Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Alan Brown, Ton van der Wiele, Kate Loughton, (1998),"Smaller enterprises’ experiences with ISO 9000", International
Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 15 Iss 3 pp. 273-285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02656719810198935
Salleh Yahya, Wee-Keat Goh, (2001),"The implementation of an ISO 9000 quality system", International Journal of Quality
& Reliability Management, Vol. 18 Iss 9 pp. 941-966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02656710110407127
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by 198285 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service
information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please
visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of
more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online
products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication
Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
claims that managements often fail in this respect for two reasons: they do not
think that communication is very important; and they do not know how to
communicate.
A considerable number of comprehensive strategies for introducing and
conceptualizing different quality concepts can be found in the literature.
However, descriptions as to how these modern strategies and concepts can be
diffused in organizations as efficiently as possible and applied by the members
are scarce. There are many advantages of strategies and concepts but without
the participation and understanding of the individuals involved, quality cannot
be created: “programs don’t make quality. People do”[9]. The need for member
participation and commitment to bring about efficient change has become
increasingly obvious both within the quality area[10,11] and within general
organizational theory[12].
Results
In the initial exploratory phase of the study, 114 certified companies were asked
about their reasons for implementing the ISO system by means of open-ended
questions[13]. The reasons given were compiled and classified. The data thus
obtained were used to form the basis of a questionnaire which was distributed
to all ISO certified companies in Sweden in the second phase of the study. Some
of the results of this questionnaire are presented in Table I. The Table also
shows some of the results from phase three, where the views of those
responsible for quality were compared with those of other personnel in the
companies studied.
The reasons for certification can be classified into two main groups: market-
related reasons and those related to internal routines and procedures. Hence, the
companies have opted for certification with the aim of reinforcing their market
positions and to avoid finding themselves in a disadvantageous position
relative to their competitors. The other reason for change was to improve the
companies’ internal routines and efficiency, using the ISO system to create
better internal procedures. Legal requirements seem, almost without exception,
Stated reasons for certification Mean SD Qual Other
ISO 9000 in
Swedish
A step towards total quality 4.07 1.27 n.a. n.a. industry
International market/customer demands 3.94 1.04 4.10 4.04
Competition 3.86 0.79 4.05 4.09
Create better internal routines and procedures 3.79 0.89 n.a. n.a.
39
Product quality 3.73 0.94 3.80 3.98
Domestic market/customer demands 3.53 1.13 n.a. n.a.
Development tool for the operation 3.43 1.02 n.a. n.a.
Profitability 3.07 1.04 3.11 3.24
Group/management directive 2.92 1.54 3.72 4.02
Reducing the amount of scrap 2.65 1.10 n.a. n.a.
Reducing quality deficiency costs 2.46 1.10 n.a. n.a.
Downloaded by New York University At 05:58 13 May 2015 (PT)
to have had a very small influence on the companies’ decision to certify their
operations.
There is great disparity among the respondent companies as to whether ISO
certification is a first step towards total quality. While some companies have
ranked this reason as the most important one, others consider that it lacks
importance completely. This outcome is of fundamental interest, as it reflects
the companies’ different levels of ambition with regard to quality as well as of
their awareness and understanding of the possibilities of using the ISO system
as a tool for organizational development.
The respondents to this type of question are frequently responsible for
quality in their respective companies. They most often command the greatest
knowledge of issues related to quality. At the same time, it is not unreasonable
to assume that the fact that they carry the responsibility for these issues biases
their attitude positively. Furthermore, it is our considered opinion that this type
of change work demands the involvement and commitment of all members of an
organization. In the third phase of the study we therefore compared the
attitudes to different issues of those responsible for quality with other personnel
in the same company. For example, the question dealing with the perceived
reasons for the decision to implement the ISO system was studied. The latter
IJQRM group was selected both functionally (horizontally) and hierarchically
13,7 (vertically) separate from the former.
There is remarkable consistency in the reasons behind ISO certification. Both
groups hold that the market-related reasons were a dominating factor. In
addition, both groups rank the quality improvement reasons second. Further,
the groups are in agreement that legal requirements have had little influence on
40 the decision to implement the system. It is, however, remarkable that the group
without responsibility for quality in all cases, except for market-related reasons,
shows a higher rating in respect of the reasons behind implementation than the
group with responsibility for quality. The interviews conducted have pointed to
a possible explanation for the higher rating by members without responsibility,
namely that these members have been persuaded to adopt a somewhat
uncritical attitude to the necessity of certification. Further, this group has not
Downloaded by New York University At 05:58 13 May 2015 (PT)
only adopted an uncritical attitude but has also, in the majority of cases, been
required to implement the ISO system without being able to influence the
process. This seems to have led to the view that the priority given to ISO
implementation has vouched for the importance of certification, which has
influenced the responses to the questionnaire in a positive direction. Imposing
such extensive changes, without the wholehearted commitment of the people
involved, can create future problems in maintaining the ISO system. It can also
be deduced that there are deficiencies in internal communication.
The second category of questions asked, both in the initial exploratory
approach, and in the one presented here, concerned which factors had had a
positive or negative influence on making the work more easy or difficult.
Like many previous studies, this study underlines the need for management
commitment and participation (see Table II). In the final phase of the research,
when participating observations were made, it was possible to study this factor
situation. If so, companies risk opting for design solutions which are not
adapted to subsequent functional and/or result-oriented aspects.
The other remarkable observation is that design is the only function showing
a higher value with respect to influence on their own function than reported by
those responsible for quality. The complementary interviews have shown that
the design function perceived the threat of being affected by certification more
acutely, fearing that increased bureaucratization might hamper their “creative”
work (see also Table V).
Results show great differences in attitudes to the way in which certification
has influenced different factors (see Table V). In all cases, with the exception of
competitive ability, those responsible for quality consider the influence of ISO
9000 to have been greater than do the representatives of other functions. Even
with respect to the only factor that has received a negative value, those
responsible for quality perceived the influence to have been greater. However,
there is consensus among both those responsible for quality and those not
responsible that it is primarily internal routines and procedures that have been
positively affected. There is also agreement that there has been a positive
influence on customer relations and competitive ability.
It is interesting to note that co-operation across functional boundaries is
regarded to have been positively affected. This view has emerged in several
interviews carried out at certified companies. One of the most crucial issues in
the quality area is to what extent quality concepts actually generate efficiency,
Note: 23 ISO certified companies, 161 respondents, 5-7 respondents per company. The respective has had a positive or
views of the quality function and other functions are presented. Scale –2 = very negatively, negative influence on
–1 = negatively, 0 = no influence, +1 = positively, + 2 very positively different factors
Mean SD
the choice of certifying body should not be exaggerated. The result carries
importance more in principle than in practice for this issue.
The path leading to certification in the companies investigated is
characterized by individual experiences based on different background factors
which are more or less impossible to influence. These include, among other
things duality-related factors, such as the degree to which the respondents had
used and been familiar with different types of quality systems prior to
certification. The experience of certifying bodies and consultants varies
strongly, with recommendations spanning the whole scale from “do not on any
account use consultants” to “whatever you do, use consultants”. There are
several different explanations for these conflicting views regarding the
importance of consultants, one of which concerns the consultants’ varying
levels of professionalism relative to the companies’ own knowledge about
quality issues.
However, when it comes to the involvement and commitment of
management, experiences coincide – their wholehearted commitment is of
critical importance. There is also consensus of opinion that the company’s own
personnel should document and implement the quality system themselves. It is
important that all personnel are involved in this work and that the
documentation reflects the present situation and not an ideal future situation
foisted on them by some external consultant or project group. Internal audits,
which should be performed regularly, facilitated implementation.
Recommendations to companies about implementating ISO 9000 are listed
below: top management’s support and commitment is vital; all personnel should
be engaged in the process; the certifying body should be engaged at an early
stage; prepare the manual first; draw up a long-term time plan; certification is
the only part of a focused quality strategy to attain total quality; make internal
audits during the course of the work; document the present situation, not the
desired one; perform the work swiftly using utmost concentration; educate all
personnel; do the work yourself, use consultants sparingly; engage a qualified
consultant to interpret the standard; use the routines already in place as a
starting-point; prepare a common plan of action for the different functions but
IJQRM let them document the work themselves; do not set up a quality department;
13,7 distribute responsibility to line members.
Documenting the quality system easily becomes unnecessarily bureaucratic.
To avoid this, the work should be started by documenting the routines and
processes already in place. Then the certifying body or other experienced
consultant should be used to adapt the level of documentation and, after that,
46 the routines missing should be added.
Concluding remarks
During 1993 and 1994, a major debate flared up about the advantages and
disadvantages of ISO 9000 certification of organizations. Some argued that
certification was inadequate when it comes to creating competitive companies
and organizations, and that, instead, companies should go for more offensive
Downloaded by New York University At 05:58 13 May 2015 (PT)
References
1. Atkinson, P.E. and Naden, J., “Total quality management: eight lessons to learn from
Downloaded by New York University At 05:58 13 May 2015 (PT)
1. Kenn Jhun Kam, Ahmad Hilmy Abdul Hamid. 2015. The true motives behind the adoption of QLASSIC-CIS 7: 2006;
as a quality assurance initiative in construction industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 32:6. .
[Abstract] [PDF]
2. Prodromos Chatzoglou, Dimitrios Chatzoudes, Nikolaos Kipraios. 2015. The impact of ISO 9000 certification on firms’
financial performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 35:1, 145-174. [Abstract] [Full Text]
[PDF]
3. Santi Cots, Martí Casadesús, Frederic Marimon. 2014. Benefits of ISO 20000 IT service management certification. Information
Systems and e-Business Management . [CrossRef]
4. Vahid Nabavi, Majid Azizi, Mehdi Faezipour. 2014. Implementation of quality management system based on ISO9001:2008
and its effects on customer satisfaction case study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 31:8, 921-937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
5. Dong-Young Kim, Young-Ha Hwang. 2014. Self-certification framework for technological innovation: a case study.
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 31:7, 751-763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
6. Juan José Tarí, Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria, Gavin Dick. 2014. Internal and external drivers for quality certification in the service
industry: Do they have different impacts on success?. Service Business 8, 337-354. [CrossRef]
7. María Cruz del Río Rama, José Álvarez García, Mercedes Vila Alonso. 2013. Reasons which lead the rural accommodation
sector to become certified with “Q For Tourist Quality”. Global Business Perspectives 1, 341-358. [CrossRef]
8. Juan José Tarí, Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria, Jorge Pereira. 2013. Internalization of quality management in service organizations.
Downloaded by New York University At 05:58 13 May 2015 (PT)
Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 23:6, 456-473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
9. Shardy Abdullah, Arman Abdul Razak, Mohd Hanizun Hanafi, Mastura Jaafar. 2013. Implementation barriers of ISO 9000
within the Malaysian local government. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 30:8, 853-876. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]
10. Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria, Olivier Boiral. 2013. ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: Towards a Research Agenda on Management System
Standards*. International Journal of Management Reviews 15:10.1111/ijmr.2013.15.issue-1, 47-65. [CrossRef]
11. Daniel Prajogo, Baofeng Huo, Zhaojun Han. 2012. The effects of different aspects of ISO 9000 implementation on key
supply chain management practices and operational performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 17:3,
306-322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
12. Álvarez García José, Fraiz Brea José Antonio, Del Río Rama María de la Cruz. 2012. ANÁLISIS DE LAS MOTIVACIONES
PARA CERTIFICAR LA MARCA “Q DE CALIDAD TURÍSTICA”. SECTOR DE ALOJAMIENTO. Investigaciones
Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa 18, 101-121. [CrossRef]
13. Michael Bell, Vincent Omachonu. 2011. Quality system implementation process for business success. International Journal of
Quality & Reliability Management 28:7, 723-734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
14. Dong‐Young Kim, Vinod Kumar, Uma Kumar. 2011. A performance realization framework for implementing ISO 9000.
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 28:4, 383-404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
15. Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria, Martí Casadesús, Frederic Marimón. 2011. The impact of ISO 9001 standard and the EFQM
model: The view of the assessors. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 22, 197-218. [CrossRef]
16. Daniel I. Prajogo. 2011. The roles of firms' motives in affecting the outcomes of ISO 9000 adoption. International Journal of
Operations & Production Management 31:1, 78-100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
17. W.M. To, Peter K.C. Lee, Billy T.W. Yu. 2011. ISO 9001:2000 implementation in the public sector. The TQM Journal
23:1, 59-72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
18. Juan José Tarí, José F. Molina‐Azorín. 2010. Integration of quality management and environmental management systems.
The TQM Journal 22:6, 687-701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
19. Milena Alič, Borut Rusjan. 2010. Contribution of the ISO 9001 internal audit to business performance. International Journal
of Quality & Reliability Management 27:8, 916-937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
20. Borut Rusjan, Milena Alič. 2010. Capitalising on ISO 9001 benefits for strategic results. International Journal of Quality &
Reliability Management 27:7, 756-778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
21. Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria. 2010. Interiorización de ISO 9001 y eficiencia en costes. Un estudio de casos. Spanish Journal of
Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 39, 609-636. [CrossRef]
22. Roslina Ab Wahid, James Corner. 2009. Critical success factors and problems in ISO 9000 maintenance. International Journal
of Quality & Reliability Management 26:9, 881-893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
23. Lusine H. Aramyan, Miranda P.M. Meuwissen, Alfons G.J.M. Oude Lansink, Jack G.A.J. van der Vorst, Olaf van Kooten,
Ivo A. van der Lans. 2009. The perceived impact of quality assurance systems on tomato supply chain performance. Total
Quality Management & Business Excellence 20, 633-653. [CrossRef]
24. Ching‐I Lin, Woan‐Yuh Jang. 2008. Successful ISO 9000 implementation in Taiwan. International Journal of Productivity
and Performance Management 57:8, 600-622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
25. Prakash J. Singh. 2008. Empirical assessment of ISO 9000 related management practices and performance relationships.
International Journal of Production Economics 113, 40-59. [CrossRef]
26. Woan‐Yuh Jang, Ching‐I Lin. 2008. An integrated framework for ISO 9000 motivation, depth of ISO implementation and
firm performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 19:2, 194-216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
27. Dana M. Johnson, Jichao Sun, Mark A. Johnson. 2007. Integrating multiple manufacturing initiatives: challenge for
automotive suppliers. Measuring Business Excellence 11:3, 41-56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
28. Katerina D. Gotzamani, George D. Tsiotras, Maria Nicolaou, Akis Nicolaides, Vassiliki Hadjiadamou. 2007. The contribution
to excellence of ISO 9001: the case of certified organisations in Cyprus. The TQM Magazine 19:5, 388-402. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]
29. Walid Zaramdini. 2007. An empirical study of the motives and benefits of ISO 9000 certification: the UAE experience.
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 24:5, 472-491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
30. Ali Bayati, Allahvirdi Taghavi. 2007. The impacts of acquiring ISO 9000 certification on the performance of SMEs in Tehran.
The TQM Magazine 19:2, 140-149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
31. Olivier Boiral, Marie‐Josée Roy. 2007. ISO 9000: integration rationales and organizational impacts. International Journal of
Operations & Production Management 27:2, 226-247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
32. W.G. Lewis, K.F. Pun, T.R.M. Lalla. 2006. Exploring soft versus hard factors for TQM implementation in small and
medium‐sized enterprises. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 55:7, 539-554. [Abstract] [Full
Text] [PDF]
Downloaded by New York University At 05:58 13 May 2015 (PT)
33. Heras Saizarbitoria Iñaki, German Arana Landín, Martí Casadesús Fa. 2006. A Delphi study on motivation for ISO 9000 and
EFQM. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 23:7, 807-827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
34. Bozena Poksinska, Jörgen A.E. Eklund, Jens Jörn Dahlgaard. 2006. ISO 9001:2000 in small organisations. International
Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 23:5, 490-512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
35. Enrique Claver, Juan José Tarí, Jorge Pereira. 2006. Does quality impact on hotel performance?. International Journal of
Contemporary Hospitality Management 18:4, 350-358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
36. Prakash J. Singh, Alan Smith. 2006. Uncovering the faultlines in quality management. Total Quality Management & Business
Excellence 17, 395-407. [CrossRef]
37. Prakash J. Singh, Peter Mansour‐Nahra. 2006. ISO 9000 in the public sector: a successful case from Australia. The TQM
Magazine 18:2, 131-142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
38. Prakash J. Singh, Mei Feng, Alan Smith. 2006. ISO 9000 series of standards: comparison of manufacturing and service
organisations. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 23:2, 122-142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
39. Frederic Marimon Viadiu, Martí Casadesús Fa, Iñaki Heras Saizarbitoria. 2006. ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 standards: an
international diffusion model. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 26:2, 141-165. [Abstract] [Full
Text] [PDF]
40. Katerina D. Gotzamani, Ypatia D. Theodorakioglou, George D. Tsiotras. 2006. A longitudinal study of the ISO 9000 (1994)
series' contribution towards TQM in Greek industry. The TQM Magazine 18:1, 44-54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
41. Sigitas Urbonavicius. 2005. ISO system implementation in small and medium companies from new EU member countries: A
tool of managerial and marketing benefits development. Research in International Business and Finance 19, 412-426. [CrossRef]
42. Mohd Zulkifli Mokhtar, Yusuf Karbhari, Kamal Naser. 2005. Company Financial Performance and ISO 9000 Registration:
Evidence from Malaysia. Asia Pacific Business Review 11, 349-367. [CrossRef]
43. Martí Casadesús, Stanislav Karapetrovic. 2005. Has ISO 9000 lost some of its lustre? A longitudinal impact study. International
Journal of Operations & Production Management 25:6, 580-596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
44. Nadia Bhuiyan, Nadeem Alam. 2005. A case study of a quality system implementation in a small manufacturing firm.
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 54:3, 172-186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
45. S. X. Zeng, P. Tian, C. M. Tam, Vivian W. Y. Tam. 2005. Evaluation of Implementing ISO 9001:2000 Standard in the
Construction Industry of China. Architectural Science Review 48, 11-16. [CrossRef]
46. Nadia Bhuiyan, Nadeem Alam. 2005. An investigation into issues related to the latest version of iso 9000. Total Quality
Management & Business Excellence 16, 199-213. [CrossRef]
47. Martí Casadesús, Stanislav Karapetrovic. 2005. The erosion of ISO 9000 benefits: a temporal study. International Journal of
Quality & Reliability Management 22:2, 120-136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
48. Martí Casadesús, Stanislav Karapetrovic. 2005. An empirical study of the benefits and costs of ISO 9001: 2000 compared to
ISO 9001/2/3: 1994. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 16, 105-120. [CrossRef]
49. Nadia Bhuiyan, Nadeem Alam. 2004. ISO 9001: 2000 implementation – the North American experience. International Journal
of Productivity and Performance Management 53:1, 10-17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
50. Olivier Boiral. 2003. ISO 9000: Outside the Iron Cage. Organization Science 14, 720-737. [CrossRef]
51. Hesham Magd, Adrienne Curry. 2003. ISO 9000 and TQM: are they complementary or contradictory to each other?. The
TQM Magazine 15:4, 244-256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
52. Clara Martínez Fuentes, Francisco Balbastre Benavent, M.A. Escribá Moreno, T.F. González Cruz, M. Pardo del Val. 2003.
ISO 9000‐based quality assurance approaches and their relationship with strategic analysis. International Journal of Quality
& Reliability Management 20:6, 664-690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
53. Hayat M. Awan, M. Ishaq Bhatti. 2003. An evaluation of ISO 9000 registration practices: a case study of sports goods
industry. Managerial Finance 29:7, 109-134. [Abstract] [PDF]
54. Bozena Poksinska, Jens Jörn Dahlgaard, Jörgen A.E. Eklund. 2003. Implementing ISO 14000 in Sweden: motives, benefits
and comparisons with ISO 9000. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 20:5, 585-606. [Abstract] [Full
Text] [PDF]
55. Juan Llopis, Juan José Tarí. 2003. The importance of internal aspects in quality improvement. International Journal of Quality
& Reliability Management 20:3, 304-324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
56. Adrienne Curry, Nasser Kadasah. 2002. The yin and yang of quality systems evaluation. Managerial Auditing Journal 17:7,
424-429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
57. Carmen Escanciano, Esteban Fernández, Camilo Vázquez. 2002. Linking the firm's technological status and ISO 9000
certification: results of an empirical research. Technovation 22, 509-515. [CrossRef]
58. Leticia Santos, Carmen Escanciano. 2002. Benefits of the ISO 9000:1994 system. International Journal of Quality & Reliability
Downloaded by New York University At 05:58 13 May 2015 (PT)