Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Correspondence to: Yoshio Kasashima, Education Center, Faculty of Engineering, Chiba Institute of Technology, Shibazono 2-1-1,
Narashino-shi, Chiba 275-0023, Japan
E-mail: yoshio.kasashima@it-chiba.ac.jp
Accepted June 19, 2012 (recieved for review November 21, 2011)
Journal of Oleo Science ISSN 1345-8957 print / ISSN 1347-3352 online
http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/jos/http://mc.manusriptcentral.com/jjocs
631
Y. Hanzawa, K. Hashimoto, Y. Kasashima et al.
13
C-NMR , CDCl3 : 9.7, 16.7, 19.9, 20.1, 21.9, 27.9, 28.3, was extracted three times with diisopropyl ether10 mL.
29.5, 33.6, 36.7, 42.6, 70.2, 71.2, 76.5, 175.3 The organic layer was washed twice with aqueous sodium
neat, cm1: 2974, 1738
IR chloride solution20 mL, dried with anhydrous sodium
HRMS FAB-MSm/z calcd for C 15H 28O 3H 257.2117, sulfate, and evaporated. The product was purified using
found 257.2112. column chromatography and eluted with hexane/ethyl
acetate40/1. A total mass of 0.340 g73 yieldof 2-
2-Methyl-2-2,6,6-trimethyltetrahydropyran-2-ylpropyl 2-methoxyethyl-2,6,6-trimethyltetrahydropyran11a
butanoate10c was obtained.
Colorless oil. 11b was synthesized using a similar procedure.
1
H-NMR , CDCl3 3H, s, 0.90
: 0.89 3H, s, 0.96
3H, t,
J7.4Hz, 1.103H, s, 1.186H, s, 1.21-1.312H, m, 2-2-Methoxyethyl-2,6,6-trimethyltetrahydropyran
1.44-1.836H, m, 2.302H, t, J7.4Hz, 4.02,4.132H, 11a
ABq, J10.8Hz Colorless oil.
13
C-NMR, CDCl 3: 14.1, 16.7, 19.0, 20.1, 21.9, 27.9, 1
H-NMR, CDCl3: 1.203H, s, 1.213H, s, 1.223H,
29.5, 33.6, 36.7, 42.6, 70.1, 71.2, 76.5, 77.0, 174.5 s, 1.26-1.898H, m, 3.343H, s , 3.45-3.572H, m
IRneat, cm1: 2970, 2877, 1734 13
C-NMR, CDCl 3: 16.9, 28.4, 30.2, 31.6, 35.5, 37.2,
HRMS FAB-MSm/z calcd for C 16H 30O 3H 271.2273, 42.9, 59.0, 69.7, 71.7, 72.7
found 271.2269. IRneat, cm1 : 2971, 2933, 2870, 1118
HRMS ESI-MSm/z calcd for C11H 22O 2Na 209.1512,
2-Methyl-2-2,6,6-trimethyltetrahydropyran-2-ylpropyl found 209.1510.
2-methylpropanoate10d
Colorless oil. 2-2-Methoxy-1,1-dimethylethyl-2,6,6-trimethyltetrahy-
1
H-NMR , CDCl3 : 0.906H, s, 1.103H, s , 1.176H, d, dropyran 11b
J7.0Hz,1 .18 6H, s 6H, m
, 1.24-1.84 1H, quin, J
, 2.56 Colorless oil.
7.0Hz, 4.02-4.11 2H, ABq, J10.8Hz 1
H-NMR, CDCl3: 0.883H, s, 0.893H, s, 1.103H,
13
C-NMR, CDCl 3: 16.8, 19.5, 19.9, 20.1, 21.9, 27.9, s, 1.153H, s, 1.183H, s, 0.92-1.796H, m, 3.24, 3.33
29.5, 33.6, 34.8, 36.7, 70.1, 71.2, 77.0, 177.9 2H, ABq, J9.5Hz , 3.323H, s
IRneat, cm1: 2973, 2877, 1734 13
C-NMR, CDCl 3: 16.8, 20.0, 20.3, 22.0, 28.0, 29.5,
HRMS FAB-MSm/z calcd for C 16H 30O 3H 271.2273, 33.7, 36.9, 43.2, 59.7, 71.0, 76.5, 77.0, 79.2S
found 271.2276. IRneat, cm1 : 2927, 1101
HRMS ESI-MSm/z calcd for C13H 26O 2Na 237.1825,
2-Methyl-2-2,6,6-trimethyltetrahydropyran-2-ylpropyl found 237.1824.
benzoate 10e 2.2.7 One-pot syntheses of esters 5a-c from 1
Colorless oil. Typical procedure:
1
H-NMR, CDCl3: 1.026H, s, 1.133H, s, 1.213H, Iodine0.132 g, 0.5 mmol, toluene25 mL, and 1 0.466
3H, s, 1.04-1.82
s, 1.25 6H, m 2H, ABq, J
, 4.29, 4.83 g, 2.5 mmol were placed in a 100 mL flask, and the mixture
10.8Hz, 7.42-7.452H, m, 7.45-7.591H, m, 8.08-8.08 was stirred at 50 for 8 h. After cooling to room tempera-
2H, m ture, ethanol25 mLwas added. A reflux condenser was
13
C-NMR, CDCl 3: 16.8, 20.2, 20.4, 22.0, 27.9, 33.6, attached to the flask, and the mixture was stirred for 8 h
36.7, 43.0, 70.9, 71.3, 76.6, 128.7, 129.9, 131.3, 133.1, 167.4 with refluxing. After the reaction mixture was chilled to
IRneat, cm1: 2972, 1720, 712 room temperature, water20 mL was added. Next, sodium
HRMS FAB-MSm/z calcd for C 19H 28O 3H 305.2117, thiosulfate2.0 gwas added with stirring, and the reaction
found 305.2108. mixture was extracted three times with diisopropyl ether
2.2.6 Etherification of alcohol 3 or 4 10 mL . The organic layer was washed twice with aqueous
Typical procedure: sodium chloride solution20 mL, dried with anhydrous
Tetrahydrofuran30 mLand 60 sodium hydride in sodium sulfate, and evaporated. The product was purified
paraffin solution0.120 g, 3.0 mmolwere placed in a 100 by column chromatography and eluted with hexane/ethyl
mL flask equipped with a funnel. A solution of 70.431 g, acetate20/1. A total mass of 0.379 g71 yieldof ethyl
2.5 mmolin tetrahydrofuran5 mLwas added dropwise 2-2,6,6-trimethyltetrahydropyran-2-ylacetate5bwas
over 30 min. The mixture was stirred for 2 h, and then a obtained.
solution of methyl iodide0.532 g, 3.75 mmolin tetrahy- The other esters of 5a and 5c were synthesized using a
drofuran5 mLwas added dropwise over 3 h. The reaction similar procedure.
mixture was stirred overnight, and then water 20 mL was
added dropwise with cooling. Next, the reaction mixture
635
J. Oleo Sci. 61, (11) 631-640 (2012)
Y. Hanzawa, K. Hashimoto, Y. Kasashima et al.
636
J. Oleo Sci. 61, (11) 631-640 (2012)
Synthesis of carboxylic acids, esters, alcohols, and ethers containing a tetrahydropyran ring
Table 3Esterification of 3.
entries 1-4
lustrated in Table 2. In the case of iodine , the further. When toluene was used as a solvent and the reac-
cyclization proceeded to produce the carboxylic acid 4, but tion temperature was 50entry 5, the yield was the
the yields were modest, ranging from 42 to 73. In the highest out of all the reactions83.
case of p-toluenesulfonic acidentries 9-12 , the yields in- Esterification of the carboxylic acid 3 with alcohols was
creased somewhat, ranging from 60 to 79. Using boron performed using iodine or p-toluenesulfonic acid as a cata-
trifluoride diethyl etherate, the yield increased even lyst and the results are summarized in Table 3. Iodine has
637
J. Oleo Sci. 61, (11) 631-640 (2012)
Y. Hanzawa, K. Hashimoto, Y. Kasashima et al.
Table 4Esterification of 4.
previously been reported to be an effective catalyst for the Table 5Esterification of alcohol 7.
esterification reaction11, 12. In the production of the methyl
ester 5aentries 1, 2, ethyl ester 5bentries 3,4, and
propyl ester 5c entries 5,6 , both iodine and p-toluenesul-
fonic acid were effective as catalysts. The yield of each was
above 74. Esterification of 4 with several different alco- Entry R3 group Yieldof 9
hols was also attempted Table 4 . When p-toluenesulfonic
1 a methyl 86
acid was used as a catalyst in the production of the methyl
ester, esterification did not proceed entry 1 . Accordingly, 2 b ethyl 93
the catalyst was changed to sulfuric acid, and the methyl 3 c propyl 92
ester 6a was obtained in 44 yield entry 2 . Similarly, the 4 d isopropyl 90
production of the ethyl ester 6bentry 3 or propyl ester 6c
5 e phenyl 77
entry 4was attempted. Each ester was obtained in mod-
erate yield. These relatively low yields were attributed to Reaction conditions: alcohol 2.5 mmol, triethylamine 3.8
the steric hindrance of carboxylic acid 4. mmol, acyl chloride 3.8 mmol, DMAP 0.41 mmol, solvent
Reduction of carboxylic acid 3 or 4 to produce the novel tetrahydrofuran10 mL, time 12 h.
corresponding alcohol containing a tetrahydropyran ring
was carried out using lithium aluminum hydride in tetrahy- lower than that of the aliphatic acyl chlorides. The results
drofuran, as shown in Scheme 2. The alcohol 7 was ob- using 8 are shown in Table 6. Similar to the esterification
tained in 88 yield, and 8 was produced in 93 yield. of 7, esters 10 were produced in excellent yields using ali-
Using these alcohols with several acyl chlorides and trieth- phatic acyl chlorides, but the yield decreased slightly in the
ylamine, novel esters were produced. The results using 7 esterification with benzyl chlorideentry 5.
are summarized in Table 5. In the case of each aliphatic Etherification of the alcohol 3 or 4 with methyl iodide
acyl chloride used, the esters 9a-d were obtained in excel- using sodium hydride was carried out as shown in Scheme
lent yieldsentries 1-4. However, when benzyl chloride 3. The yield of the ether 11a was 73, and that of 11b was
was used, the yield decreased considerably entry 5 . This 43. The lower yield of 11b was attributed to the steric
was attributed to the reactivity of benzyl chloride being hindrance of the two methyl groups.
As mentioned above, iodine was an effective catalyst in
the esterification of 3 as well as in the cyclization of 1. Ac-
Scheme 2 Scheme 3
638
J. Oleo Sci. 61, (11) 631-640 (2012)
Synthesis of carboxylic acids, esters, alcohols, and ethers containing a tetrahydropyran ring
Entry R3 group of 10
Yield
1 a methyl 90
2 b ethyl 90
3 c propyl 91
4 d isopropyl 99
5 e phenyl 84
Reaction conditions: alcohol 2.5 mmol, triethylamine 3.8 mmol, acyl
chloride 3.8 mmol, DMAP 0.41 mmol, solventtetrahydrofuran10 mL,
time 12 h.
cordingly, a one-pot method of cyclization-esterification of acids using lithium aluminum hydride produces alcohols.
1 was attempted. First, 1 2.5 mmol 0.5 mmol
and iodine These alcohols that contain the tetrahydropyran ring could
and toluene were added to a flask, and the mixture was be derivatized to esters or ethers. Additionally, a one-pot
stirred at 50 for 8 h. Second, after cooling to room tem- method of cyclizationesterification of 1 gives esters 5
perature, ethanol25 mLwas added to the flask, and the without the requirement for isolation of the carboxylic
mixture was stirred with refluxing for 8 h. In the cases acids.
where ethanol was added, iodine was not added. The yield
of 5b from 1 was 71entry 2, which was higher than
that in the cases of the cyclization, and the esterification
was carried out separately. The results of this one-pot References
method are illustrated in Table 7. When methanol was 1Mousseron-canet, M.; Levallois, C.; Wylde, J. LOXY-
used, the yield of 5a from 1 was 66 entry 1 . In the case DE DU LINALOL. Tetrahedron Lett. 17, 769-774
of 1-propanol, the yield of 5c was 63entry 3. Thus, 1962.
using iodine as a catalyst, the one-pot method of cycliza- 2Iwasaki, S.; Okuno, T. Jpn. Pat., 2002-2937752002.
tion-esterification of 1 proceeded smoothly. 3Miyawaki, H.; Yukawa, C. Jpn. Pat., 59-2251761984.
In conclusion, the reaction of 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one 4Robin, J.; Dhal, R.; Dujardin, G.; Girodier, L.; Mevellec,
with acetic acid or 2-methylpropanoic acid affords the cor- L.; Poutot, S. The First Semi-synthesis of Enantiopure
responding 3-hydroxy acids, which subsequently react Homogarringtonine via Anhydrohomoharringtonine
using boron trifluoride diethyl etherate or iodine as an from Chiral Acyl Moiety. Tetrahedron Lett. 40, 2931-
acidic catalyst to give carboxylic acids containing a tetra- 29341999.
hydropyran ring. The reactions of these carboxylic acids 5Caliezi, A.; Lederer, E.; Schinz, H. Zur saurekatalysi-
with alcohols produce esters. Reduction of these carboxylic erten Cyclisation von ungesattigten -Oxy-sauren der
Terpen- und Sesquiterpenreihe. Helv. Chim. Acta 34,
Table 7One-pot syntheses of esters 5a-c from 1. 879-8831951.
6Iwamoto, M.; Fujita, A.; Takagi, K.; Kubota, N.; Koga-
mi, K.; Jpn. Pat. 56-1137761981.
7Fkyerat, A.; Burki, N.; Tabacchi, R. Enantioselective
Synthesis of 3-Hydroxycitronellic Acid Isolated from
Ceratocystis fimbriata sp. platani. Tetrahedron Asym-
Entry R2 Product
Yield metry 7, 2023-20281996.
1 methyl 5a 66 8Colonge, J.; Lagier, A. Sur les acides -alcools ter-
tiaires -ethyleniques. Bull. de la Societe Chim. de
2 ethyl 5b 71
France 24-261949.
3 propyl 5c 63 9Fujita, T.; Suga, K.; Watanabe, S.; Yanagi, R. A Conve-
Reaction conditions: 1 2.5 mmol, catalystiodine0.5 mmol, nient Preparative Method of 3-Hydroxy Acids, and the
toluene25 mL, alcohols 25 mL, first step 50 for 8 h,
solvent Reaction of 3-Hydroxy Acids with Acidic Materials. J.
second step refluxing for 8 h. appl. Chem. Biotechnol. 27, 293-598 1977.
639
J. Oleo Sci. 61, (11) 631-640 (2012)
Y. Hanzawa, K. Hashimoto, Y. Kasashima et al.
10Kasashima, Y.; Fujimoto, H.; Mino, T.; Sakamoto, M.; esterificaton catalyzed by iodine. Tetrahedron Lett.
Fujita, T. An Efficient Synthesis of Five-membered Cy- 43, 879-8822002.
clic Ehters from 1,3-Diols Using Molecular Iodine as a 12Jereb, M.; Vrazic, D.; Zupan, M. Dual behaviour of al-
Catalyst. J. Oleo Sci. 57, 437-4432008 . cohols in iodine-catalyzed esterification under solvent-
11Ramalinga, K.; Vijayalakshmi, P.; Kaimal. T. N. B. A free conditions. Tetrahedron Lett. 50, 2347-2352
mild and efficient method for esterification and trans- 2009.
640
J. Oleo Sci. 61, (11) 631-640 (2012)