Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ariel.org
MBS 011 Ariel Ministries Digital Press
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1983, 2005 Ariel Ministries. All rights reserved. No part of this manuscript may be reproduced in any form, except in brief
quotation in a review or professional work, without written permission from the publishers.
Cover illustration by Olivier Melnick.
Email: Homeoffice@ariel.org www.ariel.org
Page 2
MBS 011 The Suffering Messiah of Isaiah 53
T
INTRODUCTION
This passage will be divided into five main sections: the paradox, the
source of the paradox, the text, clues to the interpretation of the text,
and the conclusion.
I. THE PARADOX
Anyone who sets himself to the task of seeking to know what the Old
Testament has to say about the coming of the Messiah soon finds
himself involved with a seeming paradox. At times, one even seems to
be faced with an outright contradiction, for the Jewish prophets gave
a twofold picture of the Messiah who was to come.
Thus there is the twofold picture the Jewish prophets gave of the
Messiah. For centuries past, during the formulation of the Talmud,
the rabbis made serious studies of messianic prophecies and
Page 3
MBS 011 The Suffering Messiah of Isaiah 53
Yosef or Messiah, the Son of Joseph. The second Messiah who would
then come following the first was termed Mashiach ben David or
Messiah, the Son of David. This One would raise the first Messiah
back to life and establish the Messianic Kingdom of peace on earth.
That the Old Testament presents these two lines of messianic
prophecy was something that all the early rabbis recognized. The Old
Testament never clearly states that there will be two Messiahs. In fact,
many of the paradoxical descriptions are found side by side in the
same passages in which, it seems, that only one person is meant.
Nevertheless, for the early rabbis, the Two Messiahs Theory seemed
to be the best answer.
One of the major sources from which the rabbis developed their
concept of the Suffering Messiah, the Son of Joseph, was Isaiah 53.
The present-day bone of contention regarding what the Old
Testament says about the Messiah centers on this chapter. The
passage speaks of the Servant of Jehovah. This Servant undergoes a
great deal of suffering, ending in death. The chapter goes on to state
that this suffering is a vicarious suffering, that the death is a
substitutionary death for sin. He is suffering and dying for the sins of
others. The passage goes on to indicate that this Servant is
resurrected. The bone of contention is not so much over what the
passage says, but of whom it speaks.
But to make the passage speak of the collective body of Israel seems
Page 4
MBS 011 The Suffering Messiah of Isaiah 53
In a book I wrote several years ago, titled Jesus was a Jew, I quote
source after source showing that the historical Jewish interpretation of
Isaiah 53 is that it speaks of the Messiah, not of the nation. In fact,
the first rabbi ever to interpret Isaiah 53 to speak of the nation and
not of an individual was Rashi, about A.D. 1100. I might add that he
was opposed in this interpretation by the majority of the rabbis of his
day and they continued to oppose that interpretation for centuries
after him. Historically speaking, it was not until the 1800s that the
national interpretation of Isaiah 53, instead of the messianic
interpretation, actually became the dominant view among the rabbis.
Before dealing with some specific details given in the text, several
things by way of introduction should be discussed.
There are four Servant passages. The first is found in Isaiah 42:1 4,
which spelled out the ministry of the Servant at His First Coming.
The third Servant passage is found in Isaiah 50:4-9 and deals with the
sufferings of the Servant, just short of His coming death.
One way of dividing the text is to see that verses 13-15 of chapter 52
Page 5
MBS 011 The Suffering Messiah of Isaiah 53
having already taken place. Finally, verses 10-12 give the theology of
the Suffering Servant.
For this study, the text will be divided into five basic strophes or
stanzas, with the theme given in each opening line. This is followed by
a summary of each strophe. The text itself should be able to help
determine whether the Suffering Servant is the individual Messiah or
the nation of Israel.
Page 6
MBS 011 The Suffering Messiah of Isaiah 53
On the contrary, verse 3 points out that the opposite was true. Instead
of drawing people to Him in general, He was despised and rejected of men;
NOTES
Page 7
MBS 011 The Suffering Messiah of Isaiah 53
Page 8
MBS 011 The Suffering Messiah of Isaiah 53
Verse 10 records how God was pleased to allow the Servant to suffer
and die. This was the means by which God was going to make the
atonement for the people. The death of the Servant was an offering
for the sins of the people. The ones who had gone astray and sinned
would now be forgiven on the basis of the death of the Servant for, by
His substitutionary death, He provided the atonement for the people.
God punished the Servant instead of the people, and thus the sins of
the people were atoned for. This verse further states that the Servant
will see his posterity, and His days will be prolonged. How can that be
if the Servant is killed? The only way this would be possible is by
means of resurrection. So the pleasure of the Lord, the verse concludes,
will continue to prosper in His hand, for He will live again because of His
Resurrection.
Verse 11 declares that God will be satisfied with the work of the
Servant. The Servant of Jehovah dies a substitutionary death for the
sins of the people. The question now is, Will God accept this
substitution? And the answer is, Yes. For God will see the sufferings
and death of the Servant and God's justice will be satisfied. This is the
meaning of the word propitiation. Therefore, God can make the
next statement: it is because of the Servant's vicarious suffering and
death that the righteous Servant will justify many. To justify means to
declare righteous. So the Servant, who suffered and died and is now
resurrected, will be able to make many righteous. The people who
were sinners and could do nothing because of the separation from
God will be able to be made righteous by the Servant. This verse
concludes by telling us how this is possible: the Servant bears their
sins. In other words, their sins are put on the Servant's account, and
the account is considered Paid In Full by the Servant's blood. So to
be justified in the knowledge of himself, for He will bear their sins.
thirdly, He actually bore the sin of many. For the many who are justified NOTES
and made righteous are made so only because He has put their sins on
His account. And fourthly, the Servant makes intercession and pleads to
God on behalf of the sinners.
Page 10
MBS 011 The Suffering Messiah of Isaiah 53
different category: HE, HIM, and HIS. HE is the One who is suffering
for US; HE is the One upon whom God is laying OUR sins; HE is the
NOTES
One who is going to die for OUR sins so that WE can have salvation
through HIM.
D. An Innocent Sufferer
The fourth clue lies in the fact that the Suffering Servant is presented
in the passage as an innocent sufferer (vv. 4-6, 8b, 9b). It is easy to see
how this can be true of the Messiah, but not of Israel. Moses and the
prophets never told Israel, You will suffer for being innocent. But
rather, You will suffer for your sins unless you repent and conform to
the revealed will of God. God punished Israel many times and in
various ways, and it was always because of sins. According to the
prophets, both the Babylonian Exile and the present-day Dispersion
were results of disobedience on the part of Israel to the revealed will
of God. This is in sharp contrast with the Suffering Servant, who is
portrayed as an innocent sufferer.
Page 11
MBS 011 The Suffering Messiah of Isaiah 53
Page 12
MBS 011 The Suffering Messiah of Isaiah 53
CONCLUSION
This, then, is the conflict over Isaiah 53. If one simply reads the
chapter as one would read any chapter of another book, no other
conclusion can be reached than that Isaiah speaks of an individual
person suffering for the sins of the Jewish people. And for centuries,
this was the only conclusion that Judaism ever had; they labeled the
Suffering Servant as the Messiah, the Son of Joseph. Later rabbinical
interpretation that made the Suffering Servant the personification of
Israel seemed more like an attempt to explain away rather than an
actual explanation of the passage. This chapter must be read without
prejudice and taken simply for what it is saying. It must not be
interpreted in any way that is only a defense against Christian
polemics, but only for what the content of the passage really is. The
traditional Jewish viewpoint is most in harmony with the simple
statements of the text itself, speaking of the sufferings of the Messiah
for the sins of Israel.A