Powered by Website address:

https://www.gesundheitsindustrie-
bw.de/en/article/news/a-heidelberg-man-of-african-
origin/

A Heidelberg man of African origin

The lower jaw of Homo heidelbergensis was an isolated find and has long been
overshadowed by other spectacular early human finds. Homo heidelbergensis is regarded
as the last common ancestor of Neanderthals and Homo sapiens, and so is a central part of
the debate on modern human origins.

Lower jaw of Homo heidelbergensis. © Museum of Geology and Palaeontology, University of Heidelberg

On the evening of 21st October 1907, Daniel Hartmann, a gravel pit worker known as
‘Sanddaniel’, walked into the Hochschwender pub in the village of Mauer near Heidelberg
and announced that he had found “Adam”. What he had found in the Grafenrain sand pit on
the river Elsenz near Heidelberg was an almost complete, fairly robust human jaw that
appeared to be very old indeed. The palaeontologist Professor Otto Schoetensack from the
University of Heidelberg who had previously visited the Grafenrain pits in search of glacial
fossils was contacted the following day. Schoetensack described the find in a monograph
entitled “Der Unterkiefer des Homo heidelbergensis aus den Sanden von Mauer bei
Heidelberg” (The lower jaw of the Homo heidelbergensis from the Mauer sands near
Heidelberg”) published in 1908. Schoetensack realised almost immediately how important
the discovery was and believed the Mauer mandible to be older than the Neanderthals.
Neanderthals were classified as such based on a specimen discovered in the Neander Valley
near Düsseldorf (Germany) in 1856. Following the discovery of this Neanderthal type
specimen, other previously discovered fossils were also (retrospectively) classified as
Neanderthal.

The most famous lower jaw in the world

The Grafenrain excavation site close to the village of Mauer, where the “Heidelberg Jaw” was discovered in 1907. ©
Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Heidelberg

The jaw of the prehistoric man from Heidelberg, the valuable type specimen, has been dated
to around 600,000 years ago and is kept in a safe in the Institute of Earth Sciences (formerly,
the Institute of Geology and Palaeontology) at the University of Heidelberg. However, visitors
can see a detailed replica of the fossil jaw in the institute’s museum as well as in the small
primeval world museum in Mauer town hall. No further remains of the “Heidelberg Man”, as
Homo heidelbergensis is also known, have been discovered at the site despite intensive
searches. However, huge quantities of single rhino, elephant, lion and hippo bones have been
found in the Grafenrain sand pit and not so long ago human fossils were found in the village
of Bilzingsleben near the Kyffhäuser mountains; these fossils are geologically more recent
than the Mauer mandible, but have nevertheless been assigned to the same species. Well-
preserved hunting spears and animal skeletons have also been discovered in the village of
Schöningen (close to Helmstedt), suggesting that their owners were excellent hunters.
Illustrations of these finds are displayed in the primeval world museum in Mauer. 

In the 1890s, Dutch geologist Eugène Dubois excavated the skull roof and thigh bone of a
human specimen on Java, which he classified as a “species in between humans and apes”. He
called it Pithecanthropus erectus (originally Anthropopithecus), i.e. an “ape-human that
stands upright”. However, many of his peers disagreed with Dubois’ interpretations, which is
why the 1907 “Heidelberg Jaw” was long seen as the earliest evidence of human evolution.

Palaeoanthropologists seem to be constantly embroiled in polemic, even according to the

standards of the scientific world. Could this be because their research objects cause a stir that
spills over into the non-scientific realm, often putting the researchers in the limelight? Could
it also be because palaeoanthropologists are exposed to attacks from the church and from
religious fundamentalists of all creeds? In the first half of the 20th century, the passion of the
disputes was often not only stoked by the vanity and vulnerability of the researchers, but also
by nationalistic and racist prejudices which seem odd to us today.

Homo britannicus
A few years after the discovery of the Mauer mandible, a spectacular discovery in a gravel pit
near the village of Piltdown in the south of England hit headlines around the world. It
consisted of fragments of a human skull with an ape-like lower jaw. Primitive stone tools as
well as rhinoceros and elephant bone fragments were discovered alongside it. It seemed that
the perfect missing link Darwin alluded to in his epochal oeuvre 40 years previously had
finally been discovered. The outpouring of joy was tremendous because, at the height of
Anglo-German rivalry in the period immediately preceding WWI, the British had outperformed
the Germans, including in the field of human origin. The ironic term “Homo britannicus” (the
official name of the species was Eoanthropus dawsoni, after its collector, Charles Dawson)
suggested that at least one patriot truly believed that mankind was of British origin.

Examination of the Piltdown skull in 1912. Charles Dawson (second from the right), fossil hunter who found
Piltdown Man and prime suspect the fraud. © Natural History Museum, London

The Piltdown Man was “an audacious fake and a sophisticated scientific fraud” (quoted from
the website of the Natural History Museum in London). The skull fragments actually came
from a modern human and had been artificially stained to match the surrounding gravel; the
lower jawbone and canine of an orang-utan were also found. From the outset, some scientists
had expressed scepticism at the find, but it was not until 1952 – approximately 40 years after
its alleged discovery – that the forgery was discovered by Kenneth Oakley, then a
geoarchaeologist at the Natural History Museum, after he had carried out chemical analyses
of the finds. He is credited with restoring the tarnished image of the world-famous museum.
Now, a hundred years after the “discovery” of the skull fragments, this criminal case still
occupies the minds of scientists around the world: what roles did those involved in the fraud
play, including famous figures like the Jesuit priest Teilhard de Chardin? What were the
motives behind the fraud? In a recent publication, Professor Chris Stringer, head of research
of the “Human Origins” department at the Natural History Museum, presents the current
view of the scandal and a new research programme aimed at finally unravelling the mystery
of Piltdown Man using state-of-the-art DNA analysis, spectroscopy, radiocarbon- and isotope
analysis methods (Nature 492, 177-179, 13th December 2012: “The 100-year mystery of
Piltdown Man“).

Out of Africa – again and again and again

Beyond a doubt, the scandal had damaged the reputation of science, but it did not succeed in
stopping the progress of research. In the decades after WW1, numerous discoveries “shed
light on the origin of man” (as Darwin once famously wrote). Racial prejudices nevertheless
dominated human thinking for quite some time. This led, for example, to an American
anthropologist saying in 1962: “If Africa was the cradle of mankind, it was only an indifferent
kindergarten. Europe and Asia were our principal schools” (C. Stringer: The Observer, 19th
June 2011). It was only modern DNA analyses that helped the thesis that mankind actually
originated in Africa to gain ground.

Homo heidelbergensis reconstruction. © Natural History Museum, London

The first humans to leave Africa belonged to the species Homo erectus, named after the first
specimen of Homo erectus discovered (and later confirmed as a true find) in Java by Eugène
Dubois in 1891. The earliest Homo erectus fossils, dating to around 1.8 million years ago,
were discovered in East Africa. It is assumed that Homo erectus quickly migrated from Africa
to West Asia (Dmanisi in Georgia) and then moved on to China and Indonesia where Homo
erectus descendants lived up until at least 200,000 years ago. It is generally agreed that
Homo erectus originates from more ancient African hominids (Homo habilis or
Australopithecus); however, the details of their phylogenetic relationships remain highly
controversial and are a central part of the debate on modern human origins.
For a long time, all hominids of the pre-Neanderthal era found in Eurasia were classified as
Homo erectus. The Mauer mandible was therefore initially classified as Homo erectus
heidelbergensis, a term still used by the Heidelberg-based Museum of Geology and
Palaeontology. Many anthropologists are since using a new, broader nomenclature. The
original H. erectus who lived approximately 700,000 years ago evolved into a new human
species with a much bigger brain who used well-manufactured stone tools (known as the
Acheulian culture) which, in a second propagation wave (out of Africa II theory), subsequently
migrated to southern Europe, including Germany and England. All representatives of this
more advanced human species are classified as Homo heidelbergensis based on the Mauer
type specimen. Their robust build and excellent hunting tools appeared to be well suited to
dealing with the climate fluctuations in Europe. H. heidelbergensis hominids evolved into the
Neanderthals approximately 250,000 years ago. 

The Homo heidelbergensis populations that remained in Africa (most probably the great
majority) evolved into the ancestors of modern humans; however, little information is
available about their evolution. Humans classified as H. heidelbergensis lived in Ethiopia,
Zambia and South Africa around 600 – 500,000 years ago; around 200,000 years ago,
anatomically modern humans lived in Ethiopia and have therefore been recognised as Homo
sapiens. These Homo sapiens specimens are part of the third propagation wave (out of Africa
III or recent out of Africa theory), which occurred less than 100,000 years ago. They colonised
Europe around 45,000 years ago and eventually went on to colonise the whole world. 

The search continues

According to current scientific knowledge, the aforementioned scenario is plausible but not
undisputed. New unexpected discoveries can change the picture tremendously, for example
the Homo erectus fossil found in Dmanisi in Georgia, the dwarfish Flores Man (Homo
floresiensis) dating to around 17,000 years ago and the Denisova Man from south Siberia
identified from the DNA analysis of a finger bone. Although multiple new human fossils have
been discovered over the last decades, there are still big gaps in the fossil evidence regarding
the alleged evolution of humans. An even bigger problem is that only fragments have been
discovered: a few skull pieces here, and an arm bone, teeth, a cheekbone or a lower jawbone
at a different site. This leaves room for different interpretations and controversy. Researchers
are therefore diligently and patiently searching for further fragments at known discovery
sites in the assumption that the sites harbour more information about the fossils. The
“Isotope Geochemistry” research group led by Dr. Bernd Kober at the Institute of Earth
Sciences at the University of Heidelberg, for example, is specifically focused on the Mauer
discovery site and is using a state-of-the-art thermion mass spectrometer to analyse the
Grafenrain sand pit where Daniel Hartmann discovered his “Adam” in 1907.
Article
14-Jan-2013
EJ
BioRN
© BIOPRO Baden-Württemberg GmbH

The article is part of the following dossiers

Evolutionary research - from
classical biology to molecular
phylogeny