Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 19

Blockchain in banking

While the interest is huge, challenges


remain for large scale adoption
April 18, 2017
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

Contents
What is Blockchain? 5
Understanding the concept, technology and features 5

When is Blockchain the right solution? 9
Positioning for a future with Blockchain 9

Blockchain for banks 11


Understanding the relevance of Blockchain in banking 11

Blockchain use cases for Indian banks 12


Case 1: Vendor financing 12

Case 2: Loyalty programs 17

Case 3: Syndicated loans 22

Challenges and Implementation Roadmap 27

Summary 30

Deloitte credentials and experience 31

References 33

Contacts 34

Headline Open Sans Bold


Subheading Open Sans
Light up to two lines of text
Subtitle or date
subtitle, date or author second line
3
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

What is Blockchain?
Understanding the concept, technology and features

Blockchain technology is defined by its “A Blockchain is a digital, immutable, distributed


characteristics. In order to understand Blockchain,
one needs to understand the key features of the ledger that chronologically records transactions
technology and how they are interrelated. in near real time. The prerequisite for each
subsequent transaction to be added to the
ledger is the respective consensus of the
network participants (called nodes), thereby
creating a continuous mechanism of control
regarding manipulation, errors, and data quality"

Figure 1: Key characteristics of the Blockchain


Digital Chronological and time-stamped
All the information on Blockchain is digitized, Blockchain, as the name suggests is a chain of
eliminating the need for manual documentation blocks – each being a repository that stores
information pertaining to a transaction and
Digital also links to the previous block in the same
Distributed
ledger 2 transaction. These connected blocks form
1 a chronological chain providing a trail of the
Distributed ledger underlying transaction
Indistinguishable
3 Updated near
copies of all information
real time
are shared on the
Blockchain. Participants
Fewer third
independently validate parties
information without a
centralized authority. Chronological and
8 4 timestamped
Even if one node fails,
the remaining nodes
continue to operate,
ensuring no disruption
7

Operates Cryptographically
‘trustless’ sealed
5
6
Cryptographically sealed
Irreversible and Blocks created are cryptographically sealed in the chain. This
auditable
Consensus-based means that it become impossible to delete, edit or copy already
A transaction on Blockchain created blocks and put it on network, thereby creating true
can be executed only if all digital assets and ensuring a high level of robustness and trust.
the parties on the network Furthermore, the decentralized storage in a Blockchain is known to
unanimously approve it. be very failure-resistant. Even in the event of the failure of a large
However, consensus based number of network participants, the Blockchain remains available,
rules can be altered to suit eliminating the single point of failure. Data stored in a Blockchain is
various circumstances immutable.
4 5
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

Smart contracts are an important Figure 2 describes the various layers in Types of Blockchain
feature of the Blockchain technology a Blockchain stack
Apart from above mentioned The development and operation support
characteristics, smart contracts is one for a Blockchain is concentrated in the Public Blockchain Permissioned or closed-loop Private Blockchain
of the most important feature of the infrastructure layer of the technology stack. Public blockchain are open-source. Anyone Blockchain Write permissions are restricted to one
Blockchain technology. They are essentially A fundamental difference between legacy can be part of this type of Blockchain i.e. The difference in a permissioned organisation. Major applications include
computer codes stored in a Blockchain to processes and Blockchain technology is anyone can participate in the transaction blockchain compared to the public database management, auditing i.e. areas
process pre-defined business steps and in the way data is stored and processed. facilitated by the Blockchain, everyone blockchain is that the right to validate specific to a single entity where there is no
execute a commercial/ legally enforceable Blockchain has features of encryption and can see what blocks are getting added the transaction is provided to only few requirement to provide the right to read or
transaction without involvement of an verification inherent to its design, with and thereby anyone can participate in the pre-selected nodes. The right to read the validate to public.
intermediary. Smart contracts can be consensus on the network being a required consensus process i.e. the process of what blockchain may be public, or restricted to
executed in a cost efficient and secure condition for a transaction to be captured blocks get added to the chain and what the the participants.
manner, and in real time. Smart contracts in a block. current state is.
have a far reaching cross-industry
applications because they can automate
decision making especially when the
outcome of a decision is based on the
consensus reached between participating
members.

Figure 2: Blockchain technology stack1

Application layer
Customer interaction, business Programming languages
logic, and user interface design
User interface Logic Application Python C++ Rust Solidity Java
integration

Services layer
Blockchain services to enable Multisignature Trackers Oracles Wallets Digital assets Connectors
operation of the application
and connection to other
technology
Event Application Distributed Smart Distributed Digital
managers server files stores contracts databases identity

Bitcoin
Network and protocol* Permissionless Proof of Gossip
(UTXO)
Network participation stake
requirement, base protocol, Ethereum
Permissioned Ethereum virtual Sidechains Proof of Byzantine fault
and method of consensus
machine work tolerant

Infrastucture layer
Blockchain as a service (BaaS)*
or in-house infrastructure to
operate the nodes
Compute Storage Network Virtualization Mining as
a service

*Many BaaS provides move up in the reference architenture to offer network and protocol and services layer solutions.
Note: The representation is not meant to be exhaustive (e.g. Ethereum and Bitcoin are not the only protocols and the represented consensus mechanism are also not
exhaustive).

6 7
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

When is Blockchain
the right solution?
Positioning for the future with Blockchain
Organizations around the world, including experimentation is necessary to validate a
banks and other financial institutions solution, it is important to first select the
are continuously experimenting with right use-cases to implement a Blockchain
multiple use-cases on Blockchain. While based solution.

Figure 3: Blockchain fit assessment framework

High fees for intermediary?


Will the transactions benefit from
being real-time or synchronous? Latency due to processing
through intermediary?

Does the intermediary exist due


Is the documentation paper- to lack of a trust?
based?
Are mltiple participants
Is there a large number of involved?
docments/reports required Blockchain
Fit
to be generated (e.g. for Assessment Does increase in transparency
regulatory purposes)? Framework into the transaction help the
participants?

Is there trust among participants?


Is the same information being stored
Do multiple participants have the in multiple locations by multiple
right to modify transactions? participants?

Is there a risk of fraudulent Is data consistency an issue?


transactions? Does the process involve manual
operations?

Is the cost of Reconciliation high?

As presented in figure 3 above, Deloitte For a process or a use-case to classify as


has developed a Blockchain Assessment Blockchain-fit, majority of the questions
Framework to evaluate whether a provided in the framework need to be
particular process or use-case is the answered in the affirmative
right fit for a Blockchain based solution.

8 9
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

Blockchain for Banks


Assessing the impact of implementing which could be resolved by a feature of the
a Blockchain based solution Blockchain solution. The resulting impact
As we can see from the above framework, of implementing a full-fledged Blockchain
each of the evaluation factors uncovers solution is summarized below:
a pain point in the current state process, Understanding relevance of Blockchain in banking
Figure 4: Impact of implementing a Blockchain based solution
Blockchain is being widely debated and has to build proof-of-concepts and explore
become the new buzz word for multiple various potential use-cases. This implies
Blockchain enables the near real-time
Blockchain's distributed ledger technology industries, especially banking. the seriousness of banks towards the
settlement of recorded transactions,
reducing risk and providing an enhanced facilitates disintermediation, thereby reducing Blockchain technology and its eagerness to
customer experience costs and lowering latency Banks across the country have successfully understand how Blockchain can address
initiated collaboration with specialized and resolve few pain points in the current-
firms (Fintech) and/or consulting firms state process.

Smart contracts allow business The hash/ pointers of the records written
validations and automated on the Blockchain are immutable and
reconciliation for straight through Blockchain irreversible, not allowing modifications
Fit
processing Assessment and eliminating risk of fraud
Framework

Smart contracts allow codification Blockchain's distributed ledger


of business rules, validations and and consensus mechanism allows
reconciliation, thereby reducing data consistency across multiple
manual processing participants

Blockchain maintains automated audit trail of


transactions, thereby reducing manual processing
for data validations and reconciliations

Assessing the economic impact of •• What will be savings in operating cost as •• Whether the firm should tie up with a
implementing a Blockchain based a result of implementing Blockchain? specialized Fintech firm to implement the
solution Blockchain solution or shall it develop it
•• What will be the intangible benefit to
A firm considering a Blockchain based in-house? What will be the cost incurred
each of the participants if Blockchain
solution, needs to perform a cost-benefit in either scenario?
based solution is implemented i.e.
analysis to evaluate the tangible and
customer satisfaction, convenience, •• What will be the cost of running a pilot, Major issues that banks face today? to be validated by various participants at For this, Blockchain potentially provides
intangible benefits vis-à-vis its existing
better relationship, etc.? who will be participants for pilots and The Indian banking industry today is various point in time causing the delay a solution for banks as it inherently
way of doing business. Some of these key
within how many days can it go live? faced with issues such as rising costs thereby resulting in almost lack of fraud- helps eliminate intermediaries, maintain
questions include: •• What will be the other tangible benefit
to each of the participants if Blockchain •• Whether the Blockchain model be open of operations, increasing susceptibility proof real time solution. immutable log of transactions and
Benefits evaluation: based solution is implemented e.g. to modification i.e. from consortium to to fraudulent attacks on centralized also facilitates real-time execution of
increase in revenue due to new Public? servers and challenges in ensureing What are banks looking for? transactions. This could potentially
•• Who are the participants and their role in transparency. All this, primarily because Banks are continuously exploring new reduce the TAT for banking transaction,
customers or higher customer retention?
the transaction/process? •• What should be the standardized most of the banking transactions – from ways to perform transactions quicker reducing costs of manual work, and
protocols governing the transaction/ opening customer accounts to making for an enhanced customer service, while leading to enhanced customer service
•• What is the time taken and cost incurred Cost evaluation:
process and what are the associated global payments – may require intensive ensuring cost efficiency in its operations and satisfaction. Like any other industry,
for the process currently?
•• What will be Blockchain model i.e. Private, costs of any such standardization? manual processing and documentation, and assuring transparency to customers choosing the right ‘use case’ is the key for
•• What will be the time taken and cost Public or Consortium? involve costly intermediaries and is time- and regulators. Banks to leverage full value of Blockchain.
incurred under Blockchain based consuming as these transactions need
•• Will the participants be willing to integrate
transaction/process?
on a common system?

10 11
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

Blockchain use cases for


Looking at it through the Blockchain Fit Assessment Framework

Indian banks
Factors Assessment Framework Vendor Financing Fit

•• High fees for intermediary?


Yes – intermediaries such as correspondent
Intermediary •• Latency due to processing through intermediary? banks are added for trust in cross-border
transactions, and increase latency
Presented below are three specific use cases, where we believe that Blockchain can •• Does the intermediary exist due to lack of trust?

play a key role for helping Indian banks and financial institutions realize significant
benefits. Yes – applicant, beneficiary, issuing bank,
•• Are multiple participants involved? advising bank, etc. are involved in the
Case 1: Vendor financing invoices. Banks also provide structured
Realization of funds at various points in a financing services against confirmed Transparency •• Does increase in transparency into the transaction help the transaction. Higher transparency would
value chain is a critical concern for anyone purchase orders from their customers. participants increase trust in the system, and speed up
who is in the business of manufacturing the process
and selling of goods. Bank’s vendor We have examined this landscape using
financing program provides credit facilities our assessment framework and find a
such as Letter of credit, Bill discounting near-perfect candidate for adoption of a
and financing against purchase orders and Blockchain based solution.
•• Is the same information being stored in multiple locations? Yes – common information is stored across
Information Storage the participants such as Issuing bank,
•• Is data consistency an issue? Advising bank, Presenting Bank

State of the Market

Overall industry Number of Cost of funding a Yes – it is required throughout the lifecycle of
•• Does the process involve manual operations? the process. Manual processing is performed
Transaction value2 days it takes vendor financing Manual Processing
transaction2 •• Is the cost of Reconciliation high? at the Branch and CPC (Scrutinizer, Maker,
Checker)
$1bn 3-5 0.3%

Vendor financing participants •• Is there trust among participants? Yes – multiple participants are involved in
•• Do multiple participants have the right to modify transactions? the transactions and make changes/ issue
Trust instructions. Since these may be unknown
•• Is there a risk of fraudulent transactions? to each other, there is a lack of trust and
possibility of fraudulent activities
Clients Banks Vendors
Purchase materials Provide financing Supply materials
from vendors and to vendors based as requested by
•• Is the documentation paper-based?
instruct banks to on documentation clients and collect
make payment to provided by money from banks Yes – The application, PO, validations, bills,
•• Is there a large number of documents / reports required to
vendors vendors Documentation insurance, etc. are all paper-based. This is not
be generated?
due to regulatory reporting requirements

Yes – it will help inproviding enhanced


•• Will the transactions benefit from being real-time
Time Sensitivity customer experience, and reduce the
or synchronous?
exposure risk of banks

12 13
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

As is To be

1 Orders supply of goods


1 Orders supply of goods

2 Supply of goods
2 Supply of goods Clients Vendors
Clients Vendors

Takes few
3 Sends hours to
9 Auto-debits client 8 Payment
7 Auto- 3 Sends 6 Payment approved
account on due-date to vendor execute the
debits approved to vendor Takes 3-4 days Invoice via
transaction
clients Invoice (1-2 days) to execute the API
account (1 day) transaction
on due 4 Invoice uploaded 7 Payment
date request sent for
processing after
5 Transaction
validation
crypto key
Client’s generated Bank’s admin
node node
4 Sends 5 Authorize
payment payment Bank
Banks Bank’s Bank’s
request for Admin (1-2 days) payment
processing Department Department Certificate Bank’s payment
after authority node node
validation 6 Transaction certificate 8 Authorize and
(1-2 days) issued disburse payment DLT

Current pain points How Blockchain can help

Manual documentation Lack of mechanism to track status of Automated documentation Real time-tracking of transaction Currently, banks will have
Manual documentation is required invoice throughout the process Blockchain helps eliminate the manual With the transaction being up on
throughout the lifecycle of a Vendor finance Currently, all the participants (banks, client steps involved in the company’s bill Blockchain, all the relevant parties can view
to opt for a permissioned
process right from raising purchase orders and vendors) cannot simultaneously track discounting process and the entire and verify the processes. There is only one or closed loop Blockchain
to raising bill of exchange by vendors and transaction in real-time. The status of transaction becomes paperless. source of truth and transactions cannot be
submission of invoices and transport invoice is known to the participants only processed further unless all the relevant
with smart contracts
documents to banks. This increases through mails. Real time settlement of transaction parties agree and authenticate it. (which in this case would
overheads for banks and also makes the Clients can transfer invoices to the
process tedious for vendors. Potential of fraud Blockchain network using an external Fraud proof
be code-driven, tripartite
As invoice changes multiple hands technology such as Oracle and once it is Blockchain’s DLT and all the relevant parties agreement between
Time-consuming process throughout the lifecycle of a transaction, on Blockchain, smart contract rules can be can view and verify the processes. There is
Due to manual processing of the there are high possibilities for frauds in triggered, and then the bills are discounted only one source of truth and transactions
banks, clients and vendors.
transaction and lack of automation at any form of tampering of documents thereby and funds disbursed to the vendor within cannot be processed further unless all the If an open Blockchain is
point, it takes minimum 4-5 days for vendor causing delay in release of funds, funds few hours. An automatic debit to customer relevant parties agree and authenticate it.
to collect funds from the bank against being disbursed to wrong entity. Also, once account is triggered on the due date.
created, then ‘many-to-
the relevant document. This affects the such transaction happens, it is difficult to many’ relationships can
working capital situation of vendors as keep a track of such fraudulent entities/
the funds remain blocked as long as the practices.
be established between
processing takes place. banks/FIs and vendors.

14 15
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

Win- Win for all Case 2: Customer loyalty programs A variety of reward points schemes are
Loyalty/reward points are an integral part introduced by banks. There reward points
of the customer retention strategy across can be either merchant specific i.e. can be
industries, and especially for banks with a redeemed only with a specific vendor, or it
significant retail business. Loyalty/reward can provide loyalty points that can be availed
based incentives are offered by everyone across multiple vendors.
right from banks to e-wallets. Reward points
help in tokenizing a portion of the customer’s
spend and using it to increase stickiness.

State of the Market4

Average Non-usage due to Average decline in


redemption rate delayed gratification membership on
Y-O-Y basis
>80% 70% 5%
Clients Banks Vendors

Intangible Tangible Intangible Tangible Intangible Tangible Loyalty program participants

•• Better •• Good •• Provision of •• Increase in •• Savings in •• Interest


relationship relationship other financial revenue by interest savings for
with vendors with vendors services to INR 25000002 vendors2
•• Instant
thereby vendors from new
working Clients Banks Merchants
leading to clients and
•• Higher client capital Loyalty/reward Issues cards with Merchants who
a supply of higher client
retention financing point beneficiaries loyalty/reward sell goods against
goods at retention points to clients redemption of reward
discounted •• Cost savings points by clients
•• Cost savings
prices leading
to the tune of
to cost savings
70%3

16 17
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

Looking at it through the Blockchain Fit Assessment Framework Since a majority of the questions are answered in the affirmative, this is a right use
case for Blockchain.
Factors Assessment Framework Loyalty Program Fit
As is

1 Purchases air tickets


•• High fees for intermediary?
No – there is no real intermediary required,
Intermediary •• Latency due to processing through intermediary?
processes are generally within the bank
•• Does the intermediary exist due to lack of trust? Client 1 2 Bank transfers loyalty Airline Client 1 5 Client 1 later meets client 2 Client 2
points that can be later in the day and realizes
4 Hotel staff redeemed at specific that he needs to leave
checks if merchants that the urgently on account of an
client 1 bank has tie ups with. emergency. So he plans to
•• Are multiple participants involved? wants to hop onto the last flight of the
Yes – customer, merchants, vendors, and 3 Client 1 day but it is super-expensive.
Transparency •• Does increase in transparency into the transaction help the avail any
multiple entities within the bank checks He also discusses how he
loyalty
participants in the hotel could have extended his
points but
client 1 holiday using his reward
refuses points

6 Client 1 also shares how


Bank
he had wonderful his stay
was and how he wishes to
•• Is the same information being stored in multiple locations? Yes – common customer information is Hotel extend as well but is low on
Information Storage budget
•• Is data consistency an issue? stored across multiple entities of the bank

Client 1 refused to avail loyalty points got wasted without any Accumulated reward points by client 2 get wasted
benefits may be because he didn’t know how to avail those points
or the points could not be redeemed at the concerned hotel
•• Does the process involve manual operations? Yes – it is required throughout the lifecycle
Manual Processing
•• Is the cost of Reconciliation high?
of the process and involves reconciliation Current pain points
among data across entities
Lack of interoperability in reward points the usefulness of reward points for in order to redeem against decent purchase
Various reward point programs offer consumers. As per an estimate, the current you need at least 500-600 points therefore in
merchant or category specific reward points. redemption rate is less than 80%. order to accumulate 500 points, you should
•• Is there trust among participants?
These specific reward points can’t be used shop for approx. 1-2 lacs.
Yes – multiple participants are involved
•• Do multiple participants have the right to modify transactions? in the transactions including merchants,
for any other category or any other merchant Complex programs
Trust outlet. This makes it less attractive for the As per a study, a significant portion of Lack of standardization
•• Is there a risk of fraudulent transactions? customers, vendors, etc. which are not well
consumers as there might be instances consumers are not aware of all the benefits Due to lack of product/quality
known to each other, causing a lack of trust
where the reward points might get expired associated with a reward linked card, process standardization, it becomes difficult to
and customer might not be able to to redeem the points, exclusive benefits ensure repeat usage of goods
avail the benefit. to members. Also, according to The 2016 by customers
•• Is the documentation paper-based? Yes – There is multiple documentation Bond Loyalty Report, 57% of respondents
required at each participant, with a lot Delayed gratification expressed interest in engaging with loyalty Information security
•• Is there a large number of documents / reports required to Consumers prefer instant gratification. programs via a mobile device. Loyalty programs accumulate large volumes
Documentation of validations for bills, items of purchase,
be generated? However, reward points does not get of Personally Identifiable Information (PII)
etc. This is not due to regulatory reporting
requirements credited instantly, which leads to 70% of System inefficiency thus they are prone to threats from data
the consumers abandoning the points Loyalty program management systems security. Identity theft is another area of
accumulated by them. inefficiencies cause poor data integrity. concern for program administrators
Degree of channel integration is also limited.
Limited redemption Real-time integration would help drive more Financial burden
•• Will the transactions benefit from being real-time Yes – currently it takes too long to redeem None of the reward points currently provide cross-channel integration. Administration of loyalty programs adds to
Time Sensitivity access across all the merchants. In fact, there the liability for company financials. Unused
or synchronous? points earned causing delayed gratification
are cases where reward points can be used Limited accumulation of reward points reward points are an unwanted liability
only to buy a selected range of goods at the The value of each reward point on an average
partnered merchant outlet. This decreases is 25-30 paisa on a purchase of INR 100 and

18 19
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

To be Blockchain makes a more efficient rewards network

1 Purchases air tickets


Rewards Network

The network connects different participants such as program


administrators, individuals, and merchants.
Client 1 2 Bank transfers Airline Client 1 5 Client 1 transfers his airline Client 2
interoperable loyalty tokens to client 2 and client 2 A rewards application operates as a wallet, holding reward
4 Hotel tokens can avail a cheaper flight tokens, and acts as the interface between the user and the
staff uses network.
blockchain
based app 6 Client 2 transfers his hotel The applications facilitate the exchange of rewards tokens
and uses 3 Client 1 tokens to client 1 and client 1 between users
checks can extend his vacation
his hotel
in the hotel
token to The program administrator governs the network and reward
upgrade validators
his room
to a suite
The Blockchain allows this to happen in a frictionless, secure
Bank Reward Rewards Rewards
environment
Applications Platform Tokens
Hotel
Reward Applications Reward Tokens
99 Identity information 99 Customizable 99 Tokens serve as the 99 Programmed with rules
secured through reward tokens medium of exchange & restrictions that govern
digital signatures functionality
99 Integrated reward 99 Can be freely traded to
•• Hotel’s suite services get promoted •• Client 1 is able to extend his vacation
99 Programmable to system enable versatility 99 Can be redeemed with
•• Client 1 has a better experience •• Client 2 is able to get a cheaper flight reward users ease

•• Airline gets a new customer i.e. client 2

Win- Win for all

How Blockchain can help

Standardized reward tokens Smooth integration of new merchants


Blockchain protocol creates an algorithm- on the platform
generated loyalty token, which is a base The Blockchain platform can accommodate
for all types of rewards issued by players different and multiple organizations and their
that sit on the network. This token can be loyalty programs, facilitating their interaction,
used to initiate and execute any transaction especially in terms of the convertibility and
– issuance, redemption or exchange. exchange of their points. The network even
The loyalty token’s existence and unique facilitates a consensus among the merchants,
identifiers are updated on each participant’s customers and banks without the need for a
ledger and made available across the middleman or clearinghouse. Clients Banks Vendors
network.
Unanimous consensus of reward points
Intangible Tangible Intangible Tangible Intangible Tangible
Instant gratification & real time tracking Several online protocol rules and restrictions
of reward points govern the way the points behind these •• Customer •• 27% increase •• Higher client •• Increase in •• Repeat •• Increase in
Blockchain can facilitate a transaction to be tokens function. For example, each satisfaction in volume of retention revenue as purchases revenue by
logged and accessed by multiple involved participant can set his or her own points transactions2 clients will 50% driven
•• More •• Cost savings •• New
parties in near real time, thereby eliminating exchange values. make more use by customer
transactions •• 5% average customers
the need for coordination with various of cards loyalty
savings on
participants to credit points faster. As •• Economic •• Brand and brand
purchase •• Cost savings
customers crave for faster redemption, this purchases advocacy advocacy
transactions2 as most of
would help achieve customer satisfaction to new
the manual
and thereby create a memorable experience. customers2
processes gets
eliminated
20 21
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

Case 3: Syndicated Loans entire process. The Lead Arranger carries Looking at it through the Blockchain Fit Assessment Framework
Corporations undertake multiple large out a KYC for the client, forms a syndicate
projects such as development of roads, of members which are willing to fund a
train systems, airports, factories, new percentage of the loan and diversify the Factors Assessment Framework Syndicated Loans Fit
business centers, etc., which requires risk, and also takes on underwriting
large-scale financing. Procuring these large of the loan. •• High fees for intermediary?
funds necessitate the institutions to come Yes – agents and intermediaries are
together to form syndicates and diversify The Global Syndicate loan volumes and Intermediary •• Latency due to processing through intermediary? appointed at high fees to manage and
the financial risk among its members. number of deals seem to have plateaued administer the process
•• Does the intermediary exist due to lack of trust?
between 2011 and 2015. Since the
The corporate clients seeking the loan APAC markets are growing, it provides
initiates contact with a Lead Arranger, opportunities for setting up of syndicate
which coordinates with syndicate loan back-office operations for global firms. Yes – syndicate members seek transparency
•• Are multiple participants involved?
members, manages and administers the customer’s rating, loan administering, etc.
Transparency •• Does increase in transparency into the transaction help the while customers seek transparency in
participants underwriting

Search capabilities based Indicaton of interest in Yes – customer information has to be


Loan creation
on loan characteristics sydicate participation •• Is the same information being stored in multiple locations? gathered from multiple sources for
Information Storage
•• Is data consistency an issue? underwriting. Each member also stores a
copy of the customer details

Borrowers' consents for In-flight loan amendments Management of secondary


downstream sales (evnet driven: rate changes market liquidity
or credit downgrades) Yes – the entire lifecycle is very paper-
•• Does the process involve manual operations?
Manual Processing intensive with customer details, negotiated
•• Is the cost of Reconciliation high? terms and conditions among members, etc

•• Is there trust among participants?


Yes – multiple participants are involved in
•• Do multiple participants have the right to modify transactions? the transactions including agents, customers,
Trust
•• Is there a risk of fraudulent transactions? syndicate members, etc. who may not be well
known to each other, causing a lack of trust

•• Is the documentation paper-based? Yes – There is multiple documentation


required at syndicate formation, as well as
•• Is there a large number of documents / reports required to
Documentation payment with a lot of validations for bills,
be generated?
items of purchase, etc. This is not due to
regulatory reporting requirements

Yes – the turnaround time can be reduced


•• Will the transactions benefit from being real-time
Time Sensitivity and risk lowered if payment settlements
or synchronous?
become real time

22 23
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

Since a majority of the questions are answered in the affirmative, this is a right use To be

case for Blockchain. 3 Invites syndicates and shares KYC


for customer through on BC with
As is interested syndicate
1 Loan request
6 Loan disbursed 2 Contacts agent

Corporation Smart contract Lead Syndicate


1 Loan request 7 Repayment Arranger Smart contract
2 Conducts KYC using smart contract Bank
Corporation Lead Agent and puts in on BC
arranger Syndicate Contract signed and amount
Bank
4
5 Loan disbursed transferred to LAB
4 3 Helps
Investigates form
the the
5 Terms and conditions of 8 Repayment 7 Repayment
corporation syndicate
underwriting

How BlockChain can help


Faster syndicate formation Technology integration Implementation of
Syndicate Automated selection criteria for syndicate Automated due diligence and analysis of
formation in programmable smart information for loan underwriting through Blockchain would lead to
Current pain points contracts Blockchain, reducing TAT cost savings in the range
Time-consuming process Manual Processing Delayed settlement cycles Digitization of documents Reduced settlement periods of 70-80% for a syndicate
Selection of members based on financial The technology systems are obsolete and Delayed settlement cycles for payments
soundness and industry expertise, processes are manual and paper intensive, lock up capital and increase default risk
Agreements, contracts, terms and Blockchain can facilitate near real-time loan loan transaction facilitated
condition documents, etc. are digitized on funding and payment settlements with
evaluation of borrower’s financial taking a long time as well as increasing the the BlockChain and validations and checks activities executed via smart contracts by banks2
background and then negotiation of term cost of operations are automated
and conditions is a tedious and time Document immutability
consuming process for the Lead Arranger. Duplication of effort Quicker KYC for the Clients Immutability feature of the Blockchain
The lack of technology integration for Blockchain can facilitate immediate KYC by eliminates need for multiple copies of the
Intermediary Fees due diligence and underwriting causes the Lead Arranger through digital identity same documents being held
Agents and intermediaries have to be referencing of different applications and for clients
appointed at high fees to manage and sources during the process. Document
administer the process duplication also leads to risk of fraud

24 25
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

Challenges and
Implementation Roadmap
While the interest in the technology is all pervasive, there exists a number of
challenges for its widespread adoption

Nascent technology Integration procedure and change


As most of the firms are still experimenting adoption
with Blockchain and trying to develop PoCs, Blockchain applications offer solutions
there is a high chance of failure due to lack that require significant overhaul of existing
of any precedence. As such, identification of systems. In order to make the switch,
a use-case by the bank will not suffice. Bank companies must strategize the transition. It
will have to consider other allied factors needs to be a consortium based approach
such as transaction speed, verification as banks need to make sure that all the
process, codes for smart contract and data relevant stakeholders for the underlying
limits. use-case agree to come together on the
platform. This will require conducting
Clarity around regulatory status workshops with the stakeholders and
As few of the use-cases involving Blockchain educating them about usage and usefulness
as a solution, requires use of a virtual of Blockchain based system.
currency to perform the transaction, this
will require changes in current regulation Cost
by government and other agencies like RBI. Blockchain offers tremendous savings in
This necessitates absolute clarity around transaction costs and time but the initial
how the change will impact the dynamics cost of investment in the technology might
of a transaction in terms of compliance. be high and the payback period might be
Another regulatory issue relates to smart high. Hence, Banks will have to consider it
contract mechanism of Blockchain. from a long term investment perspective
While incorporating the smart contract and make sure that the investment is
mechanism in their solution, banks would aligned to their vision statement.
have to address the traditional concepts
associated with a contract such as offer and
acceptance, certainty and consideration, etc.
to ensure its legal enforceability.

26 27
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

The figure 5 below explains the two dimensions that needs


to be considered while implementing Blockchain, i.e. ease
of implementation and Blockchain complexity5

Figure 5

Set up innovation lab Partner with fintech companies Collaborations

Create loyalty management Work with fintech startups to develop Collaborate with other players and
solutions from scratch tailored solutions develop a solution that has potential
to be industry-standard

Non permissioned ledger Permissioned ledger


Blockchain compleity

Open ledger with Bitcoin blockchain where there is Closed ledger architecture where only verified nodes are
no restriction on the identity of nodes allowed to participate

Create own infrastructure Leverage existing infrastructure

Develop enterprise-grade distributed ledger Leverage existing distributed ledger platform protocols
framework based upon protocols, pollcies and and standards like those created by Ethereum
regulatory standards

Ease of Implementation

Implementation roadmap to reduce the impact of


challenges
Though there are definitive challenges in Once a suitable business case has been
implementing a Blockchain based solution, identified, it’s vital to align all the relevant
we believe that an effective implementation stakeholders and then design and
roadmap can mitigate or address most of structure the Blockchain stack. Once the
the challenges. architecture is ready, a prototype needs to
be developed first, and then successfully
tested on a pilot basis on multiple
transactions. Post successful pilots, firms
should plan to make solution live.

We have presented below an indicative roadmap for implementation of Blockchain:

Business Case Stakeholder Proof of Concept Solution


Design
Identification Aligment Testing Commercializing

• Sandbox Testing
Key Activites

• Operational • Incorporate • Design Blockchain • Identify key geographies


effectiveness industry standards • Extended pilot phase
stack • Partners with strong
assessment • Regulatory with high confidence
• Define roles and local banks to
• Risk Assessment assessment counterparties
location of nodes increase reach
Considerations

Consider both hard • Priority may be given to • Security, Scalability, • Stakeholders • Prioritize markets
and soft dollar cost extension of digital speed and to be Stakeholders where regulators
Key

Assess the one time solutions that are already robustness


to be technical and clients are more
and recurring cost on traction footing open to innovation
and adopting digital
initiatives
28 29
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

Summary Deloitte credentials


Though the potential of Blockchain is
widely claimed to be at par with early
commercial Internet, it is important that
of implementation of the Blockchain
based solution, structure of Blockchain
i.e. public, private or consortium, and key
and experience
firms understand the key features of stakeholders can be answered by the bank. Deloitte’s Blockchain ecosystem
the technology and how it can solve the However, the questions around regulations
current business issues as on one hand, will have to be resolved through focused Deloitte’s is growing an ecosystem of the
internet enabled exchange of data while discussions with competent regulatory world’s top entrepreneurs, scientists,
on other, the Blockchain can involve authorities and incorporation of their technologists and business leaders while
exchange of value. Banks need to identify thought-process. Banks will also developing our own expertise
opportunities, determine feasibility and need to have a concrete plan for
impact, and test proof of concepts. transaction scalability.

This will involve answering a series of Due to lack of any precedence, banks will Deloitte Blockchain and CryptoCurrency Community (DBC3)
fundamental questions related to dynamics have to opt for a trial-and-error approach Internal group of 350+ practitioners in 26 countries, focused
of transaction and regulations underlying either through internal trials or partnering on educating, building eminence, supporting clients, engaging
the transaction. The questions related with a specialized technology firm. Strategic partnership technology companies and creating solutions
to dynamics of transaction such as cost Deloitte has partnered with various
FinTech players such as Blockchain
Cypher, Bloq, Stellar, Consensys,
Loyyal

Strategic bridge by Deloitte


Partners
Artificial intelligence platform
matching enterprises and
startups to accelerate innovation

World Economic Forum


Deloitte partnered with
The
the WEF to explore the Blockchain 10+ global teams
transformative potential of
innovation. This exercise Integrator Numerous teams have
assembled globally to address
involved over 40 financial
market demand and develop the
industry leaders and over
next generation of solutions
100 technological innovators

Singularity University
An educational institute that brings together
top experts, such as Michael Rhodin, Peter
Diamandis and Marc Goodman, to inform
MIT MediaLab Digital Currency Initiative
financial services leaders how technology is
Working with Brian Forde, former senior White
impacting business
House advisor for mobile and data innovation,
and world-renowned faculty members from
Sloan School of Management and the MIT
media Lab to research Blockchain and its
possible implications on society

30 31
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

References
Deloitte’s experience
Deloitte is partnering and working on generation solutions for Banking Industry
various pilots/PoCs with organizations in leveraging the capabilities provided by the
India and globally and are investigating how technology platform
distributed ledgers can enable the next-
1
Deloitte US PoV: “Investment management
firms: getting started with Blockchain.pdf”

2
Industry estimates and Deloitte analysis

3
Economic times article: “http://
economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/
banking/finance/banking/yes-bank-
upbeat-on-using-blockchain-to-add-more-
processes/articleshow/56314280.cms”

Major global bank Major Indian bank Major foreign exchange


4
Experian, CRM search, Loyyal, Transera
Current bank pilot program Deloitte partnered with a major Indian A major European bank partnered
representing interoperability of real bank to pilot a cross-border trade with Ripple to facilitate cross-currency
5
Deloitte US PoV: “Making blockchain real for
estate, bank card and employee finance transaction for an Indian payments by connecting banks directly loyalty rewards programs.pdf”
rewards, leveraging a single, global importer on Blockchain. It also on- to each other via the Blockchain.
loyalty platform, powered by boarded the foreign bank to execute
Blockchain and offering market leading second leg of the transaction directly to
customization capabilities. the Blockchain.

Major telecom DCoins Thought Leadership


A major Dutch telecommunication Deloitte in partnership with Loyyal has Unprecedented levels of investment
company helping financial transactions developed an application called DCoins. across industries is being applied
announced that it is following These can be used as a medium of towards exploring new and innovative
the evolution of Blockchain and exchange in scenarios involving applications of the Blockchain
acknowledges potential for Blockchain transfer, exchange and redemption of technology
technology. reward points.

32 33
Blockchain in banking | While the interest is huge, challenges remain for large scale adoption

Contacts
Monish Shah Suchintan Chatterjee
Partner Director
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP
monishshah@deloitte.com suchintanc@deloitte.com

34
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK
private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms,
and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally
separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”)
does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a
more detailed description of DTTL and its member firms.

This material is prepared by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP (DTTILLP).


This material (including any information contained in it) is intended to provide
general information on a particular subject(s) and is not an exhaustive
treatment of such subject(s) or a substitute to obtaining professional
services or advice. This material may contain information sourced from
publicly available information or other third party sources. DTTILLP does
not independently verify any such sources and is not responsible for any
loss whatsoever caused due to reliance placed on information sourced
from such sources. None of DTTILLP, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its
member firms, or their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte Network”)
is, by means of this material, rendering any kind of investment, legal or other
professional advice or services. You should seek specific advice of the relevant
professional(s) for these kind of services. This material or information is not
intended to be relied upon as the sole basis for any decision which may affect
you or your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that
might affect your personal finances or business, you should consult a qualified
professional adviser. No entity in the Deloitte Network shall be responsible for
any loss whatsoever sustained by any person or entity by reason of access to,
use of or reliance on, this material. By using this material or any information
contained in it, the user accepts this entire notice and terms of use.

©2017 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP. Member of Deloitte Touche


Tohmatsu Limited

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information


intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you
are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby
notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the
taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. When addressed to our
clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms
and conditions expressed in the governing client engagement letter.

Вам также может понравиться