Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
org
OBSTETRICS
Diagnostic utility of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and
soluble endoglin in hypertensive diseases of pregnancy
Saira Salahuddin, MD; Young Lee, MD; Mary Vadnais, MD; Benjamin P. Sachs, MB, BS, DPH; S. Ananth Karumanchi, MD;
Kee-Hak Lim, MD
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the clin- 88% for sFlt 1; 84% and 88% for sEng; 90% and 63% for uric acid. In
ical utility of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt 1) and soluble women with CHTN, they were 84% and 95% for sFlt 1; 84% and 79%
endoglin (sEng) in the differential diagnosis of hypertension in late for sEng; 68%; and 78% for uric acid. The positive LR for preeclamp-
pregnancy. sia was 9 for sFlt 1 and 7 for sEng in women with normal pregnancy; in
women with GHTN; 6.7 for sFlt 1 and 7.2 for sEng; in CHTN, 16 for sFlt
STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed serum levels of sFlt 1 and sEng in
1 and 4 for sEng. Serum uric acid had a positive LR of only 2.4 in
women with gestational hypertension (GHTN; n ⫽ 17), chronic hyper-
women with GHTN and 3.1 in women with CHTN.
tension (CHTN; n ⫽ 19), preeclampsia (n ⫽ 19), and normal preg-
nancy (n ⫽ 20) in the third trimester. We calculated the sensitivity, CONCLUSION: Both sFlt 1 and sEng may prove useful in differentiating
specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR) for each fac- preeclampsia from other hypertensive diseases of pregnancy. A pro-
tor in diagnosing preeclampsia. spective cohort study should be performed determine the clinical utility
of measuring these proteins.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of sFlt 1 in differentiating pre-
eclampsia from normal pregnancy were 90% and 90%, respectively, Key words: hypertension in pregnancy, preeclampsia, soluble
and 90% and 95% for sEng. In women with GHTN, they were 79% and endoglin, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1
Cite this article as: Salahuddin S, Lee Y, Vadnais M, et al. Diagnostic utility of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and soluble endoglin in hypertensive diseases
of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197;28.e1-28.e6.
TABLE 1
Admission demographics
Preeclampsia
Control (n ⴝ 20) GHTN (n ⴝ 17) CHTN (n ⴝ 19) (n ⴝ 19) P (by ANOVA)
Age (y) 33.7 ⫾ 5.3 31.2 ⫾ 5.5 35.2 ⫾ 6.3 30.6 ⫾ 5.6 .05
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
BMI 26.9 ⫾ 6.0 27.6 ⫾ 12 31.8 ⫾ 10 28.1 ⫾ 5.4 .40
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
SBP (mm Hg) 118.4 ⫾ 9.5 145.4 ⫾ 8.0 142.2 ⫾ 17 146.0 ⫾ 16.5 ⬍.001*
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
DBP (mm Hg) 74.7 ⫾ 8.2 93.0 ⫾ 9.4 92.6 ⫾ 26 91.8 ⫾ 10 .001*
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
GA (wks) 39.1 ⫾ 1.3 36.4 ⫾ 1.9 35.7 ⫾ 3.2 34.6 ⫾ 3.3 .05
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Hematocrit (%) 34.8 ⫾ 3.0 34.2 ⫾ 4.2 34.6 ⫾ 3.0 35.1 ⫾ 3.3 .9
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
BMI, body mass index; CHTN, chronic hypertension; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GA, gestational age; GHTN, gestational hypertension; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
* Compared with control.
these 2 peptides seems to precede the on- lege of Obstetrics and Gynecology (R&D Systems Inc, Minneapolis, MN).
set of hypertension and proteinuria by a (ACOG) practice bulletin (Jan. 2002).5 Briefly, various samples for ELISA mea-
few weeks9,11 and correlates with severity For proteinuria, 0.3 g protein or higher surement were diluted in respective cal-
of the disease. in a 24-hour urine specimen was used as ibrator diluent. After adding assay di-
Elevated serum levels of both sFlt 1 much as possible. When the 24-hour luent and the diluted sample in a 96-well
and sEng have been documented in pre- urine was not available, either a dipstick plate precoated with captured antibodies
eclampsia and gestational hypertension of ⫹1 or greater or a protein/creatinine directed against human sFlt-1 or human
retrospectively in samples stored for ratio of 0.3 or greater was used. We used endoglin, the plates were incubated for 2
more than a decade,9,11 and the clinical the criteria outlined by ACOG rather hours. The wells were washed 4 times in
utility of these 2 factors in differentiating than more stringent criteria of ⫹2 dip- wash buffer and incubated with second-
the 2 forms of hypertensive diseases in stick because we were interested in the ary polyclonal antibody against sFlt-1
pregnancy has not been examined. Fur- performance of these peptides in a typi- and endoglin conjugated to horseradish
thermore, we could not locate reports of cal clinical setting. peroxidase for an additional 2 hours.
serum levels of these peptides in women Severe preeclampsia was diagnosed if 1 The plates were then washed 4 times in
with chronic hypertension in the third or more of the following was present: (1) wash buffer.
trimester. Therefore, we performed this blood pressure of 160 mm Hg or greater Substrate solution containing hydro-
pilot study in advance of larger ones to systolic or greater than 110 mm Hg dia- gen peroxide and tetramethylbenzadine
evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and stolic on 2 occasions at least 6 hours were added to each well and incubated
positive and negative likelihood ratios apart while on bed rest; (2) proteinuria for 30 minutes under protection from
(LRs) of sFlt1 and sEng in patients with of 5 g or higher in a 24-hour urine col- light. Stop solution was added to each
various hypertensive diseases in lection or greater than positive 3 on 2 well. The optical density was then deter-
pregnancy. random urine samples collected at least 4 mined by subtracting readings at 540 nm
hours apart; (3) oliguria of less than 500 from the reading at 450 nm. All assays
M ATERIALS AND M ETHODS mL in 24 hours; (4) cerebral or visual dis- were performed in duplicate, and the
We performed a prevalence case-control turbances; (5) pulmonary edema or cya- protein levels were calculated using a
study measuring serum sFlt 1 and sEng nosis; (6) epigastric or right upper-quad- standard curve derived from a known
in consenting pregnant women present- rant pain; (7) impaired liver function; concentration of respective recombinant
ing to labor and delivery at Beth Israel (8) thrombocytopenia; or (9) fetal proteins. The minimum detectable doses
Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, growth restriction.5 Pregnant women in the assay for sFlt-1 and endoglin were
MA) from 2004-2006 with hypertension without hypertension, proteinuria, or 3.5 and 7 pg/mL, respectively, with in-
in the third trimester. The Committee on underlying medical conditions were re- traassay and interassay coefficients of
Clinical Investigations at Beth Israel cruited as controls. variation of 3.5% and 5.5%, respectively,
Deaconess Medical Center approved the The serum samples were stored at for sFlt-1 and 3.2% and 6.5%, respec-
study (protocol 2003-P-000342/5; Oct. –70oC in a freezer before use. Assays tively, for endoglin.
14, 2004). The pregnancy outcomes were were performed by personnel who were The data were analyzed using analysis of
analyzed by reviewing each case and unaware of the outcome of the preg- variance (ANOVA) and Student t test as
were categorized as gestational hyper- nancy. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent appropriate using the Systat 8.0 program
tension, chronic hypertension, or pre- assays (ELISAs) for sFlt 1 and endoglin (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Receiver operator
eclampsia, according to the diagnostic were performed with commercially characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn
criteria outlined by the American Col- available kits, as previously described and a full analysis performed to detect the
R ESULTS
Nineteen women with preeclampsia, 17
women with gestational hypertension, 100
and 19 women with chronic hyperten-
sFlt 1 (ng/ml)
sion were recruited for the study. In ad-
dition, 20 women with normal preg-
nancy were enrolled as controls. Basic
clinical and demographic information is
shown in Table 1. We enrolled both mul- 10
tiparous and nulliparous women in the
study. There were no significant differ-
ences between the groups in terms of
maternal age, body mass index, or gesta-
tional age. The women with preeclamp-
sia, gestational hypertension, and 1
chronic hypertension had significantly Control cHTN gHTN Preeclampsia
higher systolic (P ⬍ .001) and diastolic (n=19) (n=20) (n=17) (n=19)
(P ⫽ .001) blood pressure than the con-
trol group. Five of 19 patients with pre- CHTN, chronic hypertension; GHTN, gestational hypertension; sFlt 1, soluble
eclampsia met the criteria for severe dis- fms-like tyrosine kinase 1
ease as defined by ACOG.5 Two of the 5 *P = .04 compared with control
patients had HELLP (hemolysis, ele- **P < .01 compared with control
vated liver enzymes, and low platelet The mean serum level of sFlt 1 in women with preeclampsia was significantly higher than that of
count) syndrome, and the remaining 3 the control group (P ⬍ .01 by t test). Interestingly, the mean serum level of women with gestational
met only the blood pressure criteria. hypertension was significantly higher than the control group as well (P ⫽ .04 by t test). ANOVA
Three women in the preeclampsia group showed that the mean serum value in women with preeclampsia (74.7 ⫾ 83.3 ng/mL) was
had small-for-gestational-age babies as significantly higher than those seen in control (16.6 ⫾ 11.0 ng/mL), gestational hypertension (23.5
defined by birthweight less then 10% for ⫾ 14.9 ng/mL), or chronic hypertension (15.4 ⫾ 12.7 ng/mL) (P ⬍ .01).
gestational age.
The serum values of sFlt 1 in women
with different hypertensive diseases of tension (23.6 ⫾ 15.3 ng/mL) or chronic ity (90%) and specificity (90%) with the
pregnancy are shown in Figure 1. The hypertension (22.7 ⫾ 19.9 ng/mL) or the highest positive LR (9.0) and the lowest
mean serum value of sFlt 1 was signifi- control group (15.5 ⫾ 6.9 ng/mL; P ⬍ negative LR (0.1) in differentiating
cantly higher in women with preeclamp- .01 by ANOVA) (Figure 2). Similar to women with preeclampsia from normal
sia (74.7 ⫾ 83.3 ng/mL) than in women sFlt 1, the mean value of sEng was signif- pregnancy. The area under the ROC
with gestational hypertension (23.5 ⫾ icantly higher in women with gestational curve was 0.94 with SE of 0.04 (P ⬍ .01).
14.9 ng/mL), chronic hypertension (15.4 hypertension when compared with that For differentiating women with pre-
⫾ 12.7 ng/mL), or normal pregnancy of the control group (23.6 ⫾ 15.3 ng/mL eclampsia from those with gestational
(16.6 ⫾ 11.0 ng/mL, P ⬍ .01 by vs 15.5 ⫾ 6.9 ng/mL; P ⫽ .03 by t test) but hypertension, the serum sFlt-1 level of
ANOVA). Unlike women with chronic not in women with chronic hypertension 41.8 ng/mL had the highest sensitivity
hypertension, the mean serum level of (23.6 ⫾ 15.3 ng/mL vs 22.7 ⫾ 19.9 ng/ (79%) and specificity (88%) with posi-
sFlt 1 in women with gestational hyper- mL; P ⫽ .13 by t test). tive LR and negative LR of 6.7 and 0.2,
tension was statistically higher than the The sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, respectively. The area under the ROC
control group (23.5 ⫾ 14.9 ng/mL vs negative LR, and area under the ROC curve was 0.89 with SE of 0.06 (P ⬍ .01).
16.6 ⫾ 11.0 ng/mL, P ⫽ .04 by t test). curve for sFlt 1, sEng, and uric acid in For diagnosing preeclampsia in women
Similarly, the mean serum level of various hypertensive diseases in preg- with chronic hypertension, the sFlt-1
sEng was significantly higher in women nancy are shown in Table 2. According to level of 35.8 ng/mL showed the best sen-
with preeclampsia (69.2 ⫾ 42.5 ng/mL) the ROC curve analysis, the serum sFlt 1 sitivity (84%) and specificity (95%) with
than in women with gestational hyper- level of 23.5 ng/mL had the best sensitiv- positive LR of 16 and negative LR of 0.2.
TABLE 2
Test performance of serum sFlt 1, sEng, and uric acid in diagnosing preeclampsia
Control/PRE Gest HTN/PRE Chronic HTN/PRE
sFlt 1 sEng sFlt 1 sEng Uric acid sFlt 1 sEng Uric acid
Sens (%) 90 90 79 84 90 84 84 68
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Spec (%) 90 95 88 88 63 95 79 78
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
LR (positive) 9 17.9 6.7 7.2 2.4 16 4 3.1
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
LR (negative) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ROC 0.93 0.93 0.88 0.87 0.75 0.94 0.87 0.70
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Chronic HTN, chronic hypertension; gest HTN, gestational hypertension; PRE, preeclampsia; Sens, sensitivity; Spec, specificity.
serum values between the 2 groups, with However, all of the deliveries took place 3. Walker JJ. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2000;
an alpha of 0.05 and a beta of 0.2. Assum- after 28 weeks of gestation. In addition, 356:1260-5.
4. Redman CW, Sargent IL. Latest advances in
ing that the mean serum levels in patients the control group had the mean gesta-
understanding preeclampsia. Science 2005;
with gestational hypertension and tional age that is greater than that of the 308:1592-4.
chronic hypertension were similar to study population. It is unclear whether 5. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia
control population, we estimated the there is statistical difference in the serum and eclampsia: ACOG practice bulletin 33; Jan-
same number of patients will be needed levels of these angiogenic factors be- uary 2002.
to show a 50% difference in the mean tween early third trimester and term. 6. Report of the National High Blood Pressure
Education Program. Working Group on High
values, compared with patients with Nevertheless, previously published data
Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gy-
preeclampsia. suggest that the serum level of both sFlt 1 necol 2000;183:s1-22.
Given our findings (ie, area under the and sEng rise in normal pregnant popu- 7. Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, et al. Ex-
curves of the ROC), we now estimate lation with increasing gestational cess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1
that we would need approximately 34 age.9,11,14,15 We believe that this would (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dys-
patients to show that sFlt 1 is a better have biased the data against our findings function, hypertension, and proteinuria in
preeclampsia. J Clin Invest 2003;111:
marker than serum uric acid for distin- because the serum levels of our control
649-58.
guishing women with preeclampsia group were measured later in gestation. 8. Venkatesha S, Toporsian M, Lam C, et al.
from those with chronic hypertension Despite this possibility, our data show Soluble endoglin contributes to the patho-
with a beta of 0.2. For sEng, we would that the serum levels of these antiangio- genesis of preeclampsia. Nat Med 2006;12:
need 69 women. For differentiating genic proteins are higher in women with 642-9.
women with gestational hypertension preeclampsia. A larger study will allow us 9. Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, et al. Circu-
lating angiogenic factors and the risk of pre-
from preeclampsia, we would need 103 to determine whether the clinical utility
eclampsia. N Engl J Med 2004;350:672-83.
women for sFlt1 and 121 for sEng. of these factors will vary, depending on 10. Shibata E, Rajakumar A, Powers RW, et al.
Despite its small size, however, we gestational age. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 is increased in
were able to demonstrate and confirm Although preliminary, our findings preeclampsia but not in normotensive pregnan-
the differences in serum levels of these raise the possibility that measuring se- cies with small-for-gestational-age neonates:
peptides in various hypertensive diseases rum levels of sFlt 1 and sEng in women relationship to circulating placental growth fac-
tor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:
in pregnancy. This finding was true, even with various hypertensive diseases of
4895-903.
if we excluded the 5 patients with severe pregnancy may be clinically useful. Hav- 11. Levine RJ, Lam C, Cong Qian C, et al. Sol-
preeclampsia for both sFlt 1 (83.1 ⫾ 95.2 ing a sensitive and specific serum bi- uble endoglin, a novel circulating anti-angio-
ng/mL [preeclampsia] vs 16.6 ⫾ 11.0 omarker for preeclampsia that can be genic factor in preeclampsia. N Engl J Med
ng/mL [control], 15.4 ⫾ 12.8 ng/mL used in conjunction with urine protein 2006;355:992-1005.
[chronic hypertension], 23.5 ⫾ 14.9 analysis will not only improve the accu- 12. Lim KH, Friedman SA, Ecker JL, et al. The
clinical utility of serum uric acid measurements
ng/mL [gestational hypertension], P by racy but also expedite the diagnosis of
in hypertensive diseases of pregnancy. Am J.
ANOVA ⬍ .01) and sEng (62.0 ⫾ 34.0 preeclampsia. Our findings provide a ra- Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:1067-71.
ng/mL [preeclampsia] vs 15.5 ⫾ 6.9 tionale for a large prospective study to 13. Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett D. Users’
ng/mL [control], 22.7 ⫾ 19.9 ng/mL define normal reference ranges for these guide to the medical literature, III: how to use an
[chronic hypertension], 23.6 ⫾ 15.3 factors and to determine their clinical article about a diagnostic test. JAMA 1994;
ng/mL [gestational hypertension], P by utility and ability to predict perinatal 271:703-7.
14. Hirashima C, Ohkuchi A, Arai F, et al. Es-
ANOVA ⬍ .01). In addition, our find- outcome in the setting of various hyper-
tablishing reference values for both total soluble
ings were unchanged when we excluded tensive diseases in pregnancy. f fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and free placental
the highest serum value noted in sFlt 1 growth factor in pregnant women. Hypertens
(60.8 ⫾ 27.0 ng/mL [preeclampsia] vs REFERENCES Res 2005;28:727-32.
16.6 ⫾ 11.0 ng/mL [control], 15.4 ⫾ 12.8 1. Hauth JC, Ewell MG, Levine RJ, et al. Preg- 15. Powers RW, Roberts JM, Cooper KM, Gal-
ng/mL [chronic hypertension], 23.5 ⫾ nancy outcome in healthy nulliparas who devel- laher MJ, Frank MP, Harber GF. Maternal serum
oped hypertension. Obstet Gynecol 2000; soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 concentra-
14.9 ng/mL [gestational hypertension],
95:24-8. tions are not increased in early pregnancy and
P by ANOVA ⬍ .001). 2. Sibai BM. Diagnosis and management of decrease more slowly postpartum in women
Another limitation was that we were gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. who develop preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gy-
not able to control for gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:181-92. necol 2005;193:185-91.