Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

John Benjamins Publishing Company

This is a contribution from Information Design Journal 18:1


2010. John Benjamins Publishing Company
This electronic file may not be altered in any way.
The author(s) of this article is/are permitted to use this PDF file to generate printed copies to be used by way of
offprints, for their personal use only.
Permission is granted by the publishers to post this file on a closed server which is accessible to members (students
and staff) only of the authors/s institute, it is not permitted to post this PDF on the open internet.
For any other use of this material prior written permission should be obtained from the publishers or through the
Copyright Clearance Center (for USA: www.copyright.com).
Please contact rights@benjamins.nl or consult our website: www.benjamins.com
Tables of Contents, abstracts and guidelines are available at www.benjamins.com
Information Design Journal 18(1), 8487
2010 John Benjamins Publishing Company
d o i : 10.1075/ idj.18.1.12sch

Book Reviews

Visual Language for Designers: Principles for Creating Graphics That People Understand
Connie Malamed
Rockport Publishers, Inc., 2009
ISBN 13:978-1-59253-515-6 / ISBN 10: 1-59253-515-1
240 pages

Reviewed by Karen Schriver


KSA Communication Design & Research, Inc USA

Information designers looking for perspective on ways the same time create designs that compensate for peoples
to engage readers should check out this book. It reviews limitations in processing overly complex designs.
the research literature on the cognition of comprehend- Malamed rightly argues that if designers are to
ing visuals, derives principles from this literature, and increase the impact of their work, they must understand
illustrates the principles with visuals created by designers how their audiences perceive, organize, and interpret
from around the globe. communications. She seems keenly aware that while
Malameds 240-page lavishly illustrated book is orga- many designers are skilled in generating elegant designs,
nized into two sections. The first is a literature review they fail in understanding how audiences actually engage
on how people process visuals (about 40 pages), and the with their designs.
second presents six principles for creating visuals (about Malamed makes two major claims in her review, the
180 pages). There are a one-page bibliography, a half- first about the nature of visual information processing, and
page glossary of terms, several pages of references, and a the second about the limitations of short-term memory.
directory of contributors (the designers who created the
example illustrations). Research on visual information processing

About part one: Reviewing the empirical A major section of the review is devoted to character-
literature on comprehending visuals izing how peoples experience with the visual world
activates their perceptual processes rapidly and in
What makes this book unique and worth a read is parallel. People are hardwired to interpret what they see.
Malameds consistent focus on how people perceive They attempt to assimilate their interpretations of new
visuals. She first reviews the research on the cognitive information with what they already know. In making this
processes people engage in during perception and inter- point, Malamed summarizes the well known oldnew
pretation. Her intent is to help designers leverage the finding, namely that people learn best when they connect
strengths of their audiences cognitive abilities, while at new knowledge to prior knowledge.

84 2010. John Benjamins Publishing Company


All rights reserved
Book Reviews idj 18(1), 2010, 84-87

Malameds discussion stays on a rather abstract discussion of the writing process and how it intersects
level though, and she misses opportunities to illustrate with the visual design process. The past few decades
her ideas with examples that would make her claims of research on information design show a symbiotic
concrete. For example, she points to the well-document- relationship between the design of visual and verbal
ed finding that people form more cohesive representa- language, a point never addressed.
tions of content (and more accurate schemas) when they Malameds discussion of the early perceptual
acquire the content both visually and verbally (called processes involved in scanning a visual makes a valuable
dual coding) rather than acquiring it through visuals contribution to the field. But her claims would have been
only or text only (called single coding). But Malamed stronger if the visual examples displayed throughout the
does not illustrate this so that readers unfamiliar with the book were explicitly pointed at, analyzed, and discussed
concept could actually use it. Readers would have appre- in the text. Surprisingly, she never refers to the dozens of
ciated before and after versions to better comprehend visual examples in her text as she describes how people
her ideas. understand visuals. This omission relegates the examples
to serve as editorial illustrations rather than to drive
Research on short-term memory home her arguments. The lack of explicit text and image
integration makes Malameds book more like traditional
The second main point in Malameds review focuses on coffee-table books on design.
the limitations of short-term memory and the impor- That said, the books many stunning visual examples
tance of considering the viewers cognitive load; that is, function well without explicit reference in the text
the demands imposed on working memory at a given because Malamed constructs good captions, pointing out
moment. She describes, for example, how some designers what to focus on and giving credit to the design teams
reduce the cognitive load of user interfaces by presenting that produced them. The many illustrations and captions
the content in layers. This excellent point about designers invite the reader to peruse the chapters in any order. The
need to present content in manageable perceptual units captions would have been improved by dating the illus-
is one that she illustrates in later parts of the book. trations, as some examples appear older than others.
Because the book has no subject or name index, it is
Putting the review together not easy to locate the illustrations by various contribu-
tors, such as Nigel Holmes. Regrettably, the book is not
A theme of the review is that designers need to consider designed to facilitate easy retrieval of its content, a pity
the audiences characteristics such as age, visual literacy, for the contributors. The reader is left with the lingering
expertise, motivation, culture, and reading skill. But the question of whether the contributors of the examples
treatment of these important topics is superficial, about a actually had any of the design intentions that Malamed
paragraph for each, and there is no mention of methods assigns to them.
for learning about these audience characteristics either
before, during, or after we design. Surprisingly, the text
reads as if empirical studies of audience, information
design, and usability do not exist. Also missing is a

2010. John Benjamins Publishing Company 85


All rights reserved
Book Reviews idj 18(1), 2010, 84-87

About part two: Presenting principles for no examples from web-based communication design,
visual design important contemporary contexts for directing the eyes.

The bulk of Malameds book describes and illustrates six Reducing realism
principles: The third principle, reducing realism, advises designers
Organizing for perception (25 pages) to avoid high-fidelity images with full color, detail, depth,
Directing the eyes (32 pages) shadow, and texture. Instead, they should strive for visual
Reducing realism (26 pages) shorthand representations through line drawings, silhou-
Making the abstract concrete (40 pages) ettes, and iconic images. Malamed suggests that designers
Clarifying complexity (34 pages) selectively abstract to reduce realism and to simplify
Charging visuals with emotion (22 pages) images by limiting the key visual dimensions such as
Each principle is presented as a chapter: the first part color, depth, or texture. These are great suggestions, but
introducing the principle, then explaining its cognitive readers may hope for more procedural information on
basis, and concluding with ideas for applying it with how to selectively abstract as they attempt to move from
plenty of examples along the way. realism to reduced realism.

Organizing for perception Making the abstract concrete


The first principle, organizing for perception, advises The fourth principle, making the abstract concrete,
designers to kickstart visual information processing is her longest chapter. Here Malamed reminds us that
by using grouping, proximity, shape, line orientation, verbal language must be processed sequentially word-by-
size, and color. Malamed recommends that designers word, but images, if not cluttered, can reveal main points
make their designs unique and conspicuous by drawing in a glance. Malamed illustrates this idea through many
on primitive features (e.g. color, motion, orientation, juicy examples of data visualizations and maps. She
size, depth, tilt, closure). The idea is that these primitive provides excellent commentary on a series of maps, but
features help readers to quickly discriminate among parts the level of detail is uneven. Often the reader cannot tell
of the message. Malamed also details the rarely discussed where the text is heading or how much will be said about
topic of texture. She contends that texture consists of any given subtopic.
contrast, orientation, and element repetition enabling
people to distinguish figure from ground. Her exploration Clarifying complexity
of how people come to notice a graphic is quite good. The fifth principle, clarifying complexity, makes the
important point that designers should clarify informa-
Directing the eyes tion rather than simplify it. To break up complexity,
The second principle, directing the eyes, suggests she recommends a number of strategies, for example,
that designers can guide the viewers eyes through the sequencing explanations. This is one of the few places
structure of the graphic by using orienting cues such in the book that Malamed presents multipage examples.
as arrows, color, and captions. Malamed illustrates The examples are most effective when the captions inter-
these ideas with a number of excellent visual examples. pret rather than describe.
Regrettably, there are very few multipage examples and

86 2010. John Benjamins Publishing Company


All rights reserved
Book Reviews idj 18(1), 2010, 84-87

Charging visuals with emotion whether viewers actually found them effective. As far as
The sixth principle, charging visuals with emotion, we know, none of the examples were empirically tested
suggests that designers connect the emotional content to assess whether readers quickly perceived their content
of visuals to the readers life experience. Malamed argues and fully understood their messages the main theme
that when people can relate to a visual, the message is of the book. We also never know if the designers who
likely to become more personal and meaningful. contributed their illustrations actually tried to employ
Malameds principles. In more than a few cases, the visu-
Conclusion als are hard to read, partly because the paper stock is too
glossy and partly because they are reproduced at a scale
In summary, Malameds move to provide empirical too small to be legible. That she presents examples where
grounding for common visual design goals represents a only the shapes, patterns, and colors are clear is contra-
refreshing departure from most design books. Her expla- dictory to her contention that designers need to move
nations showing why cognitive research is relevant for past focusing just on the perceptual and to direct their
design will get readers thinking and reflecting on their attention to the semantic.
own experience. Still, some readers will find the literature The least satisfying aspect of the book is its struc-
review a bit dense and peppered with jargon that is not ture. The book would benefit by providing explicit
explained in the text and absent from the glossary. cues regarding whats coming next. Readers may have
The best aspect of Malameds book is her many exam- trouble developing an adequate mental model of the
ples. The layout of the book is handsome and invites the content. Across the book, there are no advance organiz-
reader to linger with the content. The variety of examples ers, overview diagrams, itemized lists, or summaries to
and the international scope of the visuals are outstanding guide readers about what visual features will be discussed
and will hold readers interest even if they do not read and why. The lack of explicit structural cues makes for a
the text. choppy read, makes it hard to remember which feature
Yet not all of the examples are great, and Malamed goes with which principle, and places the burden of
misses the opportunity to distinguish pretty good from integrating the texts content on the reader. While the text
outstanding contributions. Even better for learning the is organized at the chapter level, it wanders at the section
six visual principles would have been to contrast good and subsection level. The book closes abruptly in the
and bad applications of them. In addition, designers middle of a minor point about humor in visuals, without
would have appreciated seeing examples of electronic summary or reflection on how the chapters add up.
communications. The focus on print, mainly infographics Still design practitioners, students, and teachers will
and posters, seems to date the book and orient it more to find much to like about this engaging book. They will
students in traditional design programs. find a thoughtful account of the cognition of visual
A different concern that information designers may perception and dozens of compelling visual examples
have with Malameds examples is the lack of data about that warrant scrutiny and close inspection.

2010. John Benjamins Publishing Company 87


All rights reserved

Вам также может понравиться