Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • Commission On Judicial Conduct Protecting Racist Judge Jeffrey D. Goodwin.

    Загружено:

    Christopher King
    295 просмотров2 страницы
    Motion to Reconsider and/or Request for Nunc Pro Tunc Relief to Reflect that the Commission Found Repondent's Tone and Deportment to be Fully Acceptable. Well folks watch how the Commission on Judicial Ethics protects a Judge against me even though this Judge has a documented history of inappropriate deportment in their own case no 7485-F-161. They made short work of my Complaint by trying to paint it as a request for them to make him change his fucked up, racist decisions. I did no such thing. I wrote them thusly and shall now await corrective action: Not so fast: I didn’t ask you about his Decision. I asked you to discipline him for his deportment and tone, and that deportment and tone registered loud and clear in a video that I referenced for you to listen to. You intentionally failed to do so when his deportment -- not his final decision making -- is already in issue: See your Case No. Case no. 7485-F-161. The Stipulated Facts indicate he was "threatening, intimidating and retaliatory" against someone who — like me --challenged his authority. You must now evaluate him barking at me in a threatening and intimidating tone to "stop talking" for no lawful reason, retaliating against me in violation of GR 16 cameras in Court and making me pay that stupid white girl dog killer $300 of my money and refusing to grant me the same consideration when she failed to appear in Court. Do your job and quit protecting that racist pig.

    Оригинальное название

    Commission on Judicial Conduct Protecting Racist Judge Jeffrey D. Goodwin.

    Авторское право

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Доступные форматы

    PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    Motion to Reconsider and/or Request for Nunc Pro Tunc Relief to Reflect that the Commission Found Repondent's Tone and Deportment to be Fully Acceptable. Well folks watch how the Commission on Judicial Ethics protects a Judge against me even though this Judge has a documented history of inappropriate deportment in their own case no 7485-F-161. They made short work of my Complaint by trying to paint it as a request for them to make him change his fucked up, racist decisions. I did no such thing. I wrote them thusly and shall now await corrective action: Not so fast: I didn’t ask you about his Decision. I asked you to discipline him for his deportment and tone, and that deportment and tone registered loud and clear in a video that I referenced for you to listen to. You intentionally failed to do so when his deportment -- not his final decision making -- is already in issue: See your Case No. Case no. 7485-F-161. The Stipulated Facts indicate he was "threatening, intimidating and retaliatory" against someone who — like me --challenged his authority. You must now evaluate him barking at me in a threatening and intimidating tone to "stop talking" for no lawful reason, retaliating against me in violation of GR 16 cameras in Court and making me pay that stupid white girl dog killer $300 of my money and refusing to grant me the same consideration when she failed to appear in Court. Do your job and quit protecting that racist pig.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    295 просмотров2 страницы

    Commission On Judicial Conduct Protecting Racist Judge Jeffrey D. Goodwin.

    Загружено:

    Christopher King
    Motion to Reconsider and/or Request for Nunc Pro Tunc Relief to Reflect that the Commission Found Repondent's Tone and Deportment to be Fully Acceptable. Well folks watch how the Commission on Judicial Ethics protects a Judge against me even though this Judge has a documented history of inappropriate deportment in their own case no 7485-F-161. They made short work of my Complaint by trying to paint it as a request for them to make him change his fucked up, racist decisions. I did no such thing. I wrote them thusly and shall now await corrective action: Not so fast: I didn’t ask you about his Decision. I asked you to discipline him for his deportment and tone, and that deportment and tone registered loud and clear in a video that I referenced for you to listen to. You intentionally failed to do so when his deportment -- not his final decision making -- is already in issue: See your Case No. Case no. 7485-F-161. The Stipulated Facts indicate he was "threatening, intimidating and retaliatory" against someone who — like me --challenged his authority. You must now evaluate him barking at me in a threatening and intimidating tone to "stop talking" for no lawful reason, retaliating against me in violation of GR 16 cameras in Court and making me pay that stupid white girl dog killer $300 of my money and refusing to grant me the same consideration when she failed to appear in Court. Do your job and quit protecting that racist pig.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 2

    CHRISTOPHER

    KING, J.D.
    12048 Greenwood Avenue North
    Seattle, WA 98133
    mortgagemovies007@gmail.com
    617.543.8085
    206.299.9333



    20 December 2017 VIA FAX TRANSMITTAL TO 360.586.2918

    Re: Abusive Conduct and Deportment of Respondent Goodwin that you Ignored;
    Demand for Reconsideration and/or Nunc Pro Tunc Clarification that the Commission
    Found his On the Bench Deportment Toward me to be Fully Acceptable.

    Let's get a few things straight relative to your perfunctory dismissal of my Complaint by
    way of your letter dated 13 December, 2017.

    1. There are no parts of me that you actually appreciate, and vice versa. So cut the
    gratuitous salutation.

    2. You sidestepped the issue. I did not ask you to evaluate his final Judgments.

    3. Not so fast: I didnt ask you about his Decision

    I asked you to discipline him for his deportment and tone, and that deportment and tone
    registered loud and clear in a video that I referenced for you to listen to. You intentionally
    failed to do so when his deportment -- not his final decision making -- is already in issue:
    See your Case No. Case no. 7485-F-161. The Stipulated Facts indicate he was "threatening,
    intimidating and retaliatory" against someone who like me --challenged his authority.

    You must now evaluate him barking at me in a threatening and intimidating tone to "stop
    talking" for no lawful reason, retaliating against me in violation of GR 16 cameras in Court
    and making me pay that stupid white girl dog killer $300 of my money and refusing to grant
    me the same consideration when she failed to appear in Court. Do your job and quit
    protecting that racist pig.

    4. Get back in there and issue a ruling that reflects on what I actually complained about,
    instead of that which you want to talk about.

    Ciao.

    Christopher King, J.D.

    /s/Christopher King
    ______________________________________
    Christopher King, J.D.



    cc: blind copies

    Вам также может понравиться