Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 10

See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304627889

Chitosan and Silver Sulfadiazine


Immobilization onto Silicone Membrane for
Wound Dressing...

Article in Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial Organs June 2016

CITATION READS

1 77

5 authors, including:

Elham Babaie Hamid Mirzadeh


Rice University Amirkabir University of Technology
12 PUBLICATIONS 19 CITATIONS 51 PUBLICATIONS 325 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Atefeh Solouk
Amirkabir University of Technology
40 PUBLICATIONS 279 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

see my resume please. View project

Next generation cardiovascular implants View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Elham Babaie on 30 June 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs, 30(1), 32-40 (2016) http://www.sbaoi.org/tibao

Original Article

Chitosan and Silver Sulfadiazine Immobilization onto


Silicone Membrane for Wound Dressing Applications

Elham Babaiea,b,*, Hamid Mirzadehb, Hamid Keshvarib, Atefeh Soloukb, Azadehsadat Hashemi Doulabib
a
Department of Bioengineering, University of T oledo, P.O. Box: 43606/ 3390, Toledo, Ohio
b
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of T echnology (Tehran Polytechnic),
P.O. Box: 15875/4413, T ehran, Iran

Received 12 January 2016; Accepted 7 June 2016; Published online 10 June 2016

Bilayer wound dressing with antibacterial capability was prepared via two-step oxygen plasma treatment using
polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and chitosan incorporated with silver sulfadiazine (AgSD) for treating acute burn
wounds. An AgSD-incorporated chitosan membrane was immobilized onto PDMS via acrylic acid (AAc) as a spacer. To
reach the maximum immobilization of chitosan and antibiotic of AgSD, different treatment times were applied to
obtain a maximum grafting density of AAc. The time of 35 s and 180 s were chosen as plasma pretreatment time and
plasma polymerization time, respectively. Physical characterization of the prepared wound dressing via ATR-FTIR,
SEM, contact angle and inductively couple plasma methods confirmed the immobilization of chitosan incorporated
with AgSD. The composition with maximum graft density of spacer was chosen as an optimum formulation for further
studies due to suitable surface properties. Biocompatibility and antibacterial assesses were also performed, demonstrating
this new type of bilayer wound dressing incorporated with AgSD possessing graft density ca. 87 g.cm-2 may be effective
in the treatment of infected wounds by promoting cell responses and decreasing the risk of infection.

Introduction acceleration of re-epithelialization and regeneration of normal


skin that minimizes scar formation in wounded areas [5-7]. In
Autograft, allograft, or synthetic skin substitutes are of different artificial skin approach, covalently immobilization of sublayer
ways for burn wound treatment. Due to the antigenicity or the like chitosan onto skin layer like PDMS is the efficient and
limitation of donor sites, polymeric wound dressing could reliable method reported earlier [8-10]. In order to immobilize,
obviate these limitations. Therefore, to protect a skin defect synthetic polymers of skin layer (such as PDMS) often
from infections and dehydration in the intervening period required selective modification to introduce specific functional
between hospitalization and grafting, temporary closure of a groups of spacer like AAc to the surface for the binding of
wound with the use of biopolymeric material has become biomolecules [11-13]. Graft polymerization is an attractive
ordinary recently [1, 2]. Among the wound dressings, bilayer way in which a desired monomer can be grafted onto the skin
artificial skin or wound dressing composed of a dense top layer before immobilization step. Among the common methods
layer (skin layer) and a lower porous layer (sublayer) may be in graft co-polymerization, the two-step plasma (TSP) graft
an excellent and promising one [2]. The skin layer such as co-polymerization is a prominent and efficient technique
polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) which possess physiological developed by our group [3]. In this TSP technique, a polymeric
inertness, low toxicity, low modulus and good mechanical substrate treated with plasma immersed in monomer solution,
properties can prevent bacterial penetration and dehydration and then undergoes a second step of plasma treatment that
of the wound surface [3, 4] while the sublayer such as chitosan leads to co-polymerization of preadsorbed monomer. This
is designed to achieve high adsorption for fluid drainage of the technique possess benefits like lower graft polymerization time
wound and infiltration by fibroblasts for tissue regeneration. length, no controlling requirement on pH of monomer solution,
Chitosan is well known for accelerating the healing of wounds higher grafting amount, and producing more homogeneous
in humans while stimulated the migration of morphology and topology of the grafted surface compared to
polymorphonuclear (PMN) and mononuclear cells due to the other grafting method including one step plasma or laser
possessing special functional groups. This suggests the technique.

*
Coresponding author: Dr. Elham Babaie;
Besides of promoting cellular function, fluid drainage and good
E-mail: Elham.babaie@rockets.utoledo.edu mechanical properties required for potentially ideal wound

32
Chitosan and Silver Sulfadiazine Immobilization onto Silicone Membrane for Wound Dressing Applications

dressing, risk of infection beneath the dressing is another issue previous works [3, 17, 18]. Briefly, Nano-RF-PC (Diener
associated with dressing [14, 15]. Infectious organisms Electronic GmbH, Germany) apparatus was utilized for both
preferentially invade wounds beneath dressing materials, leading plasma pretreatment and copolymerization of silicone films.
to serious infections. This requires removal of the wound dressing The films were placed on the bottom of the reaction chamber,
and excision of cutaneous wounds. Thus, wound dressings or which was evacuated to 6 10-1 mbar, and pretreated with 60
artificial skins containing antibiotic agents have been developed W of oxygen plasma up to 35 second. Then, the plasma
to decrease wound infection, and the laborious replacement of pretreated films were immersed in aqueous monomer solutions
wound dressings that can avoid damage to the newly formed with the given ratios of AAc for up to 30 min at room
epithelium caused by replacement [2]. In the present study, we temperature, and dried at the same temperature. The dried
developed a bilayer wound dressing that consists of an upper plasma pretreated silicone films with a preadsorbed layer of
skin layer of PDMS and a porous sublayer of chitosan that reactive monomer of AAc on their surfaces were placed into the
have the ability to control the release of antibiotic agent. Silver reaction chamber for plasma graft copolymerization for up to 3
sulfadiazine (AgSD), an effective and widely used antibiotic min. The time of treatment was chosen based on our previous
agent for burn injuries in humans [16], is used as an antibacterial results to obtain maximum graft density (GD) as summarized
drug for the treatment of infected wounds. Acrylic acid (AAc) in Table 1 [3]. Then, by using Soxhlet extraction in distilled
employed as a spacer to covalently immobilized chitosan onto water for 72 h the residual monomers and homopolymers were
silicone. AAc was simultaneously grafted onto the surface of removed.
PDMS films using two-step oxygen plasma treatment (TSPT).
Then the mixture of chitosan/AgSD was immobilized onto AAc Determination of GD
grafted silicone. The in vitro biocompatibility, antibacterial The carboxyl group density on the PAAc-g-PDMS surface was
activity and physical characterization of bilayer wound dressing measured by a colorimetric method using toluidine blue O
are evaluated. To the best of our knowledge, there is no report staining [13]. Grafted samples were immersed in an aqueous
in the literature to discuss about bilayer chitosan/AgSD solution of toluidine blue (5 10-4 M) for 6 h at 30 C. Then
immobilized onto AAc grafted silicone and the properties as a samples were rinsed with an aqueous solution of NaOH (5 10-
potential film for wound dressing applications. 3
M) in order to remove uncomplexed dye. A standard series was
done with seven different concentrations between 4 10-6 and
Materials and methods 5 10-5 M, which allows us to determine the concentration of
decomplexed toluidine blue using the molar extinction coefficient.
The silicone rubber, Silastic MDX4-4210 medical grade
Decomplexation of toluidine blue occurs by immersing samples
elastomer was purchased from Dow Corning Corp (Midland,
in an aqueous solution of acetic acid (50 vol.%) for 24 h.
MI). The procedure of preparing silicone film was described
Concentration of decomplexed toluidine blue is measured via
elsewhere [3]. The AAc was bought from Fluka (Buchs,
UV-VIS spectrophotometry (Shimudza, 1650PC, Japan) at 633
Switzerland). AAc was redistilled under vacuum condition to
nm. A different formulation of silicone plasma treated film was
make it free from the inhibitor [3]. N-(3-dimethyl aminopropyl)
shown in Table 1.
N2-ethyl carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) was purchased from
Merck and used for activating COOH groups on the AAc grafted Immobilization of CS/AgSD
silicone. Chitosan (MW = 400KD and 85% deacetylated) was
obtained from Sigma Aldrich, USA. Silver sulfadiazine was PAAc-g-PDMS films were placed in 10 mg.mL-1 of an aqueous
obtained by Iran Najoo lab. Other reagents were reagent grades solution of (EDC) at room temperature for 2 h to activate
and used without any further purification. carboxyl groups in the grafted PAAc chains. The activated PAAc-
g-PDMS films were immersed into CS and AgSD in 0.5% (v/v)
Plasma treatment step lactic acid solution (Table 2) at 4 C for 24 h to allow the
activated carboxyl groups in the grafted PAAc chains and amino
TSPT were carried out onto silicone samples according to our groups in the CS to form covalent bonds. During immobilization
step, the pH of CS solution was 3.0. The AgSD concentration
in CS solution was 1% (w/w) (in relation to CS mass). Silver
sulfadiazine concentration was chosen based on previous study
that showed a solubility threshold of AgSD in CS solution [19].
All the PDMS-g-PAAc-CS/AgSD samples were rinsed with
distilled water many times and then the samples were stored in
desiccators at 4 C before use.

Inductively couple plasma methods (ICP)

To evaluate the presence of AgSD in wound dressing, silver


concentrations were measured in a immobilization solution
containing only CS and AgSD (Table 2) before and after soaking
PDMS-g-AAc (Max sample refer to Table 1) into the solution
by inductively coupled plasma (ICP-OES, VISTA-PRO-
VARIAN) method. This ICP apparatus has 0.06 ppm silver
assay accuracy. The difference in silver concentration of the
immobilization solution before and after of immobilizing step
was considered as AgSD loading in wound dressing film.
Figure 1: The Change of graft amount (g.cm-2) during
Contact angle and surface tension measurements
oxygen plasma treatment time 60 W, 6 10-1 mbar (n= 3,
meanSD) The static contact angles of the untreated film, PAAc-g-PDMS

33
E. Babaie, H. Mirzadeh, H. Keshvari, A. Solouk, A.H. Doulabi

Figure 2: ATR-FTIR of (a) unmodified silicone (control), (b) silicone grafted AAc and immobilized CS/AgSD (Max-g-
CS/AgSD) at 60 W and 0.6 mbar

Figure 3: SEM micrographs of (a) unmodified silicone (control), (b) oxygen plasma treated silicone (3 min, 60 W, 0.6
mbar) (c) PDMS-g-AAc (Max, 60 W, 0.6 mbar) (d) Max-g-CS/AgSD; scale bar 6 m

34
Chitosan and Silver Sulfadiazine Immobilization onto Silicone Membrane for Wound Dressing Applications

films and also immobilized with CS/AgSD were measured by


the sessile drop method using Kruss G10 goniometer (Kruss
GmbH, Germany) contact angle measurement equipment. A 5
L double distilled water droplet was used for each point and
the contact angle was recorded after 1 min [13]. The average
values of three measurements on different points of each sample
were recorded. Moreover, double distilled water and
diiodomethane attributed to polar and disperse parts of the
sample were used to calculate surface tensions using Owens-
Wendt equation [20].

ATR-FTIR measurement

Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared


spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) was used in order to confirm PAAc
and CS grafting onto silicone plasma treated film in comparison
with untreated film. A KRS5 prism (Bruker Optik GmbH,
Figure 4: SEM cross-sectional micrograph of Max-g-CS/ Germany) FTIR spectrometer was applied with incident contact
AgSD, magnification 200, scale bar 150 m angle 45 and progressive scanning range from 4000 cm-1 to 600

Figure 5: Cell adhesion, onto: (a) untreated silicone (b) Min-g-CS/AgSD (c) Med-g-CS/AgSD (d) Max-g-CS/AgSD
(e) tissue culture plate polystyrene 400 and number of cell adhered vs GD, n=3, meanSD, Pvalue compared to
untreated silicone

35
E. Babaie, H. Mirzadeh, H. Keshvari, A. Solouk, A.H. Doulabi

cm-1. each well, keeping one well as a control without any sample,
and then maintained them in the incubator for 48 h. The samples
Scanning electron microscopy were removed from the well, washed with phosphate buffer
saline solution twice, placed on a glass slide and fixed with
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed on gold- ethanol and then stained with 5 % Giemsa (Sigma-Aldrich). All
coated samples using a Polaron sputter coater. A Cambridge S- the samples were air-dried and then cover slips were mounted
360 SEM operating typically at an accelerating voltage of 10 on them. The samples were examined by an inverted light
kV in secondary electron mode to ensure a suitable image microscope (E200, Nikon, Japan).
resolution was employed for morphology measurements of
untreated film, plasma treated film, PAAc-g-PDMS film and Antibacterial activity
also immobilized samples.
The quantitative antimicrobial activities of the unloaded and
In vitro assay AgSD loaded films were determined using a viable cell count
method. The results were presented as surviving bacteria and
The immobilized silicone films with different PAAc graft population reduction in logarithmic scale on the test pathogenic
densities were immersed into sterilized saline for 12 h just before bacterium. All film samples (CS and Max-g-CS/AgSD) were cut
cell culture. The mouse fibroblast cells (L929) were gently gifted into square pieces (1.5x1.5 cm2) and placed in individual sterile
from National Cell Bank, Pasteur Institute of Iran. The cells flasks containing the test bacteria, Escherichia coli; E. coli (ATCC
were maintained in RPMI-1640 growth medium (Sigma Chemical 8739) at a concentration of 5.2x106 CFU.mL-1 in the Nutrient
Company, St. Louis, USA), supplemented with 10% heat- Broth solution (Merck, Germany). The inoculated broth was
inactivated fetal bovine serums (Gibco, BRL), 100 IU mL-1 adjusted photometrically at 600 nm to a cell density equivalent
streptomycin. A routine subculture was employed to prepare to approximately 0.5 McFarland standards (1.5108 CFU/mL).
the cell line [21]. The cells were incubated in a humidified The suspensions were then diluted in Nutrient Broth solution
atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 C. After one week incubation, the to reach the final concentration of about 106 CFU.mL-1. The
monolayer was harvested by trypsinization. The samples were tubes were kept in an incubated shaker at 37C and 100 rpm.
placed into each well using a multi-well plate with 5 mL of cell During the incubation, the cell viability count of the medium
suspension with 4105 cell.mL-1 concentration and seeded in was measured every hour for 6 h. At the intervals, 1 mL of the

Figure 6: SEM micrographs showing fibroblast culture for 2 days on the surface (a) untreated silicone (control) and
plasma treated silicone including (b) Min-g-CS/AgSD; (c) Med-g-CS/AgSD; (e) Max-g-CS/AgSD

36
Chitosan and Silver Sulfadiazine Immobilization onto Silicone Membrane for Wound Dressing Applications

solution was diluted with 9 mL of sterilized distilled water, and of untreated silicone and surface modified silicone films were
decimal serial dilution was performed and repeated. Then 100 summarized in Table 3 as water contact angle and surface tension.
L of the solution was taken out and quickly spread on the The contact angle of silicone surface decreased due to grafting
surface of the plate containing nutrient agar (Merck, Germany). of PAAc and also immobilizing of CS/AgSD onto surface of
After inoculation, the plates were kept at 37C, and the colonies plasma treated silicone. These phenomena could be associated
were counted after 24 h. The number of colonies on each plate with introducing hydrophilic groups such as carboxyl and amine
was counted and reported as CFU.mL-1. An inoculum of cell functional groups onto surface of the silicone film. The presence
suspension in a flask with no film sample was used as a control. of these functional groups may possibly improve the
The population reduction of the test organism were calculated hydrophilicity of biomaterials surface and suggest additional
using equation (1) [22]: interactions with water molecules that influence the wettability
of the films. As presented in Table 3, the more increase in
Log population reduction = Log cell count of control - Log plasma treatment time, the more decrease in contact angle,
survivor count on sample (1) demonstrating that these materials have good hydrophilicity
thereby they are suitable for cell supporting [23]. Previous
Statistical Analysis studies revealed that the fibrobroblast cells show maximum
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and linear regression were the adhesion to the surface of materials with contact angle in the
main statistical tools used for data analysis. The unpaired range of 60and 80 [24]. Thus, the as-prepared membranes
students t-tests were used for all statistical analyses. Results have suitable surface hydrophilicity for effective contribution
are expressed as meanstandard deviation (SD). in cellular activity. Changes in the surface tensions of the samples
are also presented in Table 3. More GD of AAc caused the more
Results and Discussion amount of CS immobilization which was reported earlier [8].
According to the results, grafting of hydrophilic monomer (AAc)
Determination of graft density (GD)

The AAc grafting onto silicone films was carried out to develop
a surface which is carrying a high density of carboxyl groups.
The overall process of AAc grafting through TSPT involved the
pretreatment of silicone film with oxygen plasma and subsequent
exposure to AAc solution. Produced polar groups (hydro
peroxide radicals) on the surface of chemically inert silicone due
to plasma pretreatment helped it out to physically react with
hydrophilic monomer (i.e. AAc) via hydrogen bonding, and the
produced peroxide groups may act as initiators in
copolymerization step. We chose a different pretreatment time
and the polymerization time of plasma to produce optimum
conditions in order to get the maximum amount of GD by
introducing maximum peroxides on the surface. Peroxides are
known to be the species responsible for initiating the graft
copolymerization when silicone reacts with AAc [13]. In the
next step, the dried plasma pretreated silicone films with a
preadsorbed layer of AAc monomer on their surfaces were placed
into the plasma reaction chamber for plasma graft
copolymerization. During propagation step of the plasma
copolymerization, the preadsorbed AAc react with radicals,
which create as a result of plasma treatment, and graft onto the
surface of the film until the copolymerization reaction
terminates. In fact, before the second step of plasma treatment
co-polymerization would not occur as also reported earlier [3].
The amount of grafted copolymer was sensibly affected by
pretreatment time length and the polymerization time length.
The relationship between the amount of grafted copolymer per
square centimeter and plasma pretreatment duration and
polymerization time is plotted in Fig. 1. As shown in Fig. 1
with increasing plasma treatment time the amount of GD
increased from 28.10510.147 g.cm-2 for the Min sample to
32.2999.163 g.cm-2 for the Med sample, and 86.96910.634
g.cm-2 about the Max sample. Based on results of our previous
study, there is an optimum t in treatment time. Further increment
above optimum point affects unfavorably the amount of GD.
This can be explained by the fact that further increase in time
causes plasma etching rather than co-polymerization [3].
Figure 7: Survival of E. coli (Log10 CFU.mL1) during 6 h
Surface wettability and surface tension exposure to CS and Max-g-CS/AgSD film loaded with
The contact angle test is used to obtain hydrophilic or AgSD, (a). Population reduction of E. coli (Log10 CFU.
hydrophobic surface properties. The changes in hydrophilicity mL1) during 6 h exposure to CS and Max-g-CS/AgSD

37
E. Babaie, H. Mirzadeh, H. Keshvari, A. Solouk, A.H. Doulabi

Table 1: AAc grafted PDMS via TSPT with variable process time
with fixed power of 60 (W) and AAc concentration 30% (v/v)

and hydrophilic group (CS/AgSD) onto the surface of silicone Immobilization of CS/AgSD solution onto the surface of PDMS-
films increased the surface tension from 22.670.32 to g-AAc changes the surface morphology of silicone which is
40.351.28 (n= 3, p < 0.005). On the other hand, p (polar part grafted by PAAc (Fig. 3 (c, d)). The cross-section of the grafted
of surface tension) also significantly increased for untreated layer was observed in SEM micrographs (Fig. 4). According to
silicone and PDMS-g-AAc-g-CS/AgSD with maximum amount Fig. 4 the thickness of the grafted layers was directly depend on
of GD, respectively, indicating an increment in the polar groups grafted amount. This statement suggests that an increase in the
existing on the surface. grafted amount lead to increase the thickness of the grafted
layer. As shown in Fig. 4, cross section of the grafted film is
ATR-FTIR spectra about 5 m thickness, which is comparable with what already
published [3].
The presence of the grafted AAc and CS was confirmed by
comparing the ATR-FTIR spectra of unmodified and modified ICP method
silicone film (Fig. 2). A peak at 1715 cm-1 was observed in the
spectrum of the Max-g-Cs/AgSD sample (Table 2) that was The presence of AgSD drug which is known as an antibacterial
due to the grafted carboxyl groups (C=O) onto the silicone agent in the wound dressing was confirmed via ICP methods.
surface in comparison with unmodified silicone (Fig. 2 (a, b)). Silver sulfadiazine was dissolved in CS and lactic acid solution.
The two characteristic absorption bands of CS appearing at AgSD bonded with CS and produced chelate structure with CS
consisted of two bands (medium intensity) at 1645 cm-1 and [25, 26]. Chitosan contains NH2 functional groups which makes
1542 cm-1; corresponds to the grafted amine groups of CS (amide it capable of binding with silver. The Max-g-CS/AgSD membrane
I and amide II) onto the surface of Max-g-CS/AgSD (Fig. 2 (a, has 2.5 ppm AgSD content at film with 1 cm x 2 cm.
b)) [8]. However, the intensity of amide band at 1645 cm-1 was
lowered that could not be detected in FTIR spectra likely due Cell culture and microscopy images
to adsorption of Ag+. In the adsorption process amino groups
Affinity of cells for adhesion to the surface is an excellent
become protonated resulted in changing the intensity of amide
indication for studying of cytocompatibility of biomaterials.
band. The presence of CH2OH groups of polysaccharide of
The effects of the three different PAAc densities grafted onto
chitosan is attributed to the peak at 1450 cm-1 which is also
silicone surface and immobilized with CS and AgSD were
another site of Ag+ sorption [25, 26] while the intensity is very
quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated on cell adhesion, and
low due to sorption.
are shown in Fig. 5 (a-f). The mean number of cells cultured on
SEM images different surfaces was quantified by Image Pro Plus software
(version 6.0.0.260). As shown in Fig. 5 with increasing GD of
Surface morphology of control and modified silicone was PAAc to increasing treatment time onto the surface of silicone
evaluated using SEM micrographs of surface of the films as immobilization of CS and silver sulfadiazine, the more
illustrated in Fig. 3. SEM micrographs of sample indicated that hydrophilic group such as carboxyl and amine group were
oxygen plasma pretreatment made the surface of silicone became introduced onto the surface of wound dressing, and the more
cleaner and smoother due to the plasma etching effect since cells were attached as consequently. It is known that
small molecules and occasional fragments which were attached hydrophilicity property strongly correlates with protein
onto the surface were removed. Furthermore, some cracks, which adsorption, and also cell adhesion. It was suggested that
are shown in Fig. 3 (a, b) could be attributed to the silica-like hydrophilic substrates influence adsorption of serum proteins
layer [3]. However, by grafting PAAc onto silicone plasma in the quality, amount, and conformation that favors adhesion
treated film, the surface of silicone became rougher in comparison and subsequent growth [27]. Those factors cause more cell
with control and oxygen plasma treated silicone (Fig. 3 (c)). adhesion on hydrophilic surfaces. In our work, according to
Table 3, the Max-g-CS/AgSD with the lowest amount of water
contact angle ( = 63 6.12) resulted in the most number of
adhering cells which was depicted in Fig. 5 (d). This formulation
Table 2: Silicone grafted with AAc and immobilized with showed the best behaviour; however, there is a less significant
CS and AgSD mixture difference in cell number between control and Min-g-CS/AgSD
and Med-g-CS/AgSD samples (p <0.05) (Fig. 5 (a, b, c)) in
comparison with the Max-g-CS/AgSD (p <0.005). On the other
hand, after 48 h of fibroblast culture, dense cellular monolayer
covered the Max-g-CS/AgSD samples which are similar to the
tissue culture polystyrene plate; although, the morphology of
38
Chitosan and Silver Sulfadiazine Immobilization onto Silicone Membrane for Wound Dressing Applications

Table 3: Surface tension and water contact angle of untreated silicone, PDMS-g-AAc and Min-g-AAc-g-CS/AgSD,
Med-g-AAc-g-CS/AgSD, Max-g-AAc-g-CS/AgSD

n = 3, meanSD, *p < 0.005 compared to untreated silicone

cells in contact with the Max-g-CS/AgSD sample is more conical bacteria [25]. To monitor the effectiveness of the cumulative
than those in tissue culture polystyrene plate (Fig. 5 (d, e)). antibiotic agent release from the films as wound dressings,
The Max-g-CS/AgSD showed greater tendency for entering into antimicrobial activity of CS films and CS loaded with AgSD
a rapid proliferative growth phase, build up critical cellcell were quantitatively evaluated. The surviving bacteria and
interactions and grow to confluence on the membranes. population reduction of the films are depicted in Fig. 7 (a,b). As
mentioned in the standard method, at least a 1 Log reduction of
For finding better insight regarding the state of adhered cells, bacterial load is required to claim antibacterial property [29].
the morphology of fixed cells was investigated with SEM. Fig. All films inhibited the growth of this test strain and reduced the
6 shows the typical SEM micrographs of the adhered cells on number of E. coli by approximately at least 3 Log CFU.mL1
the PAAc-g-PDMS immobilized with CS and AgSD compared comparing to the positive control at each interval. The AgSD-
with the unmodified silicone. Anchorage-dependent cells such loaded CS film with maximum GD (Max sample) exhibited higher
as fibroblast need to adhere in order to proliferate [28]. antibacterial activity than that of CS film against E. coli. The
CS-AgSD could kill most of the bacteria within 6 h, whereas;
As depicted in Fig. 6 (a), the carboxylic acid functional groups the CS film was bacteriostatic on the bacteria concentration of
of PDMS-g-PAAC had a negative effect on the adhesion, about 5.2106 CFU.mL-1. By comparison of CS-AgSD films to
spreading of fibroblast cells, while the amino groups of chitosan the control without films, a decrement of >7 log cycles after 6 h
immobilized on the surfaces, showed better adhesion, spreading of cultivation was observed. In the presence of the AgSD-loaded
(Fig. 6 (b,c,d)). Fortunately, the fibbroblast cells were grown CS films, high bacterial inoculations of 5.2106 CFU.mL-1 were
properly in all chitosan immobilized samples. They were flat decreased by 99.99% after 1 h and this decrement will continue
and elongated with spindle-shaped morphology on the surface to 6 h. It is reported that a slow AgSD releasing rate from the
of the immobilized membranes confirming their excellent ability designed wound dressing allows for better trapping of silver in
to support cell growth and proliferation. While, the cells in the wound than can be achieved with a traditional cream. It also
Med-g-CS/AgSD show more cytoplasm extension comparing reduces the potentially cytotoxicity caused by silver [2].
with Min-g-CS/AgSD whereas the round cells can be seen onto Penetration of Ag through cell wall of bacteria, possibly causes
the surface of untreated silicone. The Max-g-CS/AgSD sample DNA loses its replication ability and denaturation of cellular
presented the best results among treated membranes (Fig. 6 proteins that is one mechanism for antibacterial effect of Ag
(d)). Surface properties, especially surface energy have great [25].
effect on the type of protein adsorption and also their
orientation. Protein adsorption is a determining step for the Conclusion
first phase of cell attachment and further control of cell
morphology, as well as their proliferation capacity. In addition, Plasma functionalized surfaces of PDMS with different surface
it has been proved that since polar and disperse components of COOH density used successfully for covalent immobilization
surface energy is a key factor for interfacial interaction, an of CS and AgSD to obtain a specific cell response and
optimal distribution of polar and disperse components of antibacterial activity by enhancing the hydrophilicity of surfaces.
surface energy should be reached [28]. As can be seen from the The positive effect of the increasing plasma treatment time was
surface energy results (Table 3), the Max-g-CS/AgSD samples confirmed by a successful fibroblast response with respect to
have more amounts of cell attachment, more elongated fibroblast film with a maximum grafting density of AAc that showed high
cells and large pseudopodia-like structure, and also it can be cell adhesion properties and also the most cytoplasmic extension.
assumed increasing silver ion concentration has no adverse effect The presence of AgSD significantly improved the antibacterial
on cell response in all modified samples. activity of the wound dressing compared to CS film. The findings
of this study are expected to be promising antibacterial wound
Antibacterial activity dressing for burn treatment.
Using wound dressing membranes with promising antibacterial Acknowledgement
activity boosts their performance of protection of wounded
area from bacteria likley provide faster healing. By close The authors gratefully acknowledge the Iran national science
inspection of antibacterial dressing materials available in the foundation for financial support and also wish to thank to Dr.
market, silver is popular as a powerful broad spectrum Morteza Daliri from National Institute of Genetic Engineering
antimicrobial agent to control infection of the eyes, burns, acute and Biotechnology for his helps in cell culture tests.
and chronic wounds. For instance, silver containing wound
dressings were found to kill gram-negative bacteria gram-positive
39
E. Babaie, H. Mirzadeh, H. Keshvari, A. Solouk, A.H. Doulabi

References 15. E.G . Nascimento, T. B. M. Sampio. E. G. do Nascimento, A.


C. Medeiros, E. P. de Azevedo, Evaluation of chitosan gel
1. F.-L. Mi, S.-S. Shyu, Y.-B. Wu, S.-T. Lee, J.-Y. Shyong, and R.- with 1% silver sulfadiazine as an alternative for burn wound
N. Huang, Fabrication and characterization of a sponge-like treatment in rats, Acta Cirrgica Brasileira, 24, 460 (2009).
asymmetric chitosan membrane as a wound dressing, Biomater, 16. C.L. Fox, Silver sulfadiazine for control of burn wound
22, 165-173 (2001). infections, Int. Surg, 60, 275 (1975).
2. Y.-B. Wu, F-.L Mi, S.-S Shyuc, A.-C. Chaod, and C.-C. Su, J.-Y. 17. A. Solouk, B. G. Cousins, F. Mirahmadi, H. Mirzadeh, M. R. J.
Lai, Asymmetric chitosan membranes prepared by dry/wet Nadoushan, M. A. Shokrgozar, et al., Biomimetic modified
phase separation: a new type of wound dressing for controlled clinical-grade POSS-PCU nanocomposite polymer for bypass
antibacterial release, J. Membr. Sci, 212, 237-254 (2003). graft applications: A preliminary assessment of endothelial
3. H. Mirzadeh. A. Karkhaneh, A. R. Ghaffariyeh, Simultaneous cell adhesion and haemocompatibility, Mater. Sci. Eng. C,
graft copolymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and 46, 400-408 (2015).
acrylic acid onto polydimethylsiloxane surfaces using a two- 18. A. Solouk, H. Mirzadeh, M. A. Shokrgozar, M. Solati-Hashjin,
step plasma treatment, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 105, 2208- S. Najarian, , and A. M. Seifalian, Optimization of acrylic
2217 (2007). acid grafting onto POSS-PCU nanocomposite using response
4. H. Mirzadeh. D. Fallahi, M. T. Khorasani, Physical, mechanical, surface methodology, Iran. Biomed. J, 15, 6-14 (2011).
and biocompatibility evaluation of three different types of 19. E. P. Azevedo, T. D. P. Saldanha, M. V. M. Navarro, A. C.
silicone rubber, J. Appl. Polym.Sci, 88, 2522-2529, (2003). Medeiros, M. F. Ginani, and F. N. Raffin, Mechanical
5. E. B. Denkbas, E. ztrk, N. zdemi, K. Keeci, and M. A. properties and release studies of chitosan films impregnated
Ergn, EGF loaded chitosan sponges as wound dressing with silver sulfadiazine, J. Appl. Polym. Sci, 102, 3462-3470
material, J. Bioact. Compat. Polym, 18, 177-190 (2003). (2006).
6. A. D. Sezer, F. Hatpoglu, E. Cevher, Z. Ourtan, A. L. Ba, and 20. D. K. Owens, R. C. Wendt, J. Appl. Polym. Sci, 13, 1741
J. Akbua, Chitosan film containing fucoidan as a wound (1969)
dressing for dermal burn healing: preparation and in vitro/in 21. M. Farhadi, H. Mirzadeh, A. Solouk, A. Asghari, M. Jalessi, H.
vivo evaluation, AAPS. Pharm.Sci.Tech, 8, Article 39 (2007). Ghanbari, et al., Collagen-immobilized patch for repairing
7. F.-L. Mi, Y.-B. Wu. S.-S. Shyu, J.-Y. Schoung, Y.-B. Huang, Y.- small tympanic membrane perforations: In vitro and in vivo
H. Tsai, J.-Y. Hao, Control of wound infections using a bilayer assays, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 100A, 549-553 (2012).
chitosan wound dressing with sustainable antibiotic delivery, 22. A. Hashemi Doulabi, H. Mirzadeh, M. Imani, and N. Samadi,
J. Biomed. Mater. Res, 59, 438-449 (2002). Chitosan/polyethylene glycol fumarate blend film: Physical
8. S. Saxena, A. R. Ray, B. Gupta, Chitosan immobilization on and antibacterial properties, Carbohydr. Polym, 92, 48-56,
polyacrylic acid grafted polypropylene monofilament, (2013).
Carbohydr. Polym, 82, 1315-1322 (2010). 23. A. Solouk, B. G. Cousins, H. Mirzadeh, M. Solati-Hashtjin, S.
9. H. Mirzadeh. M.T. Khorasani, P.G. Sammes, Laser surface Najarian, and A. M. Seifalian, Surface modification of POSS-
modifcation of polymers to improve biocompatibility: HEMA nanocomposite biomaterials using reactive oxygen plasma
grafted PDMS, in vitro assay-III, Radiat. Phys. Chem, 55, treatment for cardiovascular surgical implant applications,
685-689 (1999). Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem, 58, 147-61 (2011).
10. H. Mirzadeh. H. Keshvari, P. Mansoori, F. Orang, and M. T 24. R. Gharibi, H. Yeganeh, H. Gholami, and Z. M. Hassan, Aniline
Khorasani, Collagen immobilization onto acrylic acid laser- tetramer embedded polyurethane/siloxane membranes and their
grafted silicone for using as artificial skin: in vitro, Iran. corresponding nanosilver composites as intelligent wound
Polym. J, 17, 171-182 (2008). dressing materials, RSC. Advances, 4, 62046-62060 (2014).
11. B. Gupta. C. Plummer, I. Bisson, P. Frey, and J. G. Hilborn, 25. M. Benavente, Adsorption of Metallic Ions onto Chitosan:
Plasma-induced graft polymerization of acrylic acid onto Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies, Licentiate Thesis, Sweden,
poly(ethylene terephthalate) films: characterization and 2008.
human smooth muscle cell growth on grafted films, Biomater, 26. M. D. Zofia Modrzejewska, R. Zarzycki, and A. Wojtasz-Pajk
23, 863-871 (2002). The mechanism of sorption of Ag+ ions on chitosan
12. B. Gupta, J. G. Hilborn, I. Bisson, and P. Frey, Plasma- microgranules: IR and NMR studies Progress on Chemistry
Induced Graft Polymerization of Acrylic Acid onto and Application of Chitin and Its ... , XIV, 2009.
Poly(ethylene terephthalate) Films, J. Appl. Polym. Sci, 81, 27. H. Mirzadeh, M. Dadsetan, and N. Sharifi-Sanjani, Platelet
2993-3001 (2001). adhesion on laser-induced acrylic acidgrafted polyethylene
13. A. Solouk, M. Solati Hashtjin, S. Najarian, A. Seifalian, and H. terephthalate, J. Appl. Polym. Sci, 86, 3191-3196 (2002).
Mirzadeh, Optimization of acrylic acid grafting onto POSS- 28. P. M. Lopez-Perez, A. P. Margues, R. M. P. da Silva, I.
PCU nanocomposite using response surface methodology, Pashkulevaab and R.L. Reis, Effect of chitosan membrane
Iran. Polym. J, 20, 91-107 (2011). surface modification via plasma induced polymerization on
14. F.-L. Mi. S.-H. Yu, Y.-B. Wu, C.-K. Peng, S.-S. Shyu, and R.- the adhesion of osteoblast-like cells, J. Mate. Chem, 17,
N. Huang, Antibacterial activity of chitosanalginate sponges 4064-4071 (2007).
incorporating silver sulfadiazine: effect of ladder-loop 29. R. J. B. Pinto, S. C. M. Fernandes, C. S. R. Freire, P. Sadocco,
transition of interpolyelectrolyte complex and ionic J. Causio, C. P. Neto, et al., Antibacterial activity of optically
crosslinking on the antibiotic release, J. Appl. Polym. Sci, transparent nanocomposite films based on chitosan or its
98, 538-549 (2005). derivatives and silver nanoparticles, Carbohydr. Res, 348,

40

View publication stats

Вам также может понравиться