Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Yutaka Ozeki
Mrs. Mann
AP Literature--Block 2
8 November 2017
A Wall to Protect us
Ive built a wall around me, never letting anybody inside and trying not to venture
outside myself (Haruki 9). We all have the kind of personal wall that we protect ourselves with
in order to avoid bad influences and to be ourselves. It is often wise to step outside of our barrier
and behave in a way that is acceptable to society, but it is important that our identity remains
within us. Murakami Harukis novel Kafka on the Shore builds on this idea of a wall of
protection to address the importance of individual identity even in the midst of socialization. By
illustrating the main character Kafka Tamura as a fifteen year-old boy who goes on a heros
journey to escape from the Oedipal prophecy set by his father, Murakami makes us think deeply
about ourselves as to how we hold our individual identity. Although the simplicity that would be
considered as a quality for a classic novel is lacking due to the ambiguity in the authors
message, the ambiguity creates several interpretations, provoking discussions to interpret the
authors message in unique ways as the novel is meaningful enough to be discussed. Along with
the qualitites of a universal theme of individual identity and the generation of multiple
perspectives, the various symbols that enrich the novel and illustrate the depth of the piece
Kafka on the Shore explores a universal theme of self-identity through Kafka, as a boy
who undergoes the heros journey by escaping from home in an attempt to find a meaning to his
life that is stuck in the Oedipal prophecy. The heros journey often functions as an important
Ozeki 2
aspect of a classic novel. It is used as a common template when writing a novel in which the
allows for an easier breakdown of the flow of the novel, because it allows us to identify the key
factors of what is happening on the main characters mission or journey. Kafka is a fifteen year-
old boy who escapes home and his father who he hates, and tries to live life by himself in an
entirely new place where he is determined to stay strong. Satoru Nakata, another main character
in the novel, is a seventy year-old man who has lost most of his mental faculties due to an
incident that happened during World War II. He wanders around his own neighborhood, helping
cat owners with his peculiar ability of being able to talk to cats. Although Kafka and Nakata are
portrayed as two completely different characters, they seem to be linked together and portrayed
as one combined character to complete the heros journey. Kafka sets out on a journey to find a
purpose in his own life that he feels is controlled by the oedipal prophecy. When he escapes
home, he is not alone but with his inner guardian in the form of Crow. Crow is considered to be
Kafkas own alter ego (Hmar 36), which often appears in Kafkas mind in order to teach him
lessons about life. By introducing the aspect of a heros journey, Haruki made it easier for
readers to interpret the flow of the novel. Through the interpretation, he allowed for readers to
follow Kafkas journey for self-identity. According to Dina Nabil, a scholar, Murakami usually
employs magical realistic techniques to "challenge and explore the concept of individual identity
in Japan to expose the steady of individual identity in members of the generation born
immediately after the Second World War" (Nabil). We can interpret that the existence of Crow
was to represent our own ego inside of us, who keeps us sane and remain with our own identity.
As Crow repeats several times the phrase of Kafka being the worlds toughest fifteen-year-old
(Murakami 5), it differentiates Kafka from the rest of the fifteen year-olds and keeps Kafka
Ozeki 3
focused on striving to survive. Through the existence of Crow, Murakami conveys the mentality
of individual identity we should hold inside of ourselves, in order to remain strong even in the
midst of socialization where people are expected to conform with the mass. Kafka mentions that
[he] could probably kill [his father] if [he] wanted to... But theres no way to erase the DNA
they passed down to me. If I want to drive that away Id have to get rid of me. Theres an omen
contained in that. A mechanism buried inside me (Murakami 11). Although we think that our
parents have nothing to do with our individual identity, they are the ones who have taught us
how to live. In Japan, where the author lives, children are aggressive towards their parens and
forget to appreciate their existence. Therefore, Murakami seems to be expressing that the DNA
that is passed down cannot be erased because our parents existence has constructed us and are
too important to get rid of. By presenting Kafka as a character who has a strong individuality yet
is confined by his own genes of his father, Murakami addresses the necessity of individual
identity in the midst of socialization and exposes the flaws of those who interpret self-identity as
Kafka on the Shore presents the interesting idea that everything is a metaphor, which
leads its readers to think deeply of its connection to the novel. The concept itself is introduced in
the novel when one of the characters, Oshimaa transgender librarian who helps Kafka by
providing answers to his life through messages contained in books he has read, addresses to
Kafka that Goethe presents the theory that everything is a metaphor (Murakami 107). Kafka
personally utilizes the knowledge from Oshima when he talks to Ms. Saekia female character
who Kafka falls in love with, although us readers are led to think of her as Kafkas mother, in
an attempt to have a relationship with her. While in a conversation with her, he claims that
metaphors help eliminate what separates [her] and him (Murakami 294). By envisioning that
Ozeki 4
everything is a metaphor, Kafka felt closer to Ms. Saeki. Murakami also presents the concept
through Nakatas side of the novel. In the chapters where Nakata serve as the main character,
readers are introduced to the metaphorical figure of Colonel Sanders, the Kentucky Fried
Chicken icon. Colonel Sanders mentions that God only exists in peoples minds. Especially in
Japan, Gods always been kind of a flexible concept to refer to God as a metaphor (Updike). In
the novel, Colonel Sanders emphasizes that he is a concept (Murakami 340), in order to
identify himself as a metaphor and to connect himself to his explanation of the concept of
everything being a metaphor. Just like how Colonel Sanders, God, can be a flexible concept and
just a metaphor, we can think of anything as a metaphor and we would not be incorrect.
Murakami leads readers into digging deep into detail after reading everything is a metaphor
(Murakami 107). They become conscious of everything that is mentioned in the novel because
they suspect that they are supposed to be a comparison to something else. Murakami successfully
creates a classic novel that persuades readers into not just reading at a surface level, but
and also utilizes the symbolism to create a differing meaning to the symbol.. As we can tell from
the two obvious worldwide icons of Johnnie Walker and Colonel Sanders, there seem to be
symbols that indicate something valuable. According to Djakaria and Limanta, two scholars who
focused on the deconstructive reading of the icons of Johnnie Walker and Colonel Sanders, both
of them have possessed features in which the icons are made for some certain purposes to be a
brand recognizable anywhere in the world that has survived economic convulsions, but
Murakami gives new traits to the icons as characters, which are the total opposite from the
positive meanings (Djakaria and Limanta 93-94). Although Murakami does not include the two
Ozeki 5
significant symbols with the same exact meanings to them from real life, he uses the extensive
symbols as a gateway to explaining different concepts that he think is important. By flipping the
meanings upside downfor Johnnie Walker he changes the original interpretation from by
drinking the whiskey one becomes civilized to it is the consumers who should be civilized first
before being able to consume the liquor, not that the liquor make one civilized. (Djakaria and
Limanta 96-97), and for Colonel Sanders turning the signified of providing the best service to
human being into making human being as a commodity (Djakaria and Limanta 100),
Murakami conveys the bad effects of alcohol due to Johnnie Walker, the alcohol icon, becoming
a mad man; and that Capitalism is bad because Colonel Sanders, representing Capitalism, uses
Just like how the two icons of Colonel Sanders and Johnnie Walker needs time for
interpretation, Kafka on the Shore is complex and could be confusing, yet is meaningful enough
Japanese site where he answered to several questions relating to the book, just like the one
Vintage Books created based on the interview they had with him. The fact that he received over
8,000 questions from readers signifies how curious he made readers and the ambiguity of the
message. Murakami replied to the ambiuity readers had by saying that what I concluded from
this exchange was that the key to understanding the novel lies in reading it multiple times. This
may sound self-serving, but its true... Kafka on the Shore contains several riddles, but there
arent any solutions provided. Instead several of these riddles combine, and through their
interaction the possibility of a solution takes shape. And the form this solution takes will be
different for each reader. (Knopf). Classics are mentioned to not require a second read.
However, readers can find new things if they return to a classic text. Kafka on the Shore does just
Ozeki 6
that, by leaving readers confused and provoking them to read once more to see if they had
misinterpreted some of the ideas present in the novel. A classic is what people deem as
interesting to read at least twice, and although not all of the readers might find the novel
interesting, they seek to read it once more because they are curious of the authors message.
Murakami makes Kafka on the Shore worthy to be called a classic, because it promotes constant
discussion on the messages present in the novel and does not settle with once interpretation,
Kafka on the Shore leads us into a fictional world of its own, yet embodies similarities to
our society that interests us and thus brings us into deep interpreations of the novel. The
universal themes of self-identity and mental disability raises questions in our own society, and
allows us readers to reflect on our own attitude towards these problems. By making the novel
difficult to interpret with a single read because of its extensive use of symbolism and complex
ideas, Murakami Haruki provokes interest in readers to read in depth and discuss with others on
the meaning of the novel. Kafka on the Shore is a classic that we can read and wonder about, due
to its strong impression from the conflicts in the novel and the ambiguity in the authors
message.
Ozeki 7
Works Cited
Djakaria, Jane and Liem Limanta. "Haruki Murakami's Deconstructive Reading of the
Myth of Johnnie Walker and Colonel Sanders in Kafka on the Shore." Scholarly Journal,
vol. 14, no. 2, Dec. 2012, pp. 93-101. ProQuest, doi: 10.9744/kata.14.2.87-96. Accessed
19 October 2017.
http://www.tjells.com/article/580_Rodi%20Larammawii%20Hmar.pdf. Accessed 19
October 2017.
Knopf, Alfred. "Questionss for Murakami about Kafka on the Shore." Vintage Books,
n.d. http://www.harukimurakami.com/q_and_a/questions-for-haruki-murakami-about-
Nabil, Dina. Magical Realism and Identity in Murakami's "Kafka on the Shore."
Academia, n.d.
www.academia.edu/6963738/Magical_Realism_and_Identity_in_Murakamis_Kafka_on_
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2005/01/24/subconscious-tunnels. Accessed 19
October 2017
Ozeki 8