From Redistribution to Recognition]
Dilemmas of Justice ig
a ‘Post-Socialist’ Agd
‘The ‘srugae for recognition’ i at becoming the patiiymatic om
political eafic inthe late twentieth entry. Demands for resogsit of
Aierence™ fel struggles of gsoups mobilized under the barnes of
rationality, ethnicity, "ice, gender, and sexuality In these poston
confess, group identity supplant css interest as the chet motion of
politcal mobilization. Cultural domination supplans exploitation
fandamenal injustice. And clrral recognition daplacessocoeson
redisteibotion athe remedy foe injusice and the goal of pol use
‘Tha, ofcourse, aot the whole sory. Struggle or recognition oc
world of exacerbated material inequality—in income an property
ship; in aces to pid work, education, health are and lise time bf
‘more surly in elorc intake and expose to environmental tox
inlfeespeetancy and ater of morbidity and morality. Matera ines
fon the tse in most of the worl’ countres-—in the United States a
yg nino oseget apis ing etl degra sor
ts rm he andpoin of sale ee
(Siete canes eke Revit corm ofp foe
chee rll ono otis in ots |. Sunt Wen Ae Se i
Ihe pene aa en eon, re De heey ora on eae ew er peas
1. The Redistribution Recognition Dilemma onengiton ot isp
‘ae patil aac ae eens ow ‘Sing ete incre tue Du Segnon st
on oer peso (Negeve eonape tach ot Sl
‘Kr Nar, Capi, Wu John Rawls, A Tay of stn, Cb,
Eos
“ete rama Ah
‘Sela arn tao awar ppl eeeate timp es
cctv seed Eee
wT eta ie Ce
Seer Seer nce c= Ah ee ees
rea ig epi ae
ice lem t pt wSst ec mee an
I, Exploited Classes, Despised Sexualities,
‘nd BivalenéColleeiviies
Sporximang the en ete Ha steshe pation ie peta eran wea
he burdens and aa unjustly smal share of the rewend
sure, its membets also sufer serious cultural injustices, the "badge 2
‘orton je fa batten bing ee
Sc nrc eh or
‘ton ie ea ieee cae
lon a sy te dan ane
Tela die. Pea hea pete
ming rnc finereader, oy
mf th ie, wll oi col be
Amenity eae Sen
{ES pemjntrs hrehyae menenily me o
‘Sahn dune uns me amiga
Sealy dined ffm work aed te denied Gi boved soc
een a fom eng tlc smi
Stee Te my vt omen sin,
recor sggerl tat real Sone ven ese oe eo
‘Tice ffeil fr
suey of cho eel ea!Telefe sola ions
‘chron ey entangle ep,
Piece iatlcn eens in
of i cape cn ah anne a ae he a
‘lleva “tvlen. They ae dif ak cole ee
sc, Tey hn
‘othe il chaser f gender esteem. napolis of rion. Bo
seorspenty, tz the arash
ML. Affirmation of Transformation?
Revisiting the Question of Remedy
Sor.tonere ic complete ump in
‘megan Oo ss aly hl ere
‘yng Ganev gens an, By ema ti
ule phere Ober ver st is
Ingen reap Mis sl creme, hema wld
Fr The wold ens en honing io
‘pedi eno vg
ea hn Ques hoy orm ns ene
‘ashen i 00 yg ey,
okie ena, ld craig dercee n
some spc -a min, svslIV, Fineasing the Dilemma:
Revisiting Gender and "Raceted an ree
Compete ‘ith the afin sxopion polis ora
toc eal to ipl the rdsu recognicon dea
‘iets ue clan 4h para sary al tt
socio
‘iti tmtanged th ate der of hve fb a pr
myocar engl bin eee
‘