1

Iatrogenic (Doctor-Originated) Shock Conflict Diseases

Iatrogenesis includes diagnostic and/or prognostic shock
conflicts.

Initially published at CureZone: May 17, 2012 and continuing.

Iatrogenic - (... originating from a physician) is an inadvertent[24]

adverse effect or complication resulting from medical treatment or
advice, including that of psychologists, therapists, pharmacists,
nurses, physicians and dentists.

"Iatrogenesis is a major phenomenon, and a severe risk to

patients. ... iatrogenic illness constitutes the third-leading cause of
death in the United States"[1]

That's nothing to sneeze at!

"... iatrogenic disease (doctor-caused) kills over 200,000 people

per year--4 times as many as the Viet Nam war overall."[2]

"The assignment of pathological nomenclature is rarely a benign

process and can easily rise to the level of emotional iatrogenesis,
especially when no alternatives outside of the diagnostic naming
process have been considered."

Therefore, an emotional-based iatrogenic disease is a doctor-

originated shock conflict that can typically occur with a diagnosis
(such a cancer diagnosis) and /or with a prognosis that is
discouraging to the patient.

***
August 1, 2012:

"What physicians call 'metastases' are in fact new cancers,

emanating from new conflict shocks - primarily from iatrogenic
(doctor-caused) diagnosis and prognosis shocks. No researcher
 2

has ever been able to find a cancer cell in the arterial blood of a
cancer patient. If true, that's exactly where they would normally be
found - swimming in the peripheral blood stream of the body."

From: "Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Sigmoid Colon"

(The best presentation to date that I have seen on this subject!)[3]

***
Cont. -
"Alternatives" deserve consideration. "A holistic cancer approach
includes superior nutrition, electro-medicine and vibrational or
energy medicine, emotional healing and mind therapy. ...

Many natural cancer therapists claim success rate of more than

90% in arresting and reversing cancer, provided that patients had
not been subjected to orthodox treatments beforehand. The most
damaging treatments appear to be chemotherapy and
radiotherapy.

Therefore, if you are confronted with cancer, I suggest that you

resist acting out of fear and under pressure. The situation is
hardly ever so urgent that you have to act immediately. Instead,
do your own research from books, journals and the Internet, and
then trust common sense or intuition."[4]

I think we would agree that this a time when an important decision

needs to be made and as such an opportunity to make that
decision based on your Human Design.[5]

"The people should be able to make an informed choice and to

have that choice it must be available, they must know about it and
have access to it!":
http://www.pmai.us/About

***
March 1st, 2016 -
 3

"... once the ordinary person has a diagnosis, this qualifies as a

shock in the majority of the cases and if the patient does not feel
safe or confident the disease can spread as a result.

In some cases, the tumor can spontaneously disappear. I have

observed this and I have personally experienced this. However
this is not the rule ... It is the individual's psyche that will
determine what the cancer will do."[6]

***
May 9th, 2016 -

"'People dont just die from bacteria and heart plaque, they die
from communication breakdowns, fragmented healthcare,
diagnostic mistakes, and over-dosing,' said Martin Makary, a
professor at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in
Baltimore and lead author of the study"[7] "an analysis published
Wednesday (May 4th) in the medical journal BMJ."[8]

However, this does not consider the impact of the initial shock
conflicts (DHS in German New Medicine terms) that most
individuals most likely receive in a medical diagnosis and
especially the shock of their "prognosis" (whether that is delivered
by the doctor or is simply believed to be the case by the patient).
Furthermore it is unknown whether the two leading causes of
death (identified as cancer and heart disease) consider the
deaths of those individuals who had chosen the typical medically
prescribed course of treatment that can undermine the patient's
health with dire consequences.

***
January 2, 2017 -

"The most acute trance is induced when someone has a life

threatening diagnosis such as a cancer. Unfortunately, unless we
 4

have knowledge of Dr. Hamer's research, we go into a state of

mind that I see as equivalent to a voodoo spell!"[9]

***
January 11th, 2017 -

"...one doctor noticed how much worse his patients felt after
receiving a diagnosis, a label of what was wrong, how much more
quickly they declined."[10]

I wonder whether there has ever been any "scientific" studies

(that would meet the criteria of my professor friend) on the state of
health of patients after they have received their diagnosis.

***
March 27, 2017 -

"The Journal of the American Medical Assn. (JAMA) made

estimates ranging from 235,000 to 284,000 deaths per year due
to doctor-related causes."[11]

paternalistic medical cultures and dehumanize individuals in a

clinical setting steal energy from patients and can make people
sicker."[12]

Ideally - learn three things. -

Firstly learn how to adopt a lifestyle of prevention. (That is the
lion's share of what "Cheeta"[13] is all about.)
Secondly - learn how to heal yourself (as any doctor who knows
the true nature of healing will say - healing is self-generated).
Thirdly - learn the New Medicine[14] for resolving the unexpected
"Shock Conflicts" that can occur even while living a "lifestyle of
prevention".

***
 5

June 25th, 2017 - More Re: the Nature of Iatrogenic Shock

Conflict Diseases:

Up till relatively recently the concept of disease has been

(essentially) "something gone wrong", "something defective" or
the like. That concept has been championed by the medical
industry to such an extreme that a doctor's diagnosis and/or
prognosis can induce shock conflict/s in the psyche of patients.
That phenomenal event occurs commonly. When this shock
conflict launches a biological survival program like cancer in the
body of a man or woman who already has cancer the doctor
mistakenly declares that the cancer has metastasized and by
saying that the doctor "adds insult to injury". The body is much
wiser than we or even doctors realize! Who can hear it?

What we have been told about disease comes from an industry

that is totally invested (in every sense of the word) in a concept of
disease that doctors claim expertise in resolving. However, more
and more people are discovering that in most cases - the options
that the medical industry offers for "resolution" deserve to be
reconsidered and reevaluated rather than automatically agreed to.
That's because a true healing resolution potential exists within the
body - however doctors do not usually support that potential if all
they do is apply the typical medical interventions.

The doctor of the future is more a teacher than an intervener. This

doctor supports understanding in the patient/student regarding the
true meaning of so called disease. Dr. Hamer is one of these
doctors and although he is still being persecuted - his insights into
the true nature of disease has finally been accepted by a growing
body of true health practitioners. Every "disease" points to a
shock conflict that either needs to be resolved or that actually has
already been resolved and is now in the healing stage. If any of
this sparks your interest then look into learninggnm.com or http://
www.newmedicine.ca
 6

***
August 16, 2017 - They call it "The Nocebo Effect":

"In the 1970s a man was diagnosed with end-stage liver cancer
and given just months to live. Though the patient died in the
predicted time, an autopsy showed the doctors had been
mistaken. There was a tiny tumor, but it had not spread.
Therefore, this man did not die of cancer but from the 'belief' that
he was going to die of cancer. It was surmised that if everyone
treats you as if you are dying, you buy into that perception and it
becomes your reality."[15]

I suspect the German New Medicine (GNM) assessment in the

above quoted example would be called a "death-fright" shock
conflict.

I think anyone who is going to get a diagnosis needs to have their

closest friend with them who is able to support the Individual
through the aftermath of the diagnosis and if a DHS[16] is
suspected then the friend would encourage the Individual to start
a psychotherapeutic process to support the resolution of that
shock conflict.

In fact I think all patients should be encouraged to reserve their

"Right to Life" as an "amendment" under the "Hippocratic oath" (to
be completely unharmed by the doctor) and under our
Unalienable Right to the "Pursuit of Happiness" (un-assalted by
shocking diagnosis) by including a GNM perspective as part of
the patient's Rights when seeing a medical doctor and thereby
holding doctors liable for their Iatrogenic impact. If the doctor
causes the patient to have a DHS then the doctor's insurance
should cover 100% of the costs for whatever psychotherapy is
needed to restore the patient.

***
 7

September 5, 2017 - "Too Much Medical Testing" by Carolyn

Dean MD ND - The Doctor of the Future

Maybe it's the books I've been reading lately, but I'm getting even
more skeptical about the expansion of medical testing that
doctors want to adopt to help keep us healthy!

Here's the current dilemma. Doctors do coronary artery CT scans

to check for calcium blockage. The scan gets high marks for
being non invasive (but they use radiation). However, in 2011, a
JAMA study showed that this test is associated with a higher rate
of subsequent invasive heart procedures and higher costs.
Specifically, patients were twice as likely to have more invasive
cardiac procedures compared to patients who only had the
normal stress test. The risks also include cumulative radiation
exposure.

Basically radiologists do this new Coronary Artery Scan and then

they don't know how to interpret the results so they have to do
further testing. Their latest question is whether an asymptomatic
patient that has a non-obstructive amount of coronary calcium
should be treated with surgery and drugs to prevent more plaque
from forming.

I've written about this procedure in blogs and in the latest edition
of The Magnesium Miracle. I say "The Coronary Calcium Scan
has not 'caught on' as a screening tool probably because there
are no drugs to 'dissolve' the calcium in coronary arteries.
Allopathic medicine continues to use stents, calcium channel
blockers and statin drugs ineffectively. In my world, excess
calcium depositing in arteries means a relative lack of magnesium
and magnesium is a treatment for calcium build up in the body."

In an Aug. 15, 2017 Medscape article the questions are piling up.
The most important one is "Should clinicians take action when an
asymptomatic patient has a coronary CT scan that shows
 8

nonobstructive plaque, or should these patients not have these

scans in the first place?" There are two diametrically opposing
views. The interventionist view is that nonobstructive coronary
plaque requires action because it's only going to get worse; they
are of 'the plaque or no plaque' mentality. The other view says
there is absolutely no data that says a patient can improve
cardiovascular . . . morbidity or mortality by identifying
nonobstructive plaque in healthy people, and there are
downsides, including exposing patients to radiation, creating
anxiety, and giving people unnecessary procedures or drugs with
potential for harm...we're just making patients miserable."

Doctors who want to intervene are convinced that there is no cure

for heart disease, which makes them want to start drug treatment
on patients earlier and earlier not knowing that it's magnesium
deficiency and heart medications that are driving the disease in
the first place!

The doctors that don't support coronary scans on asymptomatic

people say that preventive therapies should be engaged.
However, doctors aren't paid to talk about prevention to their
patients and they don't have time in their 7-minute appointment to
do more than write a few prescriptions! This is where magnesium
comes into play. To here

Medscape had the anti-scan doctor describe the experiences of

two recent patients. "The first, a 64-year old woman, had a few
episodes of atypical chest pain and was sent for CAC scoring.
Her CAC was 75, so she was sent for a coronary angiogram,
diagnosed with a 30% ostial LAD lesion, and given "a bag of
medicine"aspirin, statins, calcium-channel blockers, and beta-
blockersthat she did not take. She had no cardiac risk factors;
her total cholesterol was under 200 mg/dL; her LDL was around
100 mg/dL, and she was very upset and concerned about why
she had gotten all these medications I told her that she really was
low risk and reinforced diet, regular exercise, and not smoking,
 9

which she was already doing. A second very similar patient took
the statin drug and experienced memory problems that ceased
when she stopped taking the statin."

Medscape also mentioned a dramatic case published in the

Archives of Internal Medicine. "A 52- year-old woman with atypical
chest pain but normal ECG, troponins, CRP, and other markers
underwent coronary CTA 'just for reassurance.' Both noncalcified
and calcified plaque were identified, so she had a coronary
angiogram that was complicated by a left main coronary
dissection that required emergency CABG. Postoperatively the
graft failed, stents thrombosed, and she ended up with refractory
heart failure requiring a heart transplant."

My advice is to beware of tests and treatments that are done "just

for reassurance" or "just in case" or to obviously cover a doctor's
backside. And my continued advice is to take dietary supplements
that are effective building blocks to help you continue to be
healthy. You can google my name and dietary supplements to see
my recommendations

Here's my most recent recommendations. I've read 1-4 and I'm

working towards 5 and 6.

1.) Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in Pursuit of Health

Gilbert Welch[17]
2.) Less Medicine More Health Gilbert Welch[18]
3.) Worried Sick: A Prescription for Health in an Overtreated
America Nortin Hadler[19]
4.) Selling Sickness: How the World's Biggest Pharmaceutical
Companies are Turning Us All Into Patients Ray Moynihan[20]
5.) How We Do Harm: A Doctor Breaks Ranks about Being Sick in
America Otis Webb Brawley[21]
6.) Unaccountable: What Hospitals Won't Tell You and How
Transparency Can Revolutionize Health Care Martin Makary[22]
 10

***
November 19, 2017 - Additional wise advice from "The Doctor of
the Future" -

"Rather than running straight to the doctors office at the first sign
something might be off, take a moment to question any recent
lifestyle, diet or sleep changes that may have occurred. Use the
vast resources available online to figure out if youre simply
mineral deficient or stressed out. And, if you must visit a doctor,
dont forfeit your entire will to them ask questions and continue
to do research on what they propose you should be putting in
your body."

I would add "take a moment" to tell the truth regarding recent

shocks you experienced to someone whom you can be totally
honest with.
***********^***********
Notes:

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iatrogenesis#Psychology

[2]
http://www.truthquest2.com/introduction.htm

[3]
http://learninggnm.com/documents/sbs-intestinalcancer.html

[4] http://learninggnm.com/documents/last.html

[5] For certain Human Design types - "Any kind of pressure is

detrimental to your health. Take your time to make important
decisions and don't let anyone pressure you.":
http://humandesign.net/basic-concepts.html

[6] http://www.newmedicine.ca/statement.php
 11

[7] http://www.wakingtimes.com/2016/05/09/medical-errors-
now-3rd-leading-cause-death-time-new-approaches/?
utm_source=Waking+Times
+Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3344540d01-
RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_term=0_25f1e048c1-3344540d01
-54478225

[8] http://news.discovery.com/human/health/medical-error-third-
leading-cause-of-death-in-us-160504.htm

[9] "Conscious Living":

http://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/index.php/german-new-
medicine.html

[10] http://thesoakedbean.com/2017/01/10/3-ways-toward-
recovery-from-chronic-illness/

[11] http://www.yesmamm.net/doctor-caused-disease-and-death-
exposed.html

[12] http://www.nikigratrix.com/how-to-deal-with-cultural-energy-
vampires/

[13] http://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=2295931

[14] German New Medicine by Dr. Hamer

[15] http://www.bodyandsoulreconnection.com/your-power-to-
create-a-placebo-or-nocebo-effect/

[16] B****** Hammer Syndrome aka the shock conflict.

[17] https://www.amazon.com/Overdiagnosed-Making-People-
Pursuit-Health/dp/0807021997?utm_campaign=Too+Much
+Medical+Testing++%28LwZnZC
 12

%29&utm_medium=email&_ke=Y2hlZkB0aGVzZXRydXRocy5jb2
0%3D&utm_source=Dr.+Carolyn+Dean%27s+mailing+list

[18] https://www.amazon.com/Less-Medicine-More-Health-
Assumptions/dp/B0147L839C/ref=sr_1_1?utm_campaign=Too
+Much+Medical+Testing++%28LwZnZC
%29&_ke=Y2hlZkB0aGVzZXRydXRocy5jb20%3D&qid=1504531
033&utm_source=Dr.+Carolyn+Dean%27s+mailing
+list&s=books&utm_medium=email&sr=1-1&keywords=Less
+Medicine+More+Health+-+Gilbert+Welch&ie=UTF8

[19] https://www.amazon.com/Worried-Sick-Prescription-
Overtreated-America/dp/0807872334?utm_campaign=Too+Much
+Medical+Testing++%28LwZnZC
%29&utm_medium=email&_ke=Y2hlZkB0aGVzZXRydXRocy5jb2
0%3D&utm_source=Dr.+Carolyn+Dean%27s+mailing+list

[20] https://www.amazon.com/Selling-Sickness-Pharmaceutical-
Companies-Patients/dp/1553652177/ref=sr_1_1?
utm_campaign=Too+Much+Medical+Testing++%28LwZnZC
%29&_ke=Y2hlZkB0aGVzZXRydXRocy5jb20%3D&qid=1504531
080&utm_source=Dr.+Carolyn+Dean%27s+mailing
+list&s=books&utm_medium=email&sr=1-1&keywords=Selling
+Sickness%3A+How+the+Worlds+Biggest+Pharmaceutical
+Companies+are+Turning+Us+All+Into+Patients++Ray
+Moynihan&ie=UTF8

[21] https://www.amazon.com/How-We-Do-Harm-America/dp/
1250015766?utm_campaign=Too+Much+Medical+Testing++
%28LwZnZC
%29&utm_medium=email&_ke=Y2hlZkB0aGVzZXRydXRocy5jb2
0%3D&utm_source=Dr.+Carolyn+Dean%27s+mailing+list

[22] https://www.amazon.com/Unaccountable-Hospitals-
Transparency-Revolutionize-Health/dp/1608198383/
ref=sr_1_1_twi_pap_2?utm_campaign=Too+Much+Medical
 13

+Testing++%28LwZnZC
%29&_ke=Y2hlZkB0aGVzZXRydXRocy5jb20%3D&qid=15045311
15&utm_source=Dr.+Carolyn+Dean%27s+mailing
+list&s=books&utm_medium=email&sr=1-1&keywords=Unaccoun
table%3A+What+Hospitals+Wont+Tell+You+and+How
+Transparency+Can+Revolutionize+Health+Care+-+Martin
+Makary&ie=UTF8

[23] Carolyn Dean MD ND - The Doctor of the Future:

https://drcarolyndean.com/2017/11/medieval-medicine/?
utm_campaign=Medieval+Medicine%3F+%28MvXiZs
%29&utm_medium=email&_ke=Y2hlZkB0aGVzZXRydXRocy5jb2
0%3D&utm_source=Dr.+Carolyn+Dean%27s+mailing+list

[24] The definition may say: inadvertent however there are

plenty of doctors who consciously play the fear card in their
attempts to get the patient into a medical procedure. In any case
doctors know very well that a medical diagnosis can trigger
substantial fear in their patient. The question is do they care for
the patient whos fear has been triggered?

***
Also see: What is Healing? What is German New Medicine?:
https://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=1872660

***********^***********
Keywords:

iatrogenesis, shock conflict, prognosis, cancer, alternative

medicine, diagnosis, Colon Cancer, Rectal cancer, tumor,
important decisions, health, healing, new medicine, human
Design, liver cancer, tumor, belief, death-fright, DHS,
psychotherapeutic, resolution, Right to Life, Hippocratic oath,
Unalienable Right, Pursuit of Happiness, dyad communication