Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
and identity
Assessment: How will you know what they have learned? What assessment will you use?
Will you consider a student self-assessment of your lesson? Anecdotal responses?
I used a verbal assessment to determine if they understood the vocabulary, main point of
the story and if they had personal connections. I was given prior knowledge of the students
Id be reading to, and the levels that they are at for reading comprehension.
So I knew ahead of time the responses I should be expecting from each student.
Differentiation of Instruction: How will you accommodate all learners needs?
I made a system where if they didnt know what a word meant they would put their
thumbs up so I could explain what it meant, I also made sure to read slow and take
pauses so that they had time to reflect and ask questions. I allowed the students to
choose where they sat/how they sat as long as they could see the book.
I needed an open quiet space so that students were able to move around, sit in their own
Introduction/Hook: How will you get students attention to begin the lesson/reading?
I asked them to make predictions of what they thought would happen in the book and
I asked them questions based on the story. In a part of the story the girl talks about what
she would put in her suitcase since she is moving countries. I connected it back to the
students and asked them what they would put in their suitcase that represents them.
This is what worked: I liked that I had an open quiet space because it gave the students a
chance to move around if they couldnt sit still, but also be in hearing distance. Some
students sat and others were standing up. I began the lesson with asking them to predict
what they think might happen before I even open the book. The students made guesses
based on pictures and the title of the book. Then before reading I asked them to give me
thumbs up if there were any words that they didnt understand as I was reading. Then Id
come back to them and explain them later on. I chose a fairly easy level of reading for the
book so that they could focus more on the meaning behind it rather than the vocabulary. As I
read I would make sure to take pauses to give them a chance to make any comments. Once I
finished reading I asked them questions to see where their level of comprehension is. I also
tried to tie in questions that would allow them to make personal connections. Since I had one
student that was gifted, I tried to accommodate him by keeping things interesting and asking
questions that would make him think critically. I also used different tones of voices for
This is what did not work: The students had a hard time understanding the symbolism
behind the story. Even though it was a simple message behind it, some of the metaphors
used were hard for them to visualize and comprehend. I also found that by having a gifted
student, and a low reader, it didnt allow for the low reader to feel as comfortable to jump into
the discussion. The higher readers would keep jumping in and making personal connections,
and the low reader would just quietly shrug when I would ask them. They didnt feel confident
in their answers. I also had three males and one female in this reading group. The males
would often make their personal connections about hockey, and would start drifting off into
conversations about famous hockey players, which wasnt a very inviting conversation for the
girl.
Why it didnt work: By having different reading levels in this read-aloud, I had a variety of
different answers that raised a lot of good questions and were very thoughtful. However, the
other readers (lower levels) would just rephrase the same answers as the higher readers. I
knew from previous assessments, that all the readers had a really good understanding of
personal connections, and in-fact had really thoughtful connections. Since the gifted student
always spoke with a lot of confidence and had good personal connections, the other students
may have thought that there may have only been one right answer to the questions I was
asking. I also felt like the lower readers were intimidated and didnt feel confident enough with
their answers as they kept replying with I dont know or joking answers.
who was moving countries and had one suitcase to pack all of the things that she would want
to bring with her. She didnt know what to pack, and as the story progressed she began to
understand what is really important to her and what her values are. At the end of the book,
there is a pop-up of a suit case asking the students what they would pack with them. So
thats where the discussion began. I created a scenario that they would have to be moving
away and they only had one suitcase to pack and asked them what they would bring with.
Low reader #1: I would bring my hockey sticks, gloves, and helmet.
Then as the discussion progressed they made the connection that they could buy everything
that they own in the different country so they dont have to pack anything. So, I decided to
make it more challenging by asking them what they would bring if it was a country (for
example: Africa, or any third world country) where they didnt have anything that Canada had.
Low reader#1: I would bring all my video games and my hockey stuff
Gifted Student: I would just transfer all of my video games and music onto my phone and you
cant bring money into the airport without declaring it first so you should put it all onto your
bank card.
Then, I asked them what made Canada unique from any other country that they would want
the people in the other countries to know. Other than the Canadian flag, and hockey, the
students didnt know much about the differences of Canada. The gifted student did mention
that we are known for our wheat, and the low reader mentioned our Alberta beef. The
discussion went through many questions and debates as to what is significant to those
students to bring with them, and what is unique about themselves and Canada.
This is what I would improve for next time: For next time, I would like to have a poster or
some sort of individual work that they could show me of what they would put in their suitcase,
and what is important to them. By doing that, itll give all students the confidence to speak on
what is significant to them, and it would allow for me to see what their genuine answers are.
The discussion was very effective and it brought up a lot of meaningful questions and
thoughts, but I wasnt sure what some of the students genuine opinion was, since they would
This is what I learned: I learned a lot about the individual and how their minds work. I kept
the discussion open so that I could see their train of thoughts and the connections they made.
We started discussing the different countries in the world and what makes them unique and it
was interesting how much knowledge these students actually retain from books theyve
previously read, and classroom activities. The gifted student would always raise meaningful
questions like: why do I need to go to school if I am in the wild/safari countries, all I really will
need to know is how to hunt or he would comment on the air pollution in India etc. He made
interesting observations about the different countries. So I raised the idea of stereotypes, and
none of the students knew what Canada was known for. It was quite interesting to see that
these students live in this country, and many were raised here, but they dont know what
makes this country unique to others. The low readers would usually give me one worded
answers or try to debate the whole moving situation in the first place. It showed me that the
low readers are comfortable where they are (literally and symbolically) and the gifted student
is more open to different scenarios as he is prepared for them with all of his knowledge. The
ELL student didnt say much or make many connections, he would just agree with the other
students.
This lesson showed me more than how well they can comprehend a story. It showed
me whats significant in their lives, and how they measure that significance. The students
were quick to leave their things behind if they knew they had money to replace those things.
In fact, when asking them what they found valuable in their lives that they couldnt replace,
they were unable to think of anything. This makes me wonder if students are truly educated
on their heritage and culture. If so, why is it so easy for them to leave everything behind?
Overall, I thought the book read-aloud went very well, and I really appreciated learning more
about these students background and history. I also found it very interesting to learn more
about the things that matter in their lives. It was a very engaged discussion, and I believe
A B C D
Hook Clearly articulated A hook activity The hook is The hook activity
and developed has potential to included but is not clearly
hook that will engage students potential articulated.
clearly interest and assess prior engagement and
students and knowledge assessment is
assess prior somewhat
knowledge. unclear
Participation Task is clearly Task has the Potential of the Task is not
Task engaging potential to task to engage engaging and
Potential for deep engage students students and has limited
thinking is clear Some potential promote thinking learning potential
Shows creativity for deep thinking is somewhat
and imagination Some degree of unclear
creativity