Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

Sample comment

PAPER: 57
TITLE: Clustering and Profiling Customer Use RFM To Recomendation Customer Relationship
Management (CRM)
AUTHORS: (anonymous)

Overall evaluation: 1 (weak accept)


Reviewer's confidence: 4 ((high))

----------- Overall evaluation -----------


1 literature review are unclear and doesn't describe the contribution of the research
2 explanation about CRM is too general and doesn't shows anything new.
3 to many page, IEEE template only 4-6 pages include reference
4 please follows IEEE template specially standardization figure, table and reference

Overall evaluation: 2 (accept)


Reviewer's confidence: 3 ((medium))

----------- Overall evaluation -----------


Abstract:
• Need to rewritten. Not exceeded 300 words commonly.
• It should contain research motivation, objective, methodology and main finding.
• The abstract did not provide the main finding of the study.

Format paper (Section Related Works):


• Format of citation should follow the IEEE format.

PAPER: 57
TITLE: Clustering and Profiling Customer Use RFM To Recomendation Customer Relationship
Management (CRM)
AUTHORS: (anonymous)

Overall evaluation: 2 (accept)


Reviewer's confidence: 4 ((high))

----------- Overall evaluation -----------


Format paper:
• Many table were not shown properly (Table III.4, III.5, IV.4,  follow IEEE format: font size, space
etc.
• Reduce the number of pages. Not exceed 6 pages

Research Methodology:
• The author must explain the stage of research method (Figure II.1)

In term of language and grammar:


• These are many grammatical errors thus make of presentation not clear  need to proof read first
before final submitting.

Theoretical concept:

• The author need to provide the preview of Grid Hill theory. This is the theoretical lens…

EFFFFFFFFFF

Overall evaluation -----------


Abstract summarizes some of the main points of the article, including context, objective, methods,
results but it is not well presented.

The authors cites other relevant research, but they do not put clearly questions to be addressed and
the purpose of the study, so that it makes the conclusion is unclear.

The research design and discussion are appropriate.

There is no information on recommendations by Grid Hill clearly stated. Even, it is not available in
the references.

Few grammatically errors are found..

;;;

Overall evaluation -----------


The abstract adequately summarizes the main points of the article.

The authors provide adequate context for their topic, why the topic is important and timely and cite
other relevant research.

The methods Meta-Ethnography sufficiently explained so that the study could be replicated by
another researcher.

The results contain all outcome measures described in the methods.

The data justify the conclusions.

The tables and figures match the information and are easy to inpreted.

Only few typos are available.

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

- Overall evaluation -----------


- to many page, IEEE template only 4-6 pages include reference
- following IEEE template specially standardization figure, table dan reference
2. Overall evaluation -----------
1. abstract to long, Need to rewritten. Not exceeded 300 words commonly

2. It should contain research motivation, objective, methodology and main finding

3. Format of citation should follow the IEEE format.

4. up date your reference

Вам также может понравиться