
where vcl is the total clay content in the solid matrix volume,
where Ck (0.70.85 depending on maturity level) is the con- C33cl = 33.4 GPa accounts for the effective, imperfect clay
stant relating kerogen to TOC, is the porosity, and lb, lf, mineral preferred orientation (Vernik and Kachanov, 2010),
and lk are the bulk, fluid, and kerogen densities, respectively. C33K = Mk = 9.5 GPa (based on VPk = 2.7 km/s), and C33ncl
(5)
Downloaded 12/10/17 to 167.205.22.105. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
Figure 6. Compressional velocity versus porosity for log data acquired in vertical wells in (a) Bakken and Woodford shales and (b) Bossier Shale.
Mean values of kerogen content computed from core TOC data are 0.27, 0.13, and 0.08 for Bakken, Woodford, and Bossier, respectively. Note a
small and unaccounted for effect of the lower effective stress in Bossier.
References
Katahara, K., 2009, Lateral earth stress and strain: 79th Annual Inter-
national Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 21652169.
Sayers, C., 2010, Geophysics under Stress: Geomechanical Applica-
tions of Seismic and Borehole Acoustic waves: SEG 2010 Distin-
guished Instructor Short Course.
Sevostianov, I. and M. Kachanov, 2001, Authors response: Jour-
nal of Biomechanics, 34, no. 5, 709710, doi:10.1016/S0021-
9290(00)00208-6.
Sevostianov, I. and M. Kachanov, 2008, On approximate symme-
tries of the elastic properties and elliptic orthotropy: International
Journal of Engineering Science, 46, no. 3, 211223, doi:10.1016/j.
ijengsci.2007.11.003.
Thomsen, L., 1986, Weak elastic anisotropy: Geophysics, 51, no. 10,
19541966, doi:10.1190/1.1442051.
Vernik, L. and A. Nur, 1992, Ultrasonic velocity and anisotropy
of hydrocarbon source rocks: Geophysics, 57, no. 5, 727735,
doi:10.1190/1.1443286.
Vernik, L., 1993, Microcrack-induced versus intrinsic elastic anisot-
ropy in mature HC-source shales: Geophysics, 58, no. 11, 1703
1706, doi:10.1190/1.1443385.
Vernik, L. and C. Landis, 1996, Elastic anisotropy of source rocks:
Implications for hydrocarbon generation and primary migration:
AAPG Bulletin, 80, no. 4, 531544.
Vernik, L. and X. Liu, 1997, Velocity anisotropy in shales: A petrophysi-
cal study: Geophysics, 62, no. 2, 521532, doi:10.1190/1.1444162.
Vernik, L. and M. Kachanov, 2010, Modeling elastic proper-
ties of siliciclastic rocks: Geophysics, 75, no. 6, 171182,
doi:10.1190/1.3494031.